You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ofbiz.apache.org by Jacopo Cappellato <ja...@hotwaxmedia.com> on 2012/05/26 08:48:10 UTC
Moving framework/jcr out of trunk and back to experimental branch
Here are some of the arguments for moving it out of trunk:
* it is still a work in progress, and not really used in OFBiz (afaik apart from some examples in the "example" component)
* the architecture and goals of this component that should replace or enhance the OFBiz "content" framework are still to be defined
* a lot of code under jcr component is clearly a work in progress and not ready for distribution: several files are missing the license header (have they been copied?)
* most of the jars in it are not listed under the LICENSE and NOTICE files
* logging from JCR are not properly formatted (and make me think that we do not have proper configuration in log4j for it)
* the development on it is staling
In summary, I think it was moved too early out of the experimental branch.
What do you think?
Kind regards,
Jacopo
Re: Moving framework/jcr out of trunk and back to experimental branch
Posted by Francis ANDRE <fr...@orange.fr>.
Hi
I am somewhat please to see the jcr component out of the main trunk.... this
will allow to get easily hot replacement of classes when running ofbiz under
debug mode in Eclipse without having to comment out the ofbiz-container.xml
Rgds
Le 31/05/2012 11:32, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
> Thank you Sascha,
>
> please see inline:
>
> On May 31, 2012, at 11:23 AM, Sascha Rodekamp wrote:
>
>> Hey guys,
>> sry for the late response.
>>
>> The new branch is for the further jackrabbit / ofbiz integration, to
>> keep the new experimental features away from the trunk until they work
>> reliable. I didn't remove the jcr code form the trunk because the
>> basic content repository functionality works and can be used.
>>
>> But it seems that not many people are interested in the JCR feature
>> (or haven't time to support it). So it's ok to me to remove it from
>> the trunk for now.
> My concern is not on the number of people interested that could grow over time but on the fact that the code in trunk is still too experimental/incomplete (I have mentioned a few issues earlier in this thread): this is why I think that at the moment the release branch would be a better place for it.
> If I will find time to remove it will be fine or you will loose any work? I mean, is the branch updated or do you have a good checkout of your code?
>
> Regards,
>
> Jacopo
>
>
>> Regards
>> Sascha
>>
>> 2012/5/26 Jacques Le Roux<ja...@les7arts.com>:
>>> +1
>>>
>>> I saw that Sascha did it already at
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1332706&view=rev
>>> I don't know why he did not remove from trunk...
>>>
>>> Sascha?
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>> From: "Jacopo Cappellato"<ja...@hotwaxmedia.com>
>>>
>>>> Here are some of the arguments for moving it out of trunk:
>>>> * it is still a work in progress, and not really used in OFBiz (afaik
>>>> apart from some examples in the "example" component)
>>>> * the architecture and goals of this component that should replace or
>>>> enhance the OFBiz "content" framework are still to be defined
>>>> * a lot of code under jcr component is clearly a work in progress and not
>>>> ready for distribution: several files are missing the license header (have
>>>> they been copied?)
>>>> * most of the jars in it are not listed under the LICENSE and NOTICE files
>>>> * logging from JCR are not properly formatted (and make me think that we
>>>> do not have proper configuration in log4j for it)
>>>> * the development on it is staling
>>>>
>>>> In summary, I think it was moved too early out of the experimental branch.
>>>> What do you think?
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>
>>>> Jacopo
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Sascha Rodekamp
>> Visit the new german OFBiz Blog: http://www.ofbiz.biz
>> Lynx-Consulting GmbH
>> Johanniskirchplatz 6
>> D-33615 Bielefeld
>> http://www.lynx.de
>
Re: Moving framework/jcr out of trunk and back to experimental branch
Posted by Sascha Rodekamp <sa...@googlemail.com>.
Hi Jacopo,
nope the branch is up to date so i don't lose anything if you remove it.
2012/5/31 Jacopo Cappellato <ja...@hotwaxmedia.com>:
> Thank you Sascha,
>
> please see inline:
>
> On May 31, 2012, at 11:23 AM, Sascha Rodekamp wrote:
>
>> Hey guys,
>> sry for the late response.
>>
>> The new branch is for the further jackrabbit / ofbiz integration, to
>> keep the new experimental features away from the trunk until they work
>> reliable. I didn't remove the jcr code form the trunk because the
>> basic content repository functionality works and can be used.
>>
>> But it seems that not many people are interested in the JCR feature
>> (or haven't time to support it). So it's ok to me to remove it from
>> the trunk for now.
>
> My concern is not on the number of people interested that could grow over time but on the fact that the code in trunk is still too experimental/incomplete (I have mentioned a few issues earlier in this thread): this is why I think that at the moment the release branch would be a better place for it.
> If I will find time to remove it will be fine or you will loose any work? I mean, is the branch updated or do you have a good checkout of your code?
>
> Regards,
>
> Jacopo
>
>
>>
>> Regards
>> Sascha
>>
>> 2012/5/26 Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>:
>>> +1
>>>
>>> I saw that Sascha did it already at
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1332706&view=rev
>>> I don't know why he did not remove from trunk...
>>>
>>> Sascha?
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>> From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <ja...@hotwaxmedia.com>
>>>
>>>> Here are some of the arguments for moving it out of trunk:
>>>> * it is still a work in progress, and not really used in OFBiz (afaik
>>>> apart from some examples in the "example" component)
>>>> * the architecture and goals of this component that should replace or
>>>> enhance the OFBiz "content" framework are still to be defined
>>>> * a lot of code under jcr component is clearly a work in progress and not
>>>> ready for distribution: several files are missing the license header (have
>>>> they been copied?)
>>>> * most of the jars in it are not listed under the LICENSE and NOTICE files
>>>> * logging from JCR are not properly formatted (and make me think that we
>>>> do not have proper configuration in log4j for it)
>>>> * the development on it is staling
>>>>
>>>> In summary, I think it was moved too early out of the experimental branch.
>>>> What do you think?
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>
>>>> Jacopo
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Sascha Rodekamp
>> Visit the new german OFBiz Blog: http://www.ofbiz.biz
>> Lynx-Consulting GmbH
>> Johanniskirchplatz 6
>> D-33615 Bielefeld
>> http://www.lynx.de
>
--
Sascha Rodekamp
Visit the new german OFBiz Blog: http://www.ofbiz.biz
Lynx-Consulting GmbH
Johanniskirchplatz 6
D-33615 Bielefeld
http://www.lynx.de
Re: Moving framework/jcr out of trunk and back to experimental branch
Posted by Jacopo Cappellato <ja...@hotwaxmedia.com>.
Thank you Sascha,
please see inline:
On May 31, 2012, at 11:23 AM, Sascha Rodekamp wrote:
> Hey guys,
> sry for the late response.
>
> The new branch is for the further jackrabbit / ofbiz integration, to
> keep the new experimental features away from the trunk until they work
> reliable. I didn't remove the jcr code form the trunk because the
> basic content repository functionality works and can be used.
>
> But it seems that not many people are interested in the JCR feature
> (or haven't time to support it). So it's ok to me to remove it from
> the trunk for now.
My concern is not on the number of people interested that could grow over time but on the fact that the code in trunk is still too experimental/incomplete (I have mentioned a few issues earlier in this thread): this is why I think that at the moment the release branch would be a better place for it.
If I will find time to remove it will be fine or you will loose any work? I mean, is the branch updated or do you have a good checkout of your code?
Regards,
Jacopo
>
> Regards
> Sascha
>
> 2012/5/26 Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>:
>> +1
>>
>> I saw that Sascha did it already at
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1332706&view=rev
>> I don't know why he did not remove from trunk...
>>
>> Sascha?
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <ja...@hotwaxmedia.com>
>>
>>> Here are some of the arguments for moving it out of trunk:
>>> * it is still a work in progress, and not really used in OFBiz (afaik
>>> apart from some examples in the "example" component)
>>> * the architecture and goals of this component that should replace or
>>> enhance the OFBiz "content" framework are still to be defined
>>> * a lot of code under jcr component is clearly a work in progress and not
>>> ready for distribution: several files are missing the license header (have
>>> they been copied?)
>>> * most of the jars in it are not listed under the LICENSE and NOTICE files
>>> * logging from JCR are not properly formatted (and make me think that we
>>> do not have proper configuration in log4j for it)
>>> * the development on it is staling
>>>
>>> In summary, I think it was moved too early out of the experimental branch.
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>>
>>> Jacopo
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Sascha Rodekamp
> Visit the new german OFBiz Blog: http://www.ofbiz.biz
> Lynx-Consulting GmbH
> Johanniskirchplatz 6
> D-33615 Bielefeld
> http://www.lynx.de
Re: Moving framework/jcr out of trunk and back to experimental branch
Posted by Sascha Rodekamp <sa...@googlemail.com>.
Hey guys,
sry for the late response.
The new branch is for the further jackrabbit / ofbiz integration, to
keep the new experimental features away from the trunk until they work
reliable. I didn't remove the jcr code form the trunk because the
basic content repository functionality works and can be used.
But it seems that not many people are interested in the JCR feature
(or haven't time to support it). So it's ok to me to remove it from
the trunk for now.
Regards
Sascha
2012/5/26 Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>:
> +1
>
> I saw that Sascha did it already at
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1332706&view=rev
> I don't know why he did not remove from trunk...
>
> Sascha?
>
> Jacques
>
> From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <ja...@hotwaxmedia.com>
>
>> Here are some of the arguments for moving it out of trunk:
>> * it is still a work in progress, and not really used in OFBiz (afaik
>> apart from some examples in the "example" component)
>> * the architecture and goals of this component that should replace or
>> enhance the OFBiz "content" framework are still to be defined
>> * a lot of code under jcr component is clearly a work in progress and not
>> ready for distribution: several files are missing the license header (have
>> they been copied?)
>> * most of the jars in it are not listed under the LICENSE and NOTICE files
>> * logging from JCR are not properly formatted (and make me think that we
>> do not have proper configuration in log4j for it)
>> * the development on it is staling
>>
>> In summary, I think it was moved too early out of the experimental branch.
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Jacopo
>>
>>
>
--
Sascha Rodekamp
Visit the new german OFBiz Blog: http://www.ofbiz.biz
Lynx-Consulting GmbH
Johanniskirchplatz 6
D-33615 Bielefeld
http://www.lynx.de
Re: Moving framework/jcr out of trunk and back to experimental branch
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
+1
I saw that Sascha did it already at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1332706&view=rev
I don't know why he did not remove from trunk...
Sascha?
Jacques
From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <ja...@hotwaxmedia.com>
> Here are some of the arguments for moving it out of trunk:
> * it is still a work in progress, and not really used in OFBiz (afaik apart from some examples in the "example" component)
> * the architecture and goals of this component that should replace or enhance the OFBiz "content" framework are still to be
> defined
> * a lot of code under jcr component is clearly a work in progress and not ready for distribution: several files are missing the
> license header (have they been copied?)
> * most of the jars in it are not listed under the LICENSE and NOTICE files
> * logging from JCR are not properly formatted (and make me think that we do not have proper configuration in log4j for it)
> * the development on it is staling
>
> In summary, I think it was moved too early out of the experimental branch.
> What do you think?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Jacopo
>
>