You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@harmony.apache.org by Mark Hindess <ma...@googlemail.com> on 2009/08/27 16:11:48 UTC
[vote] Declare the signed source for r808406 as Milestone 11
I think we'd fixed enough license issues for one release so I'm going to
begin the vote. If anyone feels that three days isn't enough time to
complete testing then please just ask for more time.
I have created a signed source archive for this revision and made it
available at:
http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/5.0m11/
Please test these artifacts and then vote for declaring these source
archives as milestone 11, and opening up the code[0] for general
development once again.
This vote will be open for at least 3 days, or until all binding votes
have been cast (if earlier).
If the vote is successful, binary builds from that level will be made
available on the download page, as usual.
Regards,
Mark.
[0] drlvm/trunk and the java6 branches of classlib and jdktools will
remain frozen until we test and vote on 6.0M1
Re: [vote] Declare the signed source for r808406 as Milestone 11
Posted by Mark Hindess <ma...@googlemail.com>.
+1
In message <20...@d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>,
"Mark Hindess" writes:
>
> I think we'd fixed enough license issues for one release so I'm going
> to begin the vote. If anyone feels that three days isn't enough time
> to complete testing then please just ask for more time.
>
> I have created a signed source archive for this revision and made it
> available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/5.0m11/
>
> Please test these artifacts and then vote for declaring these source
> archives as milestone 11, and opening up the code[0] for general
> development once again.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 3 days, or until all binding votes
> have been cast (if earlier).
>
> If the vote is successful, binary builds from that level will be made
> available on the download page, as usual.
>
> Regards,
> Mark.
>
> [0] drlvm/trunk and the java6 branches of classlib and jdktools will
> remain frozen until we test and vote on 6.0M1
Re: [vote] Declare the signed source for r808406 as Milestone 11
Posted by Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com>.
Looks good to me. +1
Tim
On 27/Aug/2009 15:11, Mark Hindess wrote:
> I think we'd fixed enough license issues for one release so I'm going to
> begin the vote. If anyone feels that three days isn't enough time to
> complete testing then please just ask for more time.
>
> I have created a signed source archive for this revision and made it
> available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/5.0m11/
>
> Please test these artifacts and then vote for declaring these source
> archives as milestone 11, and opening up the code[0] for general
> development once again.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 3 days, or until all binding votes
> have been cast (if earlier).
>
> If the vote is successful, binary builds from that level will be made
> available on the download page, as usual.
>
> Regards,
> Mark.
>
> [0] drlvm/trunk and the java6 branches of classlib and jdktools will
> remain frozen until we test and vote on 6.0M1
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: [vote] Declare the signed source for r808406 as Milestone 11
Posted by Oliver Deakin <ol...@googlemail.com>.
+1
Regards,
Oliver
Mark Hindess wrote:
> I think we'd fixed enough license issues for one release so I'm going to
> begin the vote. If anyone feels that three days isn't enough time to
> complete testing then please just ask for more time.
>
> I have created a signed source archive for this revision and made it
> available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/5.0m11/
>
> Please test these artifacts and then vote for declaring these source
> archives as milestone 11, and opening up the code[0] for general
> development once again.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 3 days, or until all binding votes
> have been cast (if earlier).
>
> If the vote is successful, binary builds from that level will be made
> available on the download page, as usual.
>
> Regards,
> Mark.
>
> [0] drlvm/trunk and the java6 branches of classlib and jdktools will
> remain frozen until we test and vote on 6.0M1
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Oliver Deakin
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
Re: [result] [vote] Declare the signed source for r808406 as Milestone 11
Posted by Mark Hindess <ma...@googlemail.com>.
In message <4A...@gmail.com>, Tim Ellison writes:
>
> On 01/Sep/2009 16:22, Tim Ellison wrote:
> > On 31/Aug/2009 21:10, Mark Hindess wrote:
> >> Sorry, just fixing the tags in subject so that people don't miss this.
> >> -Mark.
> >>
> >> In message <20...@d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>,
> >> Mark Hindess writes:
> >>> +1 votes from Tim, Sean, Regis, Tony, Ray, Pavel, Chunrong, Oliver and
> >>> myself. No other votes, so the vote passes.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for testing the artefacts and voting.
> >>>
> >>> The classlib/trunk code base and jdktools/trunk code base is now open
> >>> for commits again.
> >>>
> >>> The java6 branches, drlvm and federated build trees will remain frozen
> >>> until we have completed a vote on a 6.0m1 release.
> >>>
> >>> I'll upload linux/x86, linux/x86_64, and windows/x86 binaries. I'll
> >>> also upload Debian packages for linux/x86 and linux/x86_64. If anyone
> >>> can make windows/x86_64 binaries, from the signed artefacts, perhaps
> >>> we could also include them.
> >
> > Cool. Do you want me to update the download page? I'm happy to do so.
>
> Hopefully we didn't overlap -- I went ahead and did it.
Cool. I didn't actually finish copying files to the /dist/ tree until
this morning so I was going to wait until tomorrow to give mirrors a chance
to catch up but it should be okay.
-Mark.
Re: [result] [vote] Declare the signed source for r808406 as Milestone
11
Posted by Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com>.
On 01/Sep/2009 16:22, Tim Ellison wrote:
> On 31/Aug/2009 21:10, Mark Hindess wrote:
>> Sorry, just fixing the tags in subject so that people don't miss this.
>> -Mark.
>>
>> In message <20...@d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>,
>> Mark Hindess writes:
>>> +1 votes from Tim, Sean, Regis, Tony, Ray, Pavel, Chunrong, Oliver and
>>> myself. No other votes, so the vote passes.
>>>
>>> Thanks for testing the artefacts and voting.
>>>
>>> The classlib/trunk code base and jdktools/trunk code base is now open
>>> for commits again.
>>>
>>> The java6 branches, drlvm and federated build trees will remain frozen
>>> until we have completed a vote on a 6.0m1 release.
>>>
>>> I'll upload linux/x86, linux/x86_64, and windows/x86 binaries. I'll
>>> also upload Debian packages for linux/x86 and linux/x86_64. If anyone
>>> can make windows/x86_64 binaries, from the signed artefacts, perhaps
>>> we could also include them.
>
> Cool. Do you want me to update the download page? I'm happy to do so.
Hopefully we didn't overlap -- I went ahead and did it.
Tim
Re: [result] [vote] Declare the signed source for r808406 as Milestone
11
Posted by Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com>.
On 31/Aug/2009 21:10, Mark Hindess wrote:
> Sorry, just fixing the tags in subject so that people don't miss this.
> -Mark.
>
> In message <20...@d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>,
> Mark Hindess writes:
>> +1 votes from Tim, Sean, Regis, Tony, Ray, Pavel, Chunrong, Oliver and
>> myself. No other votes, so the vote passes.
>>
>> Thanks for testing the artefacts and voting.
>>
>> The classlib/trunk code base and jdktools/trunk code base is now open
>> for commits again.
>>
>> The java6 branches, drlvm and federated build trees will remain frozen
>> until we have completed a vote on a 6.0m1 release.
>>
>> I'll upload linux/x86, linux/x86_64, and windows/x86 binaries. I'll
>> also upload Debian packages for linux/x86 and linux/x86_64. If anyone
>> can make windows/x86_64 binaries, from the signed artefacts, perhaps
>> we could also include them.
Cool. Do you want me to update the download page? I'm happy to do so.
For the record, here are the release notes for the 5.0M11 milestone.
Good work one and all!
--------
Release Notes - Harmony - Version 5.0M11
** Sub-task
* [HARMONY-6200] - [classlib][luni] - add cache for file's canonical
path
** Bug
* [HARMONY-329] - [classlib][luni] Endless loop when using
Double.parseDouble(String) with certain types of value
* [HARMONY-1767] -
[classlib][swing]javax.swing.text.ComponentView(Element) throws
unexpected NullPointerException on user's implementation
* [HARMONY-1866] - [classlib][swing][test] j.s.t.StyleConstantsTest
fails
* [HARMONY-5813] - [site][doc] Wrong link in DRLVM Thread Manager doc
* [HARMONY-5981] - [classlib][logging] FileHandler may throw
exception when logging to the same file by multiple thread
* [HARMONY-6206] - [classlib][beans]
java.beans.EventSetDescriptor(String, Class<?, MethodDescriptor[],
Method, Method) throws a NullPointerException while RI doesn't
* [HARMONY-6210] - [classlib][archive] Inflater.setInput crashes
when input is read 1 byte at a time
* [HARMONY-6213] - [classlib][beans] XMLDecoder.readObject() should
not invoke org.xml.sax.SAXParseException
* [HARMONY-6214] - [classlib][beans]
java.beans.XMLDecoder.XMLDecoder(InputStream inputStream, Object owner,
ExceptionListener listener) should not throw IllegalArgumentException
* [HARMONY-6215] - [classlib][beans]
java.beans.XMLEncoder.writeExpression(Expression null) should throw
NullPointerException
* [HARMONY-6218] - [classlib][lang-management]
java.lang.management.MemoryUsage.from(CompositeData cd) should throw
IlegalArgumentException but not NullPointerException
* [HARMONY-6230] - [classlib][archive] ZipEntry close() leaves
ZipInputStream in an inconsistent state
* [HARMONY-6231] - [classlib][text] DateFormat does not consider lenient
* [HARMONY-6234] - [classlib][nio] FileChannel.transferTo should not
check the upper bound of position and count
* [HARMONY-6235] - [jdwp] dt_socket.so missing from Linux federated
builds
* [HARMONY-6236] - [classlib][luni] ArrayList breaks when given
concurrent collections as input
* [HARMONY-6237] - [classlib][luni] HashMap doesn't support proxy
object as keys
* [HARMONY-6242] - Math.max(double, double) gives wrong answer when
Math.max(-0.0d, 0.0d)
* [HARMONY-6244] - [classlib][beans] java.beans.XMLEncoder fails to
write SystemColor.activeCaption object correctly
* [HARMONY-6245] - NoSuchMethod error with three-level hierarchy
* [HARMONY-6246] - Crash during debugging session
* [HARMONY-6248] - [classlib][security] Wildcard subjectAltName
dNSName entries throw IOException
* [HARMONY-6254] - [classlib][luni] URLStreamHandler throws NPE when
creating external form
* [HARMONY-6256] - [classlib][awt] Incorrect test of transformation
type when clipping
* [HARMONY-6259] - [classlib][luni] PipedInputStream.read throw
different info when IOException is raised
* [HARMONY-6261] - [classlib][luni] Float parse causes
OutOfMemoryException
* [HARMONY-6262] - Harmony's java.util.concurrent is out of date
* [HARMONY-6266] - Building in release mode fails with gcc version 4.3.3
* [HARMONY-6267] - [classlib][text] Implementation of
AttributedCharacterIterator.Attribute.equals should only return true if
objects are the same
* [HARMONY-6268] - [classlib][luni] Math.min fails when comparing
doubles and floats with the same values
* [HARMONY-6270] - [classlib][swing] JSlider problem with non-zero
minimum values
* [HARMONY-6271] - [classlib][math] BigDecimal.divide should throw
an ArithmeticException instead of OutOfMemory for too large scales
* [HARMONY-6274] - [jdwp][java6] Garbled output in JDWP trace
* [HARMONY-6276] - [luni][lang] Float.toString() can give wrong
string and throws ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException on AIX 32bit
* [HARMONY-6277] - Timer's finalizer throws an NPE if the Timer
wasn't constructed properly
* [HARMONY-6279] - [classlib][luni] file.encoding is always set to
ISO-9959-1 if using drlvm
* [HARMONY-6286] - TimeUnit.MINUTES, HOURS, DAYS shouldn't be
present in Java 5
* [HARMONY-6290] - BufferedReader.readLine() breaks at EBCDIC
newline, violating the spec
* [HARMONY-6292] - [classlib][luni] subList(int, int).size() should
also check concurrent modification when the origin changes
* [HARMONY-6293] - [classlib][luni] PipedWriter.flush should throw
IOException if pipe is closed (Java 6 only)
* [HARMONY-6294] - [classlib][nio_char] Character mapping difference
to RI for IBM-1047 charset
* [HARMONY-6299] - ioctl() doesn't work on z/OS when the pipe is set
up with pipe() function
* [HARMONY-6301] - There are 2 unused member in java.util.Locale
* [HARMONY-6302] - [classlib][nio] Encoding bug in
nio/charset/CharsetProviderTest.java
* [HARMONY-6308] - [classlib][nio_char] Character mapping difference
to RI for IBM037 charset
* [HARMONY-6310] - [classlib][luni]test
org.apache.harmony.archive.tests.java.util.jar.JarExecTest.test_jar_class_path
failed on z/OS
** Improvement
* [HARMONY-984] - [testing] collect module test directories to test jars
* [HARMONY-6094] - [classlib][luni] Performance improvement patch
in java.io.PushbackInputStream#unread(byte[] buffer, int offset, int length)
* [HARMONY-6095] - [classlib][luni] Performance improvement patch
for java.text.DateFormatSymbols.DateFormatSymbols(Locale)
* [HARMONY-6187] - [jdktools][jdwp] Contribution of updated JDWP
agent and socket transport layer for Java 6
* [HARMONY-6239] - [classlib][text]text module doesn't need to
import java.awt.font while the manifest.mf file does
* [HARMONY-6240] - [classlib][pack200]
org.apache.harmony.pack200.BandSet should specify effortThresholds as a
share field of this class
* [HARMONY-6241] -
java.text.SimpleDateFormat.SimpleDateFormat(String, Locale) performance
can be improved
* [HARMONY-6243] - [classlib][pack200] Pack200 cmd line should print
message when user packs y.jar file into y.jar.pack without specifing
--no-gzip option
* [HARMONY-6250] - [classlib][luni] Timer documentation: clarify
which time units used
* [HARMONY-6255] - Implementation of createJar method
* [HARMONY-6265] - [classlib][luni] Improve the performance of HashMap
* [HARMONY-6295] - shiftLeftOneBit Javadoc
** New Feature
* [HARMONY-6264] - Need a new native method: VM.getStackClass()
* [HARMONY-6278] - [classlib] Upgrade icu4j 4.0 to the latest icu4j
4.2.1
* [HARMONY-6282] - [jdktools] [rmi] we should create the stubs from
rmic, rmid and rmiregistry
** Test
* [HARMONY-6058] - [classlib][prefs] - remove
FilePreferencesImplTest from exclude list
[result] [vote] Declare the signed source for r808406 as Milestone 11
Posted by Mark Hindess <ma...@googlemail.com>.
Sorry, just fixing the tags in subject so that people don't miss this.
-Mark.
In message <20...@d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>,
Mark Hindess writes:
>
> +1 votes from Tim, Sean, Regis, Tony, Ray, Pavel, Chunrong, Oliver and
> myself. No other votes, so the vote passes.
>
> Thanks for testing the artefacts and voting.
>
> The classlib/trunk code base and jdktools/trunk code base is now open
> for commits again.
>
> The java6 branches, drlvm and federated build trees will remain frozen
> until we have completed a vote on a 6.0m1 release.
>
> I'll upload linux/x86, linux/x86_64, and windows/x86 binaries. I'll
> also upload Debian packages for linux/x86 and linux/x86_64. If anyone
> can make windows/x86_64 binaries, from the signed artefacts, perhaps
> we could also include them.
>
> Regards,
> Mark.
>
> In message <20...@d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>,
> Mark Hindess writes:
> >
> > I think we'd fixed enough license issues for one release so I'm going to
> > begin the vote. If anyone feels that three days isn't enough time to
> > complete testing then please just ask for more time.
> >
> > I have created a signed source archive for this revision and made it
> > available at:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/5.0m11/
> >
> > Please test these artifacts and then vote for declaring these source
> > archives as milestone 11, and opening up the code[0] for general
> > development once again.
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 3 days, or until all binding votes
> > have been cast (if earlier).
> >
> > If the vote is successful, binary builds from that level will be made
> > available on the download page, as usual.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Mark.
> >
> > [0] drlvm/trunk and the java6 branches of classlib and jdktools will
> > remain frozen until we test and vote on 6.0M1
>
Re: [vote] Declare the signed source for r808406 as Milestone 11
Posted by Mark Hindess <ma...@googlemail.com>.
+1 votes from Tim, Sean, Regis, Tony, Ray, Pavel, Chunrong, Oliver and
myself. No other votes, so the vote passes.
Thanks for testing the artefacts and voting.
The classlib/trunk code base and jdktools/trunk code base is now open
for commits again.
The java6 branches, drlvm and federated build trees will remain frozen
until we have completed a vote on a 6.0m1 release.
I'll upload linux/x86, linux/x86_64, and windows/x86 binaries. I'll
also upload Debian packages for linux/x86 and linux/x86_64. If anyone
can make windows/x86_64 binaries, from the signed artefacts, perhaps we
could also include them.
Regards,
Mark.
In message <20...@d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>,
Mark Hindess writes:
>
> I think we'd fixed enough license issues for one release so I'm going to
> begin the vote. If anyone feels that three days isn't enough time to
> complete testing then please just ask for more time.
>
> I have created a signed source archive for this revision and made it
> available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/5.0m11/
>
> Please test these artifacts and then vote for declaring these source
> archives as milestone 11, and opening up the code[0] for general
> development once again.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 3 days, or until all binding votes
> have been cast (if earlier).
>
> If the vote is successful, binary builds from that level will be made
> available on the download page, as usual.
>
> Regards,
> Mark.
>
> [0] drlvm/trunk and the java6 branches of classlib and jdktools will
> remain frozen until we test and vote on 6.0M1
Re: [vote] Declare the signed source for r808406 as Milestone 11
Posted by Pavel Pervov <pm...@gmail.com>.
+1
2009/8/27, Mark Hindess <ma...@googlemail.com>:
>
> I think we'd fixed enough license issues for one release so I'm going to
> begin the vote. If anyone feels that three days isn't enough time to
> complete testing then please just ask for more time.
>
> I have created a signed source archive for this revision and made it
> available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/5.0m11/
>
> Please test these artifacts and then vote for declaring these source
> archives as milestone 11, and opening up the code[0] for general
> development once again.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 3 days, or until all binding votes
> have been cast (if earlier).
>
> If the vote is successful, binary builds from that level will be made
> available on the download page, as usual.
>
> Regards,
> Mark.
>
> [0] drlvm/trunk and the java6 branches of classlib and jdktools will
> remain frozen until we test and vote on 6.0M1
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: [vote] Declare the signed source for r808406 as Milestone 11
Posted by chunrong lai <ch...@gmail.com>.
+1.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:11 PM, Mark Hindess
<ma...@googlemail.com>wrote:
>
> I think we'd fixed enough license issues for one release so I'm going to
> begin the vote. If anyone feels that three days isn't enough time to
> complete testing then please just ask for more time.
>
> I have created a signed source archive for this revision and made it
> available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/5.0m11/
>
> Please test these artifacts and then vote for declaring these source
> archives as milestone 11, and opening up the code[0] for general
> development once again.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 3 days, or until all binding votes
> have been cast (if earlier).
>
> If the vote is successful, binary builds from that level will be made
> available on the download page, as usual.
>
> Regards,
> Mark.
>
> [0] drlvm/trunk and the java6 branches of classlib and jdktools will
> remain frozen until we test and vote on 6.0M1
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: [vote] Declare the signed source for r808406 as Milestone 11
Posted by Tony Wu <wu...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Regis<xu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Mark Hindess wrote:
>>
>> I think we'd fixed enough license issues for one release so I'm going to
>> begin the vote. If anyone feels that three days isn't enough time to
>> complete testing then please just ask for more time.
>>
>> I have created a signed source archive for this revision and made it
>> available at:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/5.0m11/
>>
>> Please test these artifacts and then vote for declaring these source
>> archives as milestone 11, and opening up the code[0] for general
>> development once again.
>>
>> This vote will be open for at least 3 days, or until all binding votes
>> have been cast (if earlier).
>>
>> If the vote is successful, binary builds from that level will be made
>> available on the download page, as usual.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Mark.
>>
>> [0] drlvm/trunk and the java6 branches of classlib and jdktools will
>> remain frozen until we test and vote on 6.0M1
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> +1
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Regis.
>
--
Tony Wu
China Software Development Lab, IBM
Re: [vote] Declare the signed source for r808406 as Milestone 11
Posted by Regis <xu...@gmail.com>.
Mark Hindess wrote:
> I think we'd fixed enough license issues for one release so I'm going to
> begin the vote. If anyone feels that three days isn't enough time to
> complete testing then please just ask for more time.
>
> I have created a signed source archive for this revision and made it
> available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/5.0m11/
>
> Please test these artifacts and then vote for declaring these source
> archives as milestone 11, and opening up the code[0] for general
> development once again.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 3 days, or until all binding votes
> have been cast (if earlier).
>
> If the vote is successful, binary builds from that level will be made
> available on the download page, as usual.
>
> Regards,
> Mark.
>
> [0] drlvm/trunk and the java6 branches of classlib and jdktools will
> remain frozen until we test and vote on 6.0M1
>
>
>
>
>
>
+1
--
Best Regards,
Regis.
Re: [vote] Declare the signed source for r808406 as Milestone 11
Posted by Ray Chen <cl...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:11 PM, Mark Hindess
<ma...@googlemail.com>wrote:
>
> I think we'd fixed enough license issues for one release so I'm going to
> begin the vote. If anyone feels that three days isn't enough time to
> complete testing then please just ask for more time.
>
> I have created a signed source archive for this revision and made it
> available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/5.0m11/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ehindessm/5.0m11/>
>
> Please test these artifacts and then vote for declaring these source
> archives as milestone 11, and opening up the code[0] for general
> development once again.
>
> This vote will be open for at least 3 days, or until all binding votes
> have been cast (if earlier).
>
> If the vote is successful, binary builds from that level will be made
> available on the download page, as usual.
>
> Regards,
> Mark.
>
> [0] drlvm/trunk and the java6 branches of classlib and jdktools will
> remain frozen until we test and vote on 6.0M1
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Ray Chen
MSN:clraychen@hotmail.com <MS...@hotmail.com>
Email:clarychen@gmail.com <Em...@gmail.com>
Re: [vote] Declare the signed source for r808406 as Milestone 11
Posted by Sean Qiu <se...@gmail.com>.
+1
Best Regards
Sean, Xiao Xia Qiu
2009/8/28 Mark Hindess <ma...@googlemail.com>:
>
> In message <4A...@gmail.com>, Tim Ellison writes:
>>
>> It looks like the server is going to be down for a while [1] (currently
>> scheduled 24hrs). So I'd like to request that the vote is open for
>> longer to compensate.
>
> I agree (of course).
>
>> I still haven't been able to download and look at the signed source, but
>> am continuing to test with my own builds. All looks ok for M11 here.
>
> In case it helps I've duplicated the signed source at:
>
> http://www.propercustard.co.uk/harmony-m11/
>
> Regards,
> Mark.
>
>
>> [1] http://monitoring.apache.org/status/
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tim
>>
>> On 28/Aug/2009 09:30, Tim Ellison wrote:
>> > FYI
>> >
>> > people.apache.org is down at the moment. I'll take a look at the
>> > proposed packages once I can get hold of them.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Tim
>> >
>> > On 27/Aug/2009 15:11, Mark Hindess wrote:
>> >> I think we'd fixed enough license issues for one release so I'm going to
>> >> begin the vote. If anyone feels that three days isn't enough time to
>> >> complete testing then please just ask for more time.
>> >>
>> >> I have created a signed source archive for this revision and made it
>> >> available at:
>> >>
>> >> http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/5.0m11/
>> >>
>> >> Please test these artifacts and then vote for declaring these source
>> >> archives as milestone 11, and opening up the code[0] for general
>> >> development once again.
>> >>
>> >> This vote will be open for at least 3 days, or until all binding votes
>> >> have been cast (if earlier).
>> >>
>> >> If the vote is successful, binary builds from that level will be made
>> >> available on the download page, as usual.
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >> Mark.
>> >>
>> >> [0] drlvm/trunk and the java6 branches of classlib and jdktools will
>> >> remain frozen until we test and vote on 6.0M1
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
>
>
Re: [vote] Declare the signed source for r808406 as Milestone 11
Posted by Mark Hindess <ma...@googlemail.com>.
In message <4A...@gmail.com>, Tim Ellison writes:
>
> It looks like the server is going to be down for a while [1] (currently
> scheduled 24hrs). So I'd like to request that the vote is open for
> longer to compensate.
I agree (of course).
> I still haven't been able to download and look at the signed source, but
> am continuing to test with my own builds. All looks ok for M11 here.
In case it helps I've duplicated the signed source at:
http://www.propercustard.co.uk/harmony-m11/
Regards,
Mark.
> [1] http://monitoring.apache.org/status/
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
> On 28/Aug/2009 09:30, Tim Ellison wrote:
> > FYI
> >
> > people.apache.org is down at the moment. I'll take a look at the
> > proposed packages once I can get hold of them.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Tim
> >
> > On 27/Aug/2009 15:11, Mark Hindess wrote:
> >> I think we'd fixed enough license issues for one release so I'm going to
> >> begin the vote. If anyone feels that three days isn't enough time to
> >> complete testing then please just ask for more time.
> >>
> >> I have created a signed source archive for this revision and made it
> >> available at:
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/5.0m11/
> >>
> >> Please test these artifacts and then vote for declaring these source
> >> archives as milestone 11, and opening up the code[0] for general
> >> development once again.
> >>
> >> This vote will be open for at least 3 days, or until all binding votes
> >> have been cast (if earlier).
> >>
> >> If the vote is successful, binary builds from that level will be made
> >> available on the download page, as usual.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Mark.
> >>
> >> [0] drlvm/trunk and the java6 branches of classlib and jdktools will
> >> remain frozen until we test and vote on 6.0M1
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
Re: [vote] Declare the signed source for r808406 as Milestone 11
Posted by Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com>.
It looks like the server is going to be down for a while [1] (currently
scheduled 24hrs). So I'd like to request that the vote is open for
longer to compensate.
I still haven't been able to download and look at the signed source, but
am continuing to test with my own builds. All looks ok for M11 here.
[1] http://monitoring.apache.org/status/
Regards,
Tim
On 28/Aug/2009 09:30, Tim Ellison wrote:
> FYI
>
> people.apache.org is down at the moment. I'll take a look at the
> proposed packages once I can get hold of them.
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
> On 27/Aug/2009 15:11, Mark Hindess wrote:
>> I think we'd fixed enough license issues for one release so I'm going to
>> begin the vote. If anyone feels that three days isn't enough time to
>> complete testing then please just ask for more time.
>>
>> I have created a signed source archive for this revision and made it
>> available at:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/5.0m11/
>>
>> Please test these artifacts and then vote for declaring these source
>> archives as milestone 11, and opening up the code[0] for general
>> development once again.
>>
>> This vote will be open for at least 3 days, or until all binding votes
>> have been cast (if earlier).
>>
>> If the vote is successful, binary builds from that level will be made
>> available on the download page, as usual.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Mark.
>>
>> [0] drlvm/trunk and the java6 branches of classlib and jdktools will
>> remain frozen until we test and vote on 6.0M1
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>