You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by ant elder <an...@gmail.com> on 2011/07/22 11:27:20 UTC
[VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0-Beta3 RC1
Please review and vote on the 2.0-Beta3RC1 release artifacts.
The artifacts are available at:
http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/2.0-Beta3-RC1/
(they're presently still uploading so if you don't see them there now
just wait a little)
The SVN tag for the release is:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0-Beta3-RC1/
TIA,
...ant
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0-Beta3 RC1
Posted by ant elder <an...@apache.org>.
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Florian Moga <mo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> A couple of things got solved today. The compilation failure was worked
> around using the Sun VM, Ant has opened a bug about the compilation failure
> given by OpenJDK. The helloworld-scaclient works fine. helloworld-bpel was
> moved out of from samples in the Beta3 branch so should do so in trunk as
> well.
>
> The remaining items are the following:
> * applications/store, running-tuscany/ant, running-tuscany/jse are not
> working
> * getting-started/helloworld-ant does not have the appropriate readme
> * decide what to do with readmes and odt files
> * complete the changes file
> I'd be for removing the broken or incomplete samples out of the release.
> Regarding documentation, I don't have a strong preference but I think we
> should decide on one option and work towards that in the future releases.
> Other than that, things are looking good, the build is back to stable as
> well.
> Florian
>
Thanks for all your updates. I'll take the helloworld-ant and the
running ant and jse ones out of the beta3 branch as they're probably
not so useful as they are, i'm reluctant to take out the store sample
though after the hooha that caused last time, i think it may actually
run as-is with Ant in the binary distribution so i'll add a line to
its readme saying that. It would be good to have a consistent file
format for the READMEs for 2.0 but for this beta release i think its
ok to have a few different formats and we can evaluate which we like
best. I'll add a few more things to the CHANGES file but its real hard
to make it complete and useful so i think we'll just have to accept
whatever people do put in there.
With all the changes in trunk i'm now having some merge conflicts get
those to the branch now so i'm going to recreate the branch by just
copying the current trunk. I'm doing that now and will update it from
trunk and tag it for RC2 tomorrow morning so there's till then to get
in any last changes.
...ant
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0-Beta3 RC1
Posted by Florian Moga <mo...@gmail.com>.
A couple of things got solved today. The compilation failure was worked
around using the Sun VM, Ant has opened a bug about the compilation failure
given by OpenJDK. The helloworld-scaclient works fine. helloworld-bpel was
moved out of from samples in the Beta3 branch so should do so in trunk as
well.
The remaining items are the following:
* applications/store, running-tuscany/ant, running-tuscany/jse are not
working
* getting-started/helloworld-ant does not have the appropriate readme
* decide what to do with readmes and odt files
* complete the changes file
I'd be for removing the broken or incomplete samples out of the release.
Regarding documentation, I don't have a strong preference but I think we
should decide on one option and work towards that in the future releases.
Other than that, things are looking good, the build is back to stable as
well.
Florian
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 2:42 AM, Florian Moga <mo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here are some issues I detected and should be fixed IMO before RC2:
>
> 1. samples/applications/store
> - wasn't able to start sample (tried jetty plugin, various java
> commands)
> - README doesn't provide the necessary information to run the sample
> - there is no pom and README in the applications folder
> 2. running-tuscany/ant
> - getting build error when performing what README says (should a
> full build be executed first?)
> 3. running-tuscany/jse
> - contribution not found when executing script (should a full build
> be executed first?)
> 4. getting-started/helloworld-ant
> - no explanations in README file
> 5. getting-started/helloworld-bpel
> - outdated instructions in README
> 6. getting-started/helloworld-scaclient
> - wasn't able to start sample neither with tuscany:run or exec:run
> as suggested in README
> 7. The running-tuscany folder uses .odt and .html files instead of
> plain text READMEs. I think we should decide on one way and keep it
> consistent for this release. I really like the .odt template but I think it
> would be quicker for now to change odts to READMEs as odt files are less
> than READMEs. I'd like to save this template in contrib and use it for
> future releases.
> 8. Everyone, please update the CHANGES file with your work for this
> release.
> 9. When doing a full build I get the following compilation failure
>
> [INFO] Compilation failure
>
> /home/fmoga/coding/apache-tuscany/trunk/modules/core/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/core/invocation/ExtensibleProxyFactory.java:[60,43]
> invalid inferred types for R; inferred type does not conform to declared
> bound(s)
> inferred: org.oasisopen.sca.ServiceReference<B>
> bound(s): org.oasisopen.sca.ServiceReference<B>
>
> I would say let's move the broken samples that would take too much to fix
> back to contrib, fix the build, make READMEs consistent and let's kick off
> RC2.
>
> Florian
>
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:45 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Ok chatting off list i think i can get two others who would vote +1 on
>> this. I've a bunch of updates from over the weekend and Florian is
>> going to try to get the latest comet and webcocket bindings in so i'm
>> going to create an RC2 later today/tomorrow and vote on that.
>>
>> ...ant
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 9:01 PM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Anyone?
>> >
>> > ...ant
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:27 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> Please review and vote on the 2.0-Beta3RC1 release artifacts.
>> >>
>> >> The artifacts are available at:
>> >>
>> >> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/2.0-Beta3-RC1/
>> >>
>> >> (they're presently still uploading so if you don't see them there now
>> >> just wait a little)
>> >>
>> >> The SVN tag for the release is:
>> >>
>> >>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0-Beta3-RC1/
>> >>
>> >> TIA,
>> >>
>> >> ...ant
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0-Beta3 RC1
Posted by Florian Moga <mo...@gmail.com>.
Here are some issues I detected and should be fixed IMO before RC2:
1. samples/applications/store
- wasn't able to start sample (tried jetty plugin, various java
commands)
- README doesn't provide the necessary information to run the sample
- there is no pom and README in the applications folder
2. running-tuscany/ant
- getting build error when performing what README says (should a full
build be executed first?)
3. running-tuscany/jse
- contribution not found when executing script (should a full build be
executed first?)
4. getting-started/helloworld-ant
- no explanations in README file
5. getting-started/helloworld-bpel
- outdated instructions in README
6. getting-started/helloworld-scaclient
- wasn't able to start sample neither with tuscany:run or exec:run as
suggested in README
7. The running-tuscany folder uses .odt and .html files instead of plain
text READMEs. I think we should decide on one way and keep it consistent for
this release. I really like the .odt template but I think it would be
quicker for now to change odts to READMEs as odt files are less than
READMEs. I'd like to save this template in contrib and use it for future
releases.
8. Everyone, please update the CHANGES file with your work for this
release.
9. When doing a full build I get the following compilation failure
[INFO] Compilation failure
/home/fmoga/coding/apache-tuscany/trunk/modules/core/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/core/invocation/ExtensibleProxyFactory.java:[60,43]
invalid inferred types for R; inferred type does not conform to declared
bound(s)
inferred: org.oasisopen.sca.ServiceReference<B>
bound(s): org.oasisopen.sca.ServiceReference<B>
I would say let's move the broken samples that would take too much to fix
back to contrib, fix the build, make READMEs consistent and let's kick off
RC2.
Florian
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:45 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok chatting off list i think i can get two others who would vote +1 on
> this. I've a bunch of updates from over the weekend and Florian is
> going to try to get the latest comet and webcocket bindings in so i'm
> going to create an RC2 later today/tomorrow and vote on that.
>
> ...ant
>
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 9:01 PM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Anyone?
> >
> > ...ant
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:27 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Please review and vote on the 2.0-Beta3RC1 release artifacts.
> >>
> >> The artifacts are available at:
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/2.0-Beta3-RC1/
> >>
> >> (they're presently still uploading so if you don't see them there now
> >> just wait a little)
> >>
> >> The SVN tag for the release is:
> >>
> >>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0-Beta3-RC1/
> >>
> >> TIA,
> >>
> >> ...ant
> >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0-Beta3 RC1
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
Ok chatting off list i think i can get two others who would vote +1 on
this. I've a bunch of updates from over the weekend and Florian is
going to try to get the latest comet and webcocket bindings in so i'm
going to create an RC2 later today/tomorrow and vote on that.
...ant
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 9:01 PM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Anyone?
>
> ...ant
>
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:27 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Please review and vote on the 2.0-Beta3RC1 release artifacts.
>>
>> The artifacts are available at:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/2.0-Beta3-RC1/
>>
>> (they're presently still uploading so if you don't see them there now
>> just wait a little)
>>
>> The SVN tag for the release is:
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0-Beta3-RC1/
>>
>> TIA,
>>
>> ...ant
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany SCA 2.0-Beta3 RC1
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
Anyone?
...ant
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:27 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please review and vote on the 2.0-Beta3RC1 release artifacts.
>
> The artifacts are available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/2.0-Beta3-RC1/
>
> (they're presently still uploading so if you don't see them there now
> just wait a little)
>
> The SVN tag for the release is:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0-Beta3-RC1/
>
> TIA,
>
> ...ant
>