You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@felix.apache.org by Chetan Mehrotra <ch...@gmail.com> on 2014/03/05 05:46:05 UTC
Any plans to make PojoSR part of Apache Felix
Hi,
<<Apologies for cross posting but as the subject is of common interest
to both group sending it to both groups>>
In Apache Jackrabbit Oak [1] we have inbuilt support for OSGi based
deployments. To reuse the logic for non OSGi env I was investigating
[2] PojoSR [3] and it looks pretty useful and most of the stuff works
out of the box without requiring any change.
Wanted to check if there were any thoughts on moving this project to
Apache Felix
Chetan Mehrotra
[1] http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/
[2] http://jackrabbit-oak.markmail.org/thread/7zpux64mj6vecwzf
[3] https://code.google.com/p/pojosr/
Re: Any plans to make PojoSR part of Apache Felix
Posted by Clement Escoffier <cl...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I’m using PojoSR regularly (especially to simplify OSGi testing). I would be also in favor on donating pojoSR to Felix. But Karl have to take the decision.
Clement
On 5 mars 2014, at 05:46, Chetan Mehrotra <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> <<Apologies for cross posting but as the subject is of common interest
> to both group sending it to both groups>>
>
> In Apache Jackrabbit Oak [1] we have inbuilt support for OSGi based
> deployments. To reuse the logic for non OSGi env I was investigating
> [2] PojoSR [3] and it looks pretty useful and most of the stuff works
> out of the box without requiring any change.
>
> Wanted to check if there were any thoughts on moving this project to
> Apache Felix
>
> Chetan Mehrotra
> [1] http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/
> [2] http://jackrabbit-oak.markmail.org/thread/7zpux64mj6vecwzf
> [3] https://code.google.com/p/pojosr/
Re: Any plans to make PojoSR part of Apache Felix
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@apache.org>.
I've started the IP clearance process, so the form should appear in
http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html soon.
Fwiw, I won't be available next week, so I'll resume the work after that.
Guillaume
2014-03-05 15:47 GMT+01:00 Guillaume Nodet <gn...@apache.org>:
> I've raise the legal question at
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-194 to make sure we don't
> miss anything.
>
> In the mean time, I'll start a formal vote to accept the donation.
>
>
> 2014-03-05 13:43 GMT+01:00 Karl Pauls <ka...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi Chetan,
>>
>>
>> im more than willing to have PojoSR move to Felix - provided you (or
>> somebody else) is willing to do the legwork. I guess we'll have to funnel
>> it through the incubator ip clearance, rename the packages, and cut a
>> release. If somebody volunteers to drive this then lets do it (and yes,
>> I'm
>> looking at you, Clement :-).
>>
>> Perspectively, it would be nice to really integrate it with the framework
>> - i.e., we should make it so that it gets the parts it needs from the
>> framework either directly from the framework subproject or factor out the
>> service registry and have framework and PojoSR depend on it. However, for
>> starters, just renaming what is there and worry about something like this
>> later is fine too.
>>
>> Btw., if so, we should maybe rename it - I'm pretty sure nobody is going
>> to
>> complain if we call it Apache Felix Connect :-).
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Karl
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Chetan Mehrotra <
>> chetan.mehrotra@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > <<Apologies for cross posting but as the subject is of common interest
>> > to both group sending it to both groups>>
>> >
>> > In Apache Jackrabbit Oak [1] we have inbuilt support for OSGi based
>> > deployments. To reuse the logic for non OSGi env I was investigating
>> > [2] PojoSR [3] and it looks pretty useful and most of the stuff works
>> > out of the box without requiring any change.
>> >
>> > Wanted to check if there were any thoughts on moving this project to
>> > Apache Felix
>> >
>> > Chetan Mehrotra
>> > [1] http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/
>> > [2] http://jackrabbit-oak.markmail.org/thread/7zpux64mj6vecwzf
>> > [3] https://code.google.com/p/pojosr/
>> >
>> > --
>> > Sie erhalten diese Nachricht, weil Sie Mitglied der Google Groups-Gruppe
>> "pojosr-discuss" sind.
>> > Um Ihr Abonnement für diese Gruppe zu beenden und keine E-Mails mehr von
>> dieser Gruppe zu erhalten, senden Sie eine E-Mail an
>> pojosr-discuss+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
>> > Weitere Optionen: https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Karl Pauls
>> karlpauls@gmail.com
>> http://twitter.com/karlpauls
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/karlpauls
>> https://profiles.google.com/karlpauls
>>
>
>
Re: Any plans to make PojoSR part of Apache Felix
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@apache.org>.
I've raise the legal question at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-194 to make sure we don't miss
anything.
In the mean time, I'll start a formal vote to accept the donation.
2014-03-05 13:43 GMT+01:00 Karl Pauls <ka...@gmail.com>:
> Hi Chetan,
>
> im more than willing to have PojoSR move to Felix - provided you (or
> somebody else) is willing to do the legwork. I guess we'll have to funnel
> it through the incubator ip clearance, rename the packages, and cut a
> release. If somebody volunteers to drive this then lets do it (and yes, I'm
> looking at you, Clement :-).
>
> Perspectively, it would be nice to really integrate it with the framework
> - i.e., we should make it so that it gets the parts it needs from the
> framework either directly from the framework subproject or factor out the
> service registry and have framework and PojoSR depend on it. However, for
> starters, just renaming what is there and worry about something like this
> later is fine too.
>
> Btw., if so, we should maybe rename it - I'm pretty sure nobody is going to
> complain if we call it Apache Felix Connect :-).
>
> regards,
>
> Karl
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Chetan Mehrotra <chetan.mehrotra@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > <<Apologies for cross posting but as the subject is of common interest
> > to both group sending it to both groups>>
> >
> > In Apache Jackrabbit Oak [1] we have inbuilt support for OSGi based
> > deployments. To reuse the logic for non OSGi env I was investigating
> > [2] PojoSR [3] and it looks pretty useful and most of the stuff works
> > out of the box without requiring any change.
> >
> > Wanted to check if there were any thoughts on moving this project to
> > Apache Felix
> >
> > Chetan Mehrotra
> > [1] http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/
> > [2] http://jackrabbit-oak.markmail.org/thread/7zpux64mj6vecwzf
> > [3] https://code.google.com/p/pojosr/
> >
> > --
> > Sie erhalten diese Nachricht, weil Sie Mitglied der Google Groups-Gruppe
> "pojosr-discuss" sind.
> > Um Ihr Abonnement für diese Gruppe zu beenden und keine E-Mails mehr von
> dieser Gruppe zu erhalten, senden Sie eine E-Mail an
> pojosr-discuss+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > Weitere Optionen: https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out
>
>
>
>
> --
> Karl Pauls
> karlpauls@gmail.com
> http://twitter.com/karlpauls
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/karlpauls
> https://profiles.google.com/karlpauls
>
Re: Any plans to make PojoSR part of Apache Felix
Posted by David Bosschaert <da...@gmail.com>.
I also think that moving PojoSR to Felix would be a great idea!
Cheers,
David
On 5 March 2014 12:43, Karl Pauls <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Chetan,
>
> im more than willing to have PojoSR move to Felix - provided you (or
> somebody else) is willing to do the legwork. I guess we'll have to funnel
> it through the incubator ip clearance, rename the packages, and cut a
> release. If somebody volunteers to drive this then lets do it (and yes, I'm
> looking at you, Clement :-).
>
> Perspectively, it would be nice to really integrate it with the framework
> - i.e., we should make it so that it gets the parts it needs from the
> framework either directly from the framework subproject or factor out the
> service registry and have framework and PojoSR depend on it. However, for
> starters, just renaming what is there and worry about something like this
> later is fine too.
>
> Btw., if so, we should maybe rename it - I'm pretty sure nobody is going to
> complain if we call it Apache Felix Connect :-).
>
> regards,
>
> Karl
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Chetan Mehrotra <ch...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> <<Apologies for cross posting but as the subject is of common interest
>> to both group sending it to both groups>>
>>
>> In Apache Jackrabbit Oak [1] we have inbuilt support for OSGi based
>> deployments. To reuse the logic for non OSGi env I was investigating
>> [2] PojoSR [3] and it looks pretty useful and most of the stuff works
>> out of the box without requiring any change.
>>
>> Wanted to check if there were any thoughts on moving this project to
>> Apache Felix
>>
>> Chetan Mehrotra
>> [1] http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/
>> [2] http://jackrabbit-oak.markmail.org/thread/7zpux64mj6vecwzf
>> [3] https://code.google.com/p/pojosr/
>>
>> --
>> Sie erhalten diese Nachricht, weil Sie Mitglied der Google Groups-Gruppe
> "pojosr-discuss" sind.
>> Um Ihr Abonnement für diese Gruppe zu beenden und keine E-Mails mehr von
> dieser Gruppe zu erhalten, senden Sie eine E-Mail an
> pojosr-discuss+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
>> Weitere Optionen: https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out
>
>
>
>
> --
> Karl Pauls
> karlpauls@gmail.com
> http://twitter.com/karlpauls
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/karlpauls
> https://profiles.google.com/karlpauls
Re: Any plans to make PojoSR part of Apache Felix
Posted by Raymond Auge <ra...@liferay.com>.
Great!
All this means I'm not crazy! ;)
Sincerely,
- Ray
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Marcel Offermans <
marcel.offermans@luminis.nl> wrote:
> On 06 Mar 2014, at 14:58 , David Bosschaert <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > It can be quite useful for people who like to use OSGi Services or
> > migrate to OSGi for other reasons, but don't want to handle the
> > modularity on the classloader level just yet.
>
> Other applications are to deploy OSGi bundles to environments that have no
> classloaders, or even no threads, such as Google AppEngine. We’ve also used
> it in the past to deploy to Android (which does have both, but you can run
> into some differences/restrictions of the Dalvik JVM that can be avoided
> this way).
>
> Greetings, Marcel
>
>
--
*Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile>
(@rotty3000)
Senior Software Architect
*Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com> (@Liferay)
Re: Any plans to make PojoSR part of Apache Felix
Posted by Marcel Offermans <ma...@luminis.nl>.
On 06 Mar 2014, at 14:58 , David Bosschaert <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It can be quite useful for people who like to use OSGi Services or
> migrate to OSGi for other reasons, but don't want to handle the
> modularity on the classloader level just yet.
Other applications are to deploy OSGi bundles to environments that have no classloaders, or even no threads, such as Google AppEngine. We’ve also used it in the past to deploy to Android (which does have both, but you can run into some differences/restrictions of the Dalvik JVM that can be avoided this way).
Greetings, Marcel
Re: Any plans to make PojoSR part of Apache Felix
Posted by David Bosschaert <da...@gmail.com>.
Hi Ray,
PojoSR is not services injection framework, it's a container much like
an OSGi Framework with the classloading bits left out ;) You should be
able to run DS/Blueprint on top of it, but the pure modularity on the
classloading level is gone.
It can be quite useful for people who like to use OSGi Services or
migrate to OSGi for other reasons, but don't want to handle the
modularity on the classloader level just yet.
Well, that's my understanding anyway ;)
Cheers,
David
On 6 March 2014 13:49, Raymond Auge <ra...@liferay.com> wrote:
> Sorry for my ignorance, but I have to ask!
>
> Can PojoSR be used 'within' osgi runtime as a peer to DS, Blueprint?
>
> I had previously assumed no, but a conversation with a colleague has me
> doubting that.
>
> - Ray
> On Mar 6, 2014 2:52 AM, "Peter Kriens" <pe...@aqute.biz> wrote:
>
>> Great name!!!
>>
>> Wonderful idea, it is still one of the least recognized jewels in the
>> toolbox to move to OSGi.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Peter Kriens
>>
>> On 5 mrt. 2014, at 13:43, Karl Pauls <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Chetan,
>> >
>> > im more than willing to have PojoSR move to Felix - provided you (or
>> > somebody else) is willing to do the legwork. I guess we'll have to funnel
>> > it through the incubator ip clearance, rename the packages, and cut a
>> > release. If somebody volunteers to drive this then lets do it (and yes,
>> I'm
>> > looking at you, Clement :-).
>> >
>> > Perspectively, it would be nice to really integrate it with the
>> framework
>> > - i.e., we should make it so that it gets the parts it needs from the
>> > framework either directly from the framework subproject or factor out the
>> > service registry and have framework and PojoSR depend on it. However, for
>> > starters, just renaming what is there and worry about something like this
>> > later is fine too.
>> >
>> > Btw., if so, we should maybe rename it - I'm pretty sure nobody is going
>> to
>> > complain if we call it Apache Felix Connect :-).
>> >
>> > regards,
>> >
>> > Karl
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Chetan Mehrotra <
>> chetan.mehrotra@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> <<Apologies for cross posting but as the subject is of common interest
>> >> to both group sending it to both groups>>
>> >>
>> >> In Apache Jackrabbit Oak [1] we have inbuilt support for OSGi based
>> >> deployments. To reuse the logic for non OSGi env I was investigating
>> >> [2] PojoSR [3] and it looks pretty useful and most of the stuff works
>> >> out of the box without requiring any change.
>> >>
>> >> Wanted to check if there were any thoughts on moving this project to
>> >> Apache Felix
>> >>
>> >> Chetan Mehrotra
>> >> [1] http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/
>> >> [2] http://jackrabbit-oak.markmail.org/thread/7zpux64mj6vecwzf
>> >> [3] https://code.google.com/p/pojosr/
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Sie erhalten diese Nachricht, weil Sie Mitglied der Google Groups-Gruppe
>> > "pojosr-discuss" sind.
>> >> Um Ihr Abonnement für diese Gruppe zu beenden und keine E-Mails mehr von
>> > dieser Gruppe zu erhalten, senden Sie eine E-Mail an
>> > pojosr-discuss+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
>> >> Weitere Optionen: https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Karl Pauls
>> > karlpauls@gmail.com
>> > http://twitter.com/karlpauls
>> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/karlpauls
>> > https://profiles.google.com/karlpauls
>>
>>
Re: Any plans to make PojoSR part of Apache Felix
Posted by Raymond Auge <ra...@liferay.com>.
Sorry for my ignorance, but I have to ask!
Can PojoSR be used 'within' osgi runtime as a peer to DS, Blueprint?
I had previously assumed no, but a conversation with a colleague has me
doubting that.
- Ray
On Mar 6, 2014 2:52 AM, "Peter Kriens" <pe...@aqute.biz> wrote:
> Great name!!!
>
> Wonderful idea, it is still one of the least recognized jewels in the
> toolbox to move to OSGi.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Peter Kriens
>
> On 5 mrt. 2014, at 13:43, Karl Pauls <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Chetan,
> >
> > im more than willing to have PojoSR move to Felix - provided you (or
> > somebody else) is willing to do the legwork. I guess we'll have to funnel
> > it through the incubator ip clearance, rename the packages, and cut a
> > release. If somebody volunteers to drive this then lets do it (and yes,
> I'm
> > looking at you, Clement :-).
> >
> > Perspectively, it would be nice to really integrate it with the
> framework
> > - i.e., we should make it so that it gets the parts it needs from the
> > framework either directly from the framework subproject or factor out the
> > service registry and have framework and PojoSR depend on it. However, for
> > starters, just renaming what is there and worry about something like this
> > later is fine too.
> >
> > Btw., if so, we should maybe rename it - I'm pretty sure nobody is going
> to
> > complain if we call it Apache Felix Connect :-).
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Karl
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Chetan Mehrotra <
> chetan.mehrotra@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> <<Apologies for cross posting but as the subject is of common interest
> >> to both group sending it to both groups>>
> >>
> >> In Apache Jackrabbit Oak [1] we have inbuilt support for OSGi based
> >> deployments. To reuse the logic for non OSGi env I was investigating
> >> [2] PojoSR [3] and it looks pretty useful and most of the stuff works
> >> out of the box without requiring any change.
> >>
> >> Wanted to check if there were any thoughts on moving this project to
> >> Apache Felix
> >>
> >> Chetan Mehrotra
> >> [1] http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/
> >> [2] http://jackrabbit-oak.markmail.org/thread/7zpux64mj6vecwzf
> >> [3] https://code.google.com/p/pojosr/
> >>
> >> --
> >> Sie erhalten diese Nachricht, weil Sie Mitglied der Google Groups-Gruppe
> > "pojosr-discuss" sind.
> >> Um Ihr Abonnement für diese Gruppe zu beenden und keine E-Mails mehr von
> > dieser Gruppe zu erhalten, senden Sie eine E-Mail an
> > pojosr-discuss+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> >> Weitere Optionen: https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Karl Pauls
> > karlpauls@gmail.com
> > http://twitter.com/karlpauls
> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/karlpauls
> > https://profiles.google.com/karlpauls
>
>
Re: Any plans to make PojoSR part of Apache Felix
Posted by Peter Kriens <pe...@aqute.biz>.
Great name!!!
Wonderful idea, it is still one of the least recognized jewels in the toolbox to move to OSGi.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
On 5 mrt. 2014, at 13:43, Karl Pauls <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Chetan,
>
> im more than willing to have PojoSR move to Felix - provided you (or
> somebody else) is willing to do the legwork. I guess we'll have to funnel
> it through the incubator ip clearance, rename the packages, and cut a
> release. If somebody volunteers to drive this then lets do it (and yes, I'm
> looking at you, Clement :-).
>
> Perspectively, it would be nice to really integrate it with the framework
> - i.e., we should make it so that it gets the parts it needs from the
> framework either directly from the framework subproject or factor out the
> service registry and have framework and PojoSR depend on it. However, for
> starters, just renaming what is there and worry about something like this
> later is fine too.
>
> Btw., if so, we should maybe rename it - I'm pretty sure nobody is going to
> complain if we call it Apache Felix Connect :-).
>
> regards,
>
> Karl
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Chetan Mehrotra <ch...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> <<Apologies for cross posting but as the subject is of common interest
>> to both group sending it to both groups>>
>>
>> In Apache Jackrabbit Oak [1] we have inbuilt support for OSGi based
>> deployments. To reuse the logic for non OSGi env I was investigating
>> [2] PojoSR [3] and it looks pretty useful and most of the stuff works
>> out of the box without requiring any change.
>>
>> Wanted to check if there were any thoughts on moving this project to
>> Apache Felix
>>
>> Chetan Mehrotra
>> [1] http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/
>> [2] http://jackrabbit-oak.markmail.org/thread/7zpux64mj6vecwzf
>> [3] https://code.google.com/p/pojosr/
>>
>> --
>> Sie erhalten diese Nachricht, weil Sie Mitglied der Google Groups-Gruppe
> "pojosr-discuss" sind.
>> Um Ihr Abonnement für diese Gruppe zu beenden und keine E-Mails mehr von
> dieser Gruppe zu erhalten, senden Sie eine E-Mail an
> pojosr-discuss+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
>> Weitere Optionen: https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out
>
>
>
>
> --
> Karl Pauls
> karlpauls@gmail.com
> http://twitter.com/karlpauls
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/karlpauls
> https://profiles.google.com/karlpauls
Re: Any plans to make PojoSR part of Apache Felix
Posted by Karl Pauls <ka...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Marcel Offermans <
marcel.offermans@luminis.eu> wrote:
> On 05 Mar 2014, at 14:55 pm, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > 2014-03-05 13:43 GMT+01:00 Karl Pauls <ka...@gmail.com>:
> > * we need a formal agreement from the contributors (karlpauls and
> AngelovdS
> > from the pojosr commit log) to give copyright to the ASF (a CLA would do
> it
> > afaik)
>
> For the record, Angelo van der Sijpt is also an Apache committer (in the
> ACE project) so both contributors already have an ICLA on file.
>
exactly.
regards,
Karl
> Greetings, Marcel
>
>
--
Karl Pauls
karlpauls@gmail.com
http://twitter.com/karlpauls
http://www.linkedin.com/in/karlpauls
https://profiles.google.com/karlpauls
Re: Any plans to make PojoSR part of Apache Felix
Posted by Marcel Offermans <ma...@luminis.eu>.
On 05 Mar 2014, at 14:55 pm, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@apache.org> wrote:
> 2014-03-05 13:43 GMT+01:00 Karl Pauls <ka...@gmail.com>:
> * we need a formal agreement from the contributors (karlpauls and AngelovdS
> from the pojosr commit log) to give copyright to the ASF (a CLA would do it
> afaik)
For the record, Angelo van der Sijpt is also an Apache committer (in the ACE project) so both contributors already have an ICLA on file.
Greetings, Marcel
Re: Any plans to make PojoSR part of Apache Felix
Posted by Karl Pauls <ka...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@apache.org> wrote:
I'm willing to help too if needed. I don't think we can use a software
> grant, unless the code is owned by an actual entity (is that the case ?).
> * we need a formal agreement from the contributors (karlpauls and
> AngelovdS
> from the pojosr commit log) to give copyright to the ASF (a CLA would do it
> afaik)
>
The code is not owned by an entity. I am a felix commiter and have a iCLA
on file so we should be good there. I'm sure there is no problem in getting
Angelo to agree (and he has an CLA already) - however, technically, the
pojosr code was all done by me so we don't really need his approval (Angelo
provided and worked on some of the examples which we don't really need).
> * start a vote to accept the donation
>
If all we need is me having an CLA and bringing in the code we can start
that asap I guess.
> * once we have that and a formal agreement from legal, we can move the
> code as is and do any kind of package renaming or release from inside Felix
Yup. I was assuming we do it once the code is in.
> > Btw., if so, we should maybe rename it - I'm pretty sure nobody is
> going to
> > complain if we call it Apache Felix Connect :-).
> >
>
> I don't think there is a *need* to rename, but it doesn't hurt ...
>
Yeah. I used the name initially because it was done for a different purpose
and I never quite liked it that much so if we can agree on calling it
connect that would be great :-).
regards,
Karl
>
> Guillaume
>
>
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Karl
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Chetan Mehrotra <
> chetan.mehrotra@gmail.com
> > >
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > <<Apologies for cross posting but as the subject is of common interest
> > > to both group sending it to both groups>>
> > >
> > > In Apache Jackrabbit Oak [1] we have inbuilt support for OSGi based
> > > deployments. To reuse the logic for non OSGi env I was investigating
> > > [2] PojoSR [3] and it looks pretty useful and most of the stuff works
> > > out of the box without requiring any change.
> > >
> > > Wanted to check if there were any thoughts on moving this project to
> > > Apache Felix
> > >
> > > Chetan Mehrotra
> > > [1] http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/
> > > [2] http://jackrabbit-oak.markmail.org/thread/7zpux64mj6vecwzf
> > > [3] https://code.google.com/p/pojosr/
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sie erhalten diese Nachricht, weil Sie Mitglied der Google
> Groups-Gruppe
> > "pojosr-discuss" sind.
> > > Um Ihr Abonnement für diese Gruppe zu beenden und keine E-Mails mehr
> von
> > dieser Gruppe zu erhalten, senden Sie eine E-Mail an
> > pojosr-discuss+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > > Weitere Optionen: https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Karl Pauls
> > karlpauls@gmail.com
> > http://twitter.com/karlpauls
> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/karlpauls
> > https://profiles.google.com/karlpauls
> >
>
--
Karl Pauls
karlpauls@gmail.com
http://twitter.com/karlpauls
http://www.linkedin.com/in/karlpauls
https://profiles.google.com/karlpauls
Re: Any plans to make PojoSR part of Apache Felix
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@apache.org>.
2014-03-05 13:43 GMT+01:00 Karl Pauls <ka...@gmail.com>:
> Hi Chetan,
>
> im more than willing to have PojoSR move to Felix - provided you (or
> somebody else) is willing to do the legwork. I guess we'll have to funnel
> it through the incubator ip clearance, rename the packages, and cut a
> release. If somebody volunteers to drive this then lets do it (and yes, I'm
> looking at you, Clement :-).
>
I'm willing to help too if needed. I don't think we can use a software
grant, unless the code is owned by an actual entity (is that the case ?).
* we need a formal agreement from the contributors (karlpauls and AngelovdS
from the pojosr commit log) to give copyright to the ASF (a CLA would do it
afaik)
* start a vote to accept the donation
* once we have that and a formal agreement from legal, we can move the
code as is and do any kind of package renaming or release from inside Felix
>
> Perspectively, it would be nice to really integrate it with the framework
> - i.e., we should make it so that it gets the parts it needs from the
> framework either directly from the framework subproject or factor out the
> service registry and have framework and PojoSR depend on it. However, for
> starters, just renaming what is there and worry about something like this
> later is fine too.
>
> Btw., if so, we should maybe rename it - I'm pretty sure nobody is going to
> complain if we call it Apache Felix Connect :-).
>
I don't think there is a *need* to rename, but it doesn't hurt ...
Guillaume
>
> regards,
>
> Karl
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Chetan Mehrotra <chetan.mehrotra@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > <<Apologies for cross posting but as the subject is of common interest
> > to both group sending it to both groups>>
> >
> > In Apache Jackrabbit Oak [1] we have inbuilt support for OSGi based
> > deployments. To reuse the logic for non OSGi env I was investigating
> > [2] PojoSR [3] and it looks pretty useful and most of the stuff works
> > out of the box without requiring any change.
> >
> > Wanted to check if there were any thoughts on moving this project to
> > Apache Felix
> >
> > Chetan Mehrotra
> > [1] http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/
> > [2] http://jackrabbit-oak.markmail.org/thread/7zpux64mj6vecwzf
> > [3] https://code.google.com/p/pojosr/
> >
> > --
> > Sie erhalten diese Nachricht, weil Sie Mitglied der Google Groups-Gruppe
> "pojosr-discuss" sind.
> > Um Ihr Abonnement für diese Gruppe zu beenden und keine E-Mails mehr von
> dieser Gruppe zu erhalten, senden Sie eine E-Mail an
> pojosr-discuss+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > Weitere Optionen: https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out
>
>
>
>
> --
> Karl Pauls
> karlpauls@gmail.com
> http://twitter.com/karlpauls
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/karlpauls
> https://profiles.google.com/karlpauls
>
Re: Any plans to make PojoSR part of Apache Felix
Posted by Chetan Mehrotra <ch...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Karl Pauls <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> im more than willing to have PojoSR move to Felix - provided you (or
> somebody else) is willing to do the legwork. I guess we'll have to funnel it
> through the incubator ip clearance, rename the packages, and cut a release.
> If somebody volunteers to drive this then lets do it (and yes, I'm looking
> at you, Clement :-).
Thanks for the prompt response Karl ! The project is really useful for us.
As for the work involved I am willing to volunteer wherever possible. LGTM!!
Chetan Mehrotra
Re: Any plans to make PojoSR part of Apache Felix
Posted by Karl Pauls <ka...@gmail.com>.
Hi Chetan,
im more than willing to have PojoSR move to Felix - provided you (or
somebody else) is willing to do the legwork. I guess we'll have to funnel
it through the incubator ip clearance, rename the packages, and cut a
release. If somebody volunteers to drive this then lets do it (and yes, I'm
looking at you, Clement :-).
Perspectively, it would be nice to really integrate it with the framework
- i.e., we should make it so that it gets the parts it needs from the
framework either directly from the framework subproject or factor out the
service registry and have framework and PojoSR depend on it. However, for
starters, just renaming what is there and worry about something like this
later is fine too.
Btw., if so, we should maybe rename it - I'm pretty sure nobody is going to
complain if we call it Apache Felix Connect :-).
regards,
Karl
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Chetan Mehrotra <ch...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> <<Apologies for cross posting but as the subject is of common interest
> to both group sending it to both groups>>
>
> In Apache Jackrabbit Oak [1] we have inbuilt support for OSGi based
> deployments. To reuse the logic for non OSGi env I was investigating
> [2] PojoSR [3] and it looks pretty useful and most of the stuff works
> out of the box without requiring any change.
>
> Wanted to check if there were any thoughts on moving this project to
> Apache Felix
>
> Chetan Mehrotra
> [1] http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/
> [2] http://jackrabbit-oak.markmail.org/thread/7zpux64mj6vecwzf
> [3] https://code.google.com/p/pojosr/
>
> --
> Sie erhalten diese Nachricht, weil Sie Mitglied der Google Groups-Gruppe
"pojosr-discuss" sind.
> Um Ihr Abonnement für diese Gruppe zu beenden und keine E-Mails mehr von
dieser Gruppe zu erhalten, senden Sie eine E-Mail an
pojosr-discuss+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> Weitere Optionen: https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out
--
Karl Pauls
karlpauls@gmail.com
http://twitter.com/karlpauls
http://www.linkedin.com/in/karlpauls
https://profiles.google.com/karlpauls