You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by Jaroslaw Cwiklik <ui...@gmail.com> on 2014/07/07 18:08:00 UTC
[VOTE] Release UIMA-AS 2.6.0 RC5
Hi,
the UIMA-AS 2.6.0 release candidate 5 is ready for voting.
The RC5 fixes:
1) Updated license+notice in binary release
The full list of bugs and features addressed by this RC can be viewed here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-3917?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%3D2.6.0AS%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC%2Cpriority%20DESC%2Ccreated%20DESC
The Maven artifacts are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1029/org/apache/uima/
The source and binary zip/tars are staged to:
http://people.apache.org/~cwiklik/releases/uima-as/2.6.0/RC5/
The Eclipse udpate site is:
http://people.apache.org/~cwiklik/releases/uima-as/2.6.0/RC5/eclipse-update-site/uima-as/
The SVN Tag Checkout:
svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uima-as/tags/uima-as-2.6.0
and for the Eclipse Update Site:
svn co
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uima-as/tags/uima-as-2.6.0/uima-as-eclipse-update-site
See: http://uima.apache.org/testing-builds.html for details on settting
this up.
Vote open for 72 hours.
Please vote to approve this release:
[ ] +1 Approve the release
[ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments)
[ ] 0 Don't care
- Jerry Cwiklik
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-AS 2.6.0 RC5
Posted by Jaroslaw Cwiklik <ui...@gmail.com>.
The vote passes with 3 +1 votes and no other votes received:
+1 votes received from:
- Marshall Schor
- Jaroslaw Cwiklik
- Burn Lewis
No other votes were received.
Thanks to all for taking the time to vote on the UIMA-AS release.
I will promote UIMA-AS artifacts to the Central Repo.
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Burn Lewis <bu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Also checked LICENSE & NOTICE in binary distribution and after the build
> from source.
>
> [ ] +1 Still approve the release
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Burn Lewis <bu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Checked source & binary signatures
> > Built from source
> > Built DUCC against that build
> > Installed DUCC and ran multiple UIMA-AS jobs using an http application
> > broker
> >
> > [ ] +1 Approve the release
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik <ui...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Built from source - OK
> >> Spot checked signatures - OK
> >> Spot checked LICENSE and NOTICE - OK
> >> Checked UIMA-AS API formatting - OK
> >> Installed Deployment Editor in eclipse - OK
> >> Tested sending CASes to a service using HTTP and TCP - OK
> >>
> >> [ ] +1 Approve the release
> >>
> >> Jerry
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > signatures OK
> >> > compare source-release with SVN -OK
> >> > eclipse plugin install - OK (in Eclipse 4.3.2)
> >> > build from sources after clearing local repo of uima-as artifacts: OK
> >> >
> >> > run extended tests: bumpy but ok eventually. I was running from
> >> Eclipse
> >> > and
> >> > my Eclipse doesn't quite do the right thing on building - it misses
> out
> >> > generating some xmlbean things (but build from command line with mvn
> >> > works).
> >> >
> >> > Also found a wrong version of Java compiler source / target in the
> poms,
> >> > need to
> >> > upgrade to parent-pom 10 (when that's released) and/or override in the
> >> > meanwhile. This doesn't seem to have affect the build, when built
> with
> >> a
> >> > Java 7
> >> > JVM (which the Manifests indicate the binary build artifacts were
> built
> >> > with) -
> >> > the tests and extended tests both ran fine. So I don't consider this
> a
> >> > blocker.
> >> >
> >> > issues fixed - OK
> >> >
> >> > Spot check many licenses & notices in Jars in the binary release
> >> > (especially the
> >> > new ones), and one in the Maven Artifacts in the staging repo: OK.
> >> >
> >> > check main license / notice in source and bin - OK
> >> >
> >> > Readme says "tested with Sun Java 6 on Windows XP" - probably needs
> >> > updating?
> >> > I think we mainly test with Java 7 and on Windows we use Windows 7 (or
> >> 8),
> >> > not
> >> > XP... I don't consider this a release blocker.
> >> >
> >> > Did the quickstart in the Readme - OK.
> >> >
> >> > [x] +1 OK to release.
> >> >
> >> > -Marshall Schor
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-AS 2.6.0 RC5
Posted by Burn Lewis <bu...@gmail.com>.
Also checked LICENSE & NOTICE in binary distribution and after the build
from source.
[ ] +1 Still approve the release
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Burn Lewis <bu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Checked source & binary signatures
> Built from source
> Built DUCC against that build
> Installed DUCC and ran multiple UIMA-AS jobs using an http application
> broker
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik <ui...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Built from source - OK
>> Spot checked signatures - OK
>> Spot checked LICENSE and NOTICE - OK
>> Checked UIMA-AS API formatting - OK
>> Installed Deployment Editor in eclipse - OK
>> Tested sending CASes to a service using HTTP and TCP - OK
>>
>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>
>> Jerry
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>>
>> > signatures OK
>> > compare source-release with SVN -OK
>> > eclipse plugin install - OK (in Eclipse 4.3.2)
>> > build from sources after clearing local repo of uima-as artifacts: OK
>> >
>> > run extended tests: bumpy but ok eventually. I was running from
>> Eclipse
>> > and
>> > my Eclipse doesn't quite do the right thing on building - it misses out
>> > generating some xmlbean things (but build from command line with mvn
>> > works).
>> >
>> > Also found a wrong version of Java compiler source / target in the poms,
>> > need to
>> > upgrade to parent-pom 10 (when that's released) and/or override in the
>> > meanwhile. This doesn't seem to have affect the build, when built with
>> a
>> > Java 7
>> > JVM (which the Manifests indicate the binary build artifacts were built
>> > with) -
>> > the tests and extended tests both ran fine. So I don't consider this a
>> > blocker.
>> >
>> > issues fixed - OK
>> >
>> > Spot check many licenses & notices in Jars in the binary release
>> > (especially the
>> > new ones), and one in the Maven Artifacts in the staging repo: OK.
>> >
>> > check main license / notice in source and bin - OK
>> >
>> > Readme says "tested with Sun Java 6 on Windows XP" - probably needs
>> > updating?
>> > I think we mainly test with Java 7 and on Windows we use Windows 7 (or
>> 8),
>> > not
>> > XP... I don't consider this a release blocker.
>> >
>> > Did the quickstart in the Readme - OK.
>> >
>> > [x] +1 OK to release.
>> >
>> > -Marshall Schor
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-AS 2.6.0 RC5
Posted by Burn Lewis <bu...@gmail.com>.
Checked source & binary signatures
Built from source
Built DUCC against that build
Installed DUCC and ran multiple UIMA-AS jobs using an http application
broker
[ ] +1 Approve the release
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik <ui...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Built from source - OK
> Spot checked signatures - OK
> Spot checked LICENSE and NOTICE - OK
> Checked UIMA-AS API formatting - OK
> Installed Deployment Editor in eclipse - OK
> Tested sending CASes to a service using HTTP and TCP - OK
>
> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>
> Jerry
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>
> > signatures OK
> > compare source-release with SVN -OK
> > eclipse plugin install - OK (in Eclipse 4.3.2)
> > build from sources after clearing local repo of uima-as artifacts: OK
> >
> > run extended tests: bumpy but ok eventually. I was running from
> Eclipse
> > and
> > my Eclipse doesn't quite do the right thing on building - it misses out
> > generating some xmlbean things (but build from command line with mvn
> > works).
> >
> > Also found a wrong version of Java compiler source / target in the poms,
> > need to
> > upgrade to parent-pom 10 (when that's released) and/or override in the
> > meanwhile. This doesn't seem to have affect the build, when built with a
> > Java 7
> > JVM (which the Manifests indicate the binary build artifacts were built
> > with) -
> > the tests and extended tests both ran fine. So I don't consider this a
> > blocker.
> >
> > issues fixed - OK
> >
> > Spot check many licenses & notices in Jars in the binary release
> > (especially the
> > new ones), and one in the Maven Artifacts in the staging repo: OK.
> >
> > check main license / notice in source and bin - OK
> >
> > Readme says "tested with Sun Java 6 on Windows XP" - probably needs
> > updating?
> > I think we mainly test with Java 7 and on Windows we use Windows 7 (or
> 8),
> > not
> > XP... I don't consider this a release blocker.
> >
> > Did the quickstart in the Readme - OK.
> >
> > [x] +1 OK to release.
> >
> > -Marshall Schor
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-AS 2.6.0 RC5
Posted by Jaroslaw Cwiklik <ui...@gmail.com>.
Built from source - OK
Spot checked signatures - OK
Spot checked LICENSE and NOTICE - OK
Checked UIMA-AS API formatting - OK
Installed Deployment Editor in eclipse - OK
Tested sending CASes to a service using HTTP and TCP - OK
[ ] +1 Approve the release
Jerry
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
> signatures OK
> compare source-release with SVN -OK
> eclipse plugin install - OK (in Eclipse 4.3.2)
> build from sources after clearing local repo of uima-as artifacts: OK
>
> run extended tests: bumpy but ok eventually. I was running from Eclipse
> and
> my Eclipse doesn't quite do the right thing on building - it misses out
> generating some xmlbean things (but build from command line with mvn
> works).
>
> Also found a wrong version of Java compiler source / target in the poms,
> need to
> upgrade to parent-pom 10 (when that's released) and/or override in the
> meanwhile. This doesn't seem to have affect the build, when built with a
> Java 7
> JVM (which the Manifests indicate the binary build artifacts were built
> with) -
> the tests and extended tests both ran fine. So I don't consider this a
> blocker.
>
> issues fixed - OK
>
> Spot check many licenses & notices in Jars in the binary release
> (especially the
> new ones), and one in the Maven Artifacts in the staging repo: OK.
>
> check main license / notice in source and bin - OK
>
> Readme says "tested with Sun Java 6 on Windows XP" - probably needs
> updating?
> I think we mainly test with Java 7 and on Windows we use Windows 7 (or 8),
> not
> XP... I don't consider this a release blocker.
>
> Did the quickstart in the Readme - OK.
>
> [x] +1 OK to release.
>
> -Marshall Schor
>
Re: [VOTE] Release UIMA-AS 2.6.0 RC5
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
signatures OK
compare source-release with SVN -OK
eclipse plugin install - OK (in Eclipse 4.3.2)
build from sources after clearing local repo of uima-as artifacts: OK
run extended tests: bumpy but ok eventually. I was running from Eclipse and
my Eclipse doesn't quite do the right thing on building - it misses out
generating some xmlbean things (but build from command line with mvn works).
Also found a wrong version of Java compiler source / target in the poms, need to
upgrade to parent-pom 10 (when that's released) and/or override in the
meanwhile. This doesn't seem to have affect the build, when built with a Java 7
JVM (which the Manifests indicate the binary build artifacts were built with) -
the tests and extended tests both ran fine. So I don't consider this a blocker.
issues fixed - OK
Spot check many licenses & notices in Jars in the binary release (especially the
new ones), and one in the Maven Artifacts in the staging repo: OK.
check main license / notice in source and bin - OK
Readme says "tested with Sun Java 6 on Windows XP" - probably needs updating?
I think we mainly test with Java 7 and on Windows we use Windows 7 (or 8), not
XP... I don't consider this a release blocker.
Did the quickstart in the Readme - OK.
[x] +1 OK to release.
-Marshall Schor