You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@struts.apache.org by Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> on 2006/04/27 06:12:04 UTC
[VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality
The first Action 1 release since the recent reorganization, we have a
Struts Action Framework 1.3.2 build to evaluate for release quality.
The release plan is available on the wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsActionRelease132
<http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ShaleRelease102>
the Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 test build has been completed and
deployed to
http://svn.apache.org/dist/struts/action/v1.3.2
<http://svn.apache.org/dist/struts/shale/v1.0.2/>
In my testing, I found the following issues:
1. Struts faces example webapps both don't work
2. Taglib integration tests don't work
Otherwise, all the example applications worked correctly.
Once you have had a chance to review this test build, please respond
with a vote on its quality:
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] General Availability (GA)
We welcome votes from all community members, however, only the votes
of Struts PMC members are binding.
My vote is for Beta quality, as there are no unreleased dependencies,
all the key example apps work correctly, and I've personally had the
1.3.x code in production for over six months without any problems. Only
Beta because the docs need work and there are a few outstanding bugs in
JIRA that should be addressed in the next release.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality
Posted by Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org>.
See? The projects are working together already! :)
Don
Craig McClanahan wrote:
> On 4/26/06, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote:
>
>> Stupid HTML email editor... ignore that shale stuff :)
>>
>
>
> Rats ... thought that was a very enjoyable Freudian slip :-).
>
> Craig
>
> /me is downloading the 1.3.2 build ...
>
> Don Brown wrote:
>
>>> The first Action 1 release since the recent reorganization, we have a
>>> Struts Action Framework 1.3.2 build to evaluate for release quality.
>>> The release plan is available on the wiki:
>>>
>>> http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsActionRelease132
>>> <http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ShaleRelease102>
>>>
>>> the Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 test build has been completed and
>>> deployed to
>>>
>>> http://svn.apache.org/dist/struts/action/v1.3.2
>>> <http://svn.apache.org/dist/struts/shale/v1.0.2/>
>>>
>>> In my testing, I found the following issues:
>>> 1. Struts faces example webapps both don't work
>>> 2. Taglib integration tests don't work
>>>
>>> Otherwise, all the example applications worked correctly.
>>>
>>> Once you have had a chance to review this test build, please respond
>>> with a vote on its quality:
>>>
>>> [ ] Alpha
>>> [ ] Beta
>>> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>>>
>>> We welcome votes from all community members, however, only the votes
>>> of Struts PMC members are binding.
>>>
>>> My vote is for Beta quality, as there are no unreleased dependencies,
>>> all the key example apps work correctly, and I've personally had the
>>> 1.3.x code in production for over six months without any problems.
>>> Only Beta because the docs need work and there are a few outstanding
>>> bugs in JIRA that should be addressed in the next release.
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality
Posted by Craig McClanahan <cr...@apache.org>.
On 4/26/06, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote:
>
> Stupid HTML email editor... ignore that shale stuff :)
Rats ... thought that was a very enjoyable Freudian slip :-).
Craig
/me is downloading the 1.3.2 build ...
Don Brown wrote:
> > The first Action 1 release since the recent reorganization, we have a
> > Struts Action Framework 1.3.2 build to evaluate for release quality.
> > The release plan is available on the wiki:
> >
> > http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsActionRelease132
> > <http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ShaleRelease102>
> >
> > the Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 test build has been completed and
> > deployed to
> >
> > http://svn.apache.org/dist/struts/action/v1.3.2
> > <http://svn.apache.org/dist/struts/shale/v1.0.2/>
> >
> > In my testing, I found the following issues:
> > 1. Struts faces example webapps both don't work
> > 2. Taglib integration tests don't work
> >
> > Otherwise, all the example applications worked correctly.
> >
> > Once you have had a chance to review this test build, please respond
> > with a vote on its quality:
> >
> > [ ] Alpha
> > [ ] Beta
> > [ ] General Availability (GA)
> >
> > We welcome votes from all community members, however, only the votes
> > of Struts PMC members are binding.
> >
> > My vote is for Beta quality, as there are no unreleased dependencies,
> > all the key example apps work correctly, and I've personally had the
> > 1.3.x code in production for over six months without any problems.
> > Only Beta because the docs need work and there are a few outstanding
> > bugs in JIRA that should be addressed in the next release.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality
Posted by Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org>.
Stupid HTML email editor... ignore that shale stuff :)
Don Brown wrote:
> The first Action 1 release since the recent reorganization, we have a
> Struts Action Framework 1.3.2 build to evaluate for release quality.
> The release plan is available on the wiki:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsActionRelease132
> <http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ShaleRelease102>
>
> the Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 test build has been completed and
> deployed to
>
> http://svn.apache.org/dist/struts/action/v1.3.2
> <http://svn.apache.org/dist/struts/shale/v1.0.2/>
>
> In my testing, I found the following issues:
> 1. Struts faces example webapps both don't work
> 2. Taglib integration tests don't work
>
> Otherwise, all the example applications worked correctly.
>
> Once you have had a chance to review this test build, please respond
> with a vote on its quality:
>
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>
> We welcome votes from all community members, however, only the votes
> of Struts PMC members are binding.
>
> My vote is for Beta quality, as there are no unreleased dependencies,
> all the key example apps work correctly, and I've personally had the
> 1.3.x code in production for over six months without any problems.
> Only Beta because the docs need work and there are a few outstanding
> bugs in JIRA that should be addressed in the next release.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality
Posted by James Mitchell <jm...@apache.org>.
+1 Beta -- Me too!
--
James Mitchell
On May 3, 2006, at 8:06 PM, Martin Cooper wrote:
> On 4/26/06, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote:
>>
>> The first Action 1 release since the recent reorganization, we have a
>> Struts Action Framework 1.3.2 build to evaluate for release quality.
>> The release plan is available on the wiki:
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsActionRelease132
>> <http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ShaleRelease102>
>>
>> the Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 test build has been completed and
>> deployed to
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/dist/struts/action/v1.3.2
>> <http://svn.apache.org/dist/struts/shale/v1.0.2/>
>>
>> In my testing, I found the following issues:
>> 1. Struts faces example webapps both don't work
>> 2. Taglib integration tests don't work
>>
>> Otherwise, all the example applications worked correctly.
>>
>> Once you have had a chance to review this test build, please respond
>> with a vote on its quality:
>>
>> [ ] Alpha
>> [X] Beta
>> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>
>
> Better late than never... (Me, I mean!)
>
> --
> Martin Cooper
>
>
> We welcome votes from all community members, however, only the votes
>> of Struts PMC members are binding.
>>
>> My vote is for Beta quality, as there are no unreleased dependencies,
>> all the key example apps work correctly, and I've personally had the
>> 1.3.x code in production for over six months without any
>> problems. Only
>> Beta because the docs need work and there are a few outstanding
>> bugs in
>> JIRA that should be addressed in the next release.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality
Posted by Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org>.
On 4/26/06, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote:
>
> The first Action 1 release since the recent reorganization, we have a
> Struts Action Framework 1.3.2 build to evaluate for release quality.
> The release plan is available on the wiki:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsActionRelease132
> <http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ShaleRelease102>
>
> the Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 test build has been completed and
> deployed to
>
> http://svn.apache.org/dist/struts/action/v1.3.2
> <http://svn.apache.org/dist/struts/shale/v1.0.2/>
>
> In my testing, I found the following issues:
> 1. Struts faces example webapps both don't work
> 2. Taglib integration tests don't work
>
> Otherwise, all the example applications worked correctly.
>
> Once you have had a chance to review this test build, please respond
> with a vote on its quality:
>
> [ ] Alpha
> [X] Beta
> [ ] General Availability (GA)
Better late than never... (Me, I mean!)
--
Martin Cooper
We welcome votes from all community members, however, only the votes
> of Struts PMC members are binding.
>
> My vote is for Beta quality, as there are no unreleased dependencies,
> all the key example apps work correctly, and I've personally had the
> 1.3.x code in production for over six months without any problems. Only
> Beta because the docs need work and there are a few outstanding bugs in
> JIRA that should be addressed in the next release.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality
Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
Sorry for the delay. I finally got 1.3.2 into test today.
+1 Beta
--
Wendy
On 4/26/06, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote:
> The first Action 1 release since the recent reorganization, we have a
> Struts Action Framework 1.3.2 build to evaluate for release quality.
> The release plan is available on the wiki:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsActionRelease132
>
> the Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 test build has been completed and
> deployed to
>
> http://svn.apache.org/dist/struts/action/v1.3.2
>
> In my testing, I found the following issues:
> 1. Struts faces example webapps both don't work
> 2. Taglib integration tests don't work
>
> Otherwise, all the example applications worked correctly.
>
> Once you have had a chance to review this test build, please respond
> with a vote on its quality:
>
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>
> We welcome votes from all community members, however, only the votes
> of Struts PMC members are binding.
>
> My vote is for Beta quality, as there are no unreleased dependencies,
> all the key example apps work correctly, and I've personally had the
> 1.3.x code in production for over six months without any problems. Only
> Beta because the docs need work and there are a few outstanding bugs in
> JIRA that should be addressed in the next release.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality
Posted by Michael Jouravlev <jm...@gmail.com>.
On 5/3/06, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/3/06, Michael Jouravlev <jm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Strike that. JIRA search works fine.
>
> Before or after I changed the summary text on your issue? :)
After. Aha! I noticed that something was different ;-)
Then maybe the search did not work properly indeed? I don't know, I
guess I was tired and entered something incorrectly.
> There's a new snapshot available if you want to get a head start on
> issues for 1.3.3 this weekend:
> http://cvs.apache.org/builds/struts/maven/trunk/nightly/struts-action/
Ok, thanks!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality
Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
On 5/3/06, Michael Jouravlev <jm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Strike that. JIRA search works fine.
Before or after I changed the summary text on your issue? :)
There's a new snapshot available if you want to get a head start on
issues for 1.3.3 this weekend:
http://cvs.apache.org/builds/struts/maven/trunk/nightly/struts-action/
(Ignore the struts-faces examples, I have one of them fixed here but
it's not committed yet.)
--
Wendy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality
Posted by Michael Jouravlev <jm...@gmail.com>.
On 5/3/06, Michael Jouravlev <jm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My issue is titled: "struts-cookbook-1.3.2: invalid path to source
> Java files in samples". Tried to search for "cookbook" in summary and
> description, nothing found. Tried to search for
> "struts-cookbook-1.3.2", found my issue. The "Text Search" section
> does not contain a checkbox to search for either entire word or for
> any substring, but apparently it looks for entire words.
Strike that. JIRA search works fine.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality
Posted by Michael Jouravlev <jm...@gmail.com>.
On 5/3/06, Michael Jouravlev <jm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/3/06, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 5/3/06, Michael Jouravlev <jm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > 2. The struts-cookbook-1.3.2 application allows to take a look at the
> > > Java source code of examples. The links refer to
> > > source.jsp?src=/WEB-INF/src/java/examples/simple/xxx.java, while the
> > > actual source code is located under /WEB-INF/src/examples/ , no "java"
> > > subdirectory.
> >
> > I see you've found JIRA already, but it's here: http://issues.apache.org/struts
> >
> > Where were you looking, so we can add/fix the links to JIRA for 1.3.3?
>
> http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-2855
My issue is titled: "struts-cookbook-1.3.2: invalid path to source
Java files in samples". Tried to search for "cookbook" in summary and
description, nothing found. Tried to search for
"struts-cookbook-1.3.2", found my issue. The "Text Search" section
does not contain a checkbox to search for either entire word or for
any substring, but apparently it looks for entire words.
Michael.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality
Posted by Michael Jouravlev <jm...@gmail.com>.
On 5/3/06, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/3/06, Michael Jouravlev <jm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > 2. The struts-cookbook-1.3.2 application allows to take a look at the
> > Java source code of examples. The links refer to
> > source.jsp?src=/WEB-INF/src/java/examples/simple/xxx.java, while the
> > actual source code is located under /WEB-INF/src/examples/ , no "java"
> > subdirectory.
>
> I see you've found JIRA already, but it's here: http://issues.apache.org/struts
>
> Where were you looking, so we can add/fix the links to JIRA for 1.3.3?
http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-2855
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality
Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
On 5/3/06, Michael Jouravlev <jm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2. The struts-cookbook-1.3.2 application allows to take a look at the
> Java source code of examples. The links refer to
> source.jsp?src=/WEB-INF/src/java/examples/simple/xxx.java, while the
> actual source code is located under /WEB-INF/src/examples/ , no "java"
> subdirectory.
I see you've found JIRA already, but it's here: http://issues.apache.org/struts
Where were you looking, so we can add/fix the links to JIRA for 1.3.3?
In addition to fixing the problem you reported, that example app needs
to be repackaged. It looks strange in the (as yet unpublished)
aggregated Javadoc to have an 'examples' package above all the
org.apache.struts code.
Thanks,
--
Wendy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality
Posted by Michael Jouravlev <jm...@gmail.com>.
On 5/3/06, Michael Jouravlev <jm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Am I supposed to use JIRA for SAF1 as well? Could not find
> the link to JIRA on wiki page.
Oops, should have clicked the link for outstanding bugs :-) Still, not
very clear how to get to JIRA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality
Posted by Michael Jouravlev <jm...@gmail.com>.
On 4/26/06, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote:
> The first Action 1 release since the recent reorganization, we have a
> Struts Action Framework 1.3.2 build to evaluate for release quality.
> The release plan is available on the wiki:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsActionRelease132
>
> the Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 test build has been completed and
> deployed to
>
> http://svn.apache.org/dist/struts/action/v1.3.2
>
> In my testing, I found the following issues:
> 1. Struts faces example webapps both don't work
> 2. Taglib integration tests don't work
>
> Otherwise, all the example applications worked correctly.
Just downloaded, unpacked and started:
1. I wanted to report an issue, but Bugzilla does not have 1.3.2 in
the "Version" listbox, so this will be the first issue :-)
2. The struts-cookbook-1.3.2 application allows to take a look at the
Java source code of examples. The links refer to
source.jsp?src=/WEB-INF/src/java/examples/simple/xxx.java, while the
actual source code is located under /WEB-INF/src/examples/ , no "java"
subdirectory.
This results in exception like this:
javax.servlet.jsp.JspException: No resource
/WEB-INF/src/java/examples/simple/SimpleActionForm.java
available in this application
I would file issue (2) directly to Bugzilla, if version 1.3.2 was
available to select. Oops, actually I would not. Cannot find "Struts"
under product names when creating a new bug. Is it just me, or am I
supposed to use JIRA for SAF1 as well? Could not find the link to JIRA
on wiki page.
Michael.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality
Posted by Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org>.
On 4/28/06, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote:
>
> I went through every open bug ticket last night, and out of them all,
> there only a handful outstanding, and none that are serious; again, why
> I think this is a beta release.
>
> Perhaps we need a better definition of quality, because to me, beta
> means there are some minor issues, but the code works, the examples
> work, and you could start using it in a development environment without
> problems.
That is exactly my definition of beta as well.
--
Martin Cooper
Don
>
> Ted Husted wrote:
> > +1 Alpha
> >
> > As Don mentioned, some of the documenation is patchy. There are things
> > like references to Bugzilla. The links to the "Components", like
> > Extras, need to be fleshed out, the "Core" link is useless, and we
> > need some introductory text for Taglibs.
> >
> > I might have some time to work on this Monday afternoon, if no one
> > beats me to it.
> >
> >> There are a few outstanding bugs in JIRA that should be addressed in
> >> the next release.
> >
> > Could you add the bugs you have in mind to the 1.3.2 release plan as
> > "known issues"? Or, start a 1.3.3 plan that itemizes these. There are
> > 28 open bugs in JIRA now, though I think some of these could be
> > reclassified. But at first glance, 28 is 28 too many for anything
> > except an Alpha :)
> >
> > -Ted.
> >
> > On 4/27/06, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote:
> >> The first Action 1 release since the recent reorganization, we have a
> >> Struts Action Framework 1.3.2 build to evaluate for release quality.
> >> The release plan is available on the wiki:
> >>
> >> http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsActionRelease132
> >> <http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ShaleRelease102>
> >>
> >> the Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 test build has been completed and
> >> deployed to
> >>
> >> http://svn.apache.org/dist/struts/action/v1.3.2
> >> <http://svn.apache.org/dist/struts/shale/v1.0.2/>
> >>
> >> In my testing, I found the following issues:
> >> 1. Struts faces example webapps both don't work
> >> 2. Taglib integration tests don't work
> >>
> >> Otherwise, all the example applications worked correctly.
> >>
> >> Once you have had a chance to review this test build, please respond
> >> with a vote on its quality:
> >>
> >> [ ] Alpha
> >> [ ] Beta
> >> [ ] General Availability (GA)
> >>
> >> We welcome votes from all community members, however, only the votes
> >> of Struts PMC members are binding.
> >>
> >> My vote is for Beta quality, as there are no unreleased dependencies,
> >> all the key example apps work correctly, and I've personally had the
> >> 1.3.x code in production for over six months without any
> problems. Only
> >> Beta because the docs need work and there are a few outstanding bugs in
> >> JIRA that should be addressed in the next release.
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > HTH, Ted.
> > ** http://www.husted.com/ted/blog/
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality
Posted by Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org>.
On 4/28/06, Ted Husted <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 4/28/06, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote:
> > I went through every open bug ticket last night, and out of them all,
> > there only a handful outstanding, and none that are serious; again, why
> > I think this is a beta release.
>
> I added a "Struts Action 1" filter to list all the open bugs against
> SAF1, which comes up with thirty issues. I agree that not all of these
> need to be handled by the 1.3.2 release plan, but it would be help to
> itemize the open tickets, so that we know what is not being handled
> and why.
>
>
> > Perhaps we need a better definition of quality, because to me, beta
> > means there are some minor issues, but the code works, the examples
> > work, and you could start using it in a development environment without
> > problems.
>
> To me, a Beta means that if it works for more people, we could upgrade
> it to GA.
No, that is a release candidate. Our Test Build is always a release
candidate, in effect, because since we don't vote until after it's built,
there is always a possibility that it could become GA. (Not counting the
cases where we know up front that it's not good enough, of course.)
--
Martin Cooper
The JIRA issues aside, I could never vote this release to GA since
> some of the documentation is already obsolete.
>
> But, that's OK. I'm not the only one with a vote, and no one can veto
> a release :)
>
> >
> > Don
> >
> > Ted Husted wrote:
> > > +1 Alpha
> > >
> > > As Don mentioned, some of the documenation is patchy. There are things
> > > like references to Bugzilla. The links to the "Components", like
> > > Extras, need to be fleshed out, the "Core" link is useless, and we
> > > need some introductory text for Taglibs.
> > >
> > > I might have some time to work on this Monday afternoon, if no one
> > > beats me to it.
> > >
> > >> There are a few outstanding bugs in JIRA that should be addressed in
> > >> the next release.
> > >
> > > Could you add the bugs you have in mind to the 1.3.2 release plan as
> > > "known issues"? Or, start a 1.3.3 plan that itemizes these. There are
> > > 28 open bugs in JIRA now, though I think some of these could be
> > > reclassified. But at first glance, 28 is 28 too many for anything
> > > except an Alpha :)
> > >
> > > -Ted.
> > >
> > > On 4/27/06, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote:
> > >> The first Action 1 release since the recent reorganization, we have a
> > >> Struts Action Framework 1.3.2 build to evaluate for release quality.
> > >> The release plan is available on the wiki:
> > >>
> > >> http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsActionRelease132
> > >> <http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ShaleRelease102>
> > >>
> > >> the Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 test build has been completed and
> > >> deployed to
> > >>
> > >> http://svn.apache.org/dist/struts/action/v1.3.2
> > >> <http://svn.apache.org/dist/struts/shale/v1.0.2/>
> > >>
> > >> In my testing, I found the following issues:
> > >> 1. Struts faces example webapps both don't work
> > >> 2. Taglib integration tests don't work
> > >>
> > >> Otherwise, all the example applications worked correctly.
> > >>
> > >> Once you have had a chance to review this test build, please respond
> > >> with a vote on its quality:
> > >>
> > >> [ ] Alpha
> > >> [ ] Beta
> > >> [ ] General Availability (GA)
> > >>
> > >> We welcome votes from all community members, however, only the votes
> > >> of Struts PMC members are binding.
> > >>
> > >> My vote is for Beta quality, as there are no unreleased dependencies,
> > >> all the key example apps work correctly, and I've personally had the
> > >> 1.3.x code in production for over six months without any
> problems. Only
> > >> Beta because the docs need work and there are a few outstanding bugs
> in
> > >> JIRA that should be addressed in the next release.
> > >>
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > HTH, Ted.
> > > ** http://www.husted.com/ted/blog/
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> HTH, Ted.
> ** http://www.husted.com/ted/blog/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality
Posted by Ted Husted <te...@gmail.com>.
On 4/28/06, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote:
> That makes sense, especially since we don't have an RC quality option.
> I wonder if we should add it, because there should be a way to indicate
> the code is pretty complete, stable, and free of major bugs, but at the
> same time, it isn't GA and is missing key ingredients like documentation
> and minor bug fixings.
Again, to me, a "Release Candidate" is a distribution that we think we
could vote onto GA without change, if wider testing does not uncover
any "showstoppers". It's a candidate for a GA release.
Sure, the binary might be "code complete" and "production ready" (or
not I haven't sorted through the thirty open issues), but that doesn't
make the distribution "ready for prime time".
Of course, the binaries in our builds are usually production ready.
Many people have been using the nightly build in production for six
months or a year. The difference between a build and release is that
we've included all the other "key ingredients" we need to turn an
entree into a meal. :)
-Ted.
>
> Don
>
> >
> > But, that's OK. I'm not the only one with a vote, and no one can veto
> > a release :)
> >
> >>
> >> Don
> >>
> >> Ted Husted wrote:
> >> > +1 Alpha
> >> >
> >> > As Don mentioned, some of the documenation is patchy. There are things
> >> > like references to Bugzilla. The links to the "Components", like
> >> > Extras, need to be fleshed out, the "Core" link is useless, and we
> >> > need some introductory text for Taglibs.
> >> >
> >> > I might have some time to work on this Monday afternoon, if no one
> >> > beats me to it.
> >> >
> >> >> There are a few outstanding bugs in JIRA that should be addressed in
> >> >> the next release.
> >> >
> >> > Could you add the bugs you have in mind to the 1.3.2 release plan as
> >> > "known issues"? Or, start a 1.3.3 plan that itemizes these. There are
> >> > 28 open bugs in JIRA now, though I think some of these could be
> >> > reclassified. But at first glance, 28 is 28 too many for anything
> >> > except an Alpha :)
> >> >
> >> > -Ted.
> >> >
> >> > On 4/27/06, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote:
> >> >> The first Action 1 release since the recent reorganization, we have a
> >> >> Struts Action Framework 1.3.2 build to evaluate for release quality.
> >> >> The release plan is available on the wiki:
> >> >>
> >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsActionRelease132
> >> >> <http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ShaleRelease102>
> >> >>
> >> >> the Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 test build has been completed and
> >> >> deployed to
> >> >>
> >> >> http://svn.apache.org/dist/struts/action/v1.3.2
> >> >> <http://svn.apache.org/dist/struts/shale/v1.0.2/>
> >> >>
> >> >> In my testing, I found the following issues:
> >> >> 1. Struts faces example webapps both don't work
> >> >> 2. Taglib integration tests don't work
> >> >>
> >> >> Otherwise, all the example applications worked correctly.
> >> >>
> >> >> Once you have had a chance to review this test build, please respond
> >> >> with a vote on its quality:
> >> >>
> >> >> [ ] Alpha
> >> >> [ ] Beta
> >> >> [ ] General Availability (GA)
> >> >>
> >> >> We welcome votes from all community members, however, only the votes
> >> >> of Struts PMC members are binding.
> >> >>
> >> >> My vote is for Beta quality, as there are no unreleased dependencies,
> >> >> all the key example apps work correctly, and I've personally had the
> >> >> 1.3.x code in production for over six months without any
> >> problems. Only
> >> >> Beta because the docs need work and there are a few outstanding
> >> bugs in
> >> >> JIRA that should be addressed in the next release.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality
Posted by Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org>.
Ted Husted wrote:
> On 4/28/06, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote:
>> I went through every open bug ticket last night, and out of them all,
>> there only a handful outstanding, and none that are serious; again, why
>> I think this is a beta release.
>
> I added a "Struts Action 1" filter to list all the open bugs against
> SAF1, which comes up with thirty issues. I agree that not all of these
> need to be handled by the 1.3.2 release plan, but it would be help to
> itemize the open tickets, so that we know what is not being handled
> and why.
>
>
>> Perhaps we need a better definition of quality, because to me, beta
>> means there are some minor issues, but the code works, the examples
>> work, and you could start using it in a development environment without
>> problems.
>
> To me, a Beta means that if it works for more people, we could upgrade
> it to GA.
>
> The JIRA issues aside, I could never vote this release to GA since
> some of the documentation is already obsolete.
That makes sense, especially since we don't have an RC quality option.
I wonder if we should add it, because there should be a way to indicate
the code is pretty complete, stable, and free of major bugs, but at the
same time, it isn't GA and is missing key ingredients like documentation
and minor bug fixings.
Don
>
> But, that's OK. I'm not the only one with a vote, and no one can veto
> a release :)
>
>>
>> Don
>>
>> Ted Husted wrote:
>> > +1 Alpha
>> >
>> > As Don mentioned, some of the documenation is patchy. There are things
>> > like references to Bugzilla. The links to the "Components", like
>> > Extras, need to be fleshed out, the "Core" link is useless, and we
>> > need some introductory text for Taglibs.
>> >
>> > I might have some time to work on this Monday afternoon, if no one
>> > beats me to it.
>> >
>> >> There are a few outstanding bugs in JIRA that should be addressed in
>> >> the next release.
>> >
>> > Could you add the bugs you have in mind to the 1.3.2 release plan as
>> > "known issues"? Or, start a 1.3.3 plan that itemizes these. There are
>> > 28 open bugs in JIRA now, though I think some of these could be
>> > reclassified. But at first glance, 28 is 28 too many for anything
>> > except an Alpha :)
>> >
>> > -Ted.
>> >
>> > On 4/27/06, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote:
>> >> The first Action 1 release since the recent reorganization, we have a
>> >> Struts Action Framework 1.3.2 build to evaluate for release quality.
>> >> The release plan is available on the wiki:
>> >>
>> >> http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsActionRelease132
>> >> <http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ShaleRelease102>
>> >>
>> >> the Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 test build has been completed and
>> >> deployed to
>> >>
>> >> http://svn.apache.org/dist/struts/action/v1.3.2
>> >> <http://svn.apache.org/dist/struts/shale/v1.0.2/>
>> >>
>> >> In my testing, I found the following issues:
>> >> 1. Struts faces example webapps both don't work
>> >> 2. Taglib integration tests don't work
>> >>
>> >> Otherwise, all the example applications worked correctly.
>> >>
>> >> Once you have had a chance to review this test build, please respond
>> >> with a vote on its quality:
>> >>
>> >> [ ] Alpha
>> >> [ ] Beta
>> >> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>> >>
>> >> We welcome votes from all community members, however, only the votes
>> >> of Struts PMC members are binding.
>> >>
>> >> My vote is for Beta quality, as there are no unreleased dependencies,
>> >> all the key example apps work correctly, and I've personally had the
>> >> 1.3.x code in production for over six months without any
>> problems. Only
>> >> Beta because the docs need work and there are a few outstanding
>> bugs in
>> >> JIRA that should be addressed in the next release.
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > HTH, Ted.
>> > ** http://www.husted.com/ted/blog/
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> HTH, Ted.
> ** http://www.husted.com/ted/blog/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality
Posted by Ted Husted <te...@gmail.com>.
On 4/28/06, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote:
> I went through every open bug ticket last night, and out of them all,
> there only a handful outstanding, and none that are serious; again, why
> I think this is a beta release.
I added a "Struts Action 1" filter to list all the open bugs against
SAF1, which comes up with thirty issues. I agree that not all of these
need to be handled by the 1.3.2 release plan, but it would be help to
itemize the open tickets, so that we know what is not being handled
and why.
> Perhaps we need a better definition of quality, because to me, beta
> means there are some minor issues, but the code works, the examples
> work, and you could start using it in a development environment without
> problems.
To me, a Beta means that if it works for more people, we could upgrade
it to GA.
The JIRA issues aside, I could never vote this release to GA since
some of the documentation is already obsolete.
But, that's OK. I'm not the only one with a vote, and no one can veto
a release :)
>
> Don
>
> Ted Husted wrote:
> > +1 Alpha
> >
> > As Don mentioned, some of the documenation is patchy. There are things
> > like references to Bugzilla. The links to the "Components", like
> > Extras, need to be fleshed out, the "Core" link is useless, and we
> > need some introductory text for Taglibs.
> >
> > I might have some time to work on this Monday afternoon, if no one
> > beats me to it.
> >
> >> There are a few outstanding bugs in JIRA that should be addressed in
> >> the next release.
> >
> > Could you add the bugs you have in mind to the 1.3.2 release plan as
> > "known issues"? Or, start a 1.3.3 plan that itemizes these. There are
> > 28 open bugs in JIRA now, though I think some of these could be
> > reclassified. But at first glance, 28 is 28 too many for anything
> > except an Alpha :)
> >
> > -Ted.
> >
> > On 4/27/06, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote:
> >> The first Action 1 release since the recent reorganization, we have a
> >> Struts Action Framework 1.3.2 build to evaluate for release quality.
> >> The release plan is available on the wiki:
> >>
> >> http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsActionRelease132
> >> <http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ShaleRelease102>
> >>
> >> the Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 test build has been completed and
> >> deployed to
> >>
> >> http://svn.apache.org/dist/struts/action/v1.3.2
> >> <http://svn.apache.org/dist/struts/shale/v1.0.2/>
> >>
> >> In my testing, I found the following issues:
> >> 1. Struts faces example webapps both don't work
> >> 2. Taglib integration tests don't work
> >>
> >> Otherwise, all the example applications worked correctly.
> >>
> >> Once you have had a chance to review this test build, please respond
> >> with a vote on its quality:
> >>
> >> [ ] Alpha
> >> [ ] Beta
> >> [ ] General Availability (GA)
> >>
> >> We welcome votes from all community members, however, only the votes
> >> of Struts PMC members are binding.
> >>
> >> My vote is for Beta quality, as there are no unreleased dependencies,
> >> all the key example apps work correctly, and I've personally had the
> >> 1.3.x code in production for over six months without any problems. Only
> >> Beta because the docs need work and there are a few outstanding bugs in
> >> JIRA that should be addressed in the next release.
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > HTH, Ted.
> > ** http://www.husted.com/ted/blog/
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
--
HTH, Ted.
** http://www.husted.com/ted/blog/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality
Posted by Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org>.
I went through every open bug ticket last night, and out of them all,
there only a handful outstanding, and none that are serious; again, why
I think this is a beta release.
Perhaps we need a better definition of quality, because to me, beta
means there are some minor issues, but the code works, the examples
work, and you could start using it in a development environment without
problems.
Don
Ted Husted wrote:
> +1 Alpha
>
> As Don mentioned, some of the documenation is patchy. There are things
> like references to Bugzilla. The links to the "Components", like
> Extras, need to be fleshed out, the "Core" link is useless, and we
> need some introductory text for Taglibs.
>
> I might have some time to work on this Monday afternoon, if no one
> beats me to it.
>
>> There are a few outstanding bugs in JIRA that should be addressed in
>> the next release.
>
> Could you add the bugs you have in mind to the 1.3.2 release plan as
> "known issues"? Or, start a 1.3.3 plan that itemizes these. There are
> 28 open bugs in JIRA now, though I think some of these could be
> reclassified. But at first glance, 28 is 28 too many for anything
> except an Alpha :)
>
> -Ted.
>
> On 4/27/06, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote:
>> The first Action 1 release since the recent reorganization, we have a
>> Struts Action Framework 1.3.2 build to evaluate for release quality.
>> The release plan is available on the wiki:
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsActionRelease132
>> <http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ShaleRelease102>
>>
>> the Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 test build has been completed and
>> deployed to
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/dist/struts/action/v1.3.2
>> <http://svn.apache.org/dist/struts/shale/v1.0.2/>
>>
>> In my testing, I found the following issues:
>> 1. Struts faces example webapps both don't work
>> 2. Taglib integration tests don't work
>>
>> Otherwise, all the example applications worked correctly.
>>
>> Once you have had a chance to review this test build, please respond
>> with a vote on its quality:
>>
>> [ ] Alpha
>> [ ] Beta
>> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>>
>> We welcome votes from all community members, however, only the votes
>> of Struts PMC members are binding.
>>
>> My vote is for Beta quality, as there are no unreleased dependencies,
>> all the key example apps work correctly, and I've personally had the
>> 1.3.x code in production for over six months without any problems. Only
>> Beta because the docs need work and there are a few outstanding bugs in
>> JIRA that should be addressed in the next release.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> HTH, Ted.
> ** http://www.husted.com/ted/blog/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality
Posted by Ted Husted <te...@gmail.com>.
On 5/3/06, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/28/06, Ted Husted <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > There are things like references to Bugzilla.
>
> Do you remember where?
The nightly build looks to be fixed now. The references to Bugzilla
have now been replaced with references to JIRA.
> Help with the site and with the JIRA issues is appreciated, if anyone
> has extra time.
I'm in the middle of updating the Action2 wiki right now, and I won't
be much help here, I'm afraid.
-Ted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality
Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
On 4/28/06, Ted Husted <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There are things like references to Bugzilla.
Do you remember where? I searched across struts-action and only found
bugzilla links on the old release notes pages. The Struts Faces index
page had a typo and wasn't building, so the old version (which did
have a bugzilla link) was online.
> The links to the "Components", like
> Extras, need to be fleshed out, the "Core" link is useless, and we
> need some introductory text for Taglibs.
I removed the Core link, though it was the only way to get to its reports:
http://struts.apache.org/struts-action/struts-core/maven-reports.html
Eventually I think Maven 2 will be able to aggregate all of the
reports. Until then, we can keep a placeholder page for each report,
with links to the components, such as:
http://struts.apache.org/struts-action/checkstyle.html
> I might have some time to work on this Monday afternoon, if no one
> beats me to it.
Help with the site and with the JIRA issues is appreciated, if anyone
has extra time.
Thanks,
Wendy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality
Posted by Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org>.
James Mitchell wrote:
> Should we move the ToDo items from the bottom of StrutsMavenMaintenance
> wiki page to subtasks of a JIRA ticket?
Absolutely! We have an infrastructure component in the Action 1 project
just for these types of issues. JIRA helps by collecting what needs to
be done, any comments on it, and who is working on it. WebWork used it
a lot to even when the solution is being actively developed, which I
think is a great idea for those longer tasks.
Don
>
> If so, we could also add the tasks you mentioned below.
>
> I'd like to help, but I'm not 100% sure about what all we want done, in
> what order, and by whom. Having things spread out between the wiki,
> jira, and the mailing list only seems to compound the problem.
>
> I am encouraged though, as activity has really picked up lately. Let's
> keep this ball rolling!
>
>
> --
> James Mitchell
>
>
>
>
> On Apr 28, 2006, at 7:24 AM, Ted Husted wrote:
>
>> +1 Alpha
>>
>> As Don mentioned, some of the documenation is patchy. There are things
>> like references to Bugzilla. The links to the "Components", like
>> Extras, need to be fleshed out, the "Core" link is useless, and we
>> need some introductory text for Taglibs.
>>
>> I might have some time to work on this Monday afternoon, if no one
>> beats me to it.
>>
>>> There are a few outstanding bugs in JIRA that should be addressed in
>>> the next release.
>>
>> Could you add the bugs you have in mind to the 1.3.2 release plan as
>> "known issues"? Or, start a 1.3.3 plan that itemizes these. There are
>> 28 open bugs in JIRA now, though I think some of these could be
>> reclassified. But at first glance, 28 is 28 too many for anything
>> except an Alpha :)
>>
>> -Ted.
>>
>> On 4/27/06, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote:
>>> The first Action 1 release since the recent reorganization, we have a
>>> Struts Action Framework 1.3.2 build to evaluate for release quality.
>>> The release plan is available on the wiki:
>>>
>>> http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsActionRelease132
>>> <http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ShaleRelease102>
>>>
>>> the Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 test build has been completed and
>>> deployed to
>>>
>>> http://svn.apache.org/dist/struts/action/v1.3.2
>>> <http://svn.apache.org/dist/struts/shale/v1.0.2/>
>>>
>>> In my testing, I found the following issues:
>>> 1. Struts faces example webapps both don't work
>>> 2. Taglib integration tests don't work
>>>
>>> Otherwise, all the example applications worked correctly.
>>>
>>> Once you have had a chance to review this test build, please respond
>>> with a vote on its quality:
>>>
>>> [ ] Alpha
>>> [ ] Beta
>>> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>>>
>>> We welcome votes from all community members, however, only the votes
>>> of Struts PMC members are binding.
>>>
>>> My vote is for Beta quality, as there are no unreleased dependencies,
>>> all the key example apps work correctly, and I've personally had the
>>> 1.3.x code in production for over six months without any problems. Only
>>> Beta because the docs need work and there are a few outstanding bugs in
>>> JIRA that should be addressed in the next release.
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> HTH, Ted.
>> ** http://www.husted.com/ted/blog/
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality
Posted by James Mitchell <jm...@apache.org>.
Should we move the ToDo items from the bottom of
StrutsMavenMaintenance wiki page to subtasks of a JIRA ticket?
If so, we could also add the tasks you mentioned below.
I'd like to help, but I'm not 100% sure about what all we want done,
in what order, and by whom. Having things spread out between the
wiki, jira, and the mailing list only seems to compound the problem.
I am encouraged though, as activity has really picked up lately.
Let's keep this ball rolling!
--
James Mitchell
On Apr 28, 2006, at 7:24 AM, Ted Husted wrote:
> +1 Alpha
>
> As Don mentioned, some of the documenation is patchy. There are things
> like references to Bugzilla. The links to the "Components", like
> Extras, need to be fleshed out, the "Core" link is useless, and we
> need some introductory text for Taglibs.
>
> I might have some time to work on this Monday afternoon, if no one
> beats me to it.
>
>> There are a few outstanding bugs in JIRA that should be addressed
>> in the next release.
>
> Could you add the bugs you have in mind to the 1.3.2 release plan as
> "known issues"? Or, start a 1.3.3 plan that itemizes these. There are
> 28 open bugs in JIRA now, though I think some of these could be
> reclassified. But at first glance, 28 is 28 too many for anything
> except an Alpha :)
>
> -Ted.
>
> On 4/27/06, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote:
>> The first Action 1 release since the recent reorganization, we have a
>> Struts Action Framework 1.3.2 build to evaluate for release quality.
>> The release plan is available on the wiki:
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsActionRelease132
>> <http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ShaleRelease102>
>>
>> the Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 test build has been completed and
>> deployed to
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/dist/struts/action/v1.3.2
>> <http://svn.apache.org/dist/struts/shale/v1.0.2/>
>>
>> In my testing, I found the following issues:
>> 1. Struts faces example webapps both don't work
>> 2. Taglib integration tests don't work
>>
>> Otherwise, all the example applications worked correctly.
>>
>> Once you have had a chance to review this test build, please respond
>> with a vote on its quality:
>>
>> [ ] Alpha
>> [ ] Beta
>> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>>
>> We welcome votes from all community members, however, only the votes
>> of Struts PMC members are binding.
>>
>> My vote is for Beta quality, as there are no unreleased dependencies,
>> all the key example apps work correctly, and I've personally had the
>> 1.3.x code in production for over six months without any
>> problems. Only
>> Beta because the docs need work and there are a few outstanding
>> bugs in
>> JIRA that should be addressed in the next release.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> HTH, Ted.
> ** http://www.husted.com/ted/blog/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 Quality
Posted by Ted Husted <te...@gmail.com>.
+1 Alpha
As Don mentioned, some of the documenation is patchy. There are things
like references to Bugzilla. The links to the "Components", like
Extras, need to be fleshed out, the "Core" link is useless, and we
need some introductory text for Taglibs.
I might have some time to work on this Monday afternoon, if no one
beats me to it.
> There are a few outstanding bugs in JIRA that should be addressed in the next release.
Could you add the bugs you have in mind to the 1.3.2 release plan as
"known issues"? Or, start a 1.3.3 plan that itemizes these. There are
28 open bugs in JIRA now, though I think some of these could be
reclassified. But at first glance, 28 is 28 too many for anything
except an Alpha :)
-Ted.
On 4/27/06, Don Brown <mr...@twdata.org> wrote:
> The first Action 1 release since the recent reorganization, we have a
> Struts Action Framework 1.3.2 build to evaluate for release quality.
> The release plan is available on the wiki:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsActionRelease132
> <http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ShaleRelease102>
>
> the Struts Action Framework v1.3.2 test build has been completed and
> deployed to
>
> http://svn.apache.org/dist/struts/action/v1.3.2
> <http://svn.apache.org/dist/struts/shale/v1.0.2/>
>
> In my testing, I found the following issues:
> 1. Struts faces example webapps both don't work
> 2. Taglib integration tests don't work
>
> Otherwise, all the example applications worked correctly.
>
> Once you have had a chance to review this test build, please respond
> with a vote on its quality:
>
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>
> We welcome votes from all community members, however, only the votes
> of Struts PMC members are binding.
>
> My vote is for Beta quality, as there are no unreleased dependencies,
> all the key example apps work correctly, and I've personally had the
> 1.3.x code in production for over six months without any problems. Only
> Beta because the docs need work and there are a few outstanding bugs in
> JIRA that should be addressed in the next release.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
--
HTH, Ted.
** http://www.husted.com/ted/blog/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org