You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ofbiz.apache.org by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com> on 2009/04/18 18:48:17 UTC
Who is Using Apache OFBiz?
I think in this section we should show only active OFBiz users. Because these links are checked by possible future users and
examples mean a lot for them. So we should conscientiously take care of this section.
I had a look, and at r766356 I have commented out xinit since even http://www.xinit.com/ is now inactive
I think we should also
* remove ameniti since it's not longer demonstrating anything
* peacockalley use asp ?
* partnerhomes ?
* ulta : no access through the link => http://www.ulta.com/ulta/ (still OFBiz ?)
IMO, any new comer with a beautiful demonstration should also be considered. This does not mean to have more links than now
Thanks
Jacques
Re: Who is Using Apache OFBiz?
Posted by Ashish Vijaywargiya <vi...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Jacques :-)
--
Ashish
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.roux@les7arts.com> wrote:
> I have cleaned up things a bit :
>
> Commented out
> ameniti
> partnerhomes = php ?
> peacockalley = asp ?
> ulta still alive but now at http://www.ulta.com/ulta/ (still OFBiz ?)
> seems more jsp now. Should we comment out too ?
>
> I have added Entente Oya as "Products based on Apache OFBiz:" and C-libre
> as French provider
> I have also removed *** and put | so separate entries as suggested by
> Ashish
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <ja...@les7arts.com>
>
> I think the number of * hitstorically qualified the site quality, but I'm
>> not quite sure. I don't think it helps a lot and yes using a separator would
>> be better.
>> Waiting for comments before modifications...
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <vi...@gmail.com>
>>
>>> +1.
>>>
>>> This is little off topic but would like to put here.
>>> I would like to separate all the public site links by pipping symbol (|).
>>> This will help to easily identify each individual link.
>>>
>>> At present * is used along with the referring public sites (I don't know
>>> why) and that section looks bit messed up.
>>> Thoughts ?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ashish
>>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Tim Ruppert
>>> <ti...@hotwaxmedia.com>wrote:
>>>
>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Tim
>>>> --
>>>> Tim Ruppert
>>>> HotWax Media
>>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>>>
>>>> o:801.649.6594
>>>> f:801.649.6595
>>>>
>>>> ----- Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com> wrote:
>>>> > I think in this section we should show only active OFBiz users.
>>>> Because
>>>> these links are checked by possible future users and
>>>> > examples mean a lot for them. So we should conscientiously take care
>>>> of
>>>> this section.
>>>> >
>>>> > I had a look, and at r766356 I have commented out xinit since even
>>>> http://www.xinit.com/ is now inactive
>>>> >
>>>> > I think we should also
>>>> > * remove ameniti since it's not longer demonstrating anything
>>>> > * peacockalley use asp ?
>>>> > * partnerhomes ?
>>>> > * ulta : no access through the link => http://www.ulta.com/ulta/(still
>>>> OFBiz ?)
>>>> >
>>>> > IMO, any new comer with a beautiful demonstration should also be
>>>> considered. This does not mean to have more links than now
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks
>>>> >
>>>> > Jacques
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: Who is Using Apache OFBiz?
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
I have cleaned up things a bit :
Commented out
ameniti
partnerhomes = php ?
peacockalley = asp ?
ulta still alive but now at http://www.ulta.com/ulta/ (still OFBiz ?) seems more jsp now. Should we comment out too ?
I have added Entente Oya as "Products based on Apache OFBiz:" and C-libre as French provider
I have also removed *** and put | so separate entries as suggested by Ashish
Jacques
From: "Jacques Le Roux" <ja...@les7arts.com>
>I think the number of * hitstorically qualified the site quality, but I'm not quite sure. I don't think it helps a lot and yes
>using a separator would be better.
> Waiting for comments before modifications...
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <vi...@gmail.com>
>> +1.
>>
>> This is little off topic but would like to put here.
>> I would like to separate all the public site links by pipping symbol (|).
>> This will help to easily identify each individual link.
>>
>> At present * is used along with the referring public sites (I don't know
>> why) and that section looks bit messed up.
>> Thoughts ?
>>
>> --
>> Ashish
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Tim Ruppert
>> <ti...@hotwaxmedia.com>wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Tim
>>> --
>>> Tim Ruppert
>>> HotWax Media
>>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>>
>>> o:801.649.6594
>>> f:801.649.6595
>>>
>>> ----- Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com> wrote:
>>> > I think in this section we should show only active OFBiz users. Because
>>> these links are checked by possible future users and
>>> > examples mean a lot for them. So we should conscientiously take care of
>>> this section.
>>> >
>>> > I had a look, and at r766356 I have commented out xinit since even
>>> http://www.xinit.com/ is now inactive
>>> >
>>> > I think we should also
>>> > * remove ameniti since it's not longer demonstrating anything
>>> > * peacockalley use asp ?
>>> > * partnerhomes ?
>>> > * ulta : no access through the link => http://www.ulta.com/ulta/ (still
>>> OFBiz ?)
>>> >
>>> > IMO, any new comer with a beautiful demonstration should also be
>>> considered. This does not mean to have more links than now
>>> >
>>> > Thanks
>>> >
>>> > Jacques
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
Re: Who is Using Apache OFBiz?
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
I think the number of * hitstorically qualified the site quality, but I'm not quite sure. I don't think it helps a lot and yes using
a separator would be better.
Waiting for comments before modifications...
Jacques
From: "Ashish Vijaywargiya" <vi...@gmail.com>
> +1.
>
> This is little off topic but would like to put here.
> I would like to separate all the public site links by pipping symbol (|).
> This will help to easily identify each individual link.
>
> At present * is used along with the referring public sites (I don't know
> why) and that section looks bit messed up.
> Thoughts ?
>
> --
> Ashish
>
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Tim Ruppert
> <ti...@hotwaxmedia.com>wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Tim
>> --
>> Tim Ruppert
>> HotWax Media
>> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>>
>> o:801.649.6594
>> f:801.649.6595
>>
>> ----- Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com> wrote:
>> > I think in this section we should show only active OFBiz users. Because
>> these links are checked by possible future users and
>> > examples mean a lot for them. So we should conscientiously take care of
>> this section.
>> >
>> > I had a look, and at r766356 I have commented out xinit since even
>> http://www.xinit.com/ is now inactive
>> >
>> > I think we should also
>> > * remove ameniti since it's not longer demonstrating anything
>> > * peacockalley use asp ?
>> > * partnerhomes ?
>> > * ulta : no access through the link => http://www.ulta.com/ulta/ (still
>> OFBiz ?)
>> >
>> > IMO, any new comer with a beautiful demonstration should also be
>> considered. This does not mean to have more links than now
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> > Jacques
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
Re: Who is Using Apache OFBiz?
Posted by Ashish Vijaywargiya <vi...@gmail.com>.
+1.
This is little off topic but would like to put here.
I would like to separate all the public site links by pipping symbol (|).
This will help to easily identify each individual link.
At present * is used along with the referring public sites (I don't know
why) and that section looks bit messed up.
Thoughts ?
--
Ashish
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Tim Ruppert
<ti...@hotwaxmedia.com>wrote:
> +1
>
> Cheers,
> Tim
> --
> Tim Ruppert
> HotWax Media
> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
>
> o:801.649.6594
> f:801.649.6595
>
> ----- Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com> wrote:
> > I think in this section we should show only active OFBiz users. Because
> these links are checked by possible future users and
> > examples mean a lot for them. So we should conscientiously take care of
> this section.
> >
> > I had a look, and at r766356 I have commented out xinit since even
> http://www.xinit.com/ is now inactive
> >
> > I think we should also
> > * remove ameniti since it's not longer demonstrating anything
> > * peacockalley use asp ?
> > * partnerhomes ?
> > * ulta : no access through the link => http://www.ulta.com/ulta/ (still
> OFBiz ?)
> >
> > IMO, any new comer with a beautiful demonstration should also be
> considered. This does not mean to have more links than now
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Jacques
> >
> >
>
>
Re: Who is Using Apache OFBiz?
Posted by Tim Ruppert <ti...@hotwaxmedia.com>.
+1
Cheers,
Tim
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
----- Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com> wrote:
> I think in this section we should show only active OFBiz users. Because these links are checked by possible future users and
> examples mean a lot for them. So we should conscientiously take care of this section.
>
> I had a look, and at r766356 I have commented out xinit since even http://www.xinit.com/ is now inactive
>
> I think we should also
> * remove ameniti since it's not longer demonstrating anything
> * peacockalley use asp ?
> * partnerhomes ?
> * ulta : no access through the link => http://www.ulta.com/ulta/ (still OFBiz ?)
>
> IMO, any new comer with a beautiful demonstration should also be considered. This does not mean to have more links than now
>
> Thanks
>
> Jacques
>
>