[CANCEL] [VOTE] Apache TomEE - Jakarta EE API 9.1.1

[Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com>]

Cancelling this one so I can start another one.
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com


On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 10:56 PM David Blevins <db...@tomitribe.com>
wrote:

> Awesome.  Let’s use Richard’s suggestion of continuing to put our version
> number after a dash, i.e. 9.1.0-x (9.1.0-M1).
>
> On the Jakarta side the spec process does define all three digits, the
> third being a service release.  So there very well could be a Jakarta EE
> x.y.z release.
>
> We’re also a little fast and loose with the rules on the Jakarta side, so
> while service releases shouldn’t have behavior changes, everyone decided
> adding module-info.java files in service releases was ok.
>
> If we also used the third digit there could be a conflict and/or be
> misleading to people as to why the digits are different.  Similarly, we’re
> probably smart to always add the third digit exactly as it exists on the
> Jakarta side.
>
>
> -David
>
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 3:05 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>
> > Il fine to re roll.
> > I'll do that tomorrow morning
> >
> > Le lun. 28 févr. 2022 à 16:37, Zowalla, Richard <
> > richard.zowalla@hs-heilbronn.de> a écrit :
> >
> > > Another option would be to stay with the same schema as for the EE8 API
> > > Jar, which was: 8.0-x (x keeps incrementing). Would be somehow
> > > consistent but that scheme could be the case after 9.1 has passed the
> > > TCK.
> > >
> > > So I am fine with David's proposal.
> > >
> > > Gruß
> > > Richard
> > >
> > > Am Montag, dem 28.02.2022 um 04:41 -0500 schrieb David Blevins:
> > > > Is it possible we can reroll and use a milestone version, like 9.1.0-
> > > > M1 or similar?
> > > >
> > > > My concern is we haven't yet passed the TCK with this new version and
> > > > if we keep incrementing from here there'll be a point were say (for
> > > > example) 9.1.4 and before haven't passed the tck and 9.1.5 and after
> > > > have passed the TCK and users will have no way of knowing which
> > > > without reading docs.
> > > >
> > > > It'd be better if we used some sort of -M1, -M2, -M3 or -alpha-1, or
> > > > -beta-1 suffix until we've passed the TCK again and know we have a
> > > > jar that's compliant.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -David
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On Feb 28, 2022, at 4:22 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> > > > > jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi All,
> > > > >
> > > > > This is a first attempt at a vote for a release of Apache TomEE /
> > > > > jakartaee-api 9.1.1.
> > > > > This is essentially the first milestone of the Jakarta EE 9 APIs
> > > > > using the
> > > > > new jakarta namespace. It's probably going to move a bit and lead
> > > > > to
> > > > > another set of releases to refine it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Maven Repo:
> > > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1194
> > > > >
> > > > > Binaries & Source:
> > > > >
> > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/jakartaee-api_staging-1194/
> > > > >
> > > > > Tags:
> > > > >
> > https://github.com/apache/tomee-jakartaee-api/tree/jakartaee-api-9.1.1
> > > > >
> > > > > Please VOTE:
> > > > >
> > > > > [+1] Yes, release it
> > > > > [+0] Not fussed
> > > > > [-1] Don't release, there's a showstopper (please specify what the
> > > > > showstopper is)
> > > > >
> > > > > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > > --
> > > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > > > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > >
> >
> --
> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>