You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomee.apache.org by ehenson <eh...@gartman.com> on 2013/04/04 00:16:25 UTC
TomEE 1.5.1 on IBM i J9 JDK 7.
I'm having an issue with consuming a CFX SOAP service on an IBM i version 7.1
using its J9 JVM JDK 7.IBM does not include the com.sun.org.apache.* classes
like Oracle has included.I have an PMR with IBM and they have
responded:/"The only com/sun/org/apache/xerces/internal/dom classes we
include in JDK 7 are the following:(all found in
/QOpenSys/QIBM/ProdData/JavaVM/jdk70/32bit/jre/lib/xml.jar
)com/sun/org/apache/xerces/internal/dom/CoreDocumentImpl.class
com/sun/org/apache/xerces/internal/dom/DOMImplementationSourceImpl.class
com/sun/org/apache/xerces/internal/dom/DOMXSImplementationSourceImpl.classcom/sun/org/apache/xerces/internal/dom/DocumentImpl.class
The only ElementNSImpl.class file we have is in a different package.
org/apache/xerces/dom rather thancom/sun/org/apache/xerces/internal/domFound
in /QOpenSys/QIBM/ProdData/JavaVM/jdk70/32bit/jre/lib/xml.jar as
org/apache/xerces/dom/ElementNSImpl.class"/What JARs should I include in my
project to make up the difference in the respect of TomEE? I am using Maven
for my project management if this helps any.
--
View this message in context: http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-1-5-1-on-IBM-i-J9-JDK-7-tp4661975.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: TomEE 1.5.1 on IBM i J9 JDK 7.
Posted by dsh <da...@gmail.com>.
This should get you started:
1. In the Administration Console select *Servers*
2. Expand *Server Type* and select* WebSphere application servers *
3. Click on the name of your server
4. Expand *Java and Process Management* and select* Process Definition.*
5. Under the *Additional Properties* section, click *Java Virtual
Machine.*
6. Scroll down and locate the textbox for *Generic JVM arguments*.
Cheers
Daniel
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 7:30 PM, ehenson <eh...@gartman.com> wrote:
> This is added via system properties in which this issue is for TomEE. You
> should be able to set WAS's System properties via the admin console.
>
> On Tuesday, August 6, 2013, jjerome [via OpenEJB] wrote:
>
> > Hello, I am having the same error:
> > java.lang.VerifyError: JVMVRFY012 stack shape inconsistent;
> > class=com/sun/xml/messaging/saaj/soap/SOAPDocumentImpl,
> > method=createDocumentFragment()Lorg/w3c/dom/DocumentFragment;, pc=5
> >
> > Using an IBM iSeries under WebSPhere Application server 7.1. You
> > mentioned adding 4 lines:
> >
> > javax.xml.soap.MessageFactory =
> > com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.soap.ver1_1.SOAPMessageFactory1_1Impl
> > javax.xml.soap.SOAPFactory =
> > com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.soap.ver1_1.SOAPFactory1_1Impl
> > javax.xml.soap.SOAPConnectionFactory =
> > com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.client.p2p.HttpSOAPConnectionFactory
> > javax.xml.soap.MetaFactory =
> > com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.soap.SAAJMetaFactoryImpl
> >
> > to the conf/system.properties. I cannot find this file. Is this
> > within my Web project or within my WAS server configuration?
> >
> > Any help would be greatly appreciated.
> >
> > Thannks.
> >
> > ------------------------------
> > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> > below:
> >
> >
> http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-1-5-1-on-IBM-i-J9-JDK-7-tp4661975p4664552.html
> > To unsubscribe from TomEE 1.5.1 on IBM i J9 JDK 7., click here<
> http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=4661975&code=ZWhlbnNvbkBnYXJ0bWFuLmNvbXw0NjYxOTc1fC0xOTk5MjQzODk5
> >
> > .
> > NAML<
> http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-1-5-1-on-IBM-i-J9-JDK-7-tp4661975p4664553.html
> Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Re: TomEE 1.5.1 on IBM i J9 JDK 7.
Posted by ehenson <eh...@gartman.com>.
This is added via system properties in which this issue is for TomEE. You
should be able to set WAS's System properties via the admin console.
On Tuesday, August 6, 2013, jjerome [via OpenEJB] wrote:
> Hello, I am having the same error:
> java.lang.VerifyError: JVMVRFY012 stack shape inconsistent;
> class=com/sun/xml/messaging/saaj/soap/SOAPDocumentImpl,
> method=createDocumentFragment()Lorg/w3c/dom/DocumentFragment;, pc=5
>
> Using an IBM iSeries under WebSPhere Application server 7.1. You
> mentioned adding 4 lines:
>
> javax.xml.soap.MessageFactory =
> com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.soap.ver1_1.SOAPMessageFactory1_1Impl
> javax.xml.soap.SOAPFactory =
> com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.soap.ver1_1.SOAPFactory1_1Impl
> javax.xml.soap.SOAPConnectionFactory =
> com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.client.p2p.HttpSOAPConnectionFactory
> javax.xml.soap.MetaFactory =
> com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.soap.SAAJMetaFactoryImpl
>
> to the conf/system.properties. I cannot find this file. Is this
> within my Web project or within my WAS server configuration?
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Thannks.
>
> ------------------------------
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
>
> http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-1-5-1-on-IBM-i-J9-JDK-7-tp4661975p4664552.html
> To unsubscribe from TomEE 1.5.1 on IBM i J9 JDK 7., click here<http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=4661975&code=ZWhlbnNvbkBnYXJ0bWFuLmNvbXw0NjYxOTc1fC0xOTk5MjQzODk5>
> .
> NAML<http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
>
--
Sent from Gmail Mobile
--
View this message in context: http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-1-5-1-on-IBM-i-J9-JDK-7-tp4661975p4664553.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: TomEE 1.5.1 on IBM i J9 JDK 7.
Posted by jjerome <jj...@hcssupport.com>.
Instead of using a systems.property file I did this and it resolved the
issue:
if (System.getProperty("java.vendor").equals("IBM Corporation")) {
System.setProperty("javax.xml.soap.MessageFactory",
"com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.soap.ver1_1.SOAPMessageFactory1_1Impl");
System.setProperty("javax.xml.soap.SOAPFactory",
"com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.soap.ver1_1.SOAPFactory1_1Impl");
System.setProperty("javax.xml.soap.SOAPConnectionFactory",
"com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.client.p2p.HttpSOAPConnectionFactory");
System.setProperty("javax.xml.soap.MetaFactory",
"com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.soap.SAAJMetaFactoryImpl");
//Default to the SUN RI
} else {
System.setProperty("javax.xml.soap.MessageFactory",
"com.sun.xml.messaging.saaj.soap.ver1_1.SOAPMessageFactory1_1Impl");
System.setProperty("javax.xml.soap.SOAPFactory",
"com.sun.xml.messaging.saaj.soap.ver1_1.SOAPFactory1_1Impl");
System.setProperty("javax.xml.soap.SOAPConnectionFactory",
"com.sun.xml.messaging.saaj.client.p2p.HttpSOAPConnectionFactory");
System.setProperty("javax.xml.soap.MetaFactory",
"com.sun.xml.messaging.saaj.soap.SAAJMetaFactoryImpl");
}
Thanks
--
View this message in context: http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-1-5-1-on-IBM-i-J9-JDK-7-tp4661975p4664555.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: TomEE 1.5.1 on IBM i J9 JDK 7.
Posted by jjerome <jj...@hcssupport.com>.
Hello, I am having the same error:
java.lang.VerifyError: JVMVRFY012 stack shape inconsistent;
class=com/sun/xml/messaging/saaj/soap/SOAPDocumentImpl,
method=createDocumentFragment()Lorg/w3c/dom/DocumentFragment;, pc=5
Using an IBM iSeries under WebSPhere Application server 7.1. You mentioned
adding 4 lines:
javax.xml.soap.MessageFactory =
com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.soap.ver1_1.SOAPMessageFactory1_1Impl
javax.xml.soap.SOAPFactory =
com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.soap.ver1_1.SOAPFactory1_1Impl
javax.xml.soap.SOAPConnectionFactory =
com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.client.p2p.HttpSOAPConnectionFactory
javax.xml.soap.MetaFactory =
com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.soap.SAAJMetaFactoryImpl
to the conf/system.properties. I cannot find this file. Is this within
my Web project or within my WAS server configuration?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thannks.
--
View this message in context: http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-1-5-1-on-IBM-i-J9-JDK-7-tp4661975p4664552.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: TomEE 1.5.1 on IBM i J9 JDK 7.
Posted by ehenson <eh...@gartman.com>.
So far everything is running great. This issue was my first major issue.
Thanks,
Eric
Eric Henson
Gartman Systems
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 8:51 AM, dsh-2 [via OpenEJB] <
ml-node+s979440n4661994h89@n4.nabble.com> wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> so now everything works okay or are you still experiencing any issues
> while
> running TomEE on an IBM JDK?
>
> Cheers
> Daniel
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:39 PM, ehenson <[hidden email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4661994&i=0>>
> wrote:
>
> > That was indeed the fix to this issue!
> >
> > So to be able to serve SOAP CFX Services using IBM J9, in which case I'm
> > running it on an IBM i (aka AS/400 or iSeries), I then added the next
> four
> > line to the conf/system.properties file:
> >
> > javax.xml.soap.MessageFactory =
> >
> com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.soap.ver1_1.SOAPMessageFactory1_1Impl
> > javax.xml.soap.SOAPFactory =
> > com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.soap.ver1_1.SOAPFactory1_1Impl
> > javax.xml.soap.SOAPConnectionFactory =
> > com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.client.p2p.HttpSOAPConnectionFactory
> > javax.xml.soap.MetaFactory =
> > com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.soap.SAAJMetaFactoryImpl
> >
> > This actually fixes several issues. For the sake of email search
> engines
> > I'll will note them here.
> >
> > My original issue started when I received this exception:
> > java.lang.VerifyError: JVMVRFY012 stack shape inconsistent;
> > class=com/sun/xml/messaging/saaj/soap/SOAPDocumentImpl,
> > method=createDocumentFragment()Lorg/w3c/dom/DocumentFragment;, pc=5
> >
> > I called IBM and they told me to add the next entry to the
> > /QIBM/UserData/Java400/SystemDefault.properties file to tell the JVM to
> not
> > to verify the classes:
> >
> > #AllowOptions
> > -Xverify:none
> >
> > Then I started to receive this exception:
> > java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
> > com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.dom.ElementNSImpl
> >
> > Once I added the four lines to TomEE's conf/system.properties file
> > everything works perfect and I do not have to use the -Xverify:none
> option.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> >
> http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-1-5-1-on-IBM-i-J9-JDK-7-tp4661975p4661992.html
>
> > Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
>
> http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-1-5-1-on-IBM-i-J9-JDK-7-tp4661975p4661994.html
> To unsubscribe from TomEE 1.5.1 on IBM i J9 JDK 7., click here<http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=4661975&code=ZWhlbnNvbkBnYXJ0bWFuLmNvbXw0NjYxOTc1fC0xOTk5MjQzODk5>
> .
> NAML<http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
>
--
View this message in context: http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-1-5-1-on-IBM-i-J9-JDK-7-tp4661975p4661997.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: TomEE 1.5.1 on IBM i J9 JDK 7.
Posted by dsh <da...@gmail.com>.
That's the JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6109
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 5:29 PM, dsh <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> @Romain: I'll try to raise an INFRA JIRA this evening. I don't think that
> I do have access to the build server any more and AFAIK there's only an IBM
> JDK v6 installed on the build server.
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> @Daniel: if anyone has some time that's a good idea
>>
>> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
>> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
>> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
>> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
>> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
>>
>>
>>
>> 2013/4/4 dsh <da...@gmail.com>
>>
>> > @All: I wonder whether we could reactivate our IBM JDK build. Maybe this
>> > issue would have been catched by our test cases too.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>> > >wrote:
>> >
>> > > Thanks Eric for this feedback :), think it will help some more people
>> > >
>> > > *Romain Manni-Bucau*
>> > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
>> > > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
>> > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
>> > > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
>> > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > 2013/4/4 dsh <da...@gmail.com>
>> > >
>> > > > Hi Eric,
>> > > >
>> > > > so now everything works okay or are you still experiencing any
>> issues
>> > > while
>> > > > running TomEE on an IBM JDK?
>> > > >
>> > > > Cheers
>> > > > Daniel
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:39 PM, ehenson <eh...@gartman.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > That was indeed the fix to this issue!
>> > > > >
>> > > > > So to be able to serve SOAP CFX Services using IBM J9, in which
>> case
>> > > I'm
>> > > > > running it on an IBM i (aka AS/400 or iSeries), I then added the
>> next
>> > > > four
>> > > > > line to the conf/system.properties file:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > javax.xml.soap.MessageFactory =
>> > > > >
>> > >
>> com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.soap.ver1_1.SOAPMessageFactory1_1Impl
>> > > > > javax.xml.soap.SOAPFactory =
>> > > > > com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.soap.ver1_1.SOAPFactory1_1Impl
>> > > > > javax.xml.soap.SOAPConnectionFactory =
>> > > > >
>> > >
>> com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.client.p2p.HttpSOAPConnectionFactory
>> > > > > javax.xml.soap.MetaFactory =
>> > > > > com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.soap.SAAJMetaFactoryImpl
>> > > > >
>> > > > > This actually fixes several issues. For the sake of email search
>> > > engines
>> > > > > I'll will note them here.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > My original issue started when I received this exception:
>> > > > > java.lang.VerifyError: JVMVRFY012 stack shape inconsistent;
>> > > > > class=com/sun/xml/messaging/saaj/soap/SOAPDocumentImpl,
>> > > > > method=createDocumentFragment()Lorg/w3c/dom/DocumentFragment;,
>> pc=5
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I called IBM and they told me to add the next entry to the
>> > > > > /QIBM/UserData/Java400/SystemDefault.properties file to tell the
>> JVM
>> > to
>> > > > not
>> > > > > to verify the classes:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > #AllowOptions
>> > > > > -Xverify:none
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Then I started to receive this exception:
>> > > > > java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
>> > > > > com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.dom.ElementNSImpl
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Once I added the four lines to TomEE's conf/system.properties file
>> > > > > everything works perfect and I do not have to use the
>> -Xverify:none
>> > > > option.
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > --
>> > > > > View this message in context:
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-1-5-1-on-IBM-i-J9-JDK-7-tp4661975p4661992.html
>> > > > > Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: TomEE 1.5.1 on IBM i J9 JDK 7.
Posted by dsh <da...@gmail.com>.
@Romain: I'll try to raise an INFRA JIRA this evening. I don't think that I
do have access to the build server any more and AFAIK there's only an IBM
JDK v6 installed on the build server.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>wrote:
> @Daniel: if anyone has some time that's a good idea
>
> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
>
>
>
> 2013/4/4 dsh <da...@gmail.com>
>
> > @All: I wonder whether we could reactivate our IBM JDK build. Maybe this
> > issue would have been catched by our test cases too.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibucau@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Eric for this feedback :), think it will help some more people
> > >
> > > *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> > > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> > > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> > > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> > > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> > > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2013/4/4 dsh <da...@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > > Hi Eric,
> > > >
> > > > so now everything works okay or are you still experiencing any issues
> > > while
> > > > running TomEE on an IBM JDK?
> > > >
> > > > Cheers
> > > > Daniel
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:39 PM, ehenson <eh...@gartman.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > That was indeed the fix to this issue!
> > > > >
> > > > > So to be able to serve SOAP CFX Services using IBM J9, in which
> case
> > > I'm
> > > > > running it on an IBM i (aka AS/400 or iSeries), I then added the
> next
> > > > four
> > > > > line to the conf/system.properties file:
> > > > >
> > > > > javax.xml.soap.MessageFactory =
> > > > >
> > >
> com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.soap.ver1_1.SOAPMessageFactory1_1Impl
> > > > > javax.xml.soap.SOAPFactory =
> > > > > com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.soap.ver1_1.SOAPFactory1_1Impl
> > > > > javax.xml.soap.SOAPConnectionFactory =
> > > > >
> > >
> com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.client.p2p.HttpSOAPConnectionFactory
> > > > > javax.xml.soap.MetaFactory =
> > > > > com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.soap.SAAJMetaFactoryImpl
> > > > >
> > > > > This actually fixes several issues. For the sake of email search
> > > engines
> > > > > I'll will note them here.
> > > > >
> > > > > My original issue started when I received this exception:
> > > > > java.lang.VerifyError: JVMVRFY012 stack shape inconsistent;
> > > > > class=com/sun/xml/messaging/saaj/soap/SOAPDocumentImpl,
> > > > > method=createDocumentFragment()Lorg/w3c/dom/DocumentFragment;, pc=5
> > > > >
> > > > > I called IBM and they told me to add the next entry to the
> > > > > /QIBM/UserData/Java400/SystemDefault.properties file to tell the
> JVM
> > to
> > > > not
> > > > > to verify the classes:
> > > > >
> > > > > #AllowOptions
> > > > > -Xverify:none
> > > > >
> > > > > Then I started to receive this exception:
> > > > > java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
> > > > > com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.dom.ElementNSImpl
> > > > >
> > > > > Once I added the four lines to TomEE's conf/system.properties file
> > > > > everything works perfect and I do not have to use the -Xverify:none
> > > > option.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > View this message in context:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-1-5-1-on-IBM-i-J9-JDK-7-tp4661975p4661992.html
> > > > > Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: TomEE 1.5.1 on IBM i J9 JDK 7.
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
@Daniel: if anyone has some time that's a good idea
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
2013/4/4 dsh <da...@gmail.com>
> @All: I wonder whether we could reactivate our IBM JDK build. Maybe this
> issue would have been catched by our test cases too.
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Thanks Eric for this feedback :), think it will help some more people
> >
> > *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> > *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> > *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> > *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> > *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
> >
> >
> >
> > 2013/4/4 dsh <da...@gmail.com>
> >
> > > Hi Eric,
> > >
> > > so now everything works okay or are you still experiencing any issues
> > while
> > > running TomEE on an IBM JDK?
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > Daniel
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:39 PM, ehenson <eh...@gartman.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > That was indeed the fix to this issue!
> > > >
> > > > So to be able to serve SOAP CFX Services using IBM J9, in which case
> > I'm
> > > > running it on an IBM i (aka AS/400 or iSeries), I then added the next
> > > four
> > > > line to the conf/system.properties file:
> > > >
> > > > javax.xml.soap.MessageFactory =
> > > >
> > com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.soap.ver1_1.SOAPMessageFactory1_1Impl
> > > > javax.xml.soap.SOAPFactory =
> > > > com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.soap.ver1_1.SOAPFactory1_1Impl
> > > > javax.xml.soap.SOAPConnectionFactory =
> > > >
> > com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.client.p2p.HttpSOAPConnectionFactory
> > > > javax.xml.soap.MetaFactory =
> > > > com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.soap.SAAJMetaFactoryImpl
> > > >
> > > > This actually fixes several issues. For the sake of email search
> > engines
> > > > I'll will note them here.
> > > >
> > > > My original issue started when I received this exception:
> > > > java.lang.VerifyError: JVMVRFY012 stack shape inconsistent;
> > > > class=com/sun/xml/messaging/saaj/soap/SOAPDocumentImpl,
> > > > method=createDocumentFragment()Lorg/w3c/dom/DocumentFragment;, pc=5
> > > >
> > > > I called IBM and they told me to add the next entry to the
> > > > /QIBM/UserData/Java400/SystemDefault.properties file to tell the JVM
> to
> > > not
> > > > to verify the classes:
> > > >
> > > > #AllowOptions
> > > > -Xverify:none
> > > >
> > > > Then I started to receive this exception:
> > > > java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
> > > > com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.dom.ElementNSImpl
> > > >
> > > > Once I added the four lines to TomEE's conf/system.properties file
> > > > everything works perfect and I do not have to use the -Xverify:none
> > > option.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > View this message in context:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-1-5-1-on-IBM-i-J9-JDK-7-tp4661975p4661992.html
> > > > Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: TomEE 1.5.1 on IBM i J9 JDK 7.
Posted by dsh <da...@gmail.com>.
@All: I wonder whether we could reactivate our IBM JDK build. Maybe this
issue would have been catched by our test cases too.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Thanks Eric for this feedback :), think it will help some more people
>
> *Romain Manni-Bucau*
> *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
> *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
> *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
>
>
>
> 2013/4/4 dsh <da...@gmail.com>
>
> > Hi Eric,
> >
> > so now everything works okay or are you still experiencing any issues
> while
> > running TomEE on an IBM JDK?
> >
> > Cheers
> > Daniel
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:39 PM, ehenson <eh...@gartman.com> wrote:
> >
> > > That was indeed the fix to this issue!
> > >
> > > So to be able to serve SOAP CFX Services using IBM J9, in which case
> I'm
> > > running it on an IBM i (aka AS/400 or iSeries), I then added the next
> > four
> > > line to the conf/system.properties file:
> > >
> > > javax.xml.soap.MessageFactory =
> > >
> com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.soap.ver1_1.SOAPMessageFactory1_1Impl
> > > javax.xml.soap.SOAPFactory =
> > > com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.soap.ver1_1.SOAPFactory1_1Impl
> > > javax.xml.soap.SOAPConnectionFactory =
> > >
> com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.client.p2p.HttpSOAPConnectionFactory
> > > javax.xml.soap.MetaFactory =
> > > com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.soap.SAAJMetaFactoryImpl
> > >
> > > This actually fixes several issues. For the sake of email search
> engines
> > > I'll will note them here.
> > >
> > > My original issue started when I received this exception:
> > > java.lang.VerifyError: JVMVRFY012 stack shape inconsistent;
> > > class=com/sun/xml/messaging/saaj/soap/SOAPDocumentImpl,
> > > method=createDocumentFragment()Lorg/w3c/dom/DocumentFragment;, pc=5
> > >
> > > I called IBM and they told me to add the next entry to the
> > > /QIBM/UserData/Java400/SystemDefault.properties file to tell the JVM to
> > not
> > > to verify the classes:
> > >
> > > #AllowOptions
> > > -Xverify:none
> > >
> > > Then I started to receive this exception:
> > > java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
> > > com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.dom.ElementNSImpl
> > >
> > > Once I added the four lines to TomEE's conf/system.properties file
> > > everything works perfect and I do not have to use the -Xverify:none
> > option.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > View this message in context:
> > >
> >
> http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-1-5-1-on-IBM-i-J9-JDK-7-tp4661975p4661992.html
> > > Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > >
> >
>
Re: TomEE 1.5.1 on IBM i J9 JDK 7.
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Eric for this feedback :), think it will help some more people
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*
2013/4/4 dsh <da...@gmail.com>
> Hi Eric,
>
> so now everything works okay or are you still experiencing any issues while
> running TomEE on an IBM JDK?
>
> Cheers
> Daniel
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:39 PM, ehenson <eh...@gartman.com> wrote:
>
> > That was indeed the fix to this issue!
> >
> > So to be able to serve SOAP CFX Services using IBM J9, in which case I'm
> > running it on an IBM i (aka AS/400 or iSeries), I then added the next
> four
> > line to the conf/system.properties file:
> >
> > javax.xml.soap.MessageFactory =
> > com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.soap.ver1_1.SOAPMessageFactory1_1Impl
> > javax.xml.soap.SOAPFactory =
> > com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.soap.ver1_1.SOAPFactory1_1Impl
> > javax.xml.soap.SOAPConnectionFactory =
> > com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.client.p2p.HttpSOAPConnectionFactory
> > javax.xml.soap.MetaFactory =
> > com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.soap.SAAJMetaFactoryImpl
> >
> > This actually fixes several issues. For the sake of email search engines
> > I'll will note them here.
> >
> > My original issue started when I received this exception:
> > java.lang.VerifyError: JVMVRFY012 stack shape inconsistent;
> > class=com/sun/xml/messaging/saaj/soap/SOAPDocumentImpl,
> > method=createDocumentFragment()Lorg/w3c/dom/DocumentFragment;, pc=5
> >
> > I called IBM and they told me to add the next entry to the
> > /QIBM/UserData/Java400/SystemDefault.properties file to tell the JVM to
> not
> > to verify the classes:
> >
> > #AllowOptions
> > -Xverify:none
> >
> > Then I started to receive this exception:
> > java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
> > com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.dom.ElementNSImpl
> >
> > Once I added the four lines to TomEE's conf/system.properties file
> > everything works perfect and I do not have to use the -Xverify:none
> option.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> >
> http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-1-5-1-on-IBM-i-J9-JDK-7-tp4661975p4661992.html
> > Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
>
Re: TomEE 1.5.1 on IBM i J9 JDK 7.
Posted by dsh <da...@gmail.com>.
Hi Eric,
so now everything works okay or are you still experiencing any issues while
running TomEE on an IBM JDK?
Cheers
Daniel
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:39 PM, ehenson <eh...@gartman.com> wrote:
> That was indeed the fix to this issue!
>
> So to be able to serve SOAP CFX Services using IBM J9, in which case I'm
> running it on an IBM i (aka AS/400 or iSeries), I then added the next four
> line to the conf/system.properties file:
>
> javax.xml.soap.MessageFactory =
> com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.soap.ver1_1.SOAPMessageFactory1_1Impl
> javax.xml.soap.SOAPFactory =
> com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.soap.ver1_1.SOAPFactory1_1Impl
> javax.xml.soap.SOAPConnectionFactory =
> com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.client.p2p.HttpSOAPConnectionFactory
> javax.xml.soap.MetaFactory =
> com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.soap.SAAJMetaFactoryImpl
>
> This actually fixes several issues. For the sake of email search engines
> I'll will note them here.
>
> My original issue started when I received this exception:
> java.lang.VerifyError: JVMVRFY012 stack shape inconsistent;
> class=com/sun/xml/messaging/saaj/soap/SOAPDocumentImpl,
> method=createDocumentFragment()Lorg/w3c/dom/DocumentFragment;, pc=5
>
> I called IBM and they told me to add the next entry to the
> /QIBM/UserData/Java400/SystemDefault.properties file to tell the JVM to not
> to verify the classes:
>
> #AllowOptions
> -Xverify:none
>
> Then I started to receive this exception:
> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
> com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.dom.ElementNSImpl
>
> Once I added the four lines to TomEE's conf/system.properties file
> everything works perfect and I do not have to use the -Xverify:none option.
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-1-5-1-on-IBM-i-J9-JDK-7-tp4661975p4661992.html
> Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Re: TomEE 1.5.1 on IBM i J9 JDK 7.
Posted by ehenson <eh...@gartman.com>.
That was indeed the fix to this issue!
So to be able to serve SOAP CFX Services using IBM J9, in which case I'm
running it on an IBM i (aka AS/400 or iSeries), I then added the next four
line to the conf/system.properties file:
javax.xml.soap.MessageFactory =
com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.soap.ver1_1.SOAPMessageFactory1_1Impl
javax.xml.soap.SOAPFactory =
com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.soap.ver1_1.SOAPFactory1_1Impl
javax.xml.soap.SOAPConnectionFactory =
com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.client.p2p.HttpSOAPConnectionFactory
javax.xml.soap.MetaFactory =
com.sun.xml.internal.messaging.saaj.soap.SAAJMetaFactoryImpl
This actually fixes several issues. For the sake of email search engines
I'll will note them here.
My original issue started when I received this exception:
java.lang.VerifyError: JVMVRFY012 stack shape inconsistent;
class=com/sun/xml/messaging/saaj/soap/SOAPDocumentImpl,
method=createDocumentFragment()Lorg/w3c/dom/DocumentFragment;, pc=5
I called IBM and they told me to add the next entry to the
/QIBM/UserData/Java400/SystemDefault.properties file to tell the JVM to not
to verify the classes:
#AllowOptions
-Xverify:none
Then I started to receive this exception:
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.dom.ElementNSImpl
Once I added the four lines to TomEE's conf/system.properties file
everything works perfect and I do not have to use the -Xverify:none option.
--
View this message in context: http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-1-5-1-on-IBM-i-J9-JDK-7-tp4661975p4661992.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: TomEE 1.5.1 on IBM i J9 JDK 7.
Posted by dsh <da...@gmail.com>.
Maybe this is related to:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1126
I.e. it's a CXF issue in the first place.
Cheers
Daniel
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi
>
> What's the issue?
> Le 4 avr. 2013 00:25, "ehenson" <eh...@gartman.com> a écrit :
>
> > I'm having an issue with consuming a CFX SOAP service on an IBM i version
> > 7.1
> > using its J9 JVM JDK 7.IBM does not include the com.sun.org.apache.*
> > classes
> > like Oracle has included.I have an PMR with IBM and they have
> > responded:/"The only com/sun/org/apache/xerces/internal/dom classes we
> > include in JDK 7 are the following:(all found in
> > /QOpenSys/QIBM/ProdData/JavaVM/jdk70/32bit/jre/lib/xml.jar
> > )com/sun/org/apache/xerces/internal/dom/CoreDocumentImpl.class
> > com/sun/org/apache/xerces/internal/dom/DOMImplementationSourceImpl.class
> >
> >
> com/sun/org/apache/xerces/internal/dom/DOMXSImplementationSourceImpl.classcom/sun/org/apache/xerces/internal/dom/DocumentImpl.class
> > The only ElementNSImpl.class file we have is in a different package.
> > org/apache/xerces/dom rather
> > thancom/sun/org/apache/xerces/internal/domFound
> > in /QOpenSys/QIBM/ProdData/JavaVM/jdk70/32bit/jre/lib/xml.jar as
> > org/apache/xerces/dom/ElementNSImpl.class"/What JARs should I include in
> my
> > project to make up the difference in the respect of TomEE? I am using
> > Maven
> > for my project management if this helps any.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> >
> http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-1-5-1-on-IBM-i-J9-JDK-7-tp4661975.html
> > Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Re: TomEE 1.5.1 on IBM i J9 JDK 7.
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Hi
What's the issue?
Le 4 avr. 2013 00:25, "ehenson" <eh...@gartman.com> a écrit :
> I'm having an issue with consuming a CFX SOAP service on an IBM i version
> 7.1
> using its J9 JVM JDK 7.IBM does not include the com.sun.org.apache.*
> classes
> like Oracle has included.I have an PMR with IBM and they have
> responded:/"The only com/sun/org/apache/xerces/internal/dom classes we
> include in JDK 7 are the following:(all found in
> /QOpenSys/QIBM/ProdData/JavaVM/jdk70/32bit/jre/lib/xml.jar
> )com/sun/org/apache/xerces/internal/dom/CoreDocumentImpl.class
> com/sun/org/apache/xerces/internal/dom/DOMImplementationSourceImpl.class
>
> com/sun/org/apache/xerces/internal/dom/DOMXSImplementationSourceImpl.classcom/sun/org/apache/xerces/internal/dom/DocumentImpl.class
> The only ElementNSImpl.class file we have is in a different package.
> org/apache/xerces/dom rather
> thancom/sun/org/apache/xerces/internal/domFound
> in /QOpenSys/QIBM/ProdData/JavaVM/jdk70/32bit/jre/lib/xml.jar as
> org/apache/xerces/dom/ElementNSImpl.class"/What JARs should I include in my
> project to make up the difference in the respect of TomEE? I am using
> Maven
> for my project management if this helps any.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-1-5-1-on-IBM-i-J9-JDK-7-tp4661975.html
> Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: TomEE 1.5.1 on IBM i J9 JDK 7.
Posted by dsh <da...@gmail.com>.
Eric,
we need a full stacktrace, logs etc. to analyze the issue any further. The
IBM JDK packages Apache Xerces/Xalan and thus by nature there won't be any
com.sun.* packages provided. We had similar issues in the past where
support for non com.sun.* packages (e.g. if not running inside a Sun/Oracle
JVM) had to be configured separately:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1126
Cheers
Daniel
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 12:16 AM, ehenson <eh...@gartman.com> wrote:
> I'm having an issue with consuming a CFX SOAP service on an IBM i version
> 7.1
> using its J9 JVM JDK 7.IBM does not include the com.sun.org.apache.*
> classes
> like Oracle has included.I have an PMR with IBM and they have
> responded:/"The only com/sun/org/apache/xerces/internal/dom classes we
> include in JDK 7 are the following:(all found in
> /QOpenSys/QIBM/ProdData/JavaVM/jdk70/32bit/jre/lib/xml.jar
> )com/sun/org/apache/xerces/internal/dom/CoreDocumentImpl.class
> com/sun/org/apache/xerces/internal/dom/DOMImplementationSourceImpl.class
>
> com/sun/org/apache/xerces/internal/dom/DOMXSImplementationSourceImpl.classcom/sun/org/apache/xerces/internal/dom/DocumentImpl.class
> The only ElementNSImpl.class file we have is in a different package.
> org/apache/xerces/dom rather
> thancom/sun/org/apache/xerces/internal/domFound
> in /QOpenSys/QIBM/ProdData/JavaVM/jdk70/32bit/jre/lib/xml.jar as
> org/apache/xerces/dom/ElementNSImpl.class"/What JARs should I include in my
> project to make up the difference in the respect of TomEE? I am using
> Maven
> for my project management if this helps any.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-1-5-1-on-IBM-i-J9-JDK-7-tp4661975.html
> Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.