You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@bigtop.apache.org by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> on 2016/04/18 01:45:48 UTC
[DISCUSS] Looking at the website
Guys,
I was looking at the website and have discovered that this
https://bigtop.apache.org/team-list.html
hasn't been kept in sync for quite some time now. I see a lot of outdated
affiliation, for instance. Considering that for Apache a committer affiliation
doesn't mean a squat and rightfully so, shall we get rid of this field all
together? I really don't see what's the point of keeping it.
Thoughts?
Cos
Re: [DISCUSS] Looking at the website
Posted by RJ Nowling <rn...@gmail.com>.
After the fact, but I agree. +1
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 8:18 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> Just deployed and pushed the site
> https://bigtop.apache.org/team-list.html
>
> Thanks everyone for chiming in?
> Cos
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:31AM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:46 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > If we get the consensus, here is the patch
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-2403
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 06:40PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > I might be mistaken, but I believe the origination of this column
> goes
> > > back
> > > > > to the beginning of it when it was important to the companies
> behind
> > > > > it to count the number of committers in the FOSS projects. I don't
> > > think this
> > > > > is a good idea: besides of this being inaccurate, that's another
> > > reason to get
> > > > > rid of it.
> > > >
> > > > +1
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> > - Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Looking at the website
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
Just deployed and pushed the site
https://bigtop.apache.org/team-list.html
Thanks everyone for chiming in?
Cos
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:31AM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:46 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > If we get the consensus, here is the patch
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-2403
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 06:40PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > I might be mistaken, but I believe the origination of this column goes
> > back
> > > > to the beginning of it when it was important to the companies behind
> > > > it to count the number of committers in the FOSS projects. I don't
> > think this
> > > > is a good idea: besides of this being inaccurate, that's another
> > reason to get
> > > > rid of it.
> > >
> > > +1
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
Re: [DISCUSS] Looking at the website
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
+1
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:46 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> If we get the consensus, here is the patch
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-2403
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 06:40PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > I might be mistaken, but I believe the origination of this column goes
> back
> > > to the beginning of it when it was important to the companies behind
> > > it to count the number of committers in the FOSS projects. I don't
> think this
> > > is a good idea: besides of this being inaccurate, that's another
> reason to get
> > > rid of it.
> >
> > +1
>
--
Best regards,
- Andy
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
(via Tom White)
Re: [DISCUSS] Looking at the website
Posted by Bruno Mahé <bm...@apache.org>.
+1
As mentioned by Cos, it also gets outdated pretty easily.
Thanks,
Bruno
On 04/18/2016 10:46 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> If we get the consensus, here is the patch
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-2403
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 06:40PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> I might be mistaken, but I believe the origination of this column goes back
>>> to the beginning of it when it was important to the companies behind
>>> it to count the number of committers in the FOSS projects. I don't think this
>>> is a good idea: besides of this being inaccurate, that's another reason to get
>>> rid of it.
>> +1
Re: [DISCUSS] Looking at the website
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
If we get the consensus, here is the patch
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-2403
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 06:40PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> > I might be mistaken, but I believe the origination of this column goes back
> > to the beginning of it when it was important to the companies behind
> > it to count the number of committers in the FOSS projects. I don't think this
> > is a good idea: besides of this being inaccurate, that's another reason to get
> > rid of it.
>
> +1
Re: [DISCUSS] Looking at the website
Posted by Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org>.
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> I might be mistaken, but I believe the origination of this column goes back
> to the beginning of it when it was important to the companies behind
> it to count the number of committers in the FOSS projects. I don't think this
> is a good idea: besides of this being inaccurate, that's another reason to get
> rid of it.
+1
Re: [DISCUSS] Looking at the website
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
I might be mistaken, but I believe the origination of this column goes back
to the beginning of it when it was important to the companies behind
it to count the number of committers in the FOSS projects. I don't think this
is a good idea: besides of this being inaccurate, that's another reason to get
rid of it.
Cos
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 06:20PM, Olaf Flebbe wrote:
> Cos,
>
> I wondered about the "organization" column in the past, too. I favor to remove it, too.
>
> Olaf
>
> > Am 18.04.2016 um 01:45 schrieb Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>:
> >
> > Guys,
> >
> > I was looking at the website and have discovered that this
> > https://bigtop.apache.org/team-list.html
> >
> > hasn't been kept in sync for quite some time now. I see a lot of outdated
> > affiliation, for instance. Considering that for Apache a committer affiliation
> > doesn't mean a squat and rightfully so, shall we get rid of this field all
> > together? I really don't see what's the point of keeping it.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> > Cos
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Looking at the website
Posted by Olaf Flebbe <of...@oflebbe.de>.
Cos,
I wondered about the "organization" column in the past, too. I favor to remove it, too.
Olaf
> Am 18.04.2016 um 01:45 schrieb Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>:
>
> Guys,
>
> I was looking at the website and have discovered that this
> https://bigtop.apache.org/team-list.html
>
> hasn't been kept in sync for quite some time now. I see a lot of outdated
> affiliation, for instance. Considering that for Apache a committer affiliation
> doesn't mean a squat and rightfully so, shall we get rid of this field all
> together? I really don't see what's the point of keeping it.
>
> Thoughts?
> Cos