You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tinkerpop.apache.org by Marko Rodriguez <ok...@gmail.com> on 2016/03/16 16:51:13 UTC
[DISCUSS] HadoopGraphStandardProcessTest should be Integration
Hello,
Hadoop "mvn clean install" is starting to slow up significantly especially because of recent OLTP tests on Grateful Dead graph. Given that HadoopGraph OLTP solves this via linear scans, dar. I recommend we make the HadoopGraphStandardProcessTest an integration test, but leave the HadoopGroovyStandardProcessTest as it is. This should give us back about 3 minutes on "mvn clean install."
Anyone have any objections?
Marko.
http://markorodriguez.com
Re: [DISCUSS] HadoopGraphStandardProcessTest should be Integration
Posted by Marko Rodriguez <ok...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
We went from 5:10 to 3:30 on the Hadoop-Gremlin "mvn clean install."
Marko.
http://markorodriguez.com
On Mar 17, 2016, at 7:32 AM, Marko Rodriguez <ok...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Sounds good. I will CTR this in master/ right now as I'm merging a bunch of PRs this morning.
>
> Thanks,
> Marko.
>
> http://markorodriguez.com
>
> On Mar 17, 2016, at 5:27 AM, Stephen Mallette <sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> So we still get the similar coverage but over groovy - seems good to me.
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Marko Rodriguez <ok...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Hadoop "mvn clean install" is starting to slow up significantly especially
>>> because of recent OLTP tests on Grateful Dead graph. Given that HadoopGraph
>>> OLTP solves this via linear scans, dar. I recommend we make the
>>> HadoopGraphStandardProcessTest an integration test, but leave the
>>> HadoopGroovyStandardProcessTest as it is. This should give us back about 3
>>> minutes on "mvn clean install."
>>>
>>> Anyone have any objections?
>>>
>>> Marko.
>>>
>>> http://markorodriguez.com
>>>
>>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] HadoopGraphStandardProcessTest should be Integration
Posted by Marko Rodriguez <ok...@gmail.com>.
Hello,
Sounds good. I will CTR this in master/ right now as I'm merging a bunch of PRs this morning.
Thanks,
Marko.
http://markorodriguez.com
On Mar 17, 2016, at 5:27 AM, Stephen Mallette <sp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So we still get the similar coverage but over groovy - seems good to me.
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Marko Rodriguez <ok...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Hadoop "mvn clean install" is starting to slow up significantly especially
>> because of recent OLTP tests on Grateful Dead graph. Given that HadoopGraph
>> OLTP solves this via linear scans, dar. I recommend we make the
>> HadoopGraphStandardProcessTest an integration test, but leave the
>> HadoopGroovyStandardProcessTest as it is. This should give us back about 3
>> minutes on "mvn clean install."
>>
>> Anyone have any objections?
>>
>> Marko.
>>
>> http://markorodriguez.com
>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] HadoopGraphStandardProcessTest should be Integration
Posted by Stephen Mallette <sp...@gmail.com>.
So we still get the similar coverage but over groovy - seems good to me.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Marko Rodriguez <ok...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Hadoop "mvn clean install" is starting to slow up significantly especially
> because of recent OLTP tests on Grateful Dead graph. Given that HadoopGraph
> OLTP solves this via linear scans, dar. I recommend we make the
> HadoopGraphStandardProcessTest an integration test, but leave the
> HadoopGroovyStandardProcessTest as it is. This should give us back about 3
> minutes on "mvn clean install."
>
> Anyone have any objections?
>
> Marko.
>
> http://markorodriguez.com
>
>