You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by "ant elder (JIRA)" <tu...@ws.apache.org> on 2006/10/06 13:25:30 UTC
[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-659) Position of not consistent
between composite, component and componentType
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-659?page=all ]
ant elder updated TUSCANY-659:
------------------------------
Fix Version/s: Cpp-current
> Position of <property> not consistent between composite, component and componentType
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TUSCANY-659
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-659
> Project: Tuscany
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Specification
> Affects Versions: Cpp-current
> Reporter: Jean-Sebastien Delfino
> Assigned To: Jean-Sebastien Delfino
> Fix For: Cpp-current
>
>
> In a composite properties are defined after services and before components and before references.
> In component and componentType properties appear after references.
> This is confusing, the position of properties should be consistent between composites, components and componentTypes.
> I will raise that issue to the OSOA spec workgroup.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org