You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to java-dev@axis.apache.org by "Tim Kagle (JIRA)" <ax...@ws.apache.org> on 2005/03/22 23:21:35 UTC

[jira] Commented: (AXIS-1898) java2wsdl --extraClasses does not add extraClasses option to deploy.wsdd

     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1898?page=comments#action_61395 ]
     
Tim Kagle commented on AXIS-1898:
---------------------------------

I think I've confused myself with this bug. The problem comes from the existence of the 2 tools java2wsdl and wsdl2java, so starting from the java server classes, generating the WSDL and then the java client classes is a 2 step process and here's what I do:

Java Server Classes -> WSDL:
Java2WSDL --extraClasses ....

WSDL -> Java Stubs/Client Classes + server side deployment descriptor:
WSDL2Java --server-side ...

The problem is that deploy.wsdd is created by WSDL2Java so all the extraClasses information from the first Java2WSDL call is lost, hence the auto-generated WSDL file by the Axis runtime is incomplete, it doesn't include the extra classes.

I'm not sure what the solution here is short of editting deploy.wsdd by hand, which is not really an option in a development env. when these tools are run 50 times a day ...

> java2wsdl --extraClasses does not add extraClasses option to deploy.wsdd
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: AXIS-1898
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1898
>      Project: Axis
>         Type: Bug
>   Components: Deployment / Registries
>     Versions: 1.2RC3
>  Environment: Linux
>     Reporter: Tim Kagle

>
> When using --extraClasses as an argument to java2wsdl the statically generated WSDL is correct, it includes all extra classes, but an option <parameter name="extraClasses" value="..."/> is not added to the deploy.wsdd generated file. This is a problem because the automatically generated WSDL file by the Axis runtime (by going to http://.../ServiceName?wsdl) is incorrect, it's missing all the extra classes.
> Can this be fixed for the 1.2 release please?
> Thank you.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira