You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org> on 2004/11/01 20:25:44 UTC

Re: svn commit: rev 56270 - spamassassin/trunk/masses

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


> Log:
> work on the mass-check output a bit, state when scan has ended and
> run begins (rough approximation since the run has already begun at
> that point), format the lines better, etc.

hey btw are we going to merge Duncan's mods?  we really should, that
code will rot otherwise.

- --j.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS

iD8DBQFBho24MJF5cimLx9ARAsOuAJ9Gs2Ge8AHpMRA0JB5gtPc4ToAbdwCbBxlb
HabTXF7ghvmZNTFi0ZQu9U0=
=/zhh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: svn commit: rev 56270 - spamassassin/trunk/masses

Posted by Duncan Findlay <du...@debian.org>.

On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 02:53:12PM -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 11:25:44AM -0800, Justin Mason wrote:
> > hey btw are we going to merge Duncan's mods?  we really should, that
> > code will rot otherwise.
> 
> It depends, what mods are you talking about?

Bug 2853.

It's buggy and may need some more complete overhaul. I don't have time
to work on it.

-- 
Duncan Findlay

Re: svn commit: rev 56270 - spamassassin/trunk/masses

Posted by Theo Van Dinter <fe...@kluge.net>.

On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 11:25:44AM -0800, Justin Mason wrote:
> hey btw are we going to merge Duncan's mods?  we really should, that
> code will rot otherwise.

It depends, what mods are you talking about?

-- 
Randomly Generated Tagline:
:  - cut in regexps
 
 I don't think we reached consensus on that.  We're still backtracking...
              -- Larry Wall in <19...@wall.org>