You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@santuario.apache.org by Raul Benito <ra...@gmail.com> on 2005/09/13 00:52:09 UTC
[VOTE] xml-sec java 1.3 release?
Sorry for the delay calling a vote but I've been really busy with my
day job(deadline approaching) and I wanted to close all bugs before
doing the release (thing that I manage to do tonight).
But after a waiting time, and with all the bugs closed, I'll think is
time to graduate 1.3RC1 to release status.
What do you thing?
[ ] +1 , OK go ahead.
[ ] +0,
[ ] -1, Why we don't do RC2 before.
Regards,
Raul
--
http://r-bg.com
Re: [VOTE] xml-sec java 1.3 release?
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
+1 from me.
On 9/14/05, Raul Benito <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was also going to suggest a RC2 jar, for testing.
>
> I'll think that doing a RC jar right now is the best way to test the
> changes (There are a lot of people interested in testing that are
> afraid of generate themselves a jar).
>
> So hat do you all think if I go ahead and do a RC2.jar and after two
> weeks call for another release vote?
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Raul
>
>
> On 9/14/05, Vishal Mahajan <vm...@amberpoint.com> wrote:
> > I think your suggestion makes complete sense. We should give at least a
> > week of testing (after significant check-ins) before an RC goes out and
> > probably little more time before for the final release. Thanks for
> > bringing this up and hopefully we can incorporate this going forward.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Vishal
> >
> > Sean Mullan wrote:
> >
> > > Although I have reviewed these fixes and they look fine and fairly
> > > low-risk, I think it probably makes sense to allow a few days (a
> > > week?) to let others test and make sure there are no regressions.
> > > Comments? I'm fairly new to the process, but I just think it makes
> > > sense to test the final bits as much as possible before they are
> > > released. What are the guidelines? I don't necessarily think we need
> > > to cut an RC2, but we should at least build an xmlsec.jar and make it
> > > available for testing.
> > >
> > > --Sean
> > >
> > > Vishal Mahajan wrote:
> > >
> > >> Vishal Mahajan wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Raul,
> > >>>
> > >>> I have filed three bugs (with suggested patches) - 36638, 36639, and
> > >>> 36640, which I found recently.
> > >>> I'll check-in the fix for each of these tomorrow
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Done with the fixes.
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >>
> > >> Vishal
> > >>
> > >>> and after that it's +1 from me.
> > >>>
> > >>> Regards,
> > >>>
> > >>> Vishal
> > >>>
> > >>> Raul Benito wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Sorry for the delay calling a vote but I've been really busy with my
> > >>>> day job(deadline approaching) and I wanted to close all bugs before
> > >>>> doing the release (thing that I manage to do tonight).
> > >>>>
> > >>>> But after a waiting time, and with all the bugs closed, I'll think is
> > >>>> time to graduate 1.3RC1 to release status.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> What do you thing?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> [ ] +1 , OK go ahead.
> > >>>> [ ] +0, [ ] -1, Why we don't do RC2 before.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Regards,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Raul
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> http://r-bg.com
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/ - Oxygenating The Web Service Platform
Re: [VOTE] xml-sec java 1.3 release?
Posted by Sean Mullan <Se...@Sun.COM>.
+1
Raul Benito wrote:
> I was also going to suggest a RC2 jar, for testing.
>
> I'll think that doing a RC jar right now is the best way to test the
> changes (There are a lot of people interested in testing that are
> afraid of generate themselves a jar).
>
> So hat do you all think if I go ahead and do a RC2.jar and after two
> weeks call for another release vote?
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Raul
>
>
> On 9/14/05, Vishal Mahajan <vm...@amberpoint.com> wrote:
>
>>I think your suggestion makes complete sense. We should give at least a
>>week of testing (after significant check-ins) before an RC goes out and
>>probably little more time before for the final release. Thanks for
>>bringing this up and hopefully we can incorporate this going forward.
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Vishal
>>
>>Sean Mullan wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Although I have reviewed these fixes and they look fine and fairly
>>>low-risk, I think it probably makes sense to allow a few days (a
>>>week?) to let others test and make sure there are no regressions.
>>>Comments? I'm fairly new to the process, but I just think it makes
>>>sense to test the final bits as much as possible before they are
>>>released. What are the guidelines? I don't necessarily think we need
>>>to cut an RC2, but we should at least build an xmlsec.jar and make it
>>>available for testing.
>>>
>>>--Sean
>>>
>>>Vishal Mahajan wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Vishal Mahajan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Raul,
>>>>>
>>>>>I have filed three bugs (with suggested patches) - 36638, 36639, and
>>>>>36640, which I found recently.
>>>>>I'll check-in the fix for each of these tomorrow
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Done with the fixes.
>>>>
>>>>Regards,
>>>>
>>>>Vishal
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>and after that it's +1 from me.
>>>>>
>>>>>Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>>Vishal
>>>>>
>>>>>Raul Benito wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Sorry for the delay calling a vote but I've been really busy with my
>>>>>>day job(deadline approaching) and I wanted to close all bugs before
>>>>>>doing the release (thing that I manage to do tonight).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>But after a waiting time, and with all the bugs closed, I'll think is
>>>>>>time to graduate 1.3RC1 to release status.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>What do you thing?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>[ ] +1 , OK go ahead.
>>>>>>[ ] +0, [ ] -1, Why we don't do RC2 before.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Raul
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] xml-sec java 1.3 release?
Posted by Raul Benito <ra...@gmail.com>.
I was also going to suggest a RC2 jar, for testing.
I'll think that doing a RC jar right now is the best way to test the
changes (There are a lot of people interested in testing that are
afraid of generate themselves a jar).
So hat do you all think if I go ahead and do a RC2.jar and after two
weeks call for another release vote?
Regards,
Raul
On 9/14/05, Vishal Mahajan <vm...@amberpoint.com> wrote:
> I think your suggestion makes complete sense. We should give at least a
> week of testing (after significant check-ins) before an RC goes out and
> probably little more time before for the final release. Thanks for
> bringing this up and hopefully we can incorporate this going forward.
>
> Regards,
>
> Vishal
>
> Sean Mullan wrote:
>
> > Although I have reviewed these fixes and they look fine and fairly
> > low-risk, I think it probably makes sense to allow a few days (a
> > week?) to let others test and make sure there are no regressions.
> > Comments? I'm fairly new to the process, but I just think it makes
> > sense to test the final bits as much as possible before they are
> > released. What are the guidelines? I don't necessarily think we need
> > to cut an RC2, but we should at least build an xmlsec.jar and make it
> > available for testing.
> >
> > --Sean
> >
> > Vishal Mahajan wrote:
> >
> >> Vishal Mahajan wrote:
> >>
> >>> Raul,
> >>>
> >>> I have filed three bugs (with suggested patches) - 36638, 36639, and
> >>> 36640, which I found recently.
> >>> I'll check-in the fix for each of these tomorrow
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Done with the fixes.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Vishal
> >>
> >>> and after that it's +1 from me.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>>
> >>> Vishal
> >>>
> >>> Raul Benito wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Sorry for the delay calling a vote but I've been really busy with my
> >>>> day job(deadline approaching) and I wanted to close all bugs before
> >>>> doing the release (thing that I manage to do tonight).
> >>>>
> >>>> But after a waiting time, and with all the bugs closed, I'll think is
> >>>> time to graduate 1.3RC1 to release status.
> >>>>
> >>>> What do you thing?
> >>>>
> >>>> [ ] +1 , OK go ahead.
> >>>> [ ] +0, [ ] -1, Why we don't do RC2 before.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>>
> >>>> Raul
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
--
http://r-bg.com
Re: [VOTE] xml-sec java 1.3 release?
Posted by Vishal Mahajan <vm...@amberpoint.com>.
I think your suggestion makes complete sense. We should give at least a
week of testing (after significant check-ins) before an RC goes out and
probably little more time before for the final release. Thanks for
bringing this up and hopefully we can incorporate this going forward.
Regards,
Vishal
Sean Mullan wrote:
> Although I have reviewed these fixes and they look fine and fairly
> low-risk, I think it probably makes sense to allow a few days (a
> week?) to let others test and make sure there are no regressions.
> Comments? I'm fairly new to the process, but I just think it makes
> sense to test the final bits as much as possible before they are
> released. What are the guidelines? I don't necessarily think we need
> to cut an RC2, but we should at least build an xmlsec.jar and make it
> available for testing.
>
> --Sean
>
> Vishal Mahajan wrote:
>
>> Vishal Mahajan wrote:
>>
>>> Raul,
>>>
>>> I have filed three bugs (with suggested patches) - 36638, 36639, and
>>> 36640, which I found recently.
>>> I'll check-in the fix for each of these tomorrow
>>
>>
>>
>> Done with the fixes.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Vishal
>>
>>> and after that it's +1 from me.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Vishal
>>>
>>> Raul Benito wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sorry for the delay calling a vote but I've been really busy with my
>>>> day job(deadline approaching) and I wanted to close all bugs before
>>>> doing the release (thing that I manage to do tonight).
>>>>
>>>> But after a waiting time, and with all the bugs closed, I'll think is
>>>> time to graduate 1.3RC1 to release status.
>>>>
>>>> What do you thing?
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 , OK go ahead.
>>>> [ ] +0, [ ] -1, Why we don't do RC2 before.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Raul
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] xml-sec java 1.3 release?
Posted by Sean Mullan <Se...@Sun.COM>.
Although I have reviewed these fixes and they look fine and fairly
low-risk, I think it probably makes sense to allow a few days (a week?)
to let others test and make sure there are no regressions. Comments? I'm
fairly new to the process, but I just think it makes sense to test the
final bits as much as possible before they are released. What are the
guidelines? I don't necessarily think we need to cut an RC2, but we
should at least build an xmlsec.jar and make it available for testing.
--Sean
Vishal Mahajan wrote:
> Vishal Mahajan wrote:
>
>> Raul,
>>
>> I have filed three bugs (with suggested patches) - 36638, 36639, and
>> 36640, which I found recently.
>> I'll check-in the fix for each of these tomorrow
>
>
> Done with the fixes.
>
> Regards,
>
> Vishal
>
>> and after that it's +1 from me.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Vishal
>>
>> Raul Benito wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry for the delay calling a vote but I've been really busy with my
>>> day job(deadline approaching) and I wanted to close all bugs before
>>> doing the release (thing that I manage to do tonight).
>>>
>>> But after a waiting time, and with all the bugs closed, I'll think is
>>> time to graduate 1.3RC1 to release status.
>>>
>>> What do you thing?
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 , OK go ahead.
>>> [ ] +0, [ ] -1, Why we don't do RC2 before.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Raul
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] xml-sec java 1.3 release?
Posted by Vishal Mahajan <vm...@amberpoint.com>.
Vishal Mahajan wrote:
> Raul,
>
> I have filed three bugs (with suggested patches) - 36638, 36639, and
> 36640, which I found recently.
> I'll check-in the fix for each of these tomorrow
Done with the fixes.
Regards,
Vishal
> and after that it's +1 from me.
>
> Regards,
>
> Vishal
>
> Raul Benito wrote:
>
>> Sorry for the delay calling a vote but I've been really busy with my
>> day job(deadline approaching) and I wanted to close all bugs before
>> doing the release (thing that I manage to do tonight).
>>
>> But after a waiting time, and with all the bugs closed, I'll think is
>> time to graduate 1.3RC1 to release status.
>>
>> What do you thing?
>>
>> [ ] +1 , OK go ahead.
>> [ ] +0, [ ] -1, Why we don't do RC2 before.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Raul
>>
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] xml-sec java 1.3 release?
Posted by Vishal Mahajan <vm...@amberpoint.com>.
Raul,
I have filed three bugs (with suggested patches) - 36638, 36639, and
36640, which I found recently.
I'll check-in the fix for each of these tomorrow and after that it's +1
from me.
Regards,
Vishal
Raul Benito wrote:
>Sorry for the delay calling a vote but I've been really busy with my
>day job(deadline approaching) and I wanted to close all bugs before
>doing the release (thing that I manage to do tonight).
>
>But after a waiting time, and with all the bugs closed, I'll think is
>time to graduate 1.3RC1 to release status.
>
>What do you thing?
>
>[ ] +1 , OK go ahead.
>[ ] +0,
>[ ] -1, Why we don't do RC2 before.
>
>Regards,
>
>Raul
>
>
Re: [VOTE] xml-sec java 1.3 release?
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
Raul,
I checked in a patch to get the code to with latest Xalan yesterday.
Could we please make that part of the release? +1 otherwise.
thanks,
dims
On 9/12/05, Sean Mullan <Se...@sun.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Raul Benito wrote:
> > Sorry for the delay calling a vote but I've been really busy with my
> > day job(deadline approaching) and I wanted to close all bugs before
> > doing the release (thing that I manage to do tonight).
> >
> > But after a waiting time, and with all the bugs closed, I'll think is
> > time to graduate 1.3RC1 to release status.
> >
> > What do you thing?
> >
> > [ ] +1 , OK go ahead.
> > [ ] +0,
> > [ ] -1, Why we don't do RC2 before.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Raul
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/ - Oxygenating The Web Service Platform
Re: [VOTE] xml-sec java 1.3 release?
Posted by Sean Mullan <Se...@Sun.COM>.
+1
Raul Benito wrote:
> Sorry for the delay calling a vote but I've been really busy with my
> day job(deadline approaching) and I wanted to close all bugs before
> doing the release (thing that I manage to do tonight).
>
> But after a waiting time, and with all the bugs closed, I'll think is
> time to graduate 1.3RC1 to release status.
>
> What do you thing?
>
> [ ] +1 , OK go ahead.
> [ ] +0,
> [ ] -1, Why we don't do RC2 before.
>
> Regards,
>
> Raul