You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to droids-dev@incubator.apache.org by Richard Frovarp <rf...@apache.org> on 2011/05/26 03:03:11 UTC
RC2 up for review
RC2 is up for review. I'll call a vote sometime soon (Tomorrow or
Friday), I don't want to find something and have to abort another vote.
I have figured out how to have maven behave and create a branch and work
from that idea. So I've created a 0.1.x branch. Let the 0.2.0 goodness
proceed on trunk and it won't affect getting this release done.
Please check the release out to make sure everything is good. The source
file is clean, everything has signatures that pass, md5s, sha1s,
NOTICEs, and LICENSEs.
Changes since last time:
Extra modules removed
Docs removed
NOTICE and LICENSE consolidated and at source root
Everything passes RAT now
The source release is clean
Patch to fix crawl depth applied
Source tag (r1127762)
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/droids/tags/0.1-incubating/
Maven staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedroids-011/
Source release:
http://people.apache.org/~rfrovarp/droids/
PGP release keys (signed using 3698A2B1):
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/droids/KEYS
Re: RC2 up for review
Posted by Chapuis Bertil <bc...@agimem.com>.
Since you removed the doc files, for me, everything is fine for the release.
The documentation work will take place on the trunk and affect 0.0.2. Thanks
a lot for your great work!
On 27 May 2011 07:02, Richard Frovarp <rf...@apache.org> wrote:
> Okay. Do what you think is best. I had to head out early to help my
> brother
> take care of stuff in advance of flooding in Bismarck. I won't be able to
> do
> anything with this until probably Tuesday of next week.
> On May 26, 2011 3:16 PM, "Chapuis Bertil" <bc...@agimem.com> wrote:
> > I think it's good to remove the src/site and the forrest doc from the
> 0.1.x
> > branch.
> >
> > For the trunk and the website, I think the maven site plugin is really
> good.
> > That's why I started to create the "src/site" folders and moved a part of
> > the current documentation in apt files. This format is simple to
> understand
> > and should facilitate the documentation work. You can generate the site
> with
> > "mvn site" and the result is stored in "target/site".
> >
> > On 26 May 2011 18:41, Richard Frovarp <rf...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Looking at a couple of other projects (Maven & Tika), they do have
> >> src/site's in their releases. However, where they are present, they do
> have
> >> content.
> >>
> >>
> >> On 05/26/2011 11:36 AM, Richard Frovarp wrote:
> >>
> >>> Those probably should be removed. Looking at them, the src/site don't
> >>> have any content in them, just css, images, and a placeholder content
> >>> file that only has the license.
> >>>
> >>> I also noticed that droids-[solr|spring|wicket] have a
> src/documentation
> >>> directory and those just have boilerplate documentation as well.
> >>>
> >>> For the purposes of this release, I've removed those directories from
> >>> the 0.1.x branch. Is this overstepping?
> >>>
> >>> One thing that does need to be worked on soon is the website. But given
> >>> all of these changes, I'm not quite sure what the update strategy is.
> >>>
> >>> On 05/26/2011 01:55 AM, Chapuis Bertil wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Thanks a lot for your work. I noticed you removed the maven site from
> the
> >>>> trunk (src/site). The modules also have a site folder (core/src/site).
> Do
> >>>> you want me to remove them? Or do you intentionally kept them?
> >>>>
> >>>> On 26 May 2011 05:03, Richard Frovarp<rf...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> RC2 is up for review. I'll call a vote sometime soon (Tomorrow or
> >>>>> Friday),
> >>>>> I don't want to find something and have to abort another vote. I have
> >>>>> figured out how to have maven behave and create a branch and work
> >>>>> from that
> >>>>> idea. So I've created a 0.1.x branch. Let the 0.2.0 goodness proceed
> on
> >>>>> trunk and it won't affect getting this release done.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please check the release out to make sure everything is good. The
> source
> >>>>> file is clean, everything has signatures that pass, md5s, sha1s,
> >>>>> NOTICEs,
> >>>>> and LICENSEs.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Changes since last time:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Extra modules removed
> >>>>> Docs removed
> >>>>> NOTICE and LICENSE consolidated and at source root
> >>>>> Everything passes RAT now
> >>>>> The source release is clean
> >>>>> Patch to fix crawl depth applied
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Source tag (r1127762)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/droids/tags/0.1-incubating/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Maven staging repo:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedroids-011/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Source release:
> >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~rfrovarp/droids/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> PGP release keys (signed using 3698A2B1):
> >>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/droids/KEYS
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Bertil Chapuis
> > Agimem Sàrl
> > http://www.agimem.com
>
--
Bertil Chapuis
Agimem Sàrl
http://www.agimem.com
Re: RC2 up for review
Posted by Richard Frovarp <rf...@apache.org>.
Okay. Do what you think is best. I had to head out early to help my brother
take care of stuff in advance of flooding in Bismarck. I won't be able to do
anything with this until probably Tuesday of next week.
On May 26, 2011 3:16 PM, "Chapuis Bertil" <bc...@agimem.com> wrote:
> I think it's good to remove the src/site and the forrest doc from the
0.1.x
> branch.
>
> For the trunk and the website, I think the maven site plugin is really
good.
> That's why I started to create the "src/site" folders and moved a part of
> the current documentation in apt files. This format is simple to
understand
> and should facilitate the documentation work. You can generate the site
with
> "mvn site" and the result is stored in "target/site".
>
> On 26 May 2011 18:41, Richard Frovarp <rf...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Looking at a couple of other projects (Maven & Tika), they do have
>> src/site's in their releases. However, where they are present, they do
have
>> content.
>>
>>
>> On 05/26/2011 11:36 AM, Richard Frovarp wrote:
>>
>>> Those probably should be removed. Looking at them, the src/site don't
>>> have any content in them, just css, images, and a placeholder content
>>> file that only has the license.
>>>
>>> I also noticed that droids-[solr|spring|wicket] have a src/documentation
>>> directory and those just have boilerplate documentation as well.
>>>
>>> For the purposes of this release, I've removed those directories from
>>> the 0.1.x branch. Is this overstepping?
>>>
>>> One thing that does need to be worked on soon is the website. But given
>>> all of these changes, I'm not quite sure what the update strategy is.
>>>
>>> On 05/26/2011 01:55 AM, Chapuis Bertil wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks a lot for your work. I noticed you removed the maven site from
the
>>>> trunk (src/site). The modules also have a site folder (core/src/site).
Do
>>>> you want me to remove them? Or do you intentionally kept them?
>>>>
>>>> On 26 May 2011 05:03, Richard Frovarp<rf...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> RC2 is up for review. I'll call a vote sometime soon (Tomorrow or
>>>>> Friday),
>>>>> I don't want to find something and have to abort another vote. I have
>>>>> figured out how to have maven behave and create a branch and work
>>>>> from that
>>>>> idea. So I've created a 0.1.x branch. Let the 0.2.0 goodness proceed
on
>>>>> trunk and it won't affect getting this release done.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please check the release out to make sure everything is good. The
source
>>>>> file is clean, everything has signatures that pass, md5s, sha1s,
>>>>> NOTICEs,
>>>>> and LICENSEs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes since last time:
>>>>>
>>>>> Extra modules removed
>>>>> Docs removed
>>>>> NOTICE and LICENSE consolidated and at source root
>>>>> Everything passes RAT now
>>>>> The source release is clean
>>>>> Patch to fix crawl depth applied
>>>>>
>>>>> Source tag (r1127762)
>>>>>
>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/droids/tags/0.1-incubating/
>>>>>
>>>>> Maven staging repo:
>>>>>
>>>>>
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedroids-011/
>>>>>
>>>>> Source release:
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~rfrovarp/droids/
>>>>>
>>>>> PGP release keys (signed using 3698A2B1):
>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/droids/KEYS
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Bertil Chapuis
> Agimem Sàrl
> http://www.agimem.com
Re: RC2 up for review
Posted by Chapuis Bertil <bc...@agimem.com>.
I think it's good to remove the src/site and the forrest doc from the 0.1.x
branch.
For the trunk and the website, I think the maven site plugin is really good.
That's why I started to create the "src/site" folders and moved a part of
the current documentation in apt files. This format is simple to understand
and should facilitate the documentation work. You can generate the site with
"mvn site" and the result is stored in "target/site".
On 26 May 2011 18:41, Richard Frovarp <rf...@apache.org> wrote:
> Looking at a couple of other projects (Maven & Tika), they do have
> src/site's in their releases. However, where they are present, they do have
> content.
>
>
> On 05/26/2011 11:36 AM, Richard Frovarp wrote:
>
>> Those probably should be removed. Looking at them, the src/site don't
>> have any content in them, just css, images, and a placeholder content
>> file that only has the license.
>>
>> I also noticed that droids-[solr|spring|wicket] have a src/documentation
>> directory and those just have boilerplate documentation as well.
>>
>> For the purposes of this release, I've removed those directories from
>> the 0.1.x branch. Is this overstepping?
>>
>> One thing that does need to be worked on soon is the website. But given
>> all of these changes, I'm not quite sure what the update strategy is.
>>
>> On 05/26/2011 01:55 AM, Chapuis Bertil wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks a lot for your work. I noticed you removed the maven site from the
>>> trunk (src/site). The modules also have a site folder (core/src/site). Do
>>> you want me to remove them? Or do you intentionally kept them?
>>>
>>> On 26 May 2011 05:03, Richard Frovarp<rf...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> RC2 is up for review. I'll call a vote sometime soon (Tomorrow or
>>>> Friday),
>>>> I don't want to find something and have to abort another vote. I have
>>>> figured out how to have maven behave and create a branch and work
>>>> from that
>>>> idea. So I've created a 0.1.x branch. Let the 0.2.0 goodness proceed on
>>>> trunk and it won't affect getting this release done.
>>>>
>>>> Please check the release out to make sure everything is good. The source
>>>> file is clean, everything has signatures that pass, md5s, sha1s,
>>>> NOTICEs,
>>>> and LICENSEs.
>>>>
>>>> Changes since last time:
>>>>
>>>> Extra modules removed
>>>> Docs removed
>>>> NOTICE and LICENSE consolidated and at source root
>>>> Everything passes RAT now
>>>> The source release is clean
>>>> Patch to fix crawl depth applied
>>>>
>>>> Source tag (r1127762)
>>>>
>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/droids/tags/0.1-incubating/
>>>>
>>>> Maven staging repo:
>>>>
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedroids-011/
>>>>
>>>> Source release:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~rfrovarp/droids/
>>>>
>>>> PGP release keys (signed using 3698A2B1):
>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/droids/KEYS
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
--
Bertil Chapuis
Agimem Sàrl
http://www.agimem.com
Re: RC2 up for review
Posted by Richard Frovarp <rf...@apache.org>.
Looking at a couple of other projects (Maven & Tika), they do have
src/site's in their releases. However, where they are present, they do
have content.
On 05/26/2011 11:36 AM, Richard Frovarp wrote:
> Those probably should be removed. Looking at them, the src/site don't
> have any content in them, just css, images, and a placeholder content
> file that only has the license.
>
> I also noticed that droids-[solr|spring|wicket] have a src/documentation
> directory and those just have boilerplate documentation as well.
>
> For the purposes of this release, I've removed those directories from
> the 0.1.x branch. Is this overstepping?
>
> One thing that does need to be worked on soon is the website. But given
> all of these changes, I'm not quite sure what the update strategy is.
>
> On 05/26/2011 01:55 AM, Chapuis Bertil wrote:
>> Thanks a lot for your work. I noticed you removed the maven site from the
>> trunk (src/site). The modules also have a site folder (core/src/site). Do
>> you want me to remove them? Or do you intentionally kept them?
>>
>> On 26 May 2011 05:03, Richard Frovarp<rf...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> RC2 is up for review. I'll call a vote sometime soon (Tomorrow or
>>> Friday),
>>> I don't want to find something and have to abort another vote. I have
>>> figured out how to have maven behave and create a branch and work
>>> from that
>>> idea. So I've created a 0.1.x branch. Let the 0.2.0 goodness proceed on
>>> trunk and it won't affect getting this release done.
>>>
>>> Please check the release out to make sure everything is good. The source
>>> file is clean, everything has signatures that pass, md5s, sha1s,
>>> NOTICEs,
>>> and LICENSEs.
>>>
>>> Changes since last time:
>>>
>>> Extra modules removed
>>> Docs removed
>>> NOTICE and LICENSE consolidated and at source root
>>> Everything passes RAT now
>>> The source release is clean
>>> Patch to fix crawl depth applied
>>>
>>> Source tag (r1127762)
>>>
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/droids/tags/0.1-incubating/
>>>
>>> Maven staging repo:
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedroids-011/
>>>
>>> Source release:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~rfrovarp/droids/
>>>
>>> PGP release keys (signed using 3698A2B1):
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/droids/KEYS
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: RC2 up for review
Posted by Richard Frovarp <rf...@apache.org>.
Those probably should be removed. Looking at them, the src/site don't
have any content in them, just css, images, and a placeholder content
file that only has the license.
I also noticed that droids-[solr|spring|wicket] have a src/documentation
directory and those just have boilerplate documentation as well.
For the purposes of this release, I've removed those directories from
the 0.1.x branch. Is this overstepping?
One thing that does need to be worked on soon is the website. But given
all of these changes, I'm not quite sure what the update strategy is.
On 05/26/2011 01:55 AM, Chapuis Bertil wrote:
> Thanks a lot for your work. I noticed you removed the maven site from the
> trunk (src/site). The modules also have a site folder (core/src/site). Do
> you want me to remove them? Or do you intentionally kept them?
>
> On 26 May 2011 05:03, Richard Frovarp<rf...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> RC2 is up for review. I'll call a vote sometime soon (Tomorrow or Friday),
>> I don't want to find something and have to abort another vote. I have
>> figured out how to have maven behave and create a branch and work from that
>> idea. So I've created a 0.1.x branch. Let the 0.2.0 goodness proceed on
>> trunk and it won't affect getting this release done.
>>
>> Please check the release out to make sure everything is good. The source
>> file is clean, everything has signatures that pass, md5s, sha1s, NOTICEs,
>> and LICENSEs.
>>
>> Changes since last time:
>>
>> Extra modules removed
>> Docs removed
>> NOTICE and LICENSE consolidated and at source root
>> Everything passes RAT now
>> The source release is clean
>> Patch to fix crawl depth applied
>>
>> Source tag (r1127762)
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/droids/tags/0.1-incubating/
>>
>> Maven staging repo:
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedroids-011/
>>
>> Source release:
>> http://people.apache.org/~rfrovarp/droids/
>>
>> PGP release keys (signed using 3698A2B1):
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/droids/KEYS
>>
>
>
>
Re: RC2 up for review
Posted by Chapuis Bertil <bc...@agimem.com>.
Thanks a lot for your work. I noticed you removed the maven site from the
trunk (src/site). The modules also have a site folder (core/src/site). Do
you want me to remove them? Or do you intentionally kept them?
On 26 May 2011 05:03, Richard Frovarp <rf...@apache.org> wrote:
> RC2 is up for review. I'll call a vote sometime soon (Tomorrow or Friday),
> I don't want to find something and have to abort another vote. I have
> figured out how to have maven behave and create a branch and work from that
> idea. So I've created a 0.1.x branch. Let the 0.2.0 goodness proceed on
> trunk and it won't affect getting this release done.
>
> Please check the release out to make sure everything is good. The source
> file is clean, everything has signatures that pass, md5s, sha1s, NOTICEs,
> and LICENSEs.
>
> Changes since last time:
>
> Extra modules removed
> Docs removed
> NOTICE and LICENSE consolidated and at source root
> Everything passes RAT now
> The source release is clean
> Patch to fix crawl depth applied
>
> Source tag (r1127762)
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/droids/tags/0.1-incubating/
>
> Maven staging repo:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedroids-011/
>
> Source release:
> http://people.apache.org/~rfrovarp/droids/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 3698A2B1):
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/droids/KEYS
>
--
Bertil Chapuis
Agimem Sàrl
http://www.agimem.com