You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by Costin Manolache <co...@gmail.com> on 2008/07/17 16:37:54 UTC

Feedback on new startup class

Following Filip's example :-)

Please check http://people.apache.org/~costin/startup/ for a new class I
would like to add to tomcat(head), and an associated example/unit test. It
allows a jetty-like mode of programmatic loading/config of tomcat, without
any config file.

I know the 'official' way to run tomcat is using server.xml, and embedding
via JMX - but this mode is quite convenient in many cases.

Any problems with naming the class 'Tomcat' ? Easy to rename, but since this
will be directly used I like to keep it with this name.

If no strong objection - I'll submit it, and then you can make any
adjustments to the API (method names, etc) if you have other preferences.

Costin

Re: Feedback on new startup class

Posted by Yoav Shapira <yo...@apache.org>.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Costin Manolache <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please check http://people.apache.org/~costin/startup/ for a new class I
> would like to add to tomcat(head), and an associated example/unit test. It
> allows a jetty-like mode of programmatic loading/config of tomcat, without
> any config file.

I like it, +1.  I keep hearing from people that they want something like this.

Yoav

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org


Re: Feedback on new startup class

Posted by Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <de...@hanik.com>.
Costin Manolache wrote:
> Following Filip's example :-)
>
> Please check http://people.apache.org/~costin/startup/ for a new class I
> would like to add to tomcat(head), and an associated example/unit test. It
> allows a jetty-like mode of programmatic loading/config of tomcat, without
> any config file.
>
> I know the 'official' way to run tomcat is using server.xml, and embedding
> via JMX - but this mode is quite convenient in many cases.
>
> Any problems with naming the class 'Tomcat' ? Easy to rename, but since this
> will be directly used I like to keep it with this name.
>
> If no strong objection - I'll submit it, and then you can make any
> adjustments to the API (method names, etc) if you have other preferences.
>   
+1, I like it
and I like the name too,
Filip
> Costin
>
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG. 
> Version: 7.5.526 / Virus Database: 270.5.0/1556 - Release Date: 7/16/2008 4:56 PM
>   


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org