You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mesos.apache.org by Kiersten Gaffney <ki...@mesosphere.io> on 2016/03/19 00:59:06 UTC
Vote on #MesosCon proposals, deadline Friday March 25
Please take a few minutes the next few days and review what members of the
community have submitted!
Voting forms close Friday, March 25, 2016, 11:55 PST
A total of 154 proposals were submitted in time for #MesosCon review, up
significantly from 63 submitted for last year’s conference. Similar to last
year, the MesosCon program committee is opening these proposals up for
community review/feedback to better-inform our decisions about what should
be included in the program.
In order to make it easier to review a subset of the proposals, we’ve
segmented them based upon two loose themes: Developer and Users.
Developers: http://bit.ly/1RpZPvj
Talks on how frameworks can be used, developed, and integrate with Mesos.
Users: http://bit.ly/1Mspaxp
A combination of talks that are use cases (how company x uses Mesos), and
operations-focused (how we deploy x, use Docker, etc).
The forms above also include an opportunity to indicate which sessions you
didn't see proposed but would like to attend.
Thanks in advance for your participation!
Kiersten, Dave, and David (Program Committee)
Re: Vote on #MesosCon proposals, deadline Friday March 25
Posted by David Greenberg <ds...@gmail.com>.
We have had a couple delays, but we'll be ready with the official
announcement later this week.
Sorry for the delay! We know we're slightly behind our original schedule.
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:29 AM Tomek Janiszewski <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> @David Do you have results?
>
> pon., 21.03.2016 o 14:39 użytkownik David Greenberg <
> dsg123456789@gmail.com>
> napisał:
>
> > No, sorry--we'll collect the votes on Friday.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > David
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 9:01 PM Darren Haas <dh...@apple.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi David,
> >>
> >> We could always start the ranking using shuf. :) Is it possible to show
> >> the current votes during the ranking?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Darren
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPhone
> >> On Mar 19, 2016, at 4:45 PM, David Greenberg <ds...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Jay,
> >>
> >> Thanks for your feedback! The reason we're asking for you to rank the
> >> topics is that this will allow us to better understand everyone's
> relative
> >> preferences--next, we'll use standard voting algorithms to determine the
> >> schedule, to ensure most people get as many talks they want as
> possible. We
> >> hope you enjoy the program we come up with :)
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> David
> >>
> >> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 12:39 AM Jay JN Guo <gu...@cn.ibm.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Thank you for this good work and I'm already looking forward to this
> >>> MesosCon.
> >>>
> >>> Although one minor suggestion here, Accept/Reject on a scale of 10 is a
> >>> bit intimidating. Personally, I only have three feeling toward a topic:
> >>> will go/maybe/not interested, whereas quantifying these feeling into a
> >>> scale of 10 for 154 topics is just too much. Maybe we could simplify
> the
> >>> form in the future. We could take OpenStack summit voting form as an
> >>> example.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> /J
> >>>
> >>> ----- Original message -----
> >>> From: Kiersten Gaffney <ki...@mesosphere.io>
> >>> To: dev@mesos.apache.org, user@mesos.apache.org
> >>> Cc: David Greenberg <ds...@gmail.com>, Dave Lester <
> >>> dave@davelester.org>, Kiersten Gaffney <ki...@mesosphere.io>
> >>> Subject: Vote on #MesosCon proposals, deadline Friday March 25
> >>> Date: Sat, Mar 19, 2016 8:11 AM
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Please take a few minutes the next few days and review what members of
> >>> the
> >>> community have submitted!
> >>>
> >>> Voting forms close Friday, March 25, 2016, 11:55 PST
> >>>
> >>> A total of 154 proposals were submitted in time for #MesosCon review,
> up
> >>> significantly from 63 submitted for last year’s conference. Similar to
> >>> last
> >>> year, the MesosCon program committee is opening these proposals up for
> >>> community review/feedback to better-inform our decisions about what
> >>> should
> >>> be included in the program.
> >>>
> >>> In order to make it easier to review a subset of the proposals, we’ve
> >>> segmented them based upon two loose themes: Developer and Users.
> >>>
> >>> Developers: http://bit.ly/1RpZPvj
> >>>
> >>> Talks on how frameworks can be used, developed, and integrate with
> Mesos.
> >>>
> >>> Users: http://bit.ly/1Mspaxp
> >>>
> >>> A combination of talks that are use cases (how company x uses Mesos),
> and
> >>> operations-focused (how we deploy x, use Docker, etc).
> >>>
> >>> The forms above also include an opportunity to indicate which sessions
> >>> you
> >>> didn't see proposed but would like to attend.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks in advance for your participation!
> >>>
> >>> Kiersten, Dave, and David (Program Committee)
> >>>
> >>>
>
Re: Vote on #MesosCon proposals, deadline Friday March 25
Posted by David Greenberg <ds...@gmail.com>.
We have had a couple delays, but we'll be ready with the official
announcement later this week.
Sorry for the delay! We know we're slightly behind our original schedule.
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:29 AM Tomek Janiszewski <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> @David Do you have results?
>
> pon., 21.03.2016 o 14:39 użytkownik David Greenberg <
> dsg123456789@gmail.com>
> napisał:
>
> > No, sorry--we'll collect the votes on Friday.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > David
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 9:01 PM Darren Haas <dh...@apple.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi David,
> >>
> >> We could always start the ranking using shuf. :) Is it possible to show
> >> the current votes during the ranking?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Darren
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPhone
> >> On Mar 19, 2016, at 4:45 PM, David Greenberg <ds...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Jay,
> >>
> >> Thanks for your feedback! The reason we're asking for you to rank the
> >> topics is that this will allow us to better understand everyone's
> relative
> >> preferences--next, we'll use standard voting algorithms to determine the
> >> schedule, to ensure most people get as many talks they want as
> possible. We
> >> hope you enjoy the program we come up with :)
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> David
> >>
> >> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 12:39 AM Jay JN Guo <gu...@cn.ibm.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Thank you for this good work and I'm already looking forward to this
> >>> MesosCon.
> >>>
> >>> Although one minor suggestion here, Accept/Reject on a scale of 10 is a
> >>> bit intimidating. Personally, I only have three feeling toward a topic:
> >>> will go/maybe/not interested, whereas quantifying these feeling into a
> >>> scale of 10 for 154 topics is just too much. Maybe we could simplify
> the
> >>> form in the future. We could take OpenStack summit voting form as an
> >>> example.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> /J
> >>>
> >>> ----- Original message -----
> >>> From: Kiersten Gaffney <ki...@mesosphere.io>
> >>> To: dev@mesos.apache.org, user@mesos.apache.org
> >>> Cc: David Greenberg <ds...@gmail.com>, Dave Lester <
> >>> dave@davelester.org>, Kiersten Gaffney <ki...@mesosphere.io>
> >>> Subject: Vote on #MesosCon proposals, deadline Friday March 25
> >>> Date: Sat, Mar 19, 2016 8:11 AM
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Please take a few minutes the next few days and review what members of
> >>> the
> >>> community have submitted!
> >>>
> >>> Voting forms close Friday, March 25, 2016, 11:55 PST
> >>>
> >>> A total of 154 proposals were submitted in time for #MesosCon review,
> up
> >>> significantly from 63 submitted for last year’s conference. Similar to
> >>> last
> >>> year, the MesosCon program committee is opening these proposals up for
> >>> community review/feedback to better-inform our decisions about what
> >>> should
> >>> be included in the program.
> >>>
> >>> In order to make it easier to review a subset of the proposals, we’ve
> >>> segmented them based upon two loose themes: Developer and Users.
> >>>
> >>> Developers: http://bit.ly/1RpZPvj
> >>>
> >>> Talks on how frameworks can be used, developed, and integrate with
> Mesos.
> >>>
> >>> Users: http://bit.ly/1Mspaxp
> >>>
> >>> A combination of talks that are use cases (how company x uses Mesos),
> and
> >>> operations-focused (how we deploy x, use Docker, etc).
> >>>
> >>> The forms above also include an opportunity to indicate which sessions
> >>> you
> >>> didn't see proposed but would like to attend.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks in advance for your participation!
> >>>
> >>> Kiersten, Dave, and David (Program Committee)
> >>>
> >>>
>
Re: Vote on #MesosCon proposals, deadline Friday March 25
Posted by Tomek Janiszewski <ja...@gmail.com>.
@David Do you have results?
pon., 21.03.2016 o 14:39 użytkownik David Greenberg <ds...@gmail.com>
napisał:
> No, sorry--we'll collect the votes on Friday.
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 9:01 PM Darren Haas <dh...@apple.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> We could always start the ranking using shuf. :) Is it possible to show
>> the current votes during the ranking?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Darren
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> On Mar 19, 2016, at 4:45 PM, David Greenberg <ds...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jay,
>>
>> Thanks for your feedback! The reason we're asking for you to rank the
>> topics is that this will allow us to better understand everyone's relative
>> preferences--next, we'll use standard voting algorithms to determine the
>> schedule, to ensure most people get as many talks they want as possible. We
>> hope you enjoy the program we come up with :)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> David
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 12:39 AM Jay JN Guo <gu...@cn.ibm.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Thank you for this good work and I'm already looking forward to this
>>> MesosCon.
>>>
>>> Although one minor suggestion here, Accept/Reject on a scale of 10 is a
>>> bit intimidating. Personally, I only have three feeling toward a topic:
>>> will go/maybe/not interested, whereas quantifying these feeling into a
>>> scale of 10 for 154 topics is just too much. Maybe we could simplify the
>>> form in the future. We could take OpenStack summit voting form as an
>>> example.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> /J
>>>
>>> ----- Original message -----
>>> From: Kiersten Gaffney <ki...@mesosphere.io>
>>> To: dev@mesos.apache.org, user@mesos.apache.org
>>> Cc: David Greenberg <ds...@gmail.com>, Dave Lester <
>>> dave@davelester.org>, Kiersten Gaffney <ki...@mesosphere.io>
>>> Subject: Vote on #MesosCon proposals, deadline Friday March 25
>>> Date: Sat, Mar 19, 2016 8:11 AM
>>>
>>>
>>> Please take a few minutes the next few days and review what members of
>>> the
>>> community have submitted!
>>>
>>> Voting forms close Friday, March 25, 2016, 11:55 PST
>>>
>>> A total of 154 proposals were submitted in time for #MesosCon review, up
>>> significantly from 63 submitted for last year’s conference. Similar to
>>> last
>>> year, the MesosCon program committee is opening these proposals up for
>>> community review/feedback to better-inform our decisions about what
>>> should
>>> be included in the program.
>>>
>>> In order to make it easier to review a subset of the proposals, we’ve
>>> segmented them based upon two loose themes: Developer and Users.
>>>
>>> Developers: http://bit.ly/1RpZPvj
>>>
>>> Talks on how frameworks can be used, developed, and integrate with Mesos.
>>>
>>> Users: http://bit.ly/1Mspaxp
>>>
>>> A combination of talks that are use cases (how company x uses Mesos), and
>>> operations-focused (how we deploy x, use Docker, etc).
>>>
>>> The forms above also include an opportunity to indicate which sessions
>>> you
>>> didn't see proposed but would like to attend.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance for your participation!
>>>
>>> Kiersten, Dave, and David (Program Committee)
>>>
>>>
Re: Vote on #MesosCon proposals, deadline Friday March 25
Posted by Tomek Janiszewski <ja...@gmail.com>.
@David Do you have results?
pon., 21.03.2016 o 14:39 użytkownik David Greenberg <ds...@gmail.com>
napisał:
> No, sorry--we'll collect the votes on Friday.
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 9:01 PM Darren Haas <dh...@apple.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> We could always start the ranking using shuf. :) Is it possible to show
>> the current votes during the ranking?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Darren
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> On Mar 19, 2016, at 4:45 PM, David Greenberg <ds...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jay,
>>
>> Thanks for your feedback! The reason we're asking for you to rank the
>> topics is that this will allow us to better understand everyone's relative
>> preferences--next, we'll use standard voting algorithms to determine the
>> schedule, to ensure most people get as many talks they want as possible. We
>> hope you enjoy the program we come up with :)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> David
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 12:39 AM Jay JN Guo <gu...@cn.ibm.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Thank you for this good work and I'm already looking forward to this
>>> MesosCon.
>>>
>>> Although one minor suggestion here, Accept/Reject on a scale of 10 is a
>>> bit intimidating. Personally, I only have three feeling toward a topic:
>>> will go/maybe/not interested, whereas quantifying these feeling into a
>>> scale of 10 for 154 topics is just too much. Maybe we could simplify the
>>> form in the future. We could take OpenStack summit voting form as an
>>> example.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> /J
>>>
>>> ----- Original message -----
>>> From: Kiersten Gaffney <ki...@mesosphere.io>
>>> To: dev@mesos.apache.org, user@mesos.apache.org
>>> Cc: David Greenberg <ds...@gmail.com>, Dave Lester <
>>> dave@davelester.org>, Kiersten Gaffney <ki...@mesosphere.io>
>>> Subject: Vote on #MesosCon proposals, deadline Friday March 25
>>> Date: Sat, Mar 19, 2016 8:11 AM
>>>
>>>
>>> Please take a few minutes the next few days and review what members of
>>> the
>>> community have submitted!
>>>
>>> Voting forms close Friday, March 25, 2016, 11:55 PST
>>>
>>> A total of 154 proposals were submitted in time for #MesosCon review, up
>>> significantly from 63 submitted for last year’s conference. Similar to
>>> last
>>> year, the MesosCon program committee is opening these proposals up for
>>> community review/feedback to better-inform our decisions about what
>>> should
>>> be included in the program.
>>>
>>> In order to make it easier to review a subset of the proposals, we’ve
>>> segmented them based upon two loose themes: Developer and Users.
>>>
>>> Developers: http://bit.ly/1RpZPvj
>>>
>>> Talks on how frameworks can be used, developed, and integrate with Mesos.
>>>
>>> Users: http://bit.ly/1Mspaxp
>>>
>>> A combination of talks that are use cases (how company x uses Mesos), and
>>> operations-focused (how we deploy x, use Docker, etc).
>>>
>>> The forms above also include an opportunity to indicate which sessions
>>> you
>>> didn't see proposed but would like to attend.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance for your participation!
>>>
>>> Kiersten, Dave, and David (Program Committee)
>>>
>>>
Re: Vote on #MesosCon proposals, deadline Friday March 25
Posted by David Greenberg <ds...@gmail.com>.
No, sorry--we'll collect the votes on Friday.
Thanks,
David
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 9:01 PM Darren Haas <dh...@apple.com> wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> We could always start the ranking using shuf. :) Is it possible to show
> the current votes during the ranking?
>
> Thanks,
> Darren
>
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 19, 2016, at 4:45 PM, David Greenberg <ds...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jay,
>
> Thanks for your feedback! The reason we're asking for you to rank the
> topics is that this will allow us to better understand everyone's relative
> preferences--next, we'll use standard voting algorithms to determine the
> schedule, to ensure most people get as many talks they want as possible. We
> hope you enjoy the program we come up with :)
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 12:39 AM Jay JN Guo <gu...@cn.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thank you for this good work and I'm already looking forward to this
>> MesosCon.
>>
>> Although one minor suggestion here, Accept/Reject on a scale of 10 is a
>> bit intimidating. Personally, I only have three feeling toward a topic:
>> will go/maybe/not interested, whereas quantifying these feeling into a
>> scale of 10 for 154 topics is just too much. Maybe we could simplify the
>> form in the future. We could take OpenStack summit voting form as an
>> example.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> /J
>>
>> ----- Original message -----
>> From: Kiersten Gaffney <ki...@mesosphere.io>
>> To: dev@mesos.apache.org, user@mesos.apache.org
>> Cc: David Greenberg <ds...@gmail.com>, Dave Lester <
>> dave@davelester.org>, Kiersten Gaffney <ki...@mesosphere.io>
>> Subject: Vote on #MesosCon proposals, deadline Friday March 25
>> Date: Sat, Mar 19, 2016 8:11 AM
>>
>>
>> Please take a few minutes the next few days and review what members of the
>> community have submitted!
>>
>> Voting forms close Friday, March 25, 2016, 11:55 PST
>>
>> A total of 154 proposals were submitted in time for #MesosCon review, up
>> significantly from 63 submitted for last year’s conference. Similar to
>> last
>> year, the MesosCon program committee is opening these proposals up for
>> community review/feedback to better-inform our decisions about what should
>> be included in the program.
>>
>> In order to make it easier to review a subset of the proposals, we’ve
>> segmented them based upon two loose themes: Developer and Users.
>>
>> Developers: http://bit.ly/1RpZPvj
>>
>> Talks on how frameworks can be used, developed, and integrate with Mesos.
>>
>> Users: http://bit.ly/1Mspaxp
>>
>> A combination of talks that are use cases (how company x uses Mesos), and
>> operations-focused (how we deploy x, use Docker, etc).
>>
>> The forms above also include an opportunity to indicate which sessions you
>> didn't see proposed but would like to attend.
>>
>> Thanks in advance for your participation!
>>
>> Kiersten, Dave, and David (Program Committee)
>>
>>
Re: Vote on #MesosCon proposals, deadline Friday March 25
Posted by David Greenberg <ds...@gmail.com>.
No, sorry--we'll collect the votes on Friday.
Thanks,
David
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 9:01 PM Darren Haas <dh...@apple.com> wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> We could always start the ranking using shuf. :) Is it possible to show
> the current votes during the ranking?
>
> Thanks,
> Darren
>
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 19, 2016, at 4:45 PM, David Greenberg <ds...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Jay,
>
> Thanks for your feedback! The reason we're asking for you to rank the
> topics is that this will allow us to better understand everyone's relative
> preferences--next, we'll use standard voting algorithms to determine the
> schedule, to ensure most people get as many talks they want as possible. We
> hope you enjoy the program we come up with :)
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 12:39 AM Jay JN Guo <gu...@cn.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thank you for this good work and I'm already looking forward to this
>> MesosCon.
>>
>> Although one minor suggestion here, Accept/Reject on a scale of 10 is a
>> bit intimidating. Personally, I only have three feeling toward a topic:
>> will go/maybe/not interested, whereas quantifying these feeling into a
>> scale of 10 for 154 topics is just too much. Maybe we could simplify the
>> form in the future. We could take OpenStack summit voting form as an
>> example.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> /J
>>
>> ----- Original message -----
>> From: Kiersten Gaffney <ki...@mesosphere.io>
>> To: dev@mesos.apache.org, user@mesos.apache.org
>> Cc: David Greenberg <ds...@gmail.com>, Dave Lester <
>> dave@davelester.org>, Kiersten Gaffney <ki...@mesosphere.io>
>> Subject: Vote on #MesosCon proposals, deadline Friday March 25
>> Date: Sat, Mar 19, 2016 8:11 AM
>>
>>
>> Please take a few minutes the next few days and review what members of the
>> community have submitted!
>>
>> Voting forms close Friday, March 25, 2016, 11:55 PST
>>
>> A total of 154 proposals were submitted in time for #MesosCon review, up
>> significantly from 63 submitted for last year’s conference. Similar to
>> last
>> year, the MesosCon program committee is opening these proposals up for
>> community review/feedback to better-inform our decisions about what should
>> be included in the program.
>>
>> In order to make it easier to review a subset of the proposals, we’ve
>> segmented them based upon two loose themes: Developer and Users.
>>
>> Developers: http://bit.ly/1RpZPvj
>>
>> Talks on how frameworks can be used, developed, and integrate with Mesos.
>>
>> Users: http://bit.ly/1Mspaxp
>>
>> A combination of talks that are use cases (how company x uses Mesos), and
>> operations-focused (how we deploy x, use Docker, etc).
>>
>> The forms above also include an opportunity to indicate which sessions you
>> didn't see proposed but would like to attend.
>>
>> Thanks in advance for your participation!
>>
>> Kiersten, Dave, and David (Program Committee)
>>
>>
Re: Vote on #MesosCon proposals, deadline Friday March 25
Posted by Darren Haas <dh...@apple.com>.
Hi David,
We could always start the ranking using shuf. :) Is it possible to show the current votes during the ranking?
Thanks,
Darren
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 19, 2016, at 4:45 PM, David Greenberg <ds...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Jay,
>
> Thanks for your feedback! The reason we're asking for you to rank the topics is that this will allow us to better understand everyone's relative preferences--next, we'll use standard voting algorithms to determine the schedule, to ensure most people get as many talks they want as possible. We hope you enjoy the program we come up with :)
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
>> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 12:39 AM Jay JN Guo <gu...@cn.ibm.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thank you for this good work and I'm already looking forward to this MesosCon.
>>
>> Although one minor suggestion here, Accept/Reject on a scale of 10 is a bit intimidating. Personally, I only have three feeling toward a topic: will go/maybe/not interested, whereas quantifying these feeling into a scale of 10 for 154 topics is just too much. Maybe we could simplify the form in the future. We could take OpenStack summit voting form as an example.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> /J
>> ----- Original message -----
>> From: Kiersten Gaffney <ki...@mesosphere.io>
>> To: dev@mesos.apache.org, user@mesos.apache.org
>> Cc: David Greenberg <ds...@gmail.com>, Dave Lester <da...@davelester.org>, Kiersten Gaffney <ki...@mesosphere.io>
>> Subject: Vote on #MesosCon proposals, deadline Friday March 25
>> Date: Sat, Mar 19, 2016 8:11 AM
>>
>> Please take a few minutes the next few days and review what members of the
>> community have submitted!
>>
>> Voting forms close Friday, March 25, 2016, 11:55 PST
>>
>> A total of 154 proposals were submitted in time for #MesosCon review, up
>> significantly from 63 submitted for last year’s conference. Similar to last
>> year, the MesosCon program committee is opening these proposals up for
>> community review/feedback to better-inform our decisions about what should
>> be included in the program.
>>
>> In order to make it easier to review a subset of the proposals, we’ve
>> segmented them based upon two loose themes: Developer and Users.
>>
>> Developers: http://bit.ly/1RpZPvj
>>
>> Talks on how frameworks can be used, developed, and integrate with Mesos.
>>
>> Users: http://bit.ly/1Mspaxp
>>
>> A combination of talks that are use cases (how company x uses Mesos), and
>> operations-focused (how we deploy x, use Docker, etc).
>>
>> The forms above also include an opportunity to indicate which sessions you
>> didn't see proposed but would like to attend.
>>
>> Thanks in advance for your participation!
>>
>> Kiersten, Dave, and David (Program Committee)
Re: Vote on #MesosCon proposals, deadline Friday March 25
Posted by David Greenberg <ds...@gmail.com>.
Hi Jay,
Thanks for your feedback! The reason we're asking for you to rank the
topics is that this will allow us to better understand everyone's relative
preferences--next, we'll use standard voting algorithms to determine the
schedule, to ensure most people get as many talks they want as possible. We
hope you enjoy the program we come up with :)
Thanks,
David
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 12:39 AM Jay JN Guo <gu...@cn.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for this good work and I'm already looking forward to this
> MesosCon.
>
> Although one minor suggestion here, Accept/Reject on a scale of 10 is a
> bit intimidating. Personally, I only have three feeling toward a topic:
> will go/maybe/not interested, whereas quantifying these feeling into a
> scale of 10 for 154 topics is just too much. Maybe we could simplify the
> form in the future. We could take OpenStack summit voting form as an
> example.
>
> Cheers,
> /J
>
> ----- Original message -----
> From: Kiersten Gaffney <ki...@mesosphere.io>
> To: dev@mesos.apache.org, user@mesos.apache.org
> Cc: David Greenberg <ds...@gmail.com>, Dave Lester <
> dave@davelester.org>, Kiersten Gaffney <ki...@mesosphere.io>
> Subject: Vote on #MesosCon proposals, deadline Friday March 25
> Date: Sat, Mar 19, 2016 8:11 AM
>
>
> Please take a few minutes the next few days and review what members of the
> community have submitted!
>
> Voting forms close Friday, March 25, 2016, 11:55 PST
>
> A total of 154 proposals were submitted in time for #MesosCon review, up
> significantly from 63 submitted for last year’s conference. Similar to last
> year, the MesosCon program committee is opening these proposals up for
> community review/feedback to better-inform our decisions about what should
> be included in the program.
>
> In order to make it easier to review a subset of the proposals, we’ve
> segmented them based upon two loose themes: Developer and Users.
>
> Developers: http://bit.ly/1RpZPvj
>
> Talks on how frameworks can be used, developed, and integrate with Mesos.
>
> Users: http://bit.ly/1Mspaxp
>
> A combination of talks that are use cases (how company x uses Mesos), and
> operations-focused (how we deploy x, use Docker, etc).
>
> The forms above also include an opportunity to indicate which sessions you
> didn't see proposed but would like to attend.
>
> Thanks in advance for your participation!
>
> Kiersten, Dave, and David (Program Committee)
>
>
Re: Vote on #MesosCon proposals, deadline Friday March 25
Posted by David Greenberg <ds...@gmail.com>.
Hi Jay,
Thanks for your feedback! The reason we're asking for you to rank the
topics is that this will allow us to better understand everyone's relative
preferences--next, we'll use standard voting algorithms to determine the
schedule, to ensure most people get as many talks they want as possible. We
hope you enjoy the program we come up with :)
Thanks,
David
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 12:39 AM Jay JN Guo <gu...@cn.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for this good work and I'm already looking forward to this
> MesosCon.
>
> Although one minor suggestion here, Accept/Reject on a scale of 10 is a
> bit intimidating. Personally, I only have three feeling toward a topic:
> will go/maybe/not interested, whereas quantifying these feeling into a
> scale of 10 for 154 topics is just too much. Maybe we could simplify the
> form in the future. We could take OpenStack summit voting form as an
> example.
>
> Cheers,
> /J
>
> ----- Original message -----
> From: Kiersten Gaffney <ki...@mesosphere.io>
> To: dev@mesos.apache.org, user@mesos.apache.org
> Cc: David Greenberg <ds...@gmail.com>, Dave Lester <
> dave@davelester.org>, Kiersten Gaffney <ki...@mesosphere.io>
> Subject: Vote on #MesosCon proposals, deadline Friday March 25
> Date: Sat, Mar 19, 2016 8:11 AM
>
>
> Please take a few minutes the next few days and review what members of the
> community have submitted!
>
> Voting forms close Friday, March 25, 2016, 11:55 PST
>
> A total of 154 proposals were submitted in time for #MesosCon review, up
> significantly from 63 submitted for last year’s conference. Similar to last
> year, the MesosCon program committee is opening these proposals up for
> community review/feedback to better-inform our decisions about what should
> be included in the program.
>
> In order to make it easier to review a subset of the proposals, we’ve
> segmented them based upon two loose themes: Developer and Users.
>
> Developers: http://bit.ly/1RpZPvj
>
> Talks on how frameworks can be used, developed, and integrate with Mesos.
>
> Users: http://bit.ly/1Mspaxp
>
> A combination of talks that are use cases (how company x uses Mesos), and
> operations-focused (how we deploy x, use Docker, etc).
>
> The forms above also include an opportunity to indicate which sessions you
> didn't see proposed but would like to attend.
>
> Thanks in advance for your participation!
>
> Kiersten, Dave, and David (Program Committee)
>
>