You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@nifi.apache.org by "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/08/29 11:10:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-5147) Improve HashAttribute processor

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16596199#comment-16596199 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-5147:
--------------------------------------

Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2836
  
    @alopresto, just a ping.  It has been a while


> Improve HashAttribute processor
> -------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-5147
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5147
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Extensions
>    Affects Versions: 1.6.0
>            Reporter: Andy LoPresto
>            Assignee: Otto Fowler
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: hash, security
>             Fix For: 1.8.0
>
>
> The {{HashAttribute}} processor currently has surprising behavior. Barring familiarity with the processor, a user would expect {{HashAttribute}} to generate a hash value over one or more attributes. Instead, the processor as it is implemented "groups" incoming flowfiles into groups based on regular expressions which match attribute values, and then generates a (non-configurable) MD5 hash over the concatenation of the matching attribute keys and values. 
> In addition:
> * the processor throws an error and routes to failure any incoming flowfile which does not have all attributes specified in the processor
> * the use of MD5 is vastly deprecated
> * no other hash algorithms are available
> I am unaware of community use of this processor, but I do not want to break backward compatibility. I propose the following steps:
> * Implement a new {{CalculateAttributeHash}} processor (awkward name, but this processor already has the desired name)
> ** This processor will perform the "standard" use case -- identify an attribute, calculate the specified hash over the value, and write it to an output attribute
> ** This processor will have a required property descriptor allowing a dropdown menu of valid hash algorithms
> ** This processor will accept arbitrary dynamic properties identifying the attributes to be hashed as a key, and the resulting attribute name as a value
> ** Example: I want to generate a SHA-512 hash on the attribute {{username}}, and a flowfile enters the processor with {{username}} value {{alopresto}}. I configure {{algorithm}} with {{SHA-512}} and add a dynamic property {{username}} -- {{username_SHA512}}. The resulting flowfile will have attribute {{username_SHA512}} with value {{739b4f6722fb5de20125751c7a1a358b2a7eb8f07e530e4bf18561fbff93234908aa9d2577770c876bca9ede5ba784d5ce6081dbbdfe5ddd446678f223b8d632}}
> * Improve the documentation of this processor to explain the goal/expected use case (?)
> * Link in processor documentation to new processor for standard use cases
> * Remove the error alert when an incoming flowfile does not contain all expected attributes. I propose changing the severity to INFO and still routing to failure



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)