You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@lucenenet.apache.org by gj...@aol.com on 2010/11/03 09:30:11 UTC
Lucene and the .NET platform
Has anyone tried to compile and run the Java Lucene code base using http://www.janetdev.org/
This janetdev says it is a new web site building an open community dedicated to
enabling Java as a first class development and runtime
environment for .NET. They seem to have downloads on sourceforge and say they are based on Apache Harmony.
About 4 years ago I built a binary of Java Lucene for NET using the Microsoft J# compiler. Total effort was about a couple hours. It ran the benchmarks I was interested in evaluating.
I first did the Java Lucene 1.9.1 release, and then I later built off the trunc which I understood was to become the 2.0 branch.
See http://people.delphiforums.com/gjc/lucene-java-vjc.html
Of course a lot has changed in the Java world since early 2006. Microsoft dropped J#, and Sun announced an open source OpenJDK.
Re: Lucene and the .NET platform
Posted by Hans Merkl <hm...@hmerkl.com>.
Good find! The licensing seems a bit unclear though. I thought the Eclipse
License requires you to deliver source code if requested.
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 04:30, <gj...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> Has anyone tried to compile and run the Java Lucene code base using
> http://www.janetdev.org/
> This janetdev says it is a new web site building an open community
> dedicated to
> enabling Java as a first class development and runtime
> environment for .NET. They seem to have downloads on sourceforge and say
> they are based on Apache Harmony.
>
> About 4 years ago I built a binary of Java Lucene for NET using the
> Microsoft J# compiler. Total effort was about a couple hours. It ran the
> benchmarks I was interested in evaluating.
> I first did the Java Lucene 1.9.1 release, and then I later built off the
> trunc which I understood was to become the 2.0 branch.
> See http://people.delphiforums.com/gjc/lucene-java-vjc.html
>
> Of course a lot has changed in the Java world since early 2006. Microsoft
> dropped J#, and Sun announced an open source OpenJDK.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: Lucene and the .NET platform
Posted by Hans Merkl <hm...@hmerkl.com>.
Good find! The licensing seems a bit unclear though. I thought the Eclipse
License requires you to deliver source code if requested.
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 04:30, <gj...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> Has anyone tried to compile and run the Java Lucene code base using
> http://www.janetdev.org/
> This janetdev says it is a new web site building an open community
> dedicated to
> enabling Java as a first class development and runtime
> environment for .NET. They seem to have downloads on sourceforge and say
> they are based on Apache Harmony.
>
> About 4 years ago I built a binary of Java Lucene for NET using the
> Microsoft J# compiler. Total effort was about a couple hours. It ran the
> benchmarks I was interested in evaluating.
> I first did the Java Lucene 1.9.1 release, and then I later built off the
> trunc which I understood was to become the 2.0 branch.
> See http://people.delphiforums.com/gjc/lucene-java-vjc.html
>
> Of course a lot has changed in the Java world since early 2006. Microsoft
> dropped J#, and Sun announced an open source OpenJDK.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: Lucene and the .NET platform
Posted by Hans Merkl <hm...@hmerkl.com>.
Good find! The licensing seems a bit unclear though. I thought the Eclipse
License requires you to deliver source code if requested.
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 04:30, <gj...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> Has anyone tried to compile and run the Java Lucene code base using
> http://www.janetdev.org/
> This janetdev says it is a new web site building an open community
> dedicated to
> enabling Java as a first class development and runtime
> environment for .NET. They seem to have downloads on sourceforge and say
> they are based on Apache Harmony.
>
> About 4 years ago I built a binary of Java Lucene for NET using the
> Microsoft J# compiler. Total effort was about a couple hours. It ran the
> benchmarks I was interested in evaluating.
> I first did the Java Lucene 1.9.1 release, and then I later built off the
> trunc which I understood was to become the 2.0 branch.
> See http://people.delphiforums.com/gjc/lucene-java-vjc.html
>
> Of course a lot has changed in the Java world since early 2006. Microsoft
> dropped J#, and Sun announced an open source OpenJDK.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>