You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@systemml.apache.org by Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com> on 2016/10/01 21:41:26 UTC
Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
ok the blocking issues SYSTEMML-993, 994, and 995 have been resolved - from
my perspective we're ready to cut a new RC.
Regards,
Matthias
From: Matthias Boehm/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Date: 09/29/2016 10:44 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too. The open issues
are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-994, and the new SYSTEMML-995. We should be able
to resolve them by tomorrow to give everybody a chance of testing a new RC
over the weekend.
Regards,
Matthias
Acs S ---09/29/2016 05:31:23 PM---SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I added
changes and with UTF support Matthias added he reverted change
From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <de...@systemml.incubator.apache.org>
Date: 09/29/2016 05:31 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I added changes and with UTF support Matthias
added he reverted changes)
-Arvind
From: "dusenberrymw@gmail.com" <du...@gmail.com>
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 2:31 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
I've also opened SYSTEMML-993 that relates to poor performance for vector
DataFrame conversions, as well as SYSTEMML-994 for GC OOM on SystemML
matrix to frame conversions that would both be good to work on.
--
Mike Dusenberry
GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
Sent from my iPhone.
> On Sep 29, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
wrote:
>>
>> SYSTEMML-968 has been resolved too but we're still waiting for
>> SYSTEMML-964. Furthermore, there is also a nice-to-have feature we want
to
>> get it in: SYSTEMML-969 (extended dataframe - frame converter).
>>
>> Regards,
>> Matthias
> Great progress !!!
>
> Matthias, please let us know when these issues get resolved and I will
work
> on RC2.
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
Posted by Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>.
with SYSTEMML-1014, 1018, and 1019 now being fixed, I think we're ready to
cut RC2.
Regards,
Matthias
From: Matthias Boehm/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Date: 10/06/2016 04:58 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
unfortunately, there is one more blocking issue: SYSTEMML-1014 (one of our
algorithms crashing for a particular configuration, which I missed in
previous runs of our perf testsuite).
Regards,
Matthias
Luciano Resende ---10/06/2016 04:47:44 PM---Looks like we are about ready
for the next RC. Please let me know if not, otherwise I will try to cr
From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org, Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com>
Date: 10/06/2016 04:47 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
Looks like we are about ready for the next RC. Please let me know if not,
otherwise I will try to create a new RC later tonight.
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:04 PM, Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> +1
> -Arvind
>
> From: "dusenberrymw@gmail.com" <du...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 6:59 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
>
> +1 for SYSTEMML-951
>
> --
>
> Mike Dusenberry
> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
>
> > On Oct 5, 2016, at 1:17 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > as the Python DSL is still in experimental status, I don't think that
> SYSTEMML-1013 is blocking the release. However, there is one more
> nice-to-have performance feature I'd like to include: SYSTEMML-951 (right
> indexing via lookup). If nobody objects, we could cut tomorrow once 951
is
> in; if somebody get's a chance to look into 1013 then we could include
this
> too.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Matthias
> >
> > Acs S ---10/05/2016 12:19:57 PM---Imran has opened Jira 1013. -Arvind
> >
> > From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> > To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <dev@systemml.incubator.
> apache.org>
> > Date: 10/05/2016 12:19 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Imran has opened Jira 1013.
> > -Arvind
> >
> > From: Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
> > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 5:43 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> >
> > ok, SYSTEMML-1009 has been resolved too.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Matthias
> >
> > Acs S ---10/04/2016 05:30:52 PM---There is one more issue I am aware
> of: Imran facing max recursion issue in toNumPyArray().Not sure
> >
> > From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> > To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <dev@systemml.incubator.
> apache.org>
> > Date: 10/04/2016 05:30 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> >
> >
> >
> > There is one more issue I am aware of: Imran facing max recursion
issue
> in toNumPyArray().Not sure if Imran has opened Jira or not, but we need
> resolution for it.
> > -Arvind
> > From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 5:03 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> >
> > Ok, so looks like we are down to waiting on SYSTEMML-1009.
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 4:44 PM, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The Python test failure issue has been resolved in SYSTEMML-1005.
From
> my
> > > end, we are ready to go.
> > >
> > > -Mike
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Mike Dusenberry
> > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPhone.
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Oct 4, 2016, at 2:02 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > apart from the recently resolved SYSTEMML-1004 and SYSTEMML-1008,
> there
> > > is one more performance fix I'd like to get in: SYSTEMML-1009.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Matthias
> > > >
> > > > Luciano Resende ---10/04/2016 12:29:12 PM---Mike, are these Python
> > > failures still blocking the next RC ? Please let me know, as I am
> waiting
> > > for
> > > >
> > > > From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > Date: 10/04/2016 12:29 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike, are these Python failures still blocking the next RC ? Please
> let
> > > me
> > > > know, as I am waiting for the green light to cut the RC2.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 9:41 AM, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Yeah I can confirm that all of those issues are now resolved,
> which is
> > > > > great! However, I'm seeing a test failure in the Python mllearn
> tests
> > > > > today that I want to look into before we cut.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Mike
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Mike Dusenberry
> > > > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > > > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > > > >
> > > > > Sent from my iPhone.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Oct 2, 2016, at 8:35 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > yes, I just closed them - I left them open for Mike to confirm,
> but
> > > we
> > > > > resolved all known issues yesterday together. We should be good
to
> go.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Matthias
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Luciano Resende ---10/02/2016 08:30:37 PM---I still see the
> following
> > > > > jiras, which were mentioned on this thread, open:
> > > https://issues.apache.or
> > > > > >
> > > > > > From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > Date: 10/02/2016 08:30 PM
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I still see the following jiras, which were mentioned on this
> thread,
> > > > > open:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-993
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-994
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-995
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Did folks forgot to clode the jiras ? Or are there things that
> still
> > > need
> > > > > > to be handled here ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Matthias Boehm <
> mboehm@us.ibm.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > ok the blocking issues SYSTEMML-993, 994, and 995 have been
> > > resolved -
> > > > > > > from my perspective we're ready to cut a new RC.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > Matthias
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [image: Inactive hide details for Matthias Boehm---09/29/2016
> > > 10:44:51
> > > > > > > PM---just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too.
> > > > > Th]Matthias
> > > > > > > Boehm---09/29/2016 10:44:51 PM---just a quick update:
> SYSTEMML-969
> > > has
> > > > > been
> > > > > > > resolved too. The open issues are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > From: Matthias Boehm/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS
> > > > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > > Date: 09/29/2016 10:44 PM
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too. The
> open
> > > > > issues
> > > > > > > are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-994, and the new SYSTEMML-995. We
> > > should be
> > > > > able
> > > > > > > to resolve them by tomorrow to give everybody a chance of
> testing a
> > > > > new RC
> > > > > > > over the weekend.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > Matthias
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Acs S ---09/29/2016 05:31:23 PM---SYSTEMML-964 being
addressed
> (I
> > > added
> > > > > > > changes and with UTF support Matthias added he reverted
change
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> > > > > > > To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org"
> <dev@systemml.incubator.
> > > > > apache.org
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Date: 09/29/2016 05:31 PM
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I added changes and with UTF
> support
> > > > > > > Matthias added he reverted changes)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -Arvind
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > From: "dusenberrymw@gmail.com" <du...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 2:31 PM
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I've also opened SYSTEMML-993 that relates to poor
performance
> for
> > > > > vector
> > > > > > > DataFrame conversions, as well as SYSTEMML-994 for GC OOM on
> > > SystemML
> > > > > > > matrix to frame conversions that would both be good to work
on.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Mike Dusenberry
> > > > > > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > > > > > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Sep 29, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Luciano Resende <
> > > luckbr1975@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Matthias Boehm <
> > > mboehm@us.ibm.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> SYSTEMML-968 has been resolved too but we're still waiting
> for
> > > > > > > >> SYSTEMML-964. Furthermore, there is also a nice-to-have
> feature
> > > we
> > > > > want
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > >> get it in: SYSTEMML-969 (extended dataframe - frame
> converter).
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Regards,
> > > > > > > >> Matthias
> > > > > > > > Great progress !!!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Matthias, please let us know when these issues get resolved
> and I
> > > > > will
> > > > > > > work
> > > > > > > > on RC2.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > > > > > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/
> > > lresende1975>
> > > > > > > > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > > > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
Posted by Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>.
unfortunately, there is one more blocking issue: SYSTEMML-1014 (one of our
algorithms crashing for a particular configuration, which I missed in
previous runs of our perf testsuite).
Regards,
Matthias
From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org, Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com>
Date: 10/06/2016 04:47 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
Looks like we are about ready for the next RC. Please let me know if not,
otherwise I will try to create a new RC later tonight.
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:04 PM, Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> +1
> -Arvind
>
> From: "dusenberrymw@gmail.com" <du...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 6:59 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
>
> +1 for SYSTEMML-951
>
> --
>
> Mike Dusenberry
> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
>
> > On Oct 5, 2016, at 1:17 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > as the Python DSL is still in experimental status, I don't think that
> SYSTEMML-1013 is blocking the release. However, there is one more
> nice-to-have performance feature I'd like to include: SYSTEMML-951 (right
> indexing via lookup). If nobody objects, we could cut tomorrow once 951
is
> in; if somebody get's a chance to look into 1013 then we could include
this
> too.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Matthias
> >
> > Acs S ---10/05/2016 12:19:57 PM---Imran has opened Jira 1013. -Arvind
> >
> > From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> > To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <dev@systemml.incubator.
> apache.org>
> > Date: 10/05/2016 12:19 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Imran has opened Jira 1013.
> > -Arvind
> >
> > From: Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
> > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 5:43 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> >
> > ok, SYSTEMML-1009 has been resolved too.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Matthias
> >
> > Acs S ---10/04/2016 05:30:52 PM---There is one more issue I am aware
> of: Imran facing max recursion issue in toNumPyArray().Not sure
> >
> > From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> > To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <dev@systemml.incubator.
> apache.org>
> > Date: 10/04/2016 05:30 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> >
> >
> >
> > There is one more issue I am aware of: Imran facing max recursion
issue
> in toNumPyArray().Not sure if Imran has opened Jira or not, but we need
> resolution for it.
> > -Arvind
> > From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 5:03 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> >
> > Ok, so looks like we are down to waiting on SYSTEMML-1009.
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 4:44 PM, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The Python test failure issue has been resolved in SYSTEMML-1005.
From
> my
> > > end, we are ready to go.
> > >
> > > -Mike
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Mike Dusenberry
> > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPhone.
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Oct 4, 2016, at 2:02 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > apart from the recently resolved SYSTEMML-1004 and SYSTEMML-1008,
> there
> > > is one more performance fix I'd like to get in: SYSTEMML-1009.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Matthias
> > > >
> > > > Luciano Resende ---10/04/2016 12:29:12 PM---Mike, are these Python
> > > failures still blocking the next RC ? Please let me know, as I am
> waiting
> > > for
> > > >
> > > > From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > Date: 10/04/2016 12:29 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike, are these Python failures still blocking the next RC ? Please
> let
> > > me
> > > > know, as I am waiting for the green light to cut the RC2.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 9:41 AM, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Yeah I can confirm that all of those issues are now resolved,
> which is
> > > > > great! However, I'm seeing a test failure in the Python mllearn
> tests
> > > > > today that I want to look into before we cut.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Mike
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Mike Dusenberry
> > > > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > > > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > > > >
> > > > > Sent from my iPhone.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Oct 2, 2016, at 8:35 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > yes, I just closed them - I left them open for Mike to confirm,
> but
> > > we
> > > > > resolved all known issues yesterday together. We should be good
to
> go.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Matthias
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Luciano Resende ---10/02/2016 08:30:37 PM---I still see the
> following
> > > > > jiras, which were mentioned on this thread, open:
> > > https://issues.apache.or
> > > > > >
> > > > > > From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > Date: 10/02/2016 08:30 PM
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I still see the following jiras, which were mentioned on this
> thread,
> > > > > open:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-993
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-994
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-995
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Did folks forgot to clode the jiras ? Or are there things that
> still
> > > need
> > > > > > to be handled here ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Matthias Boehm <
> mboehm@us.ibm.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > ok the blocking issues SYSTEMML-993, 994, and 995 have been
> > > resolved -
> > > > > > > from my perspective we're ready to cut a new RC.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > Matthias
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [image: Inactive hide details for Matthias Boehm---09/29/2016
> > > 10:44:51
> > > > > > > PM---just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too.
> > > > > Th]Matthias
> > > > > > > Boehm---09/29/2016 10:44:51 PM---just a quick update:
> SYSTEMML-969
> > > has
> > > > > been
> > > > > > > resolved too. The open issues are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > From: Matthias Boehm/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS
> > > > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > > Date: 09/29/2016 10:44 PM
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too. The
> open
> > > > > issues
> > > > > > > are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-994, and the new SYSTEMML-995. We
> > > should be
> > > > > able
> > > > > > > to resolve them by tomorrow to give everybody a chance of
> testing a
> > > > > new RC
> > > > > > > over the weekend.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > Matthias
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Acs S ---09/29/2016 05:31:23 PM---SYSTEMML-964 being
addressed
> (I
> > > added
> > > > > > > changes and with UTF support Matthias added he reverted
change
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> > > > > > > To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org"
> <dev@systemml.incubator.
> > > > > apache.org
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Date: 09/29/2016 05:31 PM
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I added changes and with UTF
> support
> > > > > > > Matthias added he reverted changes)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -Arvind
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > From: "dusenberrymw@gmail.com" <du...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 2:31 PM
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I've also opened SYSTEMML-993 that relates to poor
performance
> for
> > > > > vector
> > > > > > > DataFrame conversions, as well as SYSTEMML-994 for GC OOM on
> > > SystemML
> > > > > > > matrix to frame conversions that would both be good to work
on.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Mike Dusenberry
> > > > > > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > > > > > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Sep 29, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Luciano Resende <
> > > luckbr1975@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Matthias Boehm <
> > > mboehm@us.ibm.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> SYSTEMML-968 has been resolved too but we're still waiting
> for
> > > > > > > >> SYSTEMML-964. Furthermore, there is also a nice-to-have
> feature
> > > we
> > > > > want
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > >> get it in: SYSTEMML-969 (extended dataframe - frame
> converter).
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Regards,
> > > > > > > >> Matthias
> > > > > > > > Great progress !!!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Matthias, please let us know when these issues get resolved
> and I
> > > > > will
> > > > > > > work
> > > > > > > > on RC2.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > > > > > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/
> > > lresende1975>
> > > > > > > > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > > > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
Looks like we are about ready for the next RC. Please let me know if not,
otherwise I will try to create a new RC later tonight.
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:04 PM, Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> +1
> -Arvind
>
> From: "dusenberrymw@gmail.com" <du...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 6:59 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
>
> +1 for SYSTEMML-951
>
> --
>
> Mike Dusenberry
> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
>
> > On Oct 5, 2016, at 1:17 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > as the Python DSL is still in experimental status, I don't think that
> SYSTEMML-1013 is blocking the release. However, there is one more
> nice-to-have performance feature I'd like to include: SYSTEMML-951 (right
> indexing via lookup). If nobody objects, we could cut tomorrow once 951 is
> in; if somebody get's a chance to look into 1013 then we could include this
> too.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Matthias
> >
> > Acs S ---10/05/2016 12:19:57 PM---Imran has opened Jira 1013. -Arvind
> >
> > From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> > To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <dev@systemml.incubator.
> apache.org>
> > Date: 10/05/2016 12:19 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Imran has opened Jira 1013.
> > -Arvind
> >
> > From: Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
> > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 5:43 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> >
> > ok, SYSTEMML-1009 has been resolved too.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Matthias
> >
> > Acs S ---10/04/2016 05:30:52 PM---There is one more issue I am aware
> of: Imran facing max recursion issue in toNumPyArray().Not sure
> >
> > From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> > To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <dev@systemml.incubator.
> apache.org>
> > Date: 10/04/2016 05:30 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> >
> >
> >
> > There is one more issue I am aware of: Imran facing max recursion issue
> in toNumPyArray().Not sure if Imran has opened Jira or not, but we need
> resolution for it.
> > -Arvind
> > From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 5:03 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> >
> > Ok, so looks like we are down to waiting on SYSTEMML-1009.
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 4:44 PM, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The Python test failure issue has been resolved in SYSTEMML-1005. From
> my
> > > end, we are ready to go.
> > >
> > > -Mike
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Mike Dusenberry
> > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPhone.
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Oct 4, 2016, at 2:02 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > apart from the recently resolved SYSTEMML-1004 and SYSTEMML-1008,
> there
> > > is one more performance fix I'd like to get in: SYSTEMML-1009.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Matthias
> > > >
> > > > Luciano Resende ---10/04/2016 12:29:12 PM---Mike, are these Python
> > > failures still blocking the next RC ? Please let me know, as I am
> waiting
> > > for
> > > >
> > > > From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > Date: 10/04/2016 12:29 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mike, are these Python failures still blocking the next RC ? Please
> let
> > > me
> > > > know, as I am waiting for the green light to cut the RC2.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 9:41 AM, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Yeah I can confirm that all of those issues are now resolved,
> which is
> > > > > great! However, I'm seeing a test failure in the Python mllearn
> tests
> > > > > today that I want to look into before we cut.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Mike
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Mike Dusenberry
> > > > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > > > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > > > >
> > > > > Sent from my iPhone.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Oct 2, 2016, at 8:35 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > yes, I just closed them - I left them open for Mike to confirm,
> but
> > > we
> > > > > resolved all known issues yesterday together. We should be good to
> go.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Matthias
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Luciano Resende ---10/02/2016 08:30:37 PM---I still see the
> following
> > > > > jiras, which were mentioned on this thread, open:
> > > https://issues.apache.or
> > > > > >
> > > > > > From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > Date: 10/02/2016 08:30 PM
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I still see the following jiras, which were mentioned on this
> thread,
> > > > > open:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-993
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-994
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-995
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Did folks forgot to clode the jiras ? Or are there things that
> still
> > > need
> > > > > > to be handled here ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Matthias Boehm <
> mboehm@us.ibm.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > ok the blocking issues SYSTEMML-993, 994, and 995 have been
> > > resolved -
> > > > > > > from my perspective we're ready to cut a new RC.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > Matthias
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [image: Inactive hide details for Matthias Boehm---09/29/2016
> > > 10:44:51
> > > > > > > PM---just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too.
> > > > > Th]Matthias
> > > > > > > Boehm---09/29/2016 10:44:51 PM---just a quick update:
> SYSTEMML-969
> > > has
> > > > > been
> > > > > > > resolved too. The open issues are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > From: Matthias Boehm/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS
> > > > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > > Date: 09/29/2016 10:44 PM
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too. The
> open
> > > > > issues
> > > > > > > are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-994, and the new SYSTEMML-995. We
> > > should be
> > > > > able
> > > > > > > to resolve them by tomorrow to give everybody a chance of
> testing a
> > > > > new RC
> > > > > > > over the weekend.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > Matthias
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Acs S ---09/29/2016 05:31:23 PM---SYSTEMML-964 being addressed
> (I
> > > added
> > > > > > > changes and with UTF support Matthias added he reverted change
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> > > > > > > To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org"
> <dev@systemml.incubator.
> > > > > apache.org
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Date: 09/29/2016 05:31 PM
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I added changes and with UTF
> support
> > > > > > > Matthias added he reverted changes)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -Arvind
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > From: "dusenberrymw@gmail.com" <du...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 2:31 PM
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I've also opened SYSTEMML-993 that relates to poor performance
> for
> > > > > vector
> > > > > > > DataFrame conversions, as well as SYSTEMML-994 for GC OOM on
> > > SystemML
> > > > > > > matrix to frame conversions that would both be good to work on.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Mike Dusenberry
> > > > > > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > > > > > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Sep 29, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Luciano Resende <
> > > luckbr1975@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Matthias Boehm <
> > > mboehm@us.ibm.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> SYSTEMML-968 has been resolved too but we're still waiting
> for
> > > > > > > >> SYSTEMML-964. Furthermore, there is also a nice-to-have
> feature
> > > we
> > > > > want
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > >> get it in: SYSTEMML-969 (extended dataframe - frame
> converter).
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Regards,
> > > > > > > >> Matthias
> > > > > > > > Great progress !!!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Matthias, please let us know when these issues get resolved
> and I
> > > > > will
> > > > > > > work
> > > > > > > > on RC2.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > > > > > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/
> > > lresende1975>
> > > > > > > > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > > > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
Posted by Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
+1
-Arvind
From: "dusenberrymw@gmail.com" <du...@gmail.com>
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 6:59 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
+1 for SYSTEMML-951
--
Mike Dusenberry
GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
Sent from my iPhone.
> On Oct 5, 2016, at 1:17 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> as the Python DSL is still in experimental status, I don't think that SYSTEMML-1013 is blocking the release. However, there is one more nice-to-have performance feature I'd like to include: SYSTEMML-951 (right indexing via lookup). If nobody objects, we could cut tomorrow once 951 is in; if somebody get's a chance to look into 1013 then we could include this too.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
> Acs S ---10/05/2016 12:19:57 PM---Imran has opened Jira 1013. -Arvind
>
> From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <de...@systemml.incubator.apache.org>
> Date: 10/05/2016 12:19 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
>
>
>
>
> Imran has opened Jira 1013.
> -Arvind
>
> From: Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 5:43 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
>
> ok, SYSTEMML-1009 has been resolved too.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
> Acs S ---10/04/2016 05:30:52 PM---There is one more issue I am aware of: Imran facing max recursion issue in toNumPyArray().Not sure
>
> From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <de...@systemml.incubator.apache.org>
> Date: 10/04/2016 05:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
>
>
>
> There is one more issue I am aware of: Imran facing max recursion issue in toNumPyArray().Not sure if Imran has opened Jira or not, but we need resolution for it.
> -Arvind
> From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 5:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
>
> Ok, so looks like we are down to waiting on SYSTEMML-1009.
>
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 4:44 PM, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The Python test failure issue has been resolved in SYSTEMML-1005. From my
> > end, we are ready to go.
> >
> > -Mike
> >
> > --
> >
> > Mike Dusenberry
> > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone.
> >
> >
> > > On Oct 4, 2016, at 2:02 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > apart from the recently resolved SYSTEMML-1004 and SYSTEMML-1008, there
> > is one more performance fix I'd like to get in: SYSTEMML-1009.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Matthias
> > >
> > > Luciano Resende ---10/04/2016 12:29:12 PM---Mike, are these Python
> > failures still blocking the next RC ? Please let me know, as I am waiting
> > for
> > >
> > > From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > Date: 10/04/2016 12:29 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Mike, are these Python failures still blocking the next RC ? Please let
> > me
> > > know, as I am waiting for the green light to cut the RC2.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 9:41 AM, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yeah I can confirm that all of those issues are now resolved, which is
> > > > great! However, I'm seeing a test failure in the Python mllearn tests
> > > > today that I want to look into before we cut.
> > > >
> > > > -Mike
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Mike Dusenberry
> > > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > > >
> > > > Sent from my iPhone.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On Oct 2, 2016, at 8:35 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > yes, I just closed them - I left them open for Mike to confirm, but
> > we
> > > > resolved all known issues yesterday together. We should be good to go.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Matthias
> > > > >
> > > > > Luciano Resende ---10/02/2016 08:30:37 PM---I still see the following
> > > > jiras, which were mentioned on this thread, open:
> > https://issues.apache.or
> > > > >
> > > > > From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > Date: 10/02/2016 08:30 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I still see the following jiras, which were mentioned on this thread,
> > > > open:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-993
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-994
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-995
> > > > >
> > > > > Did folks forgot to clode the jiras ? Or are there things that still
> > need
> > > > > to be handled here ?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > ok the blocking issues SYSTEMML-993, 994, and 995 have been
> > resolved -
> > > > > > from my perspective we're ready to cut a new RC.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Matthias
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [image: Inactive hide details for Matthias Boehm---09/29/2016
> > 10:44:51
> > > > > > PM---just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too.
> > > > Th]Matthias
> > > > > > Boehm---09/29/2016 10:44:51 PM---just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969
> > has
> > > > been
> > > > > > resolved too. The open issues are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-
> > > > > >
> > > > > > From: Matthias Boehm/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS
> > > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > Date: 09/29/2016 10:44 PM
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too. The open
> > > > issues
> > > > > > are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-994, and the new SYSTEMML-995. We
> > should be
> > > > able
> > > > > > to resolve them by tomorrow to give everybody a chance of testing a
> > > > new RC
> > > > > > over the weekend.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Matthias
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Acs S ---09/29/2016 05:31:23 PM---SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I
> > added
> > > > > > changes and with UTF support Matthias added he reverted change
> > > > > >
> > > > > > From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> > > > > > To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <dev@systemml.incubator.
> > > > apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > Date: 09/29/2016 05:31 PM
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I added changes and with UTF support
> > > > > > Matthias added he reverted changes)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Arvind
> > > > > >
> > > > > > From: "dusenberrymw@gmail.com" <du...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 2:31 PM
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I've also opened SYSTEMML-993 that relates to poor performance for
> > > > vector
> > > > > > DataFrame conversions, as well as SYSTEMML-994 for GC OOM on
> > SystemML
> > > > > > matrix to frame conversions that would both be good to work on.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Mike Dusenberry
> > > > > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > > > > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sent from my iPhone.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sep 29, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Luciano Resende <
> > luckbr1975@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Matthias Boehm <
> > mboehm@us.ibm.com
> > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> SYSTEMML-968 has been resolved too but we're still waiting for
> > > > > > >> SYSTEMML-964. Furthermore, there is also a nice-to-have feature
> > we
> > > > want
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > >> get it in: SYSTEMML-969 (extended dataframe - frame converter).
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Regards,
> > > > > > >> Matthias
> > > > > > > Great progress !!!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Matthias, please let us know when these issues get resolved and I
> > > > will
> > > > > > work
> > > > > > > on RC2.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > > > > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/
> > lresende1975>
> > > > > > > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Luciano Resende
> > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
Posted by du...@gmail.com.
+1 for SYSTEMML-951
--
Mike Dusenberry
GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
Sent from my iPhone.
> On Oct 5, 2016, at 1:17 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> as the Python DSL is still in experimental status, I don't think that SYSTEMML-1013 is blocking the release. However, there is one more nice-to-have performance feature I'd like to include: SYSTEMML-951 (right indexing via lookup). If nobody objects, we could cut tomorrow once 951 is in; if somebody get's a chance to look into 1013 then we could include this too.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
> Acs S ---10/05/2016 12:19:57 PM---Imran has opened Jira 1013. -Arvind
>
> From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <de...@systemml.incubator.apache.org>
> Date: 10/05/2016 12:19 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
>
>
>
>
> Imran has opened Jira 1013.
> -Arvind
>
> From: Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 5:43 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
>
> ok, SYSTEMML-1009 has been resolved too.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
> Acs S ---10/04/2016 05:30:52 PM---There is one more issue I am aware of: Imran facing max recursion issue in toNumPyArray().Not sure
>
> From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <de...@systemml.incubator.apache.org>
> Date: 10/04/2016 05:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
>
>
>
> There is one more issue I am aware of: Imran facing max recursion issue in toNumPyArray().Not sure if Imran has opened Jira or not, but we need resolution for it.
> -Arvind
> From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 5:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
>
> Ok, so looks like we are down to waiting on SYSTEMML-1009.
>
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 4:44 PM, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The Python test failure issue has been resolved in SYSTEMML-1005. From my
> > end, we are ready to go.
> >
> > -Mike
> >
> > --
> >
> > Mike Dusenberry
> > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone.
> >
> >
> > > On Oct 4, 2016, at 2:02 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > apart from the recently resolved SYSTEMML-1004 and SYSTEMML-1008, there
> > is one more performance fix I'd like to get in: SYSTEMML-1009.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Matthias
> > >
> > > Luciano Resende ---10/04/2016 12:29:12 PM---Mike, are these Python
> > failures still blocking the next RC ? Please let me know, as I am waiting
> > for
> > >
> > > From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > Date: 10/04/2016 12:29 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Mike, are these Python failures still blocking the next RC ? Please let
> > me
> > > know, as I am waiting for the green light to cut the RC2.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 9:41 AM, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yeah I can confirm that all of those issues are now resolved, which is
> > > > great! However, I'm seeing a test failure in the Python mllearn tests
> > > > today that I want to look into before we cut.
> > > >
> > > > -Mike
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Mike Dusenberry
> > > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > > >
> > > > Sent from my iPhone.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On Oct 2, 2016, at 8:35 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > yes, I just closed them - I left them open for Mike to confirm, but
> > we
> > > > resolved all known issues yesterday together. We should be good to go.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Matthias
> > > > >
> > > > > Luciano Resende ---10/02/2016 08:30:37 PM---I still see the following
> > > > jiras, which were mentioned on this thread, open:
> > https://issues.apache.or
> > > > >
> > > > > From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > Date: 10/02/2016 08:30 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I still see the following jiras, which were mentioned on this thread,
> > > > open:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-993
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-994
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-995
> > > > >
> > > > > Did folks forgot to clode the jiras ? Or are there things that still
> > need
> > > > > to be handled here ?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > ok the blocking issues SYSTEMML-993, 994, and 995 have been
> > resolved -
> > > > > > from my perspective we're ready to cut a new RC.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Matthias
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [image: Inactive hide details for Matthias Boehm---09/29/2016
> > 10:44:51
> > > > > > PM---just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too.
> > > > Th]Matthias
> > > > > > Boehm---09/29/2016 10:44:51 PM---just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969
> > has
> > > > been
> > > > > > resolved too. The open issues are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-
> > > > > >
> > > > > > From: Matthias Boehm/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS
> > > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > Date: 09/29/2016 10:44 PM
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too. The open
> > > > issues
> > > > > > are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-994, and the new SYSTEMML-995. We
> > should be
> > > > able
> > > > > > to resolve them by tomorrow to give everybody a chance of testing a
> > > > new RC
> > > > > > over the weekend.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Matthias
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Acs S ---09/29/2016 05:31:23 PM---SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I
> > added
> > > > > > changes and with UTF support Matthias added he reverted change
> > > > > >
> > > > > > From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> > > > > > To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <dev@systemml.incubator.
> > > > apache.org
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > Date: 09/29/2016 05:31 PM
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I added changes and with UTF support
> > > > > > Matthias added he reverted changes)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Arvind
> > > > > >
> > > > > > From: "dusenberrymw@gmail.com" <du...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 2:31 PM
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I've also opened SYSTEMML-993 that relates to poor performance for
> > > > vector
> > > > > > DataFrame conversions, as well as SYSTEMML-994 for GC OOM on
> > SystemML
> > > > > > matrix to frame conversions that would both be good to work on.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Mike Dusenberry
> > > > > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > > > > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sent from my iPhone.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sep 29, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Luciano Resende <
> > luckbr1975@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Matthias Boehm <
> > mboehm@us.ibm.com
> > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> SYSTEMML-968 has been resolved too but we're still waiting for
> > > > > > >> SYSTEMML-964. Furthermore, there is also a nice-to-have feature
> > we
> > > > want
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > >> get it in: SYSTEMML-969 (extended dataframe - frame converter).
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Regards,
> > > > > > >> Matthias
> > > > > > > Great progress !!!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Matthias, please let us know when these issues get resolved and I
> > > > will
> > > > > > work
> > > > > > > on RC2.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > > > > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/
> > lresende1975>
> > > > > > > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Luciano Resende
> > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
Posted by Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>.
as the Python DSL is still in experimental status, I don't think that
SYSTEMML-1013 is blocking the release. However, there is one more
nice-to-have performance feature I'd like to include: SYSTEMML-951 (right
indexing via lookup). If nobody objects, we could cut tomorrow once 951 is
in; if somebody get's a chance to look into 1013 then we could include this
too.
Regards,
Matthias
From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org"
<de...@systemml.incubator.apache.org>
Date: 10/05/2016 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
Imran has opened Jira 1013.
-Arvind
From: Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 5:43 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
ok, SYSTEMML-1009 has been resolved too.
Regards,
Matthias
Acs S ---10/04/2016 05:30:52 PM---There is one more issue I am aware of:
Imran facing max recursion issue in toNumPyArray().Not sure
From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <de...@systemml.incubator.apache.org>
Date: 10/04/2016 05:30 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
There is one more issue I am aware of: Imran facing max recursion issue
in toNumPyArray().Not sure if Imran has opened Jira or not, but we need
resolution for it.
-Arvind
From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
Ok, so looks like we are down to waiting on SYSTEMML-1009.
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 4:44 PM, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The Python test failure issue has been resolved in SYSTEMML-1005. From my
> end, we are ready to go.
>
> -Mike
>
> --
>
> Mike Dusenberry
> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
>
> > On Oct 4, 2016, at 2:02 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > apart from the recently resolved SYSTEMML-1004 and SYSTEMML-1008, there
> is one more performance fix I'd like to get in: SYSTEMML-1009.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Matthias
> >
> > Luciano Resende ---10/04/2016 12:29:12 PM---Mike, are these Python
> failures still blocking the next RC ? Please let me know, as I am waiting
> for
> >
> > From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > Date: 10/04/2016 12:29 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Mike, are these Python failures still blocking the next RC ? Please let
> me
> > know, as I am waiting for the green light to cut the RC2.
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 9:41 AM, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Yeah I can confirm that all of those issues are now resolved, which
is
> > > great! However, I'm seeing a test failure in the Python mllearn
tests
> > > today that I want to look into before we cut.
> > >
> > > -Mike
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Mike Dusenberry
> > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPhone.
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Oct 2, 2016, at 8:35 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > yes, I just closed them - I left them open for Mike to confirm, but
> we
> > > resolved all known issues yesterday together. We should be good to
go.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Matthias
> > > >
> > > > Luciano Resende ---10/02/2016 08:30:37 PM---I still see the
following
> > > jiras, which were mentioned on this thread, open:
> https://issues.apache.or
> > > >
> > > > From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > Date: 10/02/2016 08:30 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I still see the following jiras, which were mentioned on this
thread,
> > > open:
> > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-993
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-994
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-995
> > > >
> > > > Did folks forgot to clode the jiras ? Or are there things that
still
> need
> > > > to be handled here ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > ok the blocking issues SYSTEMML-993, 994, and 995 have been
> resolved -
> > > > > from my perspective we're ready to cut a new RC.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Matthias
> > > > >
> > > > > [image: Inactive hide details for Matthias Boehm---09/29/2016
> 10:44:51
> > > > > PM---just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too.
> > > Th]Matthias
> > > > > Boehm---09/29/2016 10:44:51 PM---just a quick update:
SYSTEMML-969
> has
> > > been
> > > > > resolved too. The open issues are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-
> > > > >
> > > > > From: Matthias Boehm/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS
> > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > Date: 09/29/2016 10:44 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too. The open
> > > issues
> > > > > are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-994, and the new SYSTEMML-995. We
> should be
> > > able
> > > > > to resolve them by tomorrow to give everybody a chance of testing
a
> > > new RC
> > > > > over the weekend.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Matthias
> > > > >
> > > > > Acs S ---09/29/2016 05:31:23 PM---SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I
> added
> > > > > changes and with UTF support Matthias added he reverted change
> > > > >
> > > > > From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> > > > > To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <dev@systemml.incubator.
> > > apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > Date: 09/29/2016 05:31 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I added changes and with UTF
support
> > > > > Matthias added he reverted changes)
> > > > >
> > > > > -Arvind
> > > > >
> > > > > From: "dusenberrymw@gmail.com" <du...@gmail.com>
> > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 2:31 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > >
> > > > > I've also opened SYSTEMML-993 that relates to poor performance
for
> > > vector
> > > > > DataFrame conversions, as well as SYSTEMML-994 for GC OOM on
> SystemML
> > > > > matrix to frame conversions that would both be good to work on.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Mike Dusenberry
> > > > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > > > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > > > >
> > > > > Sent from my iPhone.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Sep 29, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Luciano Resende <
> luckbr1975@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Matthias Boehm <
> mboehm@us.ibm.com
> > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> SYSTEMML-968 has been resolved too but we're still waiting for
> > > > > >> SYSTEMML-964. Furthermore, there is also a nice-to-have
feature
> we
> > > want
> > > > > to
> > > > > >> get it in: SYSTEMML-969 (extended dataframe - frame
converter).
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Regards,
> > > > > >> Matthias
> > > > > > Great progress !!!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Matthias, please let us know when these issues get resolved and
I
> > > will
> > > > > work
> > > > > > on RC2.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > > > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/
> lresende1975>
> > > > > > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >
> >
>
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
Posted by Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
Imran has opened Jira 1013.
-Arvind
From: Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 5:43 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
ok, SYSTEMML-1009 has been resolved too.
Regards,
Matthias
Acs S ---10/04/2016 05:30:52 PM---There is one more issue I am aware of: Imran facing max recursion issue in toNumPyArray().Not sure
From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <de...@systemml.incubator.apache.org>
Date: 10/04/2016 05:30 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
There is one more issue I am aware of: Imran facing max recursion issue in toNumPyArray().Not sure if Imran has opened Jira or not, but we need resolution for it.
-Arvind
From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
Ok, so looks like we are down to waiting on SYSTEMML-1009.
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 4:44 PM, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The Python test failure issue has been resolved in SYSTEMML-1005. From my
> end, we are ready to go.
>
> -Mike
>
> --
>
> Mike Dusenberry
> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
>
> > On Oct 4, 2016, at 2:02 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > apart from the recently resolved SYSTEMML-1004 and SYSTEMML-1008, there
> is one more performance fix I'd like to get in: SYSTEMML-1009.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Matthias
> >
> > Luciano Resende ---10/04/2016 12:29:12 PM---Mike, are these Python
> failures still blocking the next RC ? Please let me know, as I am waiting
> for
> >
> > From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > Date: 10/04/2016 12:29 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Mike, are these Python failures still blocking the next RC ? Please let
> me
> > know, as I am waiting for the green light to cut the RC2.
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 9:41 AM, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Yeah I can confirm that all of those issues are now resolved, which is
> > > great! However, I'm seeing a test failure in the Python mllearn tests
> > > today that I want to look into before we cut.
> > >
> > > -Mike
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Mike Dusenberry
> > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPhone.
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Oct 2, 2016, at 8:35 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > yes, I just closed them - I left them open for Mike to confirm, but
> we
> > > resolved all known issues yesterday together. We should be good to go.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Matthias
> > > >
> > > > Luciano Resende ---10/02/2016 08:30:37 PM---I still see the following
> > > jiras, which were mentioned on this thread, open:
> https://issues.apache.or
> > > >
> > > > From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > Date: 10/02/2016 08:30 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I still see the following jiras, which were mentioned on this thread,
> > > open:
> > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-993
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-994
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-995
> > > >
> > > > Did folks forgot to clode the jiras ? Or are there things that still
> need
> > > > to be handled here ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > ok the blocking issues SYSTEMML-993, 994, and 995 have been
> resolved -
> > > > > from my perspective we're ready to cut a new RC.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Matthias
> > > > >
> > > > > [image: Inactive hide details for Matthias Boehm---09/29/2016
> 10:44:51
> > > > > PM---just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too.
> > > Th]Matthias
> > > > > Boehm---09/29/2016 10:44:51 PM---just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969
> has
> > > been
> > > > > resolved too. The open issues are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-
> > > > >
> > > > > From: Matthias Boehm/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS
> > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > Date: 09/29/2016 10:44 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too. The open
> > > issues
> > > > > are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-994, and the new SYSTEMML-995. We
> should be
> > > able
> > > > > to resolve them by tomorrow to give everybody a chance of testing a
> > > new RC
> > > > > over the weekend.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Matthias
> > > > >
> > > > > Acs S ---09/29/2016 05:31:23 PM---SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I
> added
> > > > > changes and with UTF support Matthias added he reverted change
> > > > >
> > > > > From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> > > > > To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <dev@systemml.incubator.
> > > apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > Date: 09/29/2016 05:31 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I added changes and with UTF support
> > > > > Matthias added he reverted changes)
> > > > >
> > > > > -Arvind
> > > > >
> > > > > From: "dusenberrymw@gmail.com" <du...@gmail.com>
> > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 2:31 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > >
> > > > > I've also opened SYSTEMML-993 that relates to poor performance for
> > > vector
> > > > > DataFrame conversions, as well as SYSTEMML-994 for GC OOM on
> SystemML
> > > > > matrix to frame conversions that would both be good to work on.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Mike Dusenberry
> > > > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > > > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > > > >
> > > > > Sent from my iPhone.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Sep 29, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Luciano Resende <
> luckbr1975@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Matthias Boehm <
> mboehm@us.ibm.com
> > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> SYSTEMML-968 has been resolved too but we're still waiting for
> > > > > >> SYSTEMML-964. Furthermore, there is also a nice-to-have feature
> we
> > > want
> > > > > to
> > > > > >> get it in: SYSTEMML-969 (extended dataframe - frame converter).
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Regards,
> > > > > >> Matthias
> > > > > > Great progress !!!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Matthias, please let us know when these issues get resolved and I
> > > will
> > > > > work
> > > > > > on RC2.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > > > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/
> lresende1975>
> > > > > > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >
> >
>
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
Posted by Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>.
ok, SYSTEMML-1009 has been resolved too.
Regards,
Matthias
From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org"
<de...@systemml.incubator.apache.org>
Date: 10/04/2016 05:30 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
There is one more issue I am aware of: Imran facing max recursion issue
in toNumPyArray().Not sure if Imran has opened Jira or not, but we need
resolution for it.
-Arvind
From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
Ok, so looks like we are down to waiting on SYSTEMML-1009.
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 4:44 PM, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The Python test failure issue has been resolved in SYSTEMML-1005. From my
> end, we are ready to go.
>
> -Mike
>
> --
>
> Mike Dusenberry
> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
>
> > On Oct 4, 2016, at 2:02 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > apart from the recently resolved SYSTEMML-1004 and SYSTEMML-1008, there
> is one more performance fix I'd like to get in: SYSTEMML-1009.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Matthias
> >
> > Luciano Resende ---10/04/2016 12:29:12 PM---Mike, are these Python
> failures still blocking the next RC ? Please let me know, as I am waiting
> for
> >
> > From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > Date: 10/04/2016 12:29 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Mike, are these Python failures still blocking the next RC ? Please let
> me
> > know, as I am waiting for the green light to cut the RC2.
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 9:41 AM, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Yeah I can confirm that all of those issues are now resolved, which
is
> > > great! However, I'm seeing a test failure in the Python mllearn
tests
> > > today that I want to look into before we cut.
> > >
> > > -Mike
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Mike Dusenberry
> > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPhone.
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Oct 2, 2016, at 8:35 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > yes, I just closed them - I left them open for Mike to confirm, but
> we
> > > resolved all known issues yesterday together. We should be good to
go.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Matthias
> > > >
> > > > Luciano Resende ---10/02/2016 08:30:37 PM---I still see the
following
> > > jiras, which were mentioned on this thread, open:
> https://issues.apache.or
> > > >
> > > > From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > Date: 10/02/2016 08:30 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I still see the following jiras, which were mentioned on this
thread,
> > > open:
> > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-993
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-994
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-995
> > > >
> > > > Did folks forgot to clode the jiras ? Or are there things that
still
> need
> > > > to be handled here ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > ok the blocking issues SYSTEMML-993, 994, and 995 have been
> resolved -
> > > > > from my perspective we're ready to cut a new RC.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Matthias
> > > > >
> > > > > [image: Inactive hide details for Matthias Boehm---09/29/2016
> 10:44:51
> > > > > PM---just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too.
> > > Th]Matthias
> > > > > Boehm---09/29/2016 10:44:51 PM---just a quick update:
SYSTEMML-969
> has
> > > been
> > > > > resolved too. The open issues are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-
> > > > >
> > > > > From: Matthias Boehm/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS
> > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > Date: 09/29/2016 10:44 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too. The open
> > > issues
> > > > > are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-994, and the new SYSTEMML-995. We
> should be
> > > able
> > > > > to resolve them by tomorrow to give everybody a chance of testing
a
> > > new RC
> > > > > over the weekend.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Matthias
> > > > >
> > > > > Acs S ---09/29/2016 05:31:23 PM---SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I
> added
> > > > > changes and with UTF support Matthias added he reverted change
> > > > >
> > > > > From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> > > > > To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <dev@systemml.incubator.
> > > apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > Date: 09/29/2016 05:31 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I added changes and with UTF
support
> > > > > Matthias added he reverted changes)
> > > > >
> > > > > -Arvind
> > > > >
> > > > > From: "dusenberrymw@gmail.com" <du...@gmail.com>
> > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 2:31 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > >
> > > > > I've also opened SYSTEMML-993 that relates to poor performance
for
> > > vector
> > > > > DataFrame conversions, as well as SYSTEMML-994 for GC OOM on
> SystemML
> > > > > matrix to frame conversions that would both be good to work on.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Mike Dusenberry
> > > > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > > > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > > > >
> > > > > Sent from my iPhone.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Sep 29, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Luciano Resende <
> luckbr1975@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Matthias Boehm <
> mboehm@us.ibm.com
> > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> SYSTEMML-968 has been resolved too but we're still waiting for
> > > > > >> SYSTEMML-964. Furthermore, there is also a nice-to-have
feature
> we
> > > want
> > > > > to
> > > > > >> get it in: SYSTEMML-969 (extended dataframe - frame
converter).
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Regards,
> > > > > >> Matthias
> > > > > > Great progress !!!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Matthias, please let us know when these issues get resolved and
I
> > > will
> > > > > work
> > > > > > on RC2.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > > > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/
> lresende1975>
> > > > > > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >
> >
>
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
Posted by Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
There is one more issue I am aware of: Imran facing max recursion issue in toNumPyArray().Not sure if Imran has opened Jira or not, but we need resolution for it.
-Arvind
From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
Ok, so looks like we are down to waiting on SYSTEMML-1009.
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 4:44 PM, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The Python test failure issue has been resolved in SYSTEMML-1005. From my
> end, we are ready to go.
>
> -Mike
>
> --
>
> Mike Dusenberry
> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
>
> > On Oct 4, 2016, at 2:02 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > apart from the recently resolved SYSTEMML-1004 and SYSTEMML-1008, there
> is one more performance fix I'd like to get in: SYSTEMML-1009.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Matthias
> >
> > Luciano Resende ---10/04/2016 12:29:12 PM---Mike, are these Python
> failures still blocking the next RC ? Please let me know, as I am waiting
> for
> >
> > From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > Date: 10/04/2016 12:29 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Mike, are these Python failures still blocking the next RC ? Please let
> me
> > know, as I am waiting for the green light to cut the RC2.
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 9:41 AM, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Yeah I can confirm that all of those issues are now resolved, which is
> > > great! However, I'm seeing a test failure in the Python mllearn tests
> > > today that I want to look into before we cut.
> > >
> > > -Mike
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Mike Dusenberry
> > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPhone.
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Oct 2, 2016, at 8:35 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > yes, I just closed them - I left them open for Mike to confirm, but
> we
> > > resolved all known issues yesterday together. We should be good to go.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Matthias
> > > >
> > > > Luciano Resende ---10/02/2016 08:30:37 PM---I still see the following
> > > jiras, which were mentioned on this thread, open:
> https://issues.apache.or
> > > >
> > > > From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > Date: 10/02/2016 08:30 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I still see the following jiras, which were mentioned on this thread,
> > > open:
> > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-993
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-994
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-995
> > > >
> > > > Did folks forgot to clode the jiras ? Or are there things that still
> need
> > > > to be handled here ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > ok the blocking issues SYSTEMML-993, 994, and 995 have been
> resolved -
> > > > > from my perspective we're ready to cut a new RC.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Matthias
> > > > >
> > > > > [image: Inactive hide details for Matthias Boehm---09/29/2016
> 10:44:51
> > > > > PM---just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too.
> > > Th]Matthias
> > > > > Boehm---09/29/2016 10:44:51 PM---just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969
> has
> > > been
> > > > > resolved too. The open issues are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-
> > > > >
> > > > > From: Matthias Boehm/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS
> > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > Date: 09/29/2016 10:44 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too. The open
> > > issues
> > > > > are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-994, and the new SYSTEMML-995. We
> should be
> > > able
> > > > > to resolve them by tomorrow to give everybody a chance of testing a
> > > new RC
> > > > > over the weekend.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Matthias
> > > > >
> > > > > Acs S ---09/29/2016 05:31:23 PM---SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I
> added
> > > > > changes and with UTF support Matthias added he reverted change
> > > > >
> > > > > From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> > > > > To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <dev@systemml.incubator.
> > > apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > Date: 09/29/2016 05:31 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I added changes and with UTF support
> > > > > Matthias added he reverted changes)
> > > > >
> > > > > -Arvind
> > > > >
> > > > > From: "dusenberrymw@gmail.com" <du...@gmail.com>
> > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 2:31 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > >
> > > > > I've also opened SYSTEMML-993 that relates to poor performance for
> > > vector
> > > > > DataFrame conversions, as well as SYSTEMML-994 for GC OOM on
> SystemML
> > > > > matrix to frame conversions that would both be good to work on.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Mike Dusenberry
> > > > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > > > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > > > >
> > > > > Sent from my iPhone.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Sep 29, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Luciano Resende <
> luckbr1975@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Matthias Boehm <
> mboehm@us.ibm.com
> > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> SYSTEMML-968 has been resolved too but we're still waiting for
> > > > > >> SYSTEMML-964. Furthermore, there is also a nice-to-have feature
> we
> > > want
> > > > > to
> > > > > >> get it in: SYSTEMML-969 (extended dataframe - frame converter).
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Regards,
> > > > > >> Matthias
> > > > > > Great progress !!!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Matthias, please let us know when these issues get resolved and I
> > > will
> > > > > work
> > > > > > on RC2.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > > > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/
> lresende1975>
> > > > > > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >
> >
>
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
Ok, so looks like we are down to waiting on SYSTEMML-1009.
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 4:44 PM, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The Python test failure issue has been resolved in SYSTEMML-1005. From my
> end, we are ready to go.
>
> -Mike
>
> --
>
> Mike Dusenberry
> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
>
> > On Oct 4, 2016, at 2:02 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > apart from the recently resolved SYSTEMML-1004 and SYSTEMML-1008, there
> is one more performance fix I'd like to get in: SYSTEMML-1009.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Matthias
> >
> > Luciano Resende ---10/04/2016 12:29:12 PM---Mike, are these Python
> failures still blocking the next RC ? Please let me know, as I am waiting
> for
> >
> > From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > Date: 10/04/2016 12:29 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Mike, are these Python failures still blocking the next RC ? Please let
> me
> > know, as I am waiting for the green light to cut the RC2.
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 9:41 AM, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Yeah I can confirm that all of those issues are now resolved, which is
> > > great! However, I'm seeing a test failure in the Python mllearn tests
> > > today that I want to look into before we cut.
> > >
> > > -Mike
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Mike Dusenberry
> > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPhone.
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Oct 2, 2016, at 8:35 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > yes, I just closed them - I left them open for Mike to confirm, but
> we
> > > resolved all known issues yesterday together. We should be good to go.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Matthias
> > > >
> > > > Luciano Resende ---10/02/2016 08:30:37 PM---I still see the following
> > > jiras, which were mentioned on this thread, open:
> https://issues.apache.or
> > > >
> > > > From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > Date: 10/02/2016 08:30 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I still see the following jiras, which were mentioned on this thread,
> > > open:
> > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-993
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-994
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-995
> > > >
> > > > Did folks forgot to clode the jiras ? Or are there things that still
> need
> > > > to be handled here ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > ok the blocking issues SYSTEMML-993, 994, and 995 have been
> resolved -
> > > > > from my perspective we're ready to cut a new RC.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Matthias
> > > > >
> > > > > [image: Inactive hide details for Matthias Boehm---09/29/2016
> 10:44:51
> > > > > PM---just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too.
> > > Th]Matthias
> > > > > Boehm---09/29/2016 10:44:51 PM---just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969
> has
> > > been
> > > > > resolved too. The open issues are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-
> > > > >
> > > > > From: Matthias Boehm/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS
> > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > Date: 09/29/2016 10:44 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too. The open
> > > issues
> > > > > are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-994, and the new SYSTEMML-995. We
> should be
> > > able
> > > > > to resolve them by tomorrow to give everybody a chance of testing a
> > > new RC
> > > > > over the weekend.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Matthias
> > > > >
> > > > > Acs S ---09/29/2016 05:31:23 PM---SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I
> added
> > > > > changes and with UTF support Matthias added he reverted change
> > > > >
> > > > > From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> > > > > To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <dev@systemml.incubator.
> > > apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > Date: 09/29/2016 05:31 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I added changes and with UTF support
> > > > > Matthias added he reverted changes)
> > > > >
> > > > > -Arvind
> > > > >
> > > > > From: "dusenberrymw@gmail.com" <du...@gmail.com>
> > > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 2:31 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > >
> > > > > I've also opened SYSTEMML-993 that relates to poor performance for
> > > vector
> > > > > DataFrame conversions, as well as SYSTEMML-994 for GC OOM on
> SystemML
> > > > > matrix to frame conversions that would both be good to work on.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Mike Dusenberry
> > > > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > > > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > > > >
> > > > > Sent from my iPhone.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Sep 29, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Luciano Resende <
> luckbr1975@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Matthias Boehm <
> mboehm@us.ibm.com
> > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> SYSTEMML-968 has been resolved too but we're still waiting for
> > > > > >> SYSTEMML-964. Furthermore, there is also a nice-to-have feature
> we
> > > want
> > > > > to
> > > > > >> get it in: SYSTEMML-969 (extended dataframe - frame converter).
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Regards,
> > > > > >> Matthias
> > > > > > Great progress !!!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Matthias, please let us know when these issues get resolved and I
> > > will
> > > > > work
> > > > > > on RC2.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > > > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/
> lresende1975>
> > > > > > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >
> >
>
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
Posted by du...@gmail.com.
The Python test failure issue has been resolved in SYSTEMML-1005. From my end, we are ready to go.
-Mike
--
Mike Dusenberry
GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
Sent from my iPhone.
> On Oct 4, 2016, at 2:02 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> apart from the recently resolved SYSTEMML-1004 and SYSTEMML-1008, there is one more performance fix I'd like to get in: SYSTEMML-1009.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
> Luciano Resende ---10/04/2016 12:29:12 PM---Mike, are these Python failures still blocking the next RC ? Please let me know, as I am waiting for
>
> From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Date: 10/04/2016 12:29 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
>
>
>
>
> Mike, are these Python failures still blocking the next RC ? Please let me
> know, as I am waiting for the green light to cut the RC2.
>
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 9:41 AM, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Yeah I can confirm that all of those issues are now resolved, which is
> > great! However, I'm seeing a test failure in the Python mllearn tests
> > today that I want to look into before we cut.
> >
> > -Mike
> >
> > --
> >
> > Mike Dusenberry
> > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone.
> >
> >
> > > On Oct 2, 2016, at 8:35 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > yes, I just closed them - I left them open for Mike to confirm, but we
> > resolved all known issues yesterday together. We should be good to go.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Matthias
> > >
> > > Luciano Resende ---10/02/2016 08:30:37 PM---I still see the following
> > jiras, which were mentioned on this thread, open: https://issues.apache.or
> > >
> > > From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > Date: 10/02/2016 08:30 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I still see the following jiras, which were mentioned on this thread,
> > open:
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-993
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-994
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-995
> > >
> > > Did folks forgot to clode the jiras ? Or are there things that still need
> > > to be handled here ?
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > ok the blocking issues SYSTEMML-993, 994, and 995 have been resolved -
> > > > from my perspective we're ready to cut a new RC.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Matthias
> > > >
> > > > [image: Inactive hide details for Matthias Boehm---09/29/2016 10:44:51
> > > > PM---just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too.
> > Th]Matthias
> > > > Boehm---09/29/2016 10:44:51 PM---just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has
> > been
> > > > resolved too. The open issues are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-
> > > >
> > > > From: Matthias Boehm/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS
> > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > Date: 09/29/2016 10:44 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > ------------------------------
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too. The open
> > issues
> > > > are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-994, and the new SYSTEMML-995. We should be
> > able
> > > > to resolve them by tomorrow to give everybody a chance of testing a
> > new RC
> > > > over the weekend.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Matthias
> > > >
> > > > Acs S ---09/29/2016 05:31:23 PM---SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I added
> > > > changes and with UTF support Matthias added he reverted change
> > > >
> > > > From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> > > > To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <dev@systemml.incubator.
> > apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > Date: 09/29/2016 05:31 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > > ------------------------------
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I added changes and with UTF support
> > > > Matthias added he reverted changes)
> > > >
> > > > -Arvind
> > > >
> > > > From: "dusenberrymw@gmail.com" <du...@gmail.com>
> > > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 2:31 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > >
> > > > I've also opened SYSTEMML-993 that relates to poor performance for
> > vector
> > > > DataFrame conversions, as well as SYSTEMML-994 for GC OOM on SystemML
> > > > matrix to frame conversions that would both be good to work on.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Mike Dusenberry
> > > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > > >
> > > > Sent from my iPhone.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On Sep 29, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Matthias Boehm <mboehm@us.ibm.com
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> SYSTEMML-968 has been resolved too but we're still waiting for
> > > > >> SYSTEMML-964. Furthermore, there is also a nice-to-have feature we
> > want
> > > > to
> > > > >> get it in: SYSTEMML-969 (extended dataframe - frame converter).
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Regards,
> > > > >> Matthias
> > > > > Great progress !!!
> > > > >
> > > > > Matthias, please let us know when these issues get resolved and I
> > will
> > > > work
> > > > > on RC2.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/lresende1975>
> > > > > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Luciano Resende
> > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
Posted by Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>.
apart from the recently resolved SYSTEMML-1004 and SYSTEMML-1008, there is
one more performance fix I'd like to get in: SYSTEMML-1009.
Regards,
Matthias
From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Date: 10/04/2016 12:29 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
Mike, are these Python failures still blocking the next RC ? Please let me
know, as I am waiting for the green light to cut the RC2.
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 9:41 AM, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah I can confirm that all of those issues are now resolved, which is
> great! However, I'm seeing a test failure in the Python mllearn tests
> today that I want to look into before we cut.
>
> -Mike
>
> --
>
> Mike Dusenberry
> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
>
> > On Oct 2, 2016, at 8:35 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > yes, I just closed them - I left them open for Mike to confirm, but we
> resolved all known issues yesterday together. We should be good to go.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Matthias
> >
> > Luciano Resende ---10/02/2016 08:30:37 PM---I still see the following
> jiras, which were mentioned on this thread, open:
https://issues.apache.or
> >
> > From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > Date: 10/02/2016 08:30 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I still see the following jiras, which were mentioned on this thread,
> open:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-993
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-994
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-995
> >
> > Did folks forgot to clode the jiras ? Or are there things that still
need
> > to be handled here ?
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > ok the blocking issues SYSTEMML-993, 994, and 995 have been resolved
-
> > > from my perspective we're ready to cut a new RC.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Matthias
> > >
> > > [image: Inactive hide details for Matthias Boehm---09/29/2016
10:44:51
> > > PM---just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too.
> Th]Matthias
> > > Boehm---09/29/2016 10:44:51 PM---just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969
has
> been
> > > resolved too. The open issues are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-
> > >
> > > From: Matthias Boehm/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS
> > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > Date: 09/29/2016 10:44 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > ------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too. The open
> issues
> > > are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-994, and the new SYSTEMML-995. We should
be
> able
> > > to resolve them by tomorrow to give everybody a chance of testing a
> new RC
> > > over the weekend.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Matthias
> > >
> > > Acs S ---09/29/2016 05:31:23 PM---SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I
added
> > > changes and with UTF support Matthias added he reverted change
> > >
> > > From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> > > To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <dev@systemml.incubator.
> apache.org
> > > >
> > > Date: 09/29/2016 05:31 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > ------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I added changes and with UTF support
> > > Matthias added he reverted changes)
> > >
> > > -Arvind
> > >
> > > From: "dusenberrymw@gmail.com" <du...@gmail.com>
> > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 2:31 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > >
> > > I've also opened SYSTEMML-993 that relates to poor performance for
> vector
> > > DataFrame conversions, as well as SYSTEMML-994 for GC OOM on SystemML
> > > matrix to frame conversions that would both be good to work on.
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Mike Dusenberry
> > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPhone.
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Sep 29, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Luciano Resende
<lu...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Matthias Boehm
<mboehm@us.ibm.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> SYSTEMML-968 has been resolved too but we're still waiting for
> > > >> SYSTEMML-964. Furthermore, there is also a nice-to-have feature we
> want
> > > to
> > > >> get it in: SYSTEMML-969 (extended dataframe - frame converter).
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards,
> > > >> Matthias
> > > > Great progress !!!
> > > >
> > > > Matthias, please let us know when these issues get resolved and I
> will
> > > work
> > > > on RC2.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/lresende1975>
> > > > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >
> >
>
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
Mike, are these Python failures still blocking the next RC ? Please let me
know, as I am waiting for the green light to cut the RC2.
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 9:41 AM, <du...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah I can confirm that all of those issues are now resolved, which is
> great! However, I'm seeing a test failure in the Python mllearn tests
> today that I want to look into before we cut.
>
> -Mike
>
> --
>
> Mike Dusenberry
> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
>
> > On Oct 2, 2016, at 8:35 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > yes, I just closed them - I left them open for Mike to confirm, but we
> resolved all known issues yesterday together. We should be good to go.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Matthias
> >
> > Luciano Resende ---10/02/2016 08:30:37 PM---I still see the following
> jiras, which were mentioned on this thread, open: https://issues.apache.or
> >
> > From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > Date: 10/02/2016 08:30 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I still see the following jiras, which were mentioned on this thread,
> open:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-993
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-994
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-995
> >
> > Did folks forgot to clode the jiras ? Or are there things that still need
> > to be handled here ?
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > ok the blocking issues SYSTEMML-993, 994, and 995 have been resolved -
> > > from my perspective we're ready to cut a new RC.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Matthias
> > >
> > > [image: Inactive hide details for Matthias Boehm---09/29/2016 10:44:51
> > > PM---just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too.
> Th]Matthias
> > > Boehm---09/29/2016 10:44:51 PM---just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has
> been
> > > resolved too. The open issues are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-
> > >
> > > From: Matthias Boehm/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS
> > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > Date: 09/29/2016 10:44 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > ------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too. The open
> issues
> > > are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-994, and the new SYSTEMML-995. We should be
> able
> > > to resolve them by tomorrow to give everybody a chance of testing a
> new RC
> > > over the weekend.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Matthias
> > >
> > > Acs S ---09/29/2016 05:31:23 PM---SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I added
> > > changes and with UTF support Matthias added he reverted change
> > >
> > > From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> > > To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <dev@systemml.incubator.
> apache.org
> > > >
> > > Date: 09/29/2016 05:31 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > > ------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I added changes and with UTF support
> > > Matthias added he reverted changes)
> > >
> > > -Arvind
> > >
> > > From: "dusenberrymw@gmail.com" <du...@gmail.com>
> > > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 2:31 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > >
> > > I've also opened SYSTEMML-993 that relates to poor performance for
> vector
> > > DataFrame conversions, as well as SYSTEMML-994 for GC OOM on SystemML
> > > matrix to frame conversions that would both be good to work on.
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Mike Dusenberry
> > > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPhone.
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Sep 29, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Matthias Boehm <mboehm@us.ibm.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> SYSTEMML-968 has been resolved too but we're still waiting for
> > > >> SYSTEMML-964. Furthermore, there is also a nice-to-have feature we
> want
> > > to
> > > >> get it in: SYSTEMML-969 (extended dataframe - frame converter).
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards,
> > > >> Matthias
> > > > Great progress !!!
> > > >
> > > > Matthias, please let us know when these issues get resolved and I
> will
> > > work
> > > > on RC2.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/lresende1975>
> > > > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >
> >
>
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
Posted by du...@gmail.com.
Yeah I can confirm that all of those issues are now resolved, which is great! However, I'm seeing a test failure in the Python mllearn tests today that I want to look into before we cut.
-Mike
--
Mike Dusenberry
GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
Sent from my iPhone.
> On Oct 2, 2016, at 8:35 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> yes, I just closed them - I left them open for Mike to confirm, but we resolved all known issues yesterday together. We should be good to go.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
> Luciano Resende ---10/02/2016 08:30:37 PM---I still see the following jiras, which were mentioned on this thread, open: https://issues.apache.or
>
> From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Date: 10/02/2016 08:30 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
>
>
>
>
> I still see the following jiras, which were mentioned on this thread, open:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-993
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-994
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-995
>
> Did folks forgot to clode the jiras ? Or are there things that still need
> to be handled here ?
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > ok the blocking issues SYSTEMML-993, 994, and 995 have been resolved -
> > from my perspective we're ready to cut a new RC.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Matthias
> >
> > [image: Inactive hide details for Matthias Boehm---09/29/2016 10:44:51
> > PM---just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too. Th]Matthias
> > Boehm---09/29/2016 10:44:51 PM---just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been
> > resolved too. The open issues are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-
> >
> > From: Matthias Boehm/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS
> > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > Date: 09/29/2016 10:44 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > ------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> > just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too. The open issues
> > are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-994, and the new SYSTEMML-995. We should be able
> > to resolve them by tomorrow to give everybody a chance of testing a new RC
> > over the weekend.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Matthias
> >
> > Acs S ---09/29/2016 05:31:23 PM---SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I added
> > changes and with UTF support Matthias added he reverted change
> >
> > From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> > To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > Date: 09/29/2016 05:31 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> > ------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> > SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I added changes and with UTF support
> > Matthias added he reverted changes)
> >
> > -Arvind
> >
> > From: "dusenberrymw@gmail.com" <du...@gmail.com>
> > To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 2:31 PM
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> >
> > I've also opened SYSTEMML-993 that relates to poor performance for vector
> > DataFrame conversions, as well as SYSTEMML-994 for GC OOM on SystemML
> > matrix to frame conversions that would both be good to work on.
> >
> > --
> >
> > Mike Dusenberry
> > GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> > LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone.
> >
> >
> > > On Sep 29, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> SYSTEMML-968 has been resolved too but we're still waiting for
> > >> SYSTEMML-964. Furthermore, there is also a nice-to-have feature we want
> > to
> > >> get it in: SYSTEMML-969 (extended dataframe - frame converter).
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Matthias
> > > Great progress !!!
> > >
> > > Matthias, please let us know when these issues get resolved and I will
> > work
> > > on RC2.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Luciano Resende
> > > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/lresende1975>
> > > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
Posted by Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>.
yes, I just closed them - I left them open for Mike to confirm, but we
resolved all known issues yesterday together. We should be good to go.
Regards,
Matthias
From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
Date: 10/02/2016 08:30 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
I still see the following jiras, which were mentioned on this thread, open:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-993
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-994
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-995
Did folks forgot to clode the jiras ? Or are there things that still need
to be handled here ?
On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> ok the blocking issues SYSTEMML-993, 994, and 995 have been resolved -
> from my perspective we're ready to cut a new RC.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Matthias Boehm---09/29/2016 10:44:51
> PM---just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too. Th]Matthias
> Boehm---09/29/2016 10:44:51 PM---just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has
been
> resolved too. The open issues are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-
>
> From: Matthias Boehm/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Date: 09/29/2016 10:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too. The open issues
> are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-994, and the new SYSTEMML-995. We should be
able
> to resolve them by tomorrow to give everybody a chance of testing a new
RC
> over the weekend.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
> Acs S ---09/29/2016 05:31:23 PM---SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I added
> changes and with UTF support Matthias added he reverted change
>
> From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org"
<dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> >
> Date: 09/29/2016 05:31 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I added changes and with UTF support
> Matthias added he reverted changes)
>
> -Arvind
>
> From: "dusenberrymw@gmail.com" <du...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 2:31 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
>
> I've also opened SYSTEMML-993 that relates to poor performance for vector
> DataFrame conversions, as well as SYSTEMML-994 for GC OOM on SystemML
> matrix to frame conversions that would both be good to work on.
>
> --
>
> Mike Dusenberry
> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
>
> > On Sep 29, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> SYSTEMML-968 has been resolved too but we're still waiting for
> >> SYSTEMML-964. Furthermore, there is also a nice-to-have feature we
want
> to
> >> get it in: SYSTEMML-969 (extended dataframe - frame converter).
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Matthias
> > Great progress !!!
> >
> > Matthias, please let us know when these issues get resolved and I will
> work
> > on RC2.
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/lresende1975>
> > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
I still see the following jiras, which were mentioned on this thread, open:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-993
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-994
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-995
Did folks forgot to clode the jiras ? Or are there things that still need
to be handled here ?
On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> ok the blocking issues SYSTEMML-993, 994, and 995 have been resolved -
> from my perspective we're ready to cut a new RC.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Matthias Boehm---09/29/2016 10:44:51
> PM---just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too. Th]Matthias
> Boehm---09/29/2016 10:44:51 PM---just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been
> resolved too. The open issues are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-
>
> From: Matthias Boehm/Almaden/IBM@IBMUS
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Date: 09/29/2016 10:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> just a quick update: SYSTEMML-969 has been resolved too. The open issues
> are SYSTEMML-993, SYSTEMML-994, and the new SYSTEMML-995. We should be able
> to resolve them by tomorrow to give everybody a chance of testing a new RC
> over the weekend.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
> Acs S ---09/29/2016 05:31:23 PM---SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I added
> changes and with UTF support Matthias added he reverted change
>
> From: Acs S <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> To: "dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org" <dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> >
> Date: 09/29/2016 05:31 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> SYSTEMML-964 being addressed (I added changes and with UTF support
> Matthias added he reverted changes)
>
> -Arvind
>
> From: "dusenberrymw@gmail.com" <du...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 2:31 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)
>
> I've also opened SYSTEMML-993 that relates to poor performance for vector
> DataFrame conversions, as well as SYSTEMML-994 for GC OOM on SystemML
> matrix to frame conversions that would both be good to work on.
>
> --
>
> Mike Dusenberry
> GitHub: github.com/dusenberrymw
> LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/mikedusenberry
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
>
> > On Sep 29, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Matthias Boehm <mb...@us.ibm.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> SYSTEMML-968 has been resolved too but we're still waiting for
> >> SYSTEMML-964. Furthermore, there is also a nice-to-have feature we want
> to
> >> get it in: SYSTEMML-969 (extended dataframe - frame converter).
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Matthias
> > Great progress !!!
> >
> > Matthias, please let us know when these issues get resolved and I will
> work
> > on RC2.
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > *http://twitter.com/lresende1975* <http://twitter.com/lresende1975>
> > *http://lresende.blogspot.com/* <http://lresende.blogspot.com/>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/