You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@rocketmq.apache.org by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com> on 2017/03/17 07:21:38 UTC

Individuals not companies

Hi,

I noticed on this page [1] there a link [2] to a non Apache GitHub issue I think it would be best if that was removed.

It would also be better IMO to reword it to “Who’s using Apache RocketMQ” as companies are not involved in Apache projected individuals are. [3]

I would also expect the Community page to provide links to the mailing lists and how people can get involved in the project not just list external companies so perhaps some more content can be added here?

Thanks,
Justin

1. http://rocketmq.incubator.apache.org/community/
2. https://github.com/alibaba/RocketMQ/issues/1
3. http://apache.org/foundation/faq.html#corporate-membership

Re: Individuals not companies

Posted by Von Gosling <vo...@apache.org>.
Yes, we use customer resonates as those using Apache RocketMQ. we use community resonates Apache RocketMQ external project and other infos.

As for contributor, we list them in here[1]. IMO, There are still some details in these parts to be polished, such as add customer’s experience of Apache RocketMQ etc. 

Thanks to mentors review again :-)

[1] http://rocketmq.incubator.apache.org/about/team/ <http://rocketmq.incubator.apache.org/about/team/> 


> 在 2017年3月17日,18:22,John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> 写道:
> 
> Is http://rocketmq.incubator.apache.org/customer/ the page Justin was
> originally referring to? It uses the term "customer" which typically
> resonates as those using it, but the page wording implies those who
> contribute to it.
> 
> John
> 
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 6:19 AM Von Gosling <vo...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Change are live now :-) There is something to be polished later~
>> 
>>> 在 2017年3月17日,16:28,Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com> 写道:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>>> I have resolved it :-)
>>> 
>>> Thanks for that. I assume the change are not live yet?
>>> 
>>>> Agree~ we will polish here using some formal picture about external
>> companies and paste customer experience about the usage of the Apache
>> RocketMQ.
>>> 
>>> Again I think Community page may not be the best place for this sort
>> information.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Justin
>> 
>> 


Re: Individuals not companies

Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
Is http://rocketmq.incubator.apache.org/customer/ the page Justin was
originally referring to? It uses the term "customer" which typically
resonates as those using it, but the page wording implies those who
contribute to it.

John

On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 6:19 AM Von Gosling <vo...@apache.org> wrote:

>
> Change are live now :-) There is something to be polished later~
>
> > 在 2017年3月17日,16:28,Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com> 写道:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >> I have resolved it :-)
> >
> > Thanks for that. I assume the change are not live yet?
> >
> >> Agree~ we will polish here using some formal picture about external
> companies and paste customer experience about the usage of the Apache
> RocketMQ.
> >
> > Again I think Community page may not be the best place for this sort
> information.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Justin
>
>

Re: Individuals not companies

Posted by Von Gosling <vo...@apache.org>.
Change are live now :-) There is something to be polished later~

> 在 2017年3月17日,16:28,Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com> 写道:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>> I have resolved it :-)
> 
> Thanks for that. I assume the change are not live yet?
> 
>> Agree~ we will polish here using some formal picture about external companies and paste customer experience about the usage of the Apache RocketMQ.
> 
> Again I think Community page may not be the best place for this sort information.
> 
> Thanks,
> Justin


Re: Individuals not companies

Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,

> I have resolved it :-)

Thanks for that. I assume the change are not live yet?

> Agree~ we will polish here using some formal picture about external companies and paste customer experience about the usage of the Apache RocketMQ.

Again I think Community page may not be the best place for this sort information.

Thanks,
Justin

Re: Individuals not companies

Posted by Von Gosling <vo...@apache.org>.
> It would also be better IMO to reword it to “Who’s using Apache RocketMQ” as companies are not involved in Apache projected individuals are. [3]

I have resolved it :-)

> I would also expect the Community page to provide links to the mailing lists and how people can get involved in the project not just list external companies so perhaps some more content can be added here?

Agree~ we will polish here using some formal picture about external companies and paste customer experience about the usage of the Apache RocketMQ.


> 在 2017年3月17日,15:21,Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com> 写道:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I noticed on this page [1] there a link [2] to a non Apache GitHub issue I think it would be best if that was removed.
> 
> It would also be better IMO to reword it to “Who’s using Apache RocketMQ” as companies are not involved in Apache projected individuals are. [3]
> 
> I would also expect the Community page to provide links to the mailing lists and how people can get involved in the project not just list external companies so perhaps some more content can be added here?
> 
> Thanks,
> Justin
> 
> 1. http://rocketmq.incubator.apache.org/community/
> 2. https://github.com/alibaba/RocketMQ/issues/1
> 3. http://apache.org/foundation/faq.html#corporate-membership