You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by moatas <mo...@gmail.com> on 2006/07/05 01:04:19 UTC

1.5 required?

I checked out the latest from trunk and it looks like 1.5 is required since
java.util.concurrent is being used instead of backport.  Is this how it will
be going forward?
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/1.5-required--tf1891997.html#a5174051
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.

Re: 1.5 required?

Posted by moatas <mo...@gmail.com>.
That one and SessionState had the 1.5 versions.  I modified locally and all
looks better.  Also had to change BrokerStoppedException
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/1.5-required--tf1891997.html#a5176122
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.

Re: 1.5 required?

Posted by Sanjiv Jivan <sa...@gmail.com>.
I noticed that the 4.0.1 jar manifest shows that the build was compiled
using JDK 1.5.0_05. Might be safer to compile builds using JDK 1.4.x to
avoid such issues.

Sanjiv


On 7/5/06, Sanjiv Jivan <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  My bad, seems okay with the 4.0.1 release distribution. I tried this
> first and it had a JDK 1.5 dependency :
>
>
> http://people.apache.org/repository/incubator-activemq/jars/activemq-core-4.0.1-20060703.171846.jar
>
>
>
> On 7/5/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> >
> > Oh.. the 1.5 dependency snuck into the 4.0.1 release?  If that's the
> > case, I
> > think we should release the 4.0.2 as soon as possible.
> >
> > Any Objections?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Hiram
> >
> >
> > On 7/5/06, Sanjiv Jivan <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Can the current 4.0.1 release be replaced with a 4.0.1 jar which is
> > > JDK 1.4compatible? Or is there somewhere I can get the
> > > 4.0.x build which is JDK 1.4 compatible?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Sanjiv
> > >
> > >
> > > On 7/5/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Opps.  That's my fault.  I'ved fixed those now.
> > > >
> > > > On 7/4/06, moatas < moatas@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > org.apache.activemq.state.ConnectionState is the first I ran into.
> > > > > --
> > > > > View this message in context:
> > > > > http://www.nabble.com/1.5-required--tf1891997.html#a5175434
> > > > > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com<http://nabble.com/>
> > .
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Hiram
> > > >
> > > > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Hiram
> >
> > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
> >
> >
>

Re: 1.5 required?

Posted by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>.
Wheh.. thanks for checking!

On 7/5/06, Sanjiv Jivan <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> My bad, seems okay with the 4.0.1 release distribution. I tried this first
> and it had a JDK 1.5 dependency :
>
>
> http://people.apache.org/repository/incubator-activemq/jars/activemq-core-4.0.1-20060703.171846.jar
>
>
>
> On 7/5/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> >
> > Oh.. the 1.5 dependency snuck into the 4.0.1 release?  If that's the
> case,
> > I
> > think we should release the 4.0.2 as soon as possible.
> >
> > Any Objections?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Hiram
> >
> >
> > On 7/5/06, Sanjiv Jivan <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Can the current 4.0.1 release be replaced with a 4.0.1 jar which is
> > > JDK 1.4compatible? Or is there somewhere I can get the
> > > 4.0.x build which is JDK 1.4 compatible?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Sanjiv
> > >
> > >
> > > On 7/5/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Opps.  That's my fault.  I'ved fixed those now.
> > > >
> > > > On 7/4/06, moatas <mo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > org.apache.activemq.state.ConnectionState is the first I ran into.
> > > > > --
> > > > > View this message in context:
> > > > > http://www.nabble.com/1.5-required--tf1891997.html#a5175434
> > > > > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Hiram
> > > >
> > > > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Hiram
> >
> > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
> >
> >
>
>


-- 
Regards,
Hiram

Blog: http://hiramchirino.com

Re: 1.5 required?

Posted by Sanjiv Jivan <sa...@gmail.com>.
My bad, seems okay with the 4.0.1 release distribution. I tried this first
and it had a JDK 1.5 dependency :

http://people.apache.org/repository/incubator-activemq/jars/activemq-core-4.0.1-20060703.171846.jar



On 7/5/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>
> Oh.. the 1.5 dependency snuck into the 4.0.1 release?  If that's the case,
> I
> think we should release the 4.0.2 as soon as possible.
>
> Any Objections?
>
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
>
> On 7/5/06, Sanjiv Jivan <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Can the current 4.0.1 release be replaced with a 4.0.1 jar which is
> > JDK 1.4compatible? Or is there somewhere I can get the
> > 4.0.x build which is JDK 1.4 compatible?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sanjiv
> >
> >
> > On 7/5/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Opps.  That's my fault.  I'ved fixed those now.
> > >
> > > On 7/4/06, moatas <mo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > org.apache.activemq.state.ConnectionState is the first I ran into.
> > > > --
> > > > View this message in context:
> > > > http://www.nabble.com/1.5-required--tf1891997.html#a5175434
> > > > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards,
> > > Hiram
> > >
> > > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>
>

Re: 1.5 required?

Posted by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>.
Oh.. the 1.5 dependency snuck into the 4.0.1 release?  If that's the case, I
think we should release the 4.0.2 as soon as possible.

Any Objections?

Regards,
Hiram


On 7/5/06, Sanjiv Jivan <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Can the current 4.0.1 release be replaced with a 4.0.1 jar which is
> JDK 1.4compatible? Or is there somewhere I can get the
> 4.0.x build which is JDK 1.4 compatible?
>
> Thanks,
> Sanjiv
>
>
> On 7/5/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> >
> > Opps.  That's my fault.  I'ved fixed those now.
> >
> > On 7/4/06, moatas <mo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > org.apache.activemq.state.ConnectionState is the first I ran into.
> > > --
> > > View this message in context:
> > > http://www.nabble.com/1.5-required--tf1891997.html#a5175434
> > > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Hiram
> >
> > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
> >
> >
>
>


-- 
Regards,
Hiram

Blog: http://hiramchirino.com

Re: 1.5 required?

Posted by Sanjiv Jivan <sa...@gmail.com>.
Can the current 4.0.1 release be replaced with a 4.0.1 jar which is
JDK 1.4compatible? Or is there somewhere I can get the
4.0.x build which is JDK 1.4 compatible?

Thanks,
Sanjiv


On 7/5/06, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>
> Opps.  That's my fault.  I'ved fixed those now.
>
> On 7/4/06, moatas <mo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > org.apache.activemq.state.ConnectionState is the first I ran into.
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> > http://www.nabble.com/1.5-required--tf1891997.html#a5175434
> > Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>
>

Re: 1.5 required?

Posted by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>.
Opps.  That's my fault.  I'ved fixed those now.

On 7/4/06, moatas <mo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> org.apache.activemq.state.ConnectionState is the first I ran into.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/1.5-required--tf1891997.html#a5175434
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
>
>


-- 
Regards,
Hiram

Blog: http://hiramchirino.com

Re: 1.5 required?

Posted by moatas <mo...@gmail.com>.
org.apache.activemq.state.ConnectionState is the first I ran into.
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/1.5-required--tf1891997.html#a5175434
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.

Re: 1.5 required?

Posted by Adrian Co <ac...@exist.com>.
Hi,

I don't know of any move to be not 1.4 compatible. Afaik, other than a 
couple of maven plugins, AMQ should be 1.4 compatible. Which files are 
you pertaining to?

Regards,
Adrian Co

moatas wrote:
> I checked out the latest from trunk and it looks like 1.5 is required since
> java.util.concurrent is being used instead of backport.  Is this how it will
> be going forward?
>