You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@servicemix.apache.org by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> on 2012/05/07 09:40:40 UTC
[PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?
Hi all,
Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to
make a ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
WDYT ?
If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and
cut off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
Regards
JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi Charles,
+1 to spin "again" the ServiceMix 5 discussion ;)
My proposal is more to keep moving forward on ServiceMix and provide an
updated release ;)
Thanks for your quick feedback !
Regards
JB
On 05/07/2012 09:51 AM, Charles Moulliard wrote:
> Hi Jean-Baptiste,
>
> I agree on what you suggest and propose that after 4.5 we have a reflection
> about what will be the future of ServiceMix 5.0. They are still a lot of
> questions pending like adding a transversal bus for Camel communications
> between bundles, add a Camel Global Context to also facilitate camel
> exchanges using endpoints registered globally (and in this case using OSGI
> Service), develop a monitoring console for CXF, Camel and ActiveMQ to be
> able to collect metrics using jmxtrans (http://code.google.com/p/jmxtrans/)
> project with graphite (http://graphite.wikidot.com/) or jolokia (
> http://www.jolokia.org/), ...
>
> Regards,
>
> Charles Moulliard
>
> Apache Committer
>
> Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
> Twitter : http://twitter.com/cmoulliard
> Linkedin : http://www.linkedin.com/in/charlesmoulliard
> Skype: cmoulliard
>
>
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net>wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to make
>> a ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>>
>> WDYT ?
>>
>> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and cut
>> off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?
Posted by Charles Moulliard <cm...@gmail.com>.
Hi Jean-Baptiste,
I agree on what you suggest and propose that after 4.5 we have a reflection
about what will be the future of ServiceMix 5.0. They are still a lot of
questions pending like adding a transversal bus for Camel communications
between bundles, add a Camel Global Context to also facilitate camel
exchanges using endpoints registered globally (and in this case using OSGI
Service), develop a monitoring console for CXF, Camel and ActiveMQ to be
able to collect metrics using jmxtrans (http://code.google.com/p/jmxtrans/)
project with graphite (http://graphite.wikidot.com/) or jolokia (
http://www.jolokia.org/), ...
Regards,
Charles Moulliard
Apache Committer
Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
Twitter : http://twitter.com/cmoulliard
Linkedin : http://www.linkedin.com/in/charlesmoulliard
Skype: cmoulliard
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to make
> a ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>
> WDYT ?
>
> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and cut
> off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>
> Regards
> JB
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Yup, I will do that today (it was on my TODO).
Regards
JB
On 05/09/2012 08:40 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> just to summarise the proposal:
>>
>> 1/ release ServiceMix 4.4.1: this is a maintenance release to upgrade to new
>> Camel 2.9.2, Karaf 2.2.7 and provide some bug fixes. In term of dependencies
>> version, it means: Karaf 2.2.7, Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.2, ActiveMQ 5.5.1
>> 2/ prepare ServiceMix 4.5.0: this release will include Karaf 2.2.x (probably
>> Karaf 2.2.7), Camel 2.10, CXF 2.6.x, ActiveMQ 5.6
>>
>> Is it ok for you all ?
>>
>
> +1
>
> Can you release the osgi bundles as well.
> There is a pending apache-qpid bundle I am waiting for that would
> allow Camel to easier work with AMQP.
>
>
>
>
>> Thanks
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>>
>> On 05/07/2012 04:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks Claus,
>>>
>>> Good idea, I will take a look on the Camel issue in the mean time.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 05/07/2012 04:38 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> BTW I have started a parallel discussion on Camel @dev about the Camel
>>>> 2.10 release.
>>>>
>>>> So the Camel team will work towards getting that release out so SMX
>>>> 4.5 can jump on the train and be up to date with all the latest
>>>> release of CXF, AMQ and Camel.
>>>>
>>>> BTW: Camel 2.10 is already upgraded to Karaf 2.2.7 and CXF 2.6.0. And
>>>> we will jump on AMQ 5.6.0 when the JARs hit Maven central.
>>>>
>>>> As many of you are also on the Camel team, then take a look in the
>>>> Camel JIRA and help get those pending tickets resolved. And with the
>>>> documentation as well. We should avoid doing releases which lacks
>>>> documentation. That is a slipping slope I would like to avoid.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to
>>>>> make a
>>>>> ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>>>>>
>>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>>
>>>>> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and
>>>>> cut
>>>>> off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?
Posted by Claus Ibsen <cl...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> just to summarise the proposal:
>
> 1/ release ServiceMix 4.4.1: this is a maintenance release to upgrade to new
> Camel 2.9.2, Karaf 2.2.7 and provide some bug fixes. In term of dependencies
> version, it means: Karaf 2.2.7, Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.2, ActiveMQ 5.5.1
> 2/ prepare ServiceMix 4.5.0: this release will include Karaf 2.2.x (probably
> Karaf 2.2.7), Camel 2.10, CXF 2.6.x, ActiveMQ 5.6
>
> Is it ok for you all ?
>
+1
Can you release the osgi bundles as well.
There is a pending apache-qpid bundle I am waiting for that would
allow Camel to easier work with AMQP.
> Thanks
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 05/07/2012 04:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Claus,
>>
>> Good idea, I will take a look on the Camel issue in the mean time.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 05/07/2012 04:38 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> BTW I have started a parallel discussion on Camel @dev about the Camel
>>> 2.10 release.
>>>
>>> So the Camel team will work towards getting that release out so SMX
>>> 4.5 can jump on the train and be up to date with all the latest
>>> release of CXF, AMQ and Camel.
>>>
>>> BTW: Camel 2.10 is already upgraded to Karaf 2.2.7 and CXF 2.6.0. And
>>> we will jump on AMQ 5.6.0 when the JARs hit Maven central.
>>>
>>> As many of you are also on the Camel team, then take a look in the
>>> Camel JIRA and help get those pending tickets resolved. And with the
>>> documentation as well. We should avoid doing releases which lacks
>>> documentation. That is a slipping slope I would like to avoid.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to
>>>> make a
>>>> ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>>>>
>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>
>>>> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and
>>>> cut
>>>> off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>> --
>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
--
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
CamelOne 2012 Conference, May 15-16, 2012: http://camelone.com
FuseSource
Email: cibsen@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi Gert,
+1 (sorry I made a mistake in the versioning)
I take care of that.
Regards
JB
On 05/09/2012 09:36 AM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
> Jean-Baptiste,
>
>
> We already have a 4.4.1 release out since the end of February - up to now,
> the 4.4.x release have been using Camel 2.8.x and CXF 2.4.x.
>
> How about we do this instead?
> - a 4.4.2 maintenance release to pick up Camel 2.8.5 and CXF 2.4.7
> - a 4.5.0 release that includes the latest Camel 2.9.x and CXF 2.5.x,
> together with ActiveMQ 5.5.1
> - a 4.6.0 release that includes Camel 2.10.x, CXF 2.6.x and ActiveMQ 5.6.0
>
> The first one should be very easy to do, since we already have a
> maintenance branch in the features project so this should only be about
> updating the dependency versions in the parent/pom.xml and making sure
> everything works fine. In parallel, we can also do the 4.5.0 release set
> from trunk (this requires us to release everything again, so that's a bit
> more work). Not sure we want to do a 4.5.0 and 4.6.0, we might also want
> to consider going straight for Camel 2.10.x and CXF 2.6.x in 4.5.0 as well
> - wdyt?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Gert Vanthienen
> ------------------------
> FuseSource
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>
>
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net>wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> just to summarise the proposal:
>>
>> 1/ release ServiceMix 4.4.1: this is a maintenance release to upgrade to
>> new Camel 2.9.2, Karaf 2.2.7 and provide some bug fixes. In term of
>> dependencies version, it means: Karaf 2.2.7, Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.2,
>> ActiveMQ 5.5.1
>> 2/ prepare ServiceMix 4.5.0: this release will include Karaf 2.2.x
>> (probably Karaf 2.2.7), Camel 2.10, CXF 2.6.x, ActiveMQ 5.6
>>
>> Is it ok for you all ?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>>
>> On 05/07/2012 04:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Claus,
>>>
>>> Good idea, I will take a look on the Camel issue in the mean time.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 05/07/2012 04:38 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> BTW I have started a parallel discussion on Camel @dev about the Camel
>>>> 2.10 release.
>>>>
>>>> So the Camel team will work towards getting that release out so SMX
>>>> 4.5 can jump on the train and be up to date with all the latest
>>>> release of CXF, AMQ and Camel.
>>>>
>>>> BTW: Camel 2.10 is already upgraded to Karaf 2.2.7 and CXF 2.6.0. And
>>>> we will jump on AMQ 5.6.0 when the JARs hit Maven central.
>>>>
>>>> As many of you are also on the Camel team, then take a look in the
>>>> Camel JIRA and help get those pending tickets resolved. And with the
>>>> documentation as well. We should avoid doing releases which lacks
>>>> documentation. That is a slipping slope I would like to avoid.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to
>>>>> make a
>>>>> ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>>>>>
>>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>>
>>>>> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and
>>>>> cut
>>>>> off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?
Posted by "Ulhas Bhole (OS)" <ap...@gmail.com>.
Hi Gert,
Sure will be happy to do the build locally to help out in any way I can.
Regards,
Ulhas Bhole
On 22 May 2012, at 13:11, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
> Hey Ulhas,
>
> I should have some cycles available to actually cut the release on Thursday
> - in the meanwhile, you could always try to build the branch locally and
> help us make sure that everything is working OK or, if you want, you can
> also help preparing the downloads/release notes page in the website project
> (cfr. http://servicemix.apache.org/developers/source/website-source.htmlfor
> some info on how to build that) or by updating the release-notes file
> in the source tree.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Gert Vanthienen
> ------------------------
> FuseSource
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>
>
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Ulhas Bhole (OS) <ap...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I agree with doing a release now using Camel 2.8.5 and CXF 2.4.6 and
>> then scheduling another one for later version of camel when it is out. I
>> don't have necessary commit rights otherwise I would be happy to give you
>> hand in release process in any way possible.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Ulhas Bhole
>>
>> On 22 May 2012, at 01:14, Freeman Fang wrote:
>>
>>> yeah, using Camel 2.8.5 and CXF 2.4.6 is OK for me, we can release
>> often, release quick, so when Camel 2.8.6 is out with CXF 2.4.7 we can
>> release another SMX 4.4.3 accordingly.
>>>
>>> Freeman
>>> On 2012-5-21, at 下午10:04, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>
>>>> I would prefer to release ServiceMix 4.4.2 with Camel 2.8.5 and CXF
>> 2.4.6.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>> On 05/21/2012 03:07 PM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>>>>> L.S.,
>>>>>
>>>>> I just updated the 4.4.x branch to use Camel 2.8.5 - unfortunately, at
>> the
>>>>> moment, we're unable to upgrade to CXF 2.4.7 because the Camel 2.8.5
>>>>> features descriptor references CXF 2.4.6. We now have two options:
>> release
>>>>> 4.4.2 with Camel 2.8.5 and CXF 2.4.6 or wait for a new Camel 2.8.x
>> release
>>>>> to be out as well and then use Camel 2.8.6/CXF 2.4.7 instead.
>>>>>
>>>>> Wdyt?
>>>>>
>>>>> Gert Vanthienen
>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>> FuseSource
>>>>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>>>>> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Gert Vanthienen
>>>>> <ge...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We already have a 4.4.1 release out since the end of February - up to
>> now,
>>>>>> the 4.4.x release have been using Camel 2.8.x and CXF 2.4.x.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How about we do this instead?
>>>>>> - a 4.4.2 maintenance release to pick up Camel 2.8.5 and CXF 2.4.7
>>>>>> - a 4.5.0 release that includes the latest Camel 2.9.x and CXF 2.5.x,
>>>>>> together with ActiveMQ 5.5.1
>>>>>> - a 4.6.0 release that includes Camel 2.10.x, CXF 2.6.x and ActiveMQ
>> 5.6.0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The first one should be very easy to do, since we already have a
>>>>>> maintenance branch in the features project so this should only be
>> about
>>>>>> updating the dependency versions in the parent/pom.xml and making sure
>>>>>> everything works fine. In parallel, we can also do the 4.5.0 release
>> set
>>>>>> from trunk (this requires us to release everything again, so that's a
>> bit
>>>>>> more work). Not sure we want to do a 4.5.0 and 4.6.0, we might also
>> want
>>>>>> to consider going straight for Camel 2.10.x and CXF 2.6.x in 4.5.0 as
>> well
>>>>>> - wdyt?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gert Vanthienen
>>>>>> ------------------------
>>>>>> FuseSource
>>>>>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>>>>>> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb@nanthrax.net
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> just to summarise the proposal:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1/ release ServiceMix 4.4.1: this is a maintenance release to
>> upgrade to
>>>>>>> new Camel 2.9.2, Karaf 2.2.7 and provide some bug fixes. In term of
>>>>>>> dependencies version, it means: Karaf 2.2.7, Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.2,
>>>>>>> ActiveMQ 5.5.1
>>>>>>> 2/ prepare ServiceMix 4.5.0: this release will include Karaf 2.2.x
>>>>>>> (probably Karaf 2.2.7), Camel 2.10, CXF 2.6.x, ActiveMQ 5.6
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is it ok for you all ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 05/07/2012 04:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks Claus,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Good idea, I will take a look on the Camel issue in the mean time.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 05/07/2012 04:38 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> BTW I have started a parallel discussion on Camel @dev about the
>> Camel
>>>>>>>>> 2.10 release.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So the Camel team will work towards getting that release out so SMX
>>>>>>>>> 4.5 can jump on the train and be up to date with all the latest
>>>>>>>>> release of CXF, AMQ and Camel.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> BTW: Camel 2.10 is already upgraded to Karaf 2.2.7 and CXF 2.6.0.
>> And
>>>>>>>>> we will jump on AMQ 5.6.0 when the JARs hit Maven central.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As many of you are also on the Camel team, then take a look in the
>>>>>>>>> Camel JIRA and help get those pending tickets resolved. And with
>> the
>>>>>>>>> documentation as well. We should avoid doing releases which lacks
>>>>>>>>> documentation. That is a slipping slope I would like to avoid.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<
>> jb@nanthrax.net>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I
>> propose to
>>>>>>>>>> make a
>>>>>>>>>> ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series
>> and
>>>>>>>>>> cut
>>>>>>>>>> off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>>>>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------
>>> Freeman Fang
>>>
>>> FuseSource
>>> Email:ffang@fusesource.com
>>> Web: fusesource.com
>>> Twitter: freemanfang
>>> Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
>>> http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042
>>> weibo: http://weibo.com/u/1473905042
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?
Posted by Gert Vanthienen <ge...@gmail.com>.
Hey Ulhas,
I should have some cycles available to actually cut the release on Thursday
- in the meanwhile, you could always try to build the branch locally and
help us make sure that everything is working OK or, if you want, you can
also help preparing the downloads/release notes page in the website project
(cfr. http://servicemix.apache.org/developers/source/website-source.htmlfor
some info on how to build that) or by updating the release-notes file
in the source tree.
Thanks in advance,
Gert Vanthienen
------------------------
FuseSource
Web: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Ulhas Bhole (OS) <ap...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I agree with doing a release now using Camel 2.8.5 and CXF 2.4.6 and
> then scheduling another one for later version of camel when it is out. I
> don't have necessary commit rights otherwise I would be happy to give you
> hand in release process in any way possible.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ulhas Bhole
>
> On 22 May 2012, at 01:14, Freeman Fang wrote:
>
> > yeah, using Camel 2.8.5 and CXF 2.4.6 is OK for me, we can release
> often, release quick, so when Camel 2.8.6 is out with CXF 2.4.7 we can
> release another SMX 4.4.3 accordingly.
> >
> > Freeman
> > On 2012-5-21, at 下午10:04, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >
> >> I would prefer to release ServiceMix 4.4.2 with Camel 2.8.5 and CXF
> 2.4.6.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> JB
> >>
> >> On 05/21/2012 03:07 PM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
> >>> L.S.,
> >>>
> >>> I just updated the 4.4.x branch to use Camel 2.8.5 - unfortunately, at
> the
> >>> moment, we're unable to upgrade to CXF 2.4.7 because the Camel 2.8.5
> >>> features descriptor references CXF 2.4.6. We now have two options:
> release
> >>> 4.4.2 with Camel 2.8.5 and CXF 2.4.6 or wait for a new Camel 2.8.x
> release
> >>> to be out as well and then use Camel 2.8.6/CXF 2.4.7 instead.
> >>>
> >>> Wdyt?
> >>>
> >>> Gert Vanthienen
> >>> ------------------------
> >>> FuseSource
> >>> Web: http://fusesource.com
> >>> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Gert Vanthienen
> >>> <ge...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Jean-Baptiste,
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> We already have a 4.4.1 release out since the end of February - up to
> now,
> >>>> the 4.4.x release have been using Camel 2.8.x and CXF 2.4.x.
> >>>>
> >>>> How about we do this instead?
> >>>> - a 4.4.2 maintenance release to pick up Camel 2.8.5 and CXF 2.4.7
> >>>> - a 4.5.0 release that includes the latest Camel 2.9.x and CXF 2.5.x,
> >>>> together with ActiveMQ 5.5.1
> >>>> - a 4.6.0 release that includes Camel 2.10.x, CXF 2.6.x and ActiveMQ
> 5.6.0
> >>>>
> >>>> The first one should be very easy to do, since we already have a
> >>>> maintenance branch in the features project so this should only be
> about
> >>>> updating the dependency versions in the parent/pom.xml and making sure
> >>>> everything works fine. In parallel, we can also do the 4.5.0 release
> set
> >>>> from trunk (this requires us to release everything again, so that's a
> bit
> >>>> more work). Not sure we want to do a 4.5.0 and 4.6.0, we might also
> want
> >>>> to consider going straight for Camel 2.10.x and CXF 2.6.x in 4.5.0 as
> well
> >>>> - wdyt?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>>
> >>>> Gert Vanthienen
> >>>> ------------------------
> >>>> FuseSource
> >>>> Web: http://fusesource.com
> >>>> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb@nanthrax.net
> >wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi guys,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> just to summarise the proposal:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 1/ release ServiceMix 4.4.1: this is a maintenance release to
> upgrade to
> >>>>> new Camel 2.9.2, Karaf 2.2.7 and provide some bug fixes. In term of
> >>>>> dependencies version, it means: Karaf 2.2.7, Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.2,
> >>>>> ActiveMQ 5.5.1
> >>>>> 2/ prepare ServiceMix 4.5.0: this release will include Karaf 2.2.x
> >>>>> (probably Karaf 2.2.7), Camel 2.10, CXF 2.6.x, ActiveMQ 5.6
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Is it ok for you all ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks
> >>>>> Regards
> >>>>> JB
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 05/07/2012 04:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks Claus,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Good idea, I will take a look on the Camel issue in the mean time.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>> JB
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 05/07/2012 04:38 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> BTW I have started a parallel discussion on Camel @dev about the
> Camel
> >>>>>>> 2.10 release.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> So the Camel team will work towards getting that release out so SMX
> >>>>>>> 4.5 can jump on the train and be up to date with all the latest
> >>>>>>> release of CXF, AMQ and Camel.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> BTW: Camel 2.10 is already upgraded to Karaf 2.2.7 and CXF 2.6.0.
> And
> >>>>>>> we will jump on AMQ 5.6.0 when the JARs hit Maven central.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> As many of you are also on the Camel team, then take a look in the
> >>>>>>> Camel JIRA and help get those pending tickets resolved. And with
> the
> >>>>>>> documentation as well. We should avoid doing releases which lacks
> >>>>>>> documentation. That is a slipping slope I would like to avoid.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<
> jb@nanthrax.net>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I
> propose to
> >>>>>>>> make a
> >>>>>>>> ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> WDYT ?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series
> and
> >>>>>>>> cut
> >>>>>>>> off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>>>> JB
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> >>>>>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
> >>>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> >>>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> >>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
> >>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> >>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> >> jbonofre@apache.org
> >> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> >> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------
> > Freeman Fang
> >
> > FuseSource
> > Email:ffang@fusesource.com
> > Web: fusesource.com
> > Twitter: freemanfang
> > Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
> > http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042
> > weibo: http://weibo.com/u/1473905042
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?
Posted by "Ulhas Bhole (OS)" <ap...@gmail.com>.
I agree with doing a release now using Camel 2.8.5 and CXF 2.4.6 and then scheduling another one for later version of camel when it is out. I don't have necessary commit rights otherwise I would be happy to give you hand in release process in any way possible.
Regards,
Ulhas Bhole
On 22 May 2012, at 01:14, Freeman Fang wrote:
> yeah, using Camel 2.8.5 and CXF 2.4.6 is OK for me, we can release often, release quick, so when Camel 2.8.6 is out with CXF 2.4.7 we can release another SMX 4.4.3 accordingly.
>
> Freeman
> On 2012-5-21, at 下午10:04, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
>> I would prefer to release ServiceMix 4.4.2 with Camel 2.8.5 and CXF 2.4.6.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 05/21/2012 03:07 PM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>>> L.S.,
>>>
>>> I just updated the 4.4.x branch to use Camel 2.8.5 - unfortunately, at the
>>> moment, we're unable to upgrade to CXF 2.4.7 because the Camel 2.8.5
>>> features descriptor references CXF 2.4.6. We now have two options: release
>>> 4.4.2 with Camel 2.8.5 and CXF 2.4.6 or wait for a new Camel 2.8.x release
>>> to be out as well and then use Camel 2.8.6/CXF 2.4.7 instead.
>>>
>>> Wdyt?
>>>
>>> Gert Vanthienen
>>> ------------------------
>>> FuseSource
>>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>>> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Gert Vanthienen
>>> <ge...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jean-Baptiste,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We already have a 4.4.1 release out since the end of February - up to now,
>>>> the 4.4.x release have been using Camel 2.8.x and CXF 2.4.x.
>>>>
>>>> How about we do this instead?
>>>> - a 4.4.2 maintenance release to pick up Camel 2.8.5 and CXF 2.4.7
>>>> - a 4.5.0 release that includes the latest Camel 2.9.x and CXF 2.5.x,
>>>> together with ActiveMQ 5.5.1
>>>> - a 4.6.0 release that includes Camel 2.10.x, CXF 2.6.x and ActiveMQ 5.6.0
>>>>
>>>> The first one should be very easy to do, since we already have a
>>>> maintenance branch in the features project so this should only be about
>>>> updating the dependency versions in the parent/pom.xml and making sure
>>>> everything works fine. In parallel, we can also do the 4.5.0 release set
>>>> from trunk (this requires us to release everything again, so that's a bit
>>>> more work). Not sure we want to do a 4.5.0 and 4.6.0, we might also want
>>>> to consider going straight for Camel 2.10.x and CXF 2.6.x in 4.5.0 as well
>>>> - wdyt?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Gert Vanthienen
>>>> ------------------------
>>>> FuseSource
>>>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>>>> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>>
>>>>> just to summarise the proposal:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1/ release ServiceMix 4.4.1: this is a maintenance release to upgrade to
>>>>> new Camel 2.9.2, Karaf 2.2.7 and provide some bug fixes. In term of
>>>>> dependencies version, it means: Karaf 2.2.7, Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.2,
>>>>> ActiveMQ 5.5.1
>>>>> 2/ prepare ServiceMix 4.5.0: this release will include Karaf 2.2.x
>>>>> (probably Karaf 2.2.7), Camel 2.10, CXF 2.6.x, ActiveMQ 5.6
>>>>>
>>>>> Is it ok for you all ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 05/07/2012 04:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks Claus,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Good idea, I will take a look on the Camel issue in the mean time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 05/07/2012 04:38 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BTW I have started a parallel discussion on Camel @dev about the Camel
>>>>>>> 2.10 release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So the Camel team will work towards getting that release out so SMX
>>>>>>> 4.5 can jump on the train and be up to date with all the latest
>>>>>>> release of CXF, AMQ and Camel.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BTW: Camel 2.10 is already upgraded to Karaf 2.2.7 and CXF 2.6.0. And
>>>>>>> we will jump on AMQ 5.6.0 when the JARs hit Maven central.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As many of you are also on the Camel team, then take a look in the
>>>>>>> Camel JIRA and help get those pending tickets resolved. And with the
>>>>>>> documentation as well. We should avoid doing releases which lacks
>>>>>>> documentation. That is a slipping slope I would like to avoid.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to
>>>>>>>> make a
>>>>>>>> ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and
>>>>>>>> cut
>>>>>>>> off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------
> Freeman Fang
>
> FuseSource
> Email:ffang@fusesource.com
> Web: fusesource.com
> Twitter: freemanfang
> Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
> http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042
> weibo: http://weibo.com/u/1473905042
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?
Posted by Freeman Fang <fr...@gmail.com>.
yeah, using Camel 2.8.5 and CXF 2.4.6 is OK for me, we can release
often, release quick, so when Camel 2.8.6 is out with CXF 2.4.7 we can
release another SMX 4.4.3 accordingly.
Freeman
On 2012-5-21, at 下午10:04, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> I would prefer to release ServiceMix 4.4.2 with Camel 2.8.5 and CXF
> 2.4.6.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 05/21/2012 03:07 PM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>> L.S.,
>>
>> I just updated the 4.4.x branch to use Camel 2.8.5 - unfortunately,
>> at the
>> moment, we're unable to upgrade to CXF 2.4.7 because the Camel 2.8.5
>> features descriptor references CXF 2.4.6. We now have two options:
>> release
>> 4.4.2 with Camel 2.8.5 and CXF 2.4.6 or wait for a new Camel 2.8.x
>> release
>> to be out as well and then use Camel 2.8.6/CXF 2.4.7 instead.
>>
>> Wdyt?
>>
>> Gert Vanthienen
>> ------------------------
>> FuseSource
>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Gert Vanthienen
>> <ge...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Jean-Baptiste,
>>>
>>>
>>> We already have a 4.4.1 release out since the end of February - up
>>> to now,
>>> the 4.4.x release have been using Camel 2.8.x and CXF 2.4.x.
>>>
>>> How about we do this instead?
>>> - a 4.4.2 maintenance release to pick up Camel 2.8.5 and CXF 2.4.7
>>> - a 4.5.0 release that includes the latest Camel 2.9.x and CXF
>>> 2.5.x,
>>> together with ActiveMQ 5.5.1
>>> - a 4.6.0 release that includes Camel 2.10.x, CXF 2.6.x and
>>> ActiveMQ 5.6.0
>>>
>>> The first one should be very easy to do, since we already have a
>>> maintenance branch in the features project so this should only be
>>> about
>>> updating the dependency versions in the parent/pom.xml and making
>>> sure
>>> everything works fine. In parallel, we can also do the 4.5.0
>>> release set
>>> from trunk (this requires us to release everything again, so
>>> that's a bit
>>> more work). Not sure we want to do a 4.5.0 and 4.6.0, we might
>>> also want
>>> to consider going straight for Camel 2.10.x and CXF 2.6.x in 4.5.0
>>> as well
>>> - wdyt?
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Gert Vanthienen
>>> ------------------------
>>> FuseSource
>>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>>> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Jean-Baptiste
>>> Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>
>>>> just to summarise the proposal:
>>>>
>>>> 1/ release ServiceMix 4.4.1: this is a maintenance release to
>>>> upgrade to
>>>> new Camel 2.9.2, Karaf 2.2.7 and provide some bug fixes. In term of
>>>> dependencies version, it means: Karaf 2.2.7, Camel 2.9.2, CXF
>>>> 2.5.2,
>>>> ActiveMQ 5.5.1
>>>> 2/ prepare ServiceMix 4.5.0: this release will include Karaf 2.2.x
>>>> (probably Karaf 2.2.7), Camel 2.10, CXF 2.6.x, ActiveMQ 5.6
>>>>
>>>> Is it ok for you all ?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 05/07/2012 04:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Claus,
>>>>>
>>>>> Good idea, I will take a look on the Camel issue in the mean time.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>>>
>>>>> On 05/07/2012 04:38 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW I have started a parallel discussion on Camel @dev about
>>>>>> the Camel
>>>>>> 2.10 release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So the Camel team will work towards getting that release out so
>>>>>> SMX
>>>>>> 4.5 can jump on the train and be up to date with all the latest
>>>>>> release of CXF, AMQ and Camel.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW: Camel 2.10 is already upgraded to Karaf 2.2.7 and CXF
>>>>>> 2.6.0. And
>>>>>> we will jump on AMQ 5.6.0 when the JARs hit Maven central.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As many of you are also on the Camel team, then take a look in
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> Camel JIRA and help get those pending tickets resolved. And
>>>>>> with the
>>>>>> documentation as well. We should avoid doing releases which lacks
>>>>>> documentation. That is a slipping slope I would like to avoid.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb@nanthrax.ne
>>>>>> t>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I
>>>>>>> propose to
>>>>>>> make a
>>>>>>> ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test
>>>>>>> series and
>>>>>>> cut
>>>>>>> off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
---------------------------------------------
Freeman Fang
FuseSource
Email:ffang@fusesource.com
Web: fusesource.com
Twitter: freemanfang
Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042
weibo: http://weibo.com/u/1473905042
Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
I would prefer to release ServiceMix 4.4.2 with Camel 2.8.5 and CXF 2.4.6.
Regards
JB
On 05/21/2012 03:07 PM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
> L.S.,
>
> I just updated the 4.4.x branch to use Camel 2.8.5 - unfortunately, at the
> moment, we're unable to upgrade to CXF 2.4.7 because the Camel 2.8.5
> features descriptor references CXF 2.4.6. We now have two options: release
> 4.4.2 with Camel 2.8.5 and CXF 2.4.6 or wait for a new Camel 2.8.x release
> to be out as well and then use Camel 2.8.6/CXF 2.4.7 instead.
>
> Wdyt?
>
> Gert Vanthienen
> ------------------------
> FuseSource
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>
>
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Gert Vanthienen
> <ge...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Jean-Baptiste,
>>
>>
>> We already have a 4.4.1 release out since the end of February - up to now,
>> the 4.4.x release have been using Camel 2.8.x and CXF 2.4.x.
>>
>> How about we do this instead?
>> - a 4.4.2 maintenance release to pick up Camel 2.8.5 and CXF 2.4.7
>> - a 4.5.0 release that includes the latest Camel 2.9.x and CXF 2.5.x,
>> together with ActiveMQ 5.5.1
>> - a 4.6.0 release that includes Camel 2.10.x, CXF 2.6.x and ActiveMQ 5.6.0
>>
>> The first one should be very easy to do, since we already have a
>> maintenance branch in the features project so this should only be about
>> updating the dependency versions in the parent/pom.xml and making sure
>> everything works fine. In parallel, we can also do the 4.5.0 release set
>> from trunk (this requires us to release everything again, so that's a bit
>> more work). Not sure we want to do a 4.5.0 and 4.6.0, we might also want
>> to consider going straight for Camel 2.10.x and CXF 2.6.x in 4.5.0 as well
>> - wdyt?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Gert Vanthienen
>> ------------------------
>> FuseSource
>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> just to summarise the proposal:
>>>
>>> 1/ release ServiceMix 4.4.1: this is a maintenance release to upgrade to
>>> new Camel 2.9.2, Karaf 2.2.7 and provide some bug fixes. In term of
>>> dependencies version, it means: Karaf 2.2.7, Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.2,
>>> ActiveMQ 5.5.1
>>> 2/ prepare ServiceMix 4.5.0: this release will include Karaf 2.2.x
>>> (probably Karaf 2.2.7), Camel 2.10, CXF 2.6.x, ActiveMQ 5.6
>>>
>>> Is it ok for you all ?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>>
>>> On 05/07/2012 04:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks Claus,
>>>>
>>>> Good idea, I will take a look on the Camel issue in the mean time.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>> On 05/07/2012 04:38 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW I have started a parallel discussion on Camel @dev about the Camel
>>>>> 2.10 release.
>>>>>
>>>>> So the Camel team will work towards getting that release out so SMX
>>>>> 4.5 can jump on the train and be up to date with all the latest
>>>>> release of CXF, AMQ and Camel.
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW: Camel 2.10 is already upgraded to Karaf 2.2.7 and CXF 2.6.0. And
>>>>> we will jump on AMQ 5.6.0 when the JARs hit Maven central.
>>>>>
>>>>> As many of you are also on the Camel team, then take a look in the
>>>>> Camel JIRA and help get those pending tickets resolved. And with the
>>>>> documentation as well. We should avoid doing releases which lacks
>>>>> documentation. That is a slipping slope I would like to avoid.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to
>>>>>> make a
>>>>>> ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and
>>>>>> cut
>>>>>> off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> JB
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>
>>
>>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?
Posted by Gert Vanthienen <ge...@gmail.com>.
L.S.,
I just updated the 4.4.x branch to use Camel 2.8.5 - unfortunately, at the
moment, we're unable to upgrade to CXF 2.4.7 because the Camel 2.8.5
features descriptor references CXF 2.4.6. We now have two options: release
4.4.2 with Camel 2.8.5 and CXF 2.4.6 or wait for a new Camel 2.8.x release
to be out as well and then use Camel 2.8.6/CXF 2.4.7 instead.
Wdyt?
Gert Vanthienen
------------------------
FuseSource
Web: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Gert Vanthienen
<ge...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Jean-Baptiste,
>
>
> We already have a 4.4.1 release out since the end of February - up to now,
> the 4.4.x release have been using Camel 2.8.x and CXF 2.4.x.
>
> How about we do this instead?
> - a 4.4.2 maintenance release to pick up Camel 2.8.5 and CXF 2.4.7
> - a 4.5.0 release that includes the latest Camel 2.9.x and CXF 2.5.x,
> together with ActiveMQ 5.5.1
> - a 4.6.0 release that includes Camel 2.10.x, CXF 2.6.x and ActiveMQ 5.6.0
>
> The first one should be very easy to do, since we already have a
> maintenance branch in the features project so this should only be about
> updating the dependency versions in the parent/pom.xml and making sure
> everything works fine. In parallel, we can also do the 4.5.0 release set
> from trunk (this requires us to release everything again, so that's a bit
> more work). Not sure we want to do a 4.5.0 and 4.6.0, we might also want
> to consider going straight for Camel 2.10.x and CXF 2.6.x in 4.5.0 as well
> - wdyt?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Gert Vanthienen
> ------------------------
> FuseSource
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>
>
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> just to summarise the proposal:
>>
>> 1/ release ServiceMix 4.4.1: this is a maintenance release to upgrade to
>> new Camel 2.9.2, Karaf 2.2.7 and provide some bug fixes. In term of
>> dependencies version, it means: Karaf 2.2.7, Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.2,
>> ActiveMQ 5.5.1
>> 2/ prepare ServiceMix 4.5.0: this release will include Karaf 2.2.x
>> (probably Karaf 2.2.7), Camel 2.10, CXF 2.6.x, ActiveMQ 5.6
>>
>> Is it ok for you all ?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>>
>> On 05/07/2012 04:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Claus,
>>>
>>> Good idea, I will take a look on the Camel issue in the mean time.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 05/07/2012 04:38 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> BTW I have started a parallel discussion on Camel @dev about the Camel
>>>> 2.10 release.
>>>>
>>>> So the Camel team will work towards getting that release out so SMX
>>>> 4.5 can jump on the train and be up to date with all the latest
>>>> release of CXF, AMQ and Camel.
>>>>
>>>> BTW: Camel 2.10 is already upgraded to Karaf 2.2.7 and CXF 2.6.0. And
>>>> we will jump on AMQ 5.6.0 when the JARs hit Maven central.
>>>>
>>>> As many of you are also on the Camel team, then take a look in the
>>>> Camel JIRA and help get those pending tickets resolved. And with the
>>>> documentation as well. We should avoid doing releases which lacks
>>>> documentation. That is a slipping slope I would like to avoid.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to
>>>>> make a
>>>>> ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>>>>>
>>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>>
>>>>> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and
>>>>> cut
>>>>> off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>
>
Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?
Posted by Gert Vanthienen <ge...@gmail.com>.
L.S.,
That sounds like a good plan too. Now that we got ourselves on a decent
release schedule again (with 4.4.0, 4.4.1 and an upcoming 4.4.2 in less
than half a year) we just have to make sure we don't get ourselves stuck
waiting eternally for the next best thing again. But if we can incorporate
the new version of ActiveMQ without delaying 4.5.0 for a long time, we
should definitely do this.
Regards,
Gert Vanthienen
------------------------
FuseSource
Web: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Claus Ibsen <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Another thought about SMX 4.5 could be to try to make that the
> officially Java 7 supported version.
> If we taget it to include
> - CXF 2.2.7+ (already Java 7)
> - Camel 2.10 (will support Java 7)
> - CXF 2.6.x (already Java 7)
> - AMQ 5.6.x (the AMQ team want to cut a Java 7 compatible release when
> Camel 2.10 is out)
>
> That would IMHO bring value to the SMX community, that SMX 4.5 will be
> a stable platform you can bet on,
> for the future. It its Java 7 compatible and uses at the time the
> latest of the other Apache products.
> And there will be patch releases issued of SMX 4.5.x that includes
> patch upgrades of these Apache products.
>
> That would be a release you could promote, blog about, and get the
> word out. That SMX is indeed kicking and alive.
>
>
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
> wrote:
> > We are inline.
> >
> > I'm updating the version set to reflect that.
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> >
> > On 05/10/2012 10:08 AM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
> >>
> >> Claus,
> >>
> >> Yeah, that's what I was thinking as well - there's no real value in an
> >> extra ServiceMix release that ships with the backlevel Camel/CXF
> versions
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Gert Vanthienen
> >> ------------------------
> >> FuseSource
> >> Web: http://fusesource.com
> >> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Claus Ibsen<cl...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Gert Vanthienen
> >>> <ge...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Jean-Baptiste,
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> We already have a 4.4.1 release out since the end of February - up to
> >>>
> >>> now,
> >>>>
> >>>> the 4.4.x release have been using Camel 2.8.x and CXF 2.4.x.
> >>>>
> >>>> How about we do this instead?
> >>>> - a 4.4.2 maintenance release to pick up Camel 2.8.5 and CXF 2.4.7
> >>>> - a 4.5.0 release that includes the latest Camel 2.9.x and CXF 2.5.x,
> >>>> together with ActiveMQ 5.5.1
> >>>> - a 4.6.0 release that includes Camel 2.10.x, CXF 2.6.x and ActiveMQ
> >>>
> >>> 5.6.0
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> The first one should be very easy to do, since we already have a
> >>>> maintenance branch in the features project so this should only be
> about
> >>>> updating the dependency versions in the parent/pom.xml and making sure
> >>>> everything works fine. In parallel, we can also do the 4.5.0 release
> >>>> set
> >>>> from trunk (this requires us to release everything again, so that's a
> >>>> bit
> >>>> more work). Not sure we want to do a 4.5.0 and 4.6.0, we might also
> >>>> want
> >>>> to consider going straight for Camel 2.10.x and CXF 2.6.x in 4.5.0 as
> >>>
> >>> well
> >>>>
> >>>> - wdyt?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> I dont think its good to cut so many new releases, that just burdens
> >>> the SMX team to maintain that.
> >>> And also confuses the community with that many releases.
> >>>
> >>> I would go for a patch release of the existing 4.4.x with the patch
> >>> version of the AMQ,CXF and Camel that matches.
> >>> And then for SMX 4.5 jump straight to AMQ 5.6, CXF 2.6, and Camel 2.10.
> >>>
> >>> Do not do a SMX release with Camel 2.9, AMQ 5.5.1 etc. That is just
> >>> waste of time.
> >>>
> >>> Just my thoughts.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>>
> >>>> Gert Vanthienen
> >>>> ------------------------
> >>>> FuseSource
> >>>> Web: http://fusesource.com
> >>>> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb@nanthrax.net
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi guys,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> just to summarise the proposal:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 1/ release ServiceMix 4.4.1: this is a maintenance release to upgrade
> >>>>> to
> >>>>> new Camel 2.9.2, Karaf 2.2.7 and provide some bug fixes. In term of
> >>>>> dependencies version, it means: Karaf 2.2.7, Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.2,
> >>>>> ActiveMQ 5.5.1
> >>>>> 2/ prepare ServiceMix 4.5.0: this release will include Karaf 2.2.x
> >>>>> (probably Karaf 2.2.7), Camel 2.10, CXF 2.6.x, ActiveMQ 5.6
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Is it ok for you all ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks
> >>>>> Regards
> >>>>> JB
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 05/07/2012 04:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks Claus,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Good idea, I will take a look on the Camel issue in the mean time.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>> JB
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 05/07/2012 04:38 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> BTW I have started a parallel discussion on Camel @dev about the
> >>>>>>> Camel
> >>>>>>> 2.10 release.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> So the Camel team will work towards getting that release out so SMX
> >>>>>>> 4.5 can jump on the train and be up to date with all the latest
> >>>>>>> release of CXF, AMQ and Camel.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> BTW: Camel 2.10 is already upgraded to Karaf 2.2.7 and CXF 2.6.0.
> And
> >>>>>>> we will jump on AMQ 5.6.0 when the JARs hit Maven central.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> As many of you are also on the Camel team, then take a look in the
> >>>>>>> Camel JIRA and help get those pending tickets resolved. And with
> the
> >>>>>>> documentation as well. We should avoid doing releases which lacks
> >>>>>>> documentation. That is a slipping slope I would like to avoid.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<
> jb@nanthrax.net>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose
> >>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>> make a
> >>>>>>>> ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> WDYT ?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series
> >>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>> cut
> >>>>>>>> off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>>>> JB
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> >>>>>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
> >>>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> >>>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> >>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
> >>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> >>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Claus Ibsen
> >>> -----------------
> >>> CamelOne 2012 Conference, May 15-16, 2012: http://camelone.com
> >>> FuseSource
> >>> Email: cibsen@fusesource.com
> >>> Web: http://fusesource.com
> >>> Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews
> >>> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
> >>> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
> >>>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > jbonofre@apache.org
> > http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
>
>
> --
> Claus Ibsen
> -----------------
> CamelOne 2012 Conference, May 15-16, 2012: http://camelone.com
> FuseSource
> Email: cibsen@fusesource.com
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews
> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
>
Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?
Posted by Claus Ibsen <cl...@gmail.com>.
Hi
Another thought about SMX 4.5 could be to try to make that the
officially Java 7 supported version.
If we taget it to include
- CXF 2.2.7+ (already Java 7)
- Camel 2.10 (will support Java 7)
- CXF 2.6.x (already Java 7)
- AMQ 5.6.x (the AMQ team want to cut a Java 7 compatible release when
Camel 2.10 is out)
That would IMHO bring value to the SMX community, that SMX 4.5 will be
a stable platform you can bet on,
for the future. It its Java 7 compatible and uses at the time the
latest of the other Apache products.
And there will be patch releases issued of SMX 4.5.x that includes
patch upgrades of these Apache products.
That would be a release you could promote, blog about, and get the
word out. That SMX is indeed kicking and alive.
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> We are inline.
>
> I'm updating the version set to reflect that.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 05/10/2012 10:08 AM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>>
>> Claus,
>>
>> Yeah, that's what I was thinking as well - there's no real value in an
>> extra ServiceMix release that ships with the backlevel Camel/CXF versions
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Gert Vanthienen
>> ------------------------
>> FuseSource
>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Claus Ibsen<cl...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Gert Vanthienen
>>> <ge...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Jean-Baptiste,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We already have a 4.4.1 release out since the end of February - up to
>>>
>>> now,
>>>>
>>>> the 4.4.x release have been using Camel 2.8.x and CXF 2.4.x.
>>>>
>>>> How about we do this instead?
>>>> - a 4.4.2 maintenance release to pick up Camel 2.8.5 and CXF 2.4.7
>>>> - a 4.5.0 release that includes the latest Camel 2.9.x and CXF 2.5.x,
>>>> together with ActiveMQ 5.5.1
>>>> - a 4.6.0 release that includes Camel 2.10.x, CXF 2.6.x and ActiveMQ
>>>
>>> 5.6.0
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The first one should be very easy to do, since we already have a
>>>> maintenance branch in the features project so this should only be about
>>>> updating the dependency versions in the parent/pom.xml and making sure
>>>> everything works fine. In parallel, we can also do the 4.5.0 release
>>>> set
>>>> from trunk (this requires us to release everything again, so that's a
>>>> bit
>>>> more work). Not sure we want to do a 4.5.0 and 4.6.0, we might also
>>>> want
>>>> to consider going straight for Camel 2.10.x and CXF 2.6.x in 4.5.0 as
>>>
>>> well
>>>>
>>>> - wdyt?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I dont think its good to cut so many new releases, that just burdens
>>> the SMX team to maintain that.
>>> And also confuses the community with that many releases.
>>>
>>> I would go for a patch release of the existing 4.4.x with the patch
>>> version of the AMQ,CXF and Camel that matches.
>>> And then for SMX 4.5 jump straight to AMQ 5.6, CXF 2.6, and Camel 2.10.
>>>
>>> Do not do a SMX release with Camel 2.9, AMQ 5.5.1 etc. That is just
>>> waste of time.
>>>
>>> Just my thoughts.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Gert Vanthienen
>>>> ------------------------
>>>> FuseSource
>>>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>>>> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb@nanthrax.net
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>>
>>>>> just to summarise the proposal:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1/ release ServiceMix 4.4.1: this is a maintenance release to upgrade
>>>>> to
>>>>> new Camel 2.9.2, Karaf 2.2.7 and provide some bug fixes. In term of
>>>>> dependencies version, it means: Karaf 2.2.7, Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.2,
>>>>> ActiveMQ 5.5.1
>>>>> 2/ prepare ServiceMix 4.5.0: this release will include Karaf 2.2.x
>>>>> (probably Karaf 2.2.7), Camel 2.10, CXF 2.6.x, ActiveMQ 5.6
>>>>>
>>>>> Is it ok for you all ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 05/07/2012 04:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks Claus,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Good idea, I will take a look on the Camel issue in the mean time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 05/07/2012 04:38 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BTW I have started a parallel discussion on Camel @dev about the
>>>>>>> Camel
>>>>>>> 2.10 release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So the Camel team will work towards getting that release out so SMX
>>>>>>> 4.5 can jump on the train and be up to date with all the latest
>>>>>>> release of CXF, AMQ and Camel.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BTW: Camel 2.10 is already upgraded to Karaf 2.2.7 and CXF 2.6.0. And
>>>>>>> we will jump on AMQ 5.6.0 when the JARs hit Maven central.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As many of you are also on the Camel team, then take a look in the
>>>>>>> Camel JIRA and help get those pending tickets resolved. And with the
>>>>>>> documentation as well. We should avoid doing releases which lacks
>>>>>>> documentation. That is a slipping slope I would like to avoid.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> make a
>>>>>>>> ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> cut
>>>>>>>> off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Claus Ibsen
>>> -----------------
>>> CamelOne 2012 Conference, May 15-16, 2012: http://camelone.com
>>> FuseSource
>>> Email: cibsen@fusesource.com
>>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>>> Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews
>>> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
>>> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
--
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
CamelOne 2012 Conference, May 15-16, 2012: http://camelone.com
FuseSource
Email: cibsen@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
We are inline.
I'm updating the version set to reflect that.
Regards
JB
On 05/10/2012 10:08 AM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
> Claus,
>
> Yeah, that's what I was thinking as well - there's no real value in an
> extra ServiceMix release that ships with the backlevel Camel/CXF versions
>
> Regards,
>
> Gert Vanthienen
> ------------------------
> FuseSource
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>
>
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Claus Ibsen<cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Gert Vanthienen
>> <ge...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Jean-Baptiste,
>>>
>>>
>>> We already have a 4.4.1 release out since the end of February - up to
>> now,
>>> the 4.4.x release have been using Camel 2.8.x and CXF 2.4.x.
>>>
>>> How about we do this instead?
>>> - a 4.4.2 maintenance release to pick up Camel 2.8.5 and CXF 2.4.7
>>> - a 4.5.0 release that includes the latest Camel 2.9.x and CXF 2.5.x,
>>> together with ActiveMQ 5.5.1
>>> - a 4.6.0 release that includes Camel 2.10.x, CXF 2.6.x and ActiveMQ
>> 5.6.0
>>>
>>> The first one should be very easy to do, since we already have a
>>> maintenance branch in the features project so this should only be about
>>> updating the dependency versions in the parent/pom.xml and making sure
>>> everything works fine. In parallel, we can also do the 4.5.0 release set
>>> from trunk (this requires us to release everything again, so that's a bit
>>> more work). Not sure we want to do a 4.5.0 and 4.6.0, we might also want
>>> to consider going straight for Camel 2.10.x and CXF 2.6.x in 4.5.0 as
>> well
>>> - wdyt?
>>>
>>
>> I dont think its good to cut so many new releases, that just burdens
>> the SMX team to maintain that.
>> And also confuses the community with that many releases.
>>
>> I would go for a patch release of the existing 4.4.x with the patch
>> version of the AMQ,CXF and Camel that matches.
>> And then for SMX 4.5 jump straight to AMQ 5.6, CXF 2.6, and Camel 2.10.
>>
>> Do not do a SMX release with Camel 2.9, AMQ 5.5.1 etc. That is just
>> waste of time.
>>
>> Just my thoughts.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Gert Vanthienen
>>> ------------------------
>>> FuseSource
>>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>>> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb@nanthrax.net
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>
>>>> just to summarise the proposal:
>>>>
>>>> 1/ release ServiceMix 4.4.1: this is a maintenance release to upgrade to
>>>> new Camel 2.9.2, Karaf 2.2.7 and provide some bug fixes. In term of
>>>> dependencies version, it means: Karaf 2.2.7, Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.2,
>>>> ActiveMQ 5.5.1
>>>> 2/ prepare ServiceMix 4.5.0: this release will include Karaf 2.2.x
>>>> (probably Karaf 2.2.7), Camel 2.10, CXF 2.6.x, ActiveMQ 5.6
>>>>
>>>> Is it ok for you all ?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 05/07/2012 04:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Claus,
>>>>>
>>>>> Good idea, I will take a look on the Camel issue in the mean time.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>>>
>>>>> On 05/07/2012 04:38 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW I have started a parallel discussion on Camel @dev about the Camel
>>>>>> 2.10 release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So the Camel team will work towards getting that release out so SMX
>>>>>> 4.5 can jump on the train and be up to date with all the latest
>>>>>> release of CXF, AMQ and Camel.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW: Camel 2.10 is already upgraded to Karaf 2.2.7 and CXF 2.6.0. And
>>>>>> we will jump on AMQ 5.6.0 when the JARs hit Maven central.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As many of you are also on the Camel team, then take a look in the
>>>>>> Camel JIRA and help get those pending tickets resolved. And with the
>>>>>> documentation as well. We should avoid doing releases which lacks
>>>>>> documentation. That is a slipping slope I would like to avoid.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to
>>>>>>> make a
>>>>>>> ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and
>>>>>>> cut
>>>>>>> off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Claus Ibsen
>> -----------------
>> CamelOne 2012 Conference, May 15-16, 2012: http://camelone.com
>> FuseSource
>> Email: cibsen@fusesource.com
>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>> Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews
>> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
>> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
>>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?
Posted by Gert Vanthienen <ge...@gmail.com>.
Claus,
Yeah, that's what I was thinking as well - there's no real value in an
extra ServiceMix release that ships with the backlevel Camel/CXF versions
Regards,
Gert Vanthienen
------------------------
FuseSource
Web: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Claus Ibsen <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Gert Vanthienen
> <ge...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Jean-Baptiste,
> >
> >
> > We already have a 4.4.1 release out since the end of February - up to
> now,
> > the 4.4.x release have been using Camel 2.8.x and CXF 2.4.x.
> >
> > How about we do this instead?
> > - a 4.4.2 maintenance release to pick up Camel 2.8.5 and CXF 2.4.7
> > - a 4.5.0 release that includes the latest Camel 2.9.x and CXF 2.5.x,
> > together with ActiveMQ 5.5.1
> > - a 4.6.0 release that includes Camel 2.10.x, CXF 2.6.x and ActiveMQ
> 5.6.0
> >
> > The first one should be very easy to do, since we already have a
> > maintenance branch in the features project so this should only be about
> > updating the dependency versions in the parent/pom.xml and making sure
> > everything works fine. In parallel, we can also do the 4.5.0 release set
> > from trunk (this requires us to release everything again, so that's a bit
> > more work). Not sure we want to do a 4.5.0 and 4.6.0, we might also want
> > to consider going straight for Camel 2.10.x and CXF 2.6.x in 4.5.0 as
> well
> > - wdyt?
> >
>
> I dont think its good to cut so many new releases, that just burdens
> the SMX team to maintain that.
> And also confuses the community with that many releases.
>
> I would go for a patch release of the existing 4.4.x with the patch
> version of the AMQ,CXF and Camel that matches.
> And then for SMX 4.5 jump straight to AMQ 5.6, CXF 2.6, and Camel 2.10.
>
> Do not do a SMX release with Camel 2.9, AMQ 5.5.1 etc. That is just
> waste of time.
>
> Just my thoughts.
>
>
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Gert Vanthienen
> > ------------------------
> > FuseSource
> > Web: http://fusesource.com
> > Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb@nanthrax.net
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Hi guys,
> >>
> >> just to summarise the proposal:
> >>
> >> 1/ release ServiceMix 4.4.1: this is a maintenance release to upgrade to
> >> new Camel 2.9.2, Karaf 2.2.7 and provide some bug fixes. In term of
> >> dependencies version, it means: Karaf 2.2.7, Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.2,
> >> ActiveMQ 5.5.1
> >> 2/ prepare ServiceMix 4.5.0: this release will include Karaf 2.2.x
> >> (probably Karaf 2.2.7), Camel 2.10, CXF 2.6.x, ActiveMQ 5.6
> >>
> >> Is it ok for you all ?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Regards
> >> JB
> >>
> >>
> >> On 05/07/2012 04:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks Claus,
> >>>
> >>> Good idea, I will take a look on the Camel issue in the mean time.
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>> JB
> >>>
> >>> On 05/07/2012 04:38 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi
> >>>>
> >>>> BTW I have started a parallel discussion on Camel @dev about the Camel
> >>>> 2.10 release.
> >>>>
> >>>> So the Camel team will work towards getting that release out so SMX
> >>>> 4.5 can jump on the train and be up to date with all the latest
> >>>> release of CXF, AMQ and Camel.
> >>>>
> >>>> BTW: Camel 2.10 is already upgraded to Karaf 2.2.7 and CXF 2.6.0. And
> >>>> we will jump on AMQ 5.6.0 when the JARs hit Maven central.
> >>>>
> >>>> As many of you are also on the Camel team, then take a look in the
> >>>> Camel JIRA and help get those pending tickets resolved. And with the
> >>>> documentation as well. We should avoid doing releases which lacks
> >>>> documentation. That is a slipping slope I would like to avoid.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to
> >>>>> make a
> >>>>> ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> WDYT ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and
> >>>>> cut
> >>>>> off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards
> >>>>> JB
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> >>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
> >>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> >>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >> --
> >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> >> jbonofre@apache.org
> >> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> >> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Claus Ibsen
> -----------------
> CamelOne 2012 Conference, May 15-16, 2012: http://camelone.com
> FuseSource
> Email: cibsen@fusesource.com
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews
> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
>
Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi Claus,
I think that some users are waiting for a ServiceMix version including
the latest Camel release (so 2.9.2 currently).
Depending of the timeframe, I'm agree that it makes sense to directly
jump to Camel 2.10 in ServiceMix 4.5.0.
I'm working on 4.4.2 right now, we will see where we are next week.
Regards
JB
On 05/10/2012 10:00 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Gert Vanthienen
> <ge...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Jean-Baptiste,
>>
>>
>> We already have a 4.4.1 release out since the end of February - up to now,
>> the 4.4.x release have been using Camel 2.8.x and CXF 2.4.x.
>>
>> How about we do this instead?
>> - a 4.4.2 maintenance release to pick up Camel 2.8.5 and CXF 2.4.7
>> - a 4.5.0 release that includes the latest Camel 2.9.x and CXF 2.5.x,
>> together with ActiveMQ 5.5.1
>> - a 4.6.0 release that includes Camel 2.10.x, CXF 2.6.x and ActiveMQ 5.6.0
>>
>> The first one should be very easy to do, since we already have a
>> maintenance branch in the features project so this should only be about
>> updating the dependency versions in the parent/pom.xml and making sure
>> everything works fine. In parallel, we can also do the 4.5.0 release set
>> from trunk (this requires us to release everything again, so that's a bit
>> more work). Not sure we want to do a 4.5.0 and 4.6.0, we might also want
>> to consider going straight for Camel 2.10.x and CXF 2.6.x in 4.5.0 as well
>> - wdyt?
>>
>
> I dont think its good to cut so many new releases, that just burdens
> the SMX team to maintain that.
> And also confuses the community with that many releases.
>
> I would go for a patch release of the existing 4.4.x with the patch
> version of the AMQ,CXF and Camel that matches.
> And then for SMX 4.5 jump straight to AMQ 5.6, CXF 2.6, and Camel 2.10.
>
> Do not do a SMX release with Camel 2.9, AMQ 5.5.1 etc. That is just
> waste of time.
>
> Just my thoughts.
>
>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Gert Vanthienen
>> ------------------------
>> FuseSource
>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> just to summarise the proposal:
>>>
>>> 1/ release ServiceMix 4.4.1: this is a maintenance release to upgrade to
>>> new Camel 2.9.2, Karaf 2.2.7 and provide some bug fixes. In term of
>>> dependencies version, it means: Karaf 2.2.7, Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.2,
>>> ActiveMQ 5.5.1
>>> 2/ prepare ServiceMix 4.5.0: this release will include Karaf 2.2.x
>>> (probably Karaf 2.2.7), Camel 2.10, CXF 2.6.x, ActiveMQ 5.6
>>>
>>> Is it ok for you all ?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>>
>>> On 05/07/2012 04:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks Claus,
>>>>
>>>> Good idea, I will take a look on the Camel issue in the mean time.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>> On 05/07/2012 04:38 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW I have started a parallel discussion on Camel @dev about the Camel
>>>>> 2.10 release.
>>>>>
>>>>> So the Camel team will work towards getting that release out so SMX
>>>>> 4.5 can jump on the train and be up to date with all the latest
>>>>> release of CXF, AMQ and Camel.
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW: Camel 2.10 is already upgraded to Karaf 2.2.7 and CXF 2.6.0. And
>>>>> we will jump on AMQ 5.6.0 when the JARs hit Maven central.
>>>>>
>>>>> As many of you are also on the Camel team, then take a look in the
>>>>> Camel JIRA and help get those pending tickets resolved. And with the
>>>>> documentation as well. We should avoid doing releases which lacks
>>>>> documentation. That is a slipping slope I would like to avoid.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to
>>>>>> make a
>>>>>> ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and
>>>>>> cut
>>>>>> off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> JB
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>
>
>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?
Posted by Claus Ibsen <cl...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Gert Vanthienen
<ge...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Jean-Baptiste,
>
>
> We already have a 4.4.1 release out since the end of February - up to now,
> the 4.4.x release have been using Camel 2.8.x and CXF 2.4.x.
>
> How about we do this instead?
> - a 4.4.2 maintenance release to pick up Camel 2.8.5 and CXF 2.4.7
> - a 4.5.0 release that includes the latest Camel 2.9.x and CXF 2.5.x,
> together with ActiveMQ 5.5.1
> - a 4.6.0 release that includes Camel 2.10.x, CXF 2.6.x and ActiveMQ 5.6.0
>
> The first one should be very easy to do, since we already have a
> maintenance branch in the features project so this should only be about
> updating the dependency versions in the parent/pom.xml and making sure
> everything works fine. In parallel, we can also do the 4.5.0 release set
> from trunk (this requires us to release everything again, so that's a bit
> more work). Not sure we want to do a 4.5.0 and 4.6.0, we might also want
> to consider going straight for Camel 2.10.x and CXF 2.6.x in 4.5.0 as well
> - wdyt?
>
I dont think its good to cut so many new releases, that just burdens
the SMX team to maintain that.
And also confuses the community with that many releases.
I would go for a patch release of the existing 4.4.x with the patch
version of the AMQ,CXF and Camel that matches.
And then for SMX 4.5 jump straight to AMQ 5.6, CXF 2.6, and Camel 2.10.
Do not do a SMX release with Camel 2.9, AMQ 5.5.1 etc. That is just
waste of time.
Just my thoughts.
>
> Regards,
>
> Gert Vanthienen
> ------------------------
> FuseSource
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>
>
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> just to summarise the proposal:
>>
>> 1/ release ServiceMix 4.4.1: this is a maintenance release to upgrade to
>> new Camel 2.9.2, Karaf 2.2.7 and provide some bug fixes. In term of
>> dependencies version, it means: Karaf 2.2.7, Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.2,
>> ActiveMQ 5.5.1
>> 2/ prepare ServiceMix 4.5.0: this release will include Karaf 2.2.x
>> (probably Karaf 2.2.7), Camel 2.10, CXF 2.6.x, ActiveMQ 5.6
>>
>> Is it ok for you all ?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>>
>> On 05/07/2012 04:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Claus,
>>>
>>> Good idea, I will take a look on the Camel issue in the mean time.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 05/07/2012 04:38 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> BTW I have started a parallel discussion on Camel @dev about the Camel
>>>> 2.10 release.
>>>>
>>>> So the Camel team will work towards getting that release out so SMX
>>>> 4.5 can jump on the train and be up to date with all the latest
>>>> release of CXF, AMQ and Camel.
>>>>
>>>> BTW: Camel 2.10 is already upgraded to Karaf 2.2.7 and CXF 2.6.0. And
>>>> we will jump on AMQ 5.6.0 when the JARs hit Maven central.
>>>>
>>>> As many of you are also on the Camel team, then take a look in the
>>>> Camel JIRA and help get those pending tickets resolved. And with the
>>>> documentation as well. We should avoid doing releases which lacks
>>>> documentation. That is a slipping slope I would like to avoid.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to
>>>>> make a
>>>>> ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>>>>>
>>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>>
>>>>> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and
>>>>> cut
>>>>> off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
--
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
CamelOne 2012 Conference, May 15-16, 2012: http://camelone.com
FuseSource
Email: cibsen@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?
Posted by Gert Vanthienen <ge...@gmail.com>.
Jean-Baptiste,
We already have a 4.4.1 release out since the end of February - up to now,
the 4.4.x release have been using Camel 2.8.x and CXF 2.4.x.
How about we do this instead?
- a 4.4.2 maintenance release to pick up Camel 2.8.5 and CXF 2.4.7
- a 4.5.0 release that includes the latest Camel 2.9.x and CXF 2.5.x,
together with ActiveMQ 5.5.1
- a 4.6.0 release that includes Camel 2.10.x, CXF 2.6.x and ActiveMQ 5.6.0
The first one should be very easy to do, since we already have a
maintenance branch in the features project so this should only be about
updating the dependency versions in the parent/pom.xml and making sure
everything works fine. In parallel, we can also do the 4.5.0 release set
from trunk (this requires us to release everything again, so that's a bit
more work). Not sure we want to do a 4.5.0 and 4.6.0, we might also want
to consider going straight for Camel 2.10.x and CXF 2.6.x in 4.5.0 as well
- wdyt?
Regards,
Gert Vanthienen
------------------------
FuseSource
Web: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> just to summarise the proposal:
>
> 1/ release ServiceMix 4.4.1: this is a maintenance release to upgrade to
> new Camel 2.9.2, Karaf 2.2.7 and provide some bug fixes. In term of
> dependencies version, it means: Karaf 2.2.7, Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.2,
> ActiveMQ 5.5.1
> 2/ prepare ServiceMix 4.5.0: this release will include Karaf 2.2.x
> (probably Karaf 2.2.7), Camel 2.10, CXF 2.6.x, ActiveMQ 5.6
>
> Is it ok for you all ?
>
> Thanks
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 05/07/2012 04:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
>> Thanks Claus,
>>
>> Good idea, I will take a look on the Camel issue in the mean time.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 05/07/2012 04:38 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> BTW I have started a parallel discussion on Camel @dev about the Camel
>>> 2.10 release.
>>>
>>> So the Camel team will work towards getting that release out so SMX
>>> 4.5 can jump on the train and be up to date with all the latest
>>> release of CXF, AMQ and Camel.
>>>
>>> BTW: Camel 2.10 is already upgraded to Karaf 2.2.7 and CXF 2.6.0. And
>>> we will jump on AMQ 5.6.0 when the JARs hit Maven central.
>>>
>>> As many of you are also on the Camel team, then take a look in the
>>> Camel JIRA and help get those pending tickets resolved. And with the
>>> documentation as well. We should avoid doing releases which lacks
>>> documentation. That is a slipping slope I would like to avoid.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to
>>>> make a
>>>> ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>>>>
>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>
>>>> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and
>>>> cut
>>>> off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>> --
>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi guys,
just to summarise the proposal:
1/ release ServiceMix 4.4.1: this is a maintenance release to upgrade to
new Camel 2.9.2, Karaf 2.2.7 and provide some bug fixes. In term of
dependencies version, it means: Karaf 2.2.7, Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.2,
ActiveMQ 5.5.1
2/ prepare ServiceMix 4.5.0: this release will include Karaf 2.2.x
(probably Karaf 2.2.7), Camel 2.10, CXF 2.6.x, ActiveMQ 5.6
Is it ok for you all ?
Thanks
Regards
JB
On 05/07/2012 04:49 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Thanks Claus,
>
> Good idea, I will take a look on the Camel issue in the mean time.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 05/07/2012 04:38 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> BTW I have started a parallel discussion on Camel @dev about the Camel
>> 2.10 release.
>>
>> So the Camel team will work towards getting that release out so SMX
>> 4.5 can jump on the train and be up to date with all the latest
>> release of CXF, AMQ and Camel.
>>
>> BTW: Camel 2.10 is already upgraded to Karaf 2.2.7 and CXF 2.6.0. And
>> we will jump on AMQ 5.6.0 when the JARs hit Maven central.
>>
>> As many of you are also on the Camel team, then take a look in the
>> Camel JIRA and help get those pending tickets resolved. And with the
>> documentation as well. We should avoid doing releases which lacks
>> documentation. That is a slipping slope I would like to avoid.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net>
>> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to
>>> make a
>>> ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>>>
>>> WDYT ?
>>>
>>> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and
>>> cut
>>> off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>> --
>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>>
>>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Thanks Claus,
Good idea, I will take a look on the Camel issue in the mean time.
Regards
JB
On 05/07/2012 04:38 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> BTW I have started a parallel discussion on Camel @dev about the Camel
> 2.10 release.
>
> So the Camel team will work towards getting that release out so SMX
> 4.5 can jump on the train and be up to date with all the latest
> release of CXF, AMQ and Camel.
>
> BTW: Camel 2.10 is already upgraded to Karaf 2.2.7 and CXF 2.6.0. And
> we will jump on AMQ 5.6.0 when the JARs hit Maven central.
>
> As many of you are also on the Camel team, then take a look in the
> Camel JIRA and help get those pending tickets resolved. And with the
> documentation as well. We should avoid doing releases which lacks
> documentation. That is a slipping slope I would like to avoid.
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to make a
>> ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>>
>> WDYT ?
>>
>> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and cut
>> off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?
Posted by Claus Ibsen <cl...@gmail.com>.
Hi
BTW I have started a parallel discussion on Camel @dev about the Camel
2.10 release.
So the Camel team will work towards getting that release out so SMX
4.5 can jump on the train and be up to date with all the latest
release of CXF, AMQ and Camel.
BTW: Camel 2.10 is already upgraded to Karaf 2.2.7 and CXF 2.6.0. And
we will jump on AMQ 5.6.0 when the JARs hit Maven central.
As many of you are also on the Camel team, then take a look in the
Camel JIRA and help get those pending tickets resolved. And with the
documentation as well. We should avoid doing releases which lacks
documentation. That is a slipping slope I would like to avoid.
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to make a
> ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>
> WDYT ?
>
> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and cut
> off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>
> Regards
> JB
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
--
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
CamelOne 2012 Conference, May 15-16, 2012: http://camelone.com
FuseSource
Email: cibsen@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?
Posted by Johan Edstrom <je...@savoirtech.com>.
+1.
On May 7, 2012, at 7:58 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> Why not wait for Camel 2.10?
> We will most likely get that out within a month or so.
>
> Then you can use Camel 2.10, CXF 2.6.x, and AMQ 5.6.0 as well.
>
>
> If you are eager to cut a SMX release why not a 4.4.2, with CXF +
> Camel upgrades in their patch releases.
>
>
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>> Yes, but Camel features still references CXF 2.5.x.
>>
>> Especially in Camel 2.9.2:
>>
>> <repository>mvn:org.apache.cxf.karaf/apache-cxf/2.5.2/xml/features</repository>
>>
>> So, I think it's better to align Camel and CXF versions.
>>
>> Else, I can override the feature in ServiceMix to pick the target versions.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 05/07/2012 03:39 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>>
>>> On Monday, May 07, 2012 09:40:40 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to
>>>> make a ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>>>
>>>
>>> I'd say go up to CXF 2.6.0. Much better OSGi support there.
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>
>>>> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and
>>>> cut off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
>
>
> --
> Claus Ibsen
> -----------------
> CamelOne 2012 Conference, May 15-16, 2012: http://camelone.com
> FuseSource
> Email: cibsen@fusesource.com
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews
> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
It makes sense Claus.
Regards
JB
On 05/07/2012 04:30 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>> My idea is to do both aka:
>>
>> - make a ServiceMix maintenance release (why not 4.4.1 with Camel 2.9.2,
>> Karaf 2.2.7, ActiveMQ 5.6.0, etc upgrade)
>
> I would avoid upgrading AMQ from 5.5.1 to 5.6 in a patch release.
> The AMQ 5.6.0 release is *big*, its 1 full year of development and
> 400+ jira tickets.
>
>
>> - make ServiceMix 4.5 including Camel 2.10, CXF 2.6, ActiveMQ 5.6.0, Karaf
>> 2.2.7
>
> Yes makes sense to only do the AMQ 5.6 upgrade in SMX 4.5.
>
>>
>> WDYT ?
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>>
>> On 05/07/2012 03:58 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Why not wait for Camel 2.10?
>>> We will most likely get that out within a month or so.
>>>
>>> Then you can use Camel 2.10, CXF 2.6.x, and AMQ 5.6.0 as well.
>>>
>>>
>>> If you are eager to cut a SMX release why not a 4.4.2, with CXF +
>>> Camel upgrades in their patch releases.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yes, but Camel features still references CXF 2.5.x.
>>>>
>>>> Especially in Camel 2.9.2:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <repository>mvn:org.apache.cxf.karaf/apache-cxf/2.5.2/xml/features</repository>
>>>>
>>>> So, I think it's better to align Camel and CXF versions.
>>>>
>>>> Else, I can override the feature in ServiceMix to pick the target
>>>> versions.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>> On 05/07/2012 03:39 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Monday, May 07, 2012 09:40:40 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to
>>>>>> make a ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd say go up to CXF 2.6.0. Much better OSGi support there.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and
>>>>>> cut off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?
Posted by Claus Ibsen <cl...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> My idea is to do both aka:
>
> - make a ServiceMix maintenance release (why not 4.4.1 with Camel 2.9.2,
> Karaf 2.2.7, ActiveMQ 5.6.0, etc upgrade)
I would avoid upgrading AMQ from 5.5.1 to 5.6 in a patch release.
The AMQ 5.6.0 release is *big*, its 1 full year of development and
400+ jira tickets.
> - make ServiceMix 4.5 including Camel 2.10, CXF 2.6, ActiveMQ 5.6.0, Karaf
> 2.2.7
Yes makes sense to only do the AMQ 5.6 upgrade in SMX 4.5.
>
> WDYT ?
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 05/07/2012 03:58 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Why not wait for Camel 2.10?
>> We will most likely get that out within a month or so.
>>
>> Then you can use Camel 2.10, CXF 2.6.x, and AMQ 5.6.0 as well.
>>
>>
>> If you are eager to cut a SMX release why not a 4.4.2, with CXF +
>> Camel upgrades in their patch releases.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, but Camel features still references CXF 2.5.x.
>>>
>>> Especially in Camel 2.9.2:
>>>
>>>
>>> <repository>mvn:org.apache.cxf.karaf/apache-cxf/2.5.2/xml/features</repository>
>>>
>>> So, I think it's better to align Camel and CXF versions.
>>>
>>> Else, I can override the feature in ServiceMix to pick the target
>>> versions.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 05/07/2012 03:39 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Monday, May 07, 2012 09:40:40 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to
>>>>> make a ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'd say go up to CXF 2.6.0. Much better OSGi support there.
>>>>
>>>> Dan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>>
>>>>> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and
>>>>> cut off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
--
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
CamelOne 2012 Conference, May 15-16, 2012: http://camelone.com
FuseSource
Email: cibsen@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
My idea is to do both aka:
- make a ServiceMix maintenance release (why not 4.4.1 with Camel 2.9.2,
Karaf 2.2.7, ActiveMQ 5.6.0, etc upgrade)
- make ServiceMix 4.5 including Camel 2.10, CXF 2.6, ActiveMQ 5.6.0,
Karaf 2.2.7
WDYT ?
Regards
JB
On 05/07/2012 03:58 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> Why not wait for Camel 2.10?
> We will most likely get that out within a month or so.
>
> Then you can use Camel 2.10, CXF 2.6.x, and AMQ 5.6.0 as well.
>
>
> If you are eager to cut a SMX release why not a 4.4.2, with CXF +
> Camel upgrades in their patch releases.
>
>
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>> Yes, but Camel features still references CXF 2.5.x.
>>
>> Especially in Camel 2.9.2:
>>
>> <repository>mvn:org.apache.cxf.karaf/apache-cxf/2.5.2/xml/features</repository>
>>
>> So, I think it's better to align Camel and CXF versions.
>>
>> Else, I can override the feature in ServiceMix to pick the target versions.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 05/07/2012 03:39 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>>
>>> On Monday, May 07, 2012 09:40:40 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to
>>>> make a ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>>>
>>>
>>> I'd say go up to CXF 2.6.0. Much better OSGi support there.
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> WDYT ?
>>>>
>>>> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and
>>>> cut off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?
Posted by Claus Ibsen <cl...@gmail.com>.
Hi
Why not wait for Camel 2.10?
We will most likely get that out within a month or so.
Then you can use Camel 2.10, CXF 2.6.x, and AMQ 5.6.0 as well.
If you are eager to cut a SMX release why not a 4.4.2, with CXF +
Camel upgrades in their patch releases.
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> Yes, but Camel features still references CXF 2.5.x.
>
> Especially in Camel 2.9.2:
>
> <repository>mvn:org.apache.cxf.karaf/apache-cxf/2.5.2/xml/features</repository>
>
> So, I think it's better to align Camel and CXF versions.
>
> Else, I can override the feature in ServiceMix to pick the target versions.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 05/07/2012 03:39 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>
>> On Monday, May 07, 2012 09:40:40 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to
>>> make a ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>>
>>
>> I'd say go up to CXF 2.6.0. Much better OSGi support there.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>>
>>> WDYT ?
>>>
>>> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and
>>> cut off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
--
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
CamelOne 2012 Conference, May 15-16, 2012: http://camelone.com
FuseSource
Email: cibsen@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Yes, but Camel features still references CXF 2.5.x.
Especially in Camel 2.9.2:
<repository>mvn:org.apache.cxf.karaf/apache-cxf/2.5.2/xml/features</repository>
So, I think it's better to align Camel and CXF versions.
Else, I can override the feature in ServiceMix to pick the target versions.
Regards
JB
On 05/07/2012 03:39 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> On Monday, May 07, 2012 09:40:40 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to
>> make a ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>
> I'd say go up to CXF 2.6.0. Much better OSGi support there.
>
> Dan
>
>
>> WDYT ?
>>
>> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and
>> cut off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>
>
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?
Posted by Daniel Kulp <da...@kulp.com>.
On Monday, May 07, 2012 09:40:40 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to
> make a ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
I'd say go up to CXF 2.6.0. Much better OSGi support there.
Dan
> WDYT ?
>
> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and
> cut off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>
> Regards
> JB
--
Daniel Kulp
dan@kulp.com
http://dankulp.com/blog
Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?
Posted by Ioannis Canellos <io...@gmail.com>.
Awesome! +1
--
*Ioannis Canellos*
*
FuseSource <http://fusesource.com>
**
Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com
**
Twitter: iocanel
*
Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
It makes sense. I will start as soon as ActiveMQ 5.6.0 artifacts are
available on Central.
I'm starting the others updates to check if all is OK in the mean time.
Regards
JB
On 05/07/2012 11:14 AM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
> Jean-Baptiste,
>
> Yeah, that definitely makes sense for me - there also was an ActiveMQ 5.6.0
> release candidate vote this week, so perhaps we can add that one to the
> 'Mix as well. I should have some cycles available next week to help out
> too.
>
> Regards,
>
> Gert Vanthienen
> ------------------------
> FuseSource
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>
>
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré<jb...@nanthrax.net>wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to make
>> a ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>>
>> WDYT ?
>>
>> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and cut
>> off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?
Posted by Charles Moulliard <cm...@gmail.com>.
Of course ActiveMQ 5.6 should be integrated and specifically as it supports
Eclipse Jetty 7.5, WebSocket, ...
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Gert Vanthienen
<ge...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Jean-Baptiste,
>
> Yeah, that definitely makes sense for me - there also was an ActiveMQ 5.6.0
> release candidate vote this week, so perhaps we can add that one to the
> 'Mix as well. I should have some cycles available next week to help out
> too.
>
> Regards,
>
> Gert Vanthienen
> ------------------------
> FuseSource
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>
>
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb@nanthrax.net
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to
> make
> > a ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
> >
> > WDYT ?
> >
> > If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and cut
> > off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> > --
> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > jbonofre@apache.org
> > http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >
>
Re: [PROPOSAL] Toward ServiceMix 4.5.0 ?
Posted by Gert Vanthienen <ge...@gmail.com>.
Jean-Baptiste,
Yeah, that definitely makes sense for me - there also was an ActiveMQ 5.6.0
release candidate vote this week, so perhaps we can add that one to the
'Mix as well. I should have some cycles available next week to help out
too.
Regards,
Gert Vanthienen
------------------------
FuseSource
Web: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Now that Camel 2.9.2, CXF 2.5.3 and Karaf 2.2.7 are out, I propose to make
> a ServiceMix 4.5.0 release which upgrade to these versions.
>
> WDYT ?
>
> If all are OK, I will update the dependencies, make a test series and cut
> off ServiceMix 4.5.0.
>
> Regards
> JB
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>