You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mina.apache.org by Bernd Fondermann <be...@googlemail.com> on 2011/01/19 16:03:52 UTC
Presence propagation issues
ok, am I getting this right:
Users do mutually subscribe to each other? Do you use a lib like smack?
Have you already upgraded to 0.6?
I still don't have a case to debug. TRUNK works for me with mutual
subscriptions.
You could try stepping through PresenceAvailabilityHandler, especially
handleInboundAvailable, and if this looks good,
handleOutboundAvailable.
You could also try to dump the roster and see if both parties really
have a contact status of "both".
Bernd
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 14:19, Thomas Kratz <ei...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I have the in -memory roster
>
> 2011/1/19 Bernd Fondermann <bf...@brainlounge.de>:
>> Do you use a persistent roster, eg. JcrRosterManager? Or in-memory?
>>
>> Bernd
>>
>> On 19.01.11 12:50, Thomas Kratz wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Bernd,
>>>
>>> it gets even stranger. I have three users: server, admin and nobody.
>>> server logs in first at startup and adds other users to its roster.
>>> then i login as admin from the client and add other users to my roster.
>>> server sees admin become available.
>>> then i login as nobody and add other users to my roster. server sees
>>> nobody become available, but querying the roster of nobody tells me
>>> admin is offline. roster of server sees admin online. must be some
>>> little detail.
>>>
>>> Regards Thomas
>>>
>>> 2011/1/19 Bernd Fondermann<be...@googlemail.com>:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:13, Thomas Kratz<ei...@googlemail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Bernd,
>>>>>
>>>>> as it defaults to store=false this shouldn't be the point.
>>>>> I guess its somewhere else, as I came from 0.5 release where
>>>>> everything worked fine. Has something changed in roster/subscription
>>>>> management since then ? I used to have a SubscriptionPacketListener
>>>>> that auto-responds to subscription requests, but that doesnt seem to
>>>>> work now. I do built rosters lazy on startup dynamically. From what i
>>>>> see in debug, the presence available doenst go to offline storage as
>>>>> subscription packets do, so it should go to my Smack rosterListener. I
>>>>> think it must be the subscriptions management that's different now?
>>>>
>>>> I can't remember any specific changes there, but you'd have to review
>>>> svn to confirm that, as any smaller change could have broken your
>>>> setup.
>>>> Subscription is definitively working on trunk, at least for me. Also,
>>>> I highly recommend to move to 0.6, to TRUNK even.
>>>>
>>>> So the current working thesis is that this is unrelated to offline
>>>> stanza storage, right?
>>>> I might figure out what your problem is if you'd share more detailed
>>>> info, like logs or a simple test scenario.
>>>>
>>>> Bernd
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.eiswind.de
>
Re: Presence propagation issues
Posted by Thomas Kratz <ei...@googlemail.com>.
Hi Bernd,
first thanks again for your patience. After some debugging I found that it
was my own mistake in my lazy subscription handling. Is I go with in memory,
I have to re-setup subscriptions after server restart, and there was
something wrong in my status check.
Offline seems to work fine as far as I can see. This is great :)
Rergards
Thomas
2011/1/19 Bernd Fondermann <be...@googlemail.com>
> ok, am I getting this right:
> Users do mutually subscribe to each other? Do you use a lib like smack?
> Have you already upgraded to 0.6?
> I still don't have a case to debug. TRUNK works for me with mutual
> subscriptions.
>
> You could try stepping through PresenceAvailabilityHandler, especially
> handleInboundAvailable, and if this looks good,
> handleOutboundAvailable.
> You could also try to dump the roster and see if both parties really
> have a contact status of "both".
>
> Bernd
>
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 14:19, Thomas Kratz <ei...@googlemail.com>
> wrote:
> > I have the in -memory roster
> >
> > 2011/1/19 Bernd Fondermann <bf...@brainlounge.de>:
> >> Do you use a persistent roster, eg. JcrRosterManager? Or in-memory?
> >>
> >> Bernd
> >>
> >> On 19.01.11 12:50, Thomas Kratz wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Bernd,
> >>>
> >>> it gets even stranger. I have three users: server, admin and nobody.
> >>> server logs in first at startup and adds other users to its roster.
> >>> then i login as admin from the client and add other users to my roster.
> >>> server sees admin become available.
> >>> then i login as nobody and add other users to my roster. server sees
> >>> nobody become available, but querying the roster of nobody tells me
> >>> admin is offline. roster of server sees admin online. must be some
> >>> little detail.
> >>>
> >>> Regards Thomas
> >>>
> >>> 2011/1/19 Bernd Fondermann<be...@googlemail.com>:
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:13, Thomas Kratz<ei...@googlemail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi Bernd,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> as it defaults to store=false this shouldn't be the point.
> >>>>> I guess its somewhere else, as I came from 0.5 release where
> >>>>> everything worked fine. Has something changed in roster/subscription
> >>>>> management since then ? I used to have a SubscriptionPacketListener
> >>>>> that auto-responds to subscription requests, but that doesnt seem to
> >>>>> work now. I do built rosters lazy on startup dynamically. From what
> i
> >>>>> see in debug, the presence available doenst go to offline storage as
> >>>>> subscription packets do, so it should go to my Smack rosterListener.
> I
> >>>>> think it must be the subscriptions management that's different now?
> >>>>
> >>>> I can't remember any specific changes there, but you'd have to review
> >>>> svn to confirm that, as any smaller change could have broken your
> >>>> setup.
> >>>> Subscription is definitively working on trunk, at least for me. Also,
> >>>> I highly recommend to move to 0.6, to TRUNK even.
> >>>>
> >>>> So the current working thesis is that this is unrelated to offline
> >>>> stanza storage, right?
> >>>> I might figure out what your problem is if you'd share more detailed
> >>>> info, like logs or a simple test scenario.
> >>>>
> >>>> Bernd
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://www.eiswind.de
> >
>
--
www.buchmanager.com
Re: Presence propagation issues
Posted by Thomas Kratz <ei...@googlemail.com>.
HI Bernd,
I'll look deeper into this on the weekend. Paid job calls for me
tomorrow. And yes I'm currently running on trunk with smack client.
Users do subscribe to each other. I'll have to debug when I find time.
Thanks for your patience. I think it's got nothing to do with the
offline storage.
Regards
Thomas
2011/1/19 Bernd Fondermann <be...@googlemail.com>:
> ok, am I getting this right:
> Users do mutually subscribe to each other? Do you use a lib like smack?
> Have you already upgraded to 0.6?
> I still don't have a case to debug. TRUNK works for me with mutual
> subscriptions.
>
> You could try stepping through PresenceAvailabilityHandler, especially
> handleInboundAvailable, and if this looks good,
> handleOutboundAvailable.
> You could also try to dump the roster and see if both parties really
> have a contact status of "both".
>
> Bernd
>
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 14:19, Thomas Kratz <ei...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> I have the in -memory roster
>>
>> 2011/1/19 Bernd Fondermann <bf...@brainlounge.de>:
>>> Do you use a persistent roster, eg. JcrRosterManager? Or in-memory?
>>>
>>> Bernd
>>>
>>> On 19.01.11 12:50, Thomas Kratz wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Bernd,
>>>>
>>>> it gets even stranger. I have three users: server, admin and nobody.
>>>> server logs in first at startup and adds other users to its roster.
>>>> then i login as admin from the client and add other users to my roster.
>>>> server sees admin become available.
>>>> then i login as nobody and add other users to my roster. server sees
>>>> nobody become available, but querying the roster of nobody tells me
>>>> admin is offline. roster of server sees admin online. must be some
>>>> little detail.
>>>>
>>>> Regards Thomas
>>>>
>>>> 2011/1/19 Bernd Fondermann<be...@googlemail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:13, Thomas Kratz<ei...@googlemail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Bernd,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> as it defaults to store=false this shouldn't be the point.
>>>>>> I guess its somewhere else, as I came from 0.5 release where
>>>>>> everything worked fine. Has something changed in roster/subscription
>>>>>> management since then ? I used to have a SubscriptionPacketListener
>>>>>> that auto-responds to subscription requests, but that doesnt seem to
>>>>>> work now. I do built rosters lazy on startup dynamically. From what i
>>>>>> see in debug, the presence available doenst go to offline storage as
>>>>>> subscription packets do, so it should go to my Smack rosterListener. I
>>>>>> think it must be the subscriptions management that's different now?
>>>>>
>>>>> I can't remember any specific changes there, but you'd have to review
>>>>> svn to confirm that, as any smaller change could have broken your
>>>>> setup.
>>>>> Subscription is definitively working on trunk, at least for me. Also,
>>>>> I highly recommend to move to 0.6, to TRUNK even.
>>>>>
>>>>> So the current working thesis is that this is unrelated to offline
>>>>> stanza storage, right?
>>>>> I might figure out what your problem is if you'd share more detailed
>>>>> info, like logs or a simple test scenario.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bernd
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.eiswind.de
>>
>
--
http://www.eiswind.de