You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@ratis.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/07/29 03:25:00 UTC

[GitHub] [ratis] captainzmc commented on pull request #699: RATIS-1644. Improve unsafe flush to safe async flush.

captainzmc commented on PR #699:
URL: https://github.com/apache/ratis/pull/699#issuecomment-1198841033

   > * We should support unsafe flush since the existing unsafe flush still has a better performance than async flush.  @SincereXIA , do you need unsafe flush if we have the async flush provided here?
   
   Thanks @szetszwo  @ChenSammi. Yes we'd better keep unsafe flush because of the better performance. We can add a separate safe async flush here.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@ratis.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org