You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Ashutosh Chauhan <ha...@apache.org> on 2011/08/15 00:53:27 UTC
[VOTE] Release HCatalog 0.1-incubating (RC2)
Please disregard previous mail due to incorrect subject line.
Hi all,
HCatalog community is excited to share that RC for first release of
HCatalog has been +1'd over at hcatalog-user@incubator Please try it
out and vote for the Apache HCatalog 0.1-incubating release.
Vote thread:
http://markmail.org/thread/5eypr4zl75fmnxuk
Artifact and signatures:
http://people.apache.org/~hashutosh/hcatalog-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/
SVN Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hcatalog/tags/release-0.1-rc2/
PGP release keys:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hcatalog/branches/branch-0.1/KEYS
[ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache HCatalog 0.1-incubating
[ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...
Thanks,
Ashutosh
Re: [VOTE] Release HCatalog 0.1-incubating (RC2)
Posted by Ashutosh Chauhan <ha...@apache.org>.
One from Alan Gates.
Ashutosh
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 16:00, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
> Just curious, now many of these votes are from the mentors?
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
> On Aug 14, 2011, at 3:53 PM, Ashutosh Chauhan wrote:
>
> > Please disregard previous mail due to incorrect subject line.
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > HCatalog community is excited to share that RC for first release of
> > HCatalog has been +1'd over at hcatalog-user@incubator Please try it
> > out and vote for the Apache HCatalog 0.1-incubating release.
> >
> >
> > Vote thread:
> > http://markmail.org/thread/5eypr4zl75fmnxuk
> >
> > Artifact and signatures:
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~hashutosh/hcatalog-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/
> >
> > SVN Tag:
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hcatalog/tags/release-0.1-rc2/
> >
> >
> > PGP release keys:
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hcatalog/branches/branch-0.1/KEYS
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache HCatalog 0.1-incubating
> > [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ashutosh
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release HCatalog 0.1-incubating (RC2)
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
Just curious, now many of these votes are from the mentors?
Regards,
Alan
On Aug 14, 2011, at 3:53 PM, Ashutosh Chauhan wrote:
> Please disregard previous mail due to incorrect subject line.
>
> Hi all,
>
> HCatalog community is excited to share that RC for first release of
> HCatalog has been +1'd over at hcatalog-user@incubator Please try it
> out and vote for the Apache HCatalog 0.1-incubating release.
>
>
> Vote thread:
> http://markmail.org/thread/5eypr4zl75fmnxuk
>
> Artifact and signatures:
> http://people.apache.org/~hashutosh/hcatalog-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/
>
> SVN Tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hcatalog/tags/release-0.1-rc2/
>
>
> PGP release keys:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hcatalog/branches/branch-0.1/KEYS
>
> [ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache HCatalog 0.1-incubating
> [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...
>
> Thanks,
> Ashutosh
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release HCatalog 0.1-incubating (RC2)
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 18 August 2011 23:30, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 18 August 2011 18:42, Alan Gates <ga...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> Sebastian,
>>
>> Thanks for voting. I have a couple questions on your feedback. I didn't follow what you were saying about having source in the archive and about having NOTICE etc. files in every archive. HCatalog only has one archive in this proposed release, hcatalog-0.1.0.tar.gz. This archive does have all the required files, and it contains the source. You can download this archive and do a build of the project (which I did before voting).
>>
>> Looking through the NOTICE file, it looks like the reference to JDBM is unneeded, as that is not used. Other than that all the jars referenced in the file are included in the distribution. So is your concern just the extra JDBM plus that it says "includes/uses" instead of just "includes"?
>
> Yes, mostly.
>
> What about JUnit? The archive includes junit 3.8.1 (seems a bit old -
> current version is 4.8.2)
> Also Thrift-Facebook, which has package name com.facebook - suggests
> it is not part of Apache Thrift
>
> Is ANTLR really needed at run-time? Ditto JUnit?
> If it's only need to build the software it can just be listed as a
> requirement in the build instructions.
>
> Given that the code appears to use Ivy, this should be able to fetch
> compile-time dependencies automatically.
>
> BTW, you include both log4j 1.2.15 and 1.2.16 which looks wrong. Also
> antlr 2.7.7 and 3.0.1. Mixed jars often cause problems.
>
> Not sure you need both commons-logging and commons-logging-api; also
> latest version is 1.1.1 (released 2007)
>
>> Regarding the LICENSE file the licenses for the 3rd party software is in the Hive's LICENSE file which we include, but we can move it up to the top level LICENSE file.
>
> Yes, all required licenses must be in the top-level LICENSE file. You
> cannot expect users to hunt around looking for LICENSE files.
>
> I would expect to find a separate source release archive, with just
> the source from the HCatalog project.
> If I want the source, why should I have to download all the binary
> dependencies too?
>
> BTW, I don't understand why you include an external to Hive source -
> surely you can just depend on one of the Hive releases?
>
One other problem:
The build.xml file in the SVN tag does not agree with the one in the archive.
It looks like the tag was created after the archive, and in the
meantime build.xml had been updated in SVN.
The tag should reflect exactly what was used to build the release candidate.
For example:
- create tag
- checkout tag in new workarea
- build from clean workarea.
>> Alan.
>>
>>
>> On Aug 18, 2011, at 7:25 AM, sebb wrote:
>>
>>> On 14 August 2011 23:53, Ashutosh Chauhan <ha...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> Please disregard previous mail due to incorrect subject line.
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> HCatalog community is excited to share that RC for first release of
>>>> HCatalog has been +1'd over at hcatalog-user@incubator Please try it
>>>> out and vote for the Apache HCatalog 0.1-incubating release.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Vote thread:
>>>> http://markmail.org/thread/5eypr4zl75fmnxuk
>>>>
>>>> Artifact and signatures:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~hashutosh/hcatalog-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/
>>>
>>> The RAT report shows that there are a lot of files without AL headers.
>>> Some of these are test data comparisons, but it looks as though there
>>> are a few files that should have headers.
>>>
>>>> SVN Tag:
>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hcatalog/tags/release-0.1-rc2/
>>>
>>> The NOTICE file format is wrong. The paragraphs are of the form:
>>>
>>> This product includes/uses software developed by The Apache Software
>>> Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
>>>
>>> NOTICE files should only include references to software which is
>>> actually included in the release.
>>> i.e. the "/uses" should be removed.
>>>
>>> Don't include references to 3rd party software which is not actually shipped.
>>>
>>> The NOTICE file is intended for required notices only; it is not a
>>> dependecy list.
>>>
>>> For any 3rd party software that does require an entry in NOTICE, there
>>> must be a corresponding section in the LICENSE file which contains the
>>> notice.
>>>
>>> These are blockers in my opinion.
>>>
>>> Other things to check:
>>> - N&L and DISCLAIMER files in every archive (and at tag top-level)
>>> - source archive agrees with SVN tag
>>> - sigs and hashes work
>>>
>>> The ASF is primarily about releasing source; there does not seem to be
>>> a source archive.
>>>
>>> Binary archives are also often provided for convenience, but normally
>>> these only include the compiled source plus javadoc and perhaps some
>>> example source.
>>>
>>> I think the packaging needs revisiting.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> PGP release keys:
>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hcatalog/branches/branch-0.1/KEYS
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache HCatalog 0.1-incubating
>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Ashutosh
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release HCatalog 0.1-incubating (RC2)
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 18 August 2011 23:48, Alan Gates <ga...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
> On Aug 18, 2011, at 3:30 PM, sebb wrote:
>>>
>>
>> Yes, mostly.
>>
>> What about JUnit? The archive includes junit 3.8.1 (seems a bit old -
>> current version is 4.8.2)
>> Also Thrift-Facebook, which has package name com.facebook - suggests
>> it is not part of Apache Thrift
>>
>> Is ANTLR really needed at run-time? Ditto JUnit?
>> If it's only need to build the software it can just be listed as a
>> requirement in the build instructions.
>
> Antlr has a runtime jar that we need to ship.
And JUnit?
>>
>> Given that the code appears to use Ivy, this should be able to fetch
>> compile-time dependencies automatically.
>>
>> BTW, you include both log4j 1.2.15 and 1.2.16 which looks wrong. Also
>> antlr 2.7.7 and 3.0.1. Mixed jars often cause problems.
>>
>> Not sure you need both commons-logging and commons-logging-api; also
>> latest version is 1.1.1 (released 2007)
>
> All this stuff is brought along by Hive, not HCatalog unique code, so we're not in control of the versions, including the multiple versions.
Perhaps you shpuld report the issue to Hive then.
>>
>>> Regarding the LICENSE file the licenses for the 3rd party software is in the Hive's LICENSE file which we include, but we can move it up to the top level LICENSE file.
>>
>> Yes, all required licenses must be in the top-level LICENSE file. You
>> cannot expect users to hunt around looking for LICENSE files.
>
> We'll fix this.
>
>>
>> I would expect to find a separate source release archive, with just
>> the source from the HCatalog project.
>> If I want the source, why should I have to download all the binary
>> dependencies too?
>
> No project I've been on so far (Hadoop, Pig) does this.
All projects I have been on - Jakarta BSF & JMeter; Commons,
HttpComponents; (and many others I use Tomcat) release source-only
archives.
Most also release binary-only archives.
See also
http://www.apache.org/dev/release-publishing.html#valid
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what-must-every-release-contain
>>
>> BTW, I don't understand why you include an external to Hive source -
>> surely you can just depend on one of the Hive releases?
>>
> No. HCatalog depends on features that have been added to Hive that are not yet released. In general, when we set up the project one of the things we realized was that, due to different points of maturity, Hive and HCatalog are moving at different speeds. Rather than try to force Hive releases when HCatalog needs them it makes more sense to include Hive's code in HCatalog. At some point in the future, as HCatalog matures, I assume this will change and HCatalog will be able to depend on released versions of Hive.
>
> Alan.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release HCatalog 0.1-incubating (RC2)
Posted by Alan Gates <ga...@hortonworks.com>.
On Aug 18, 2011, at 3:30 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>
> Yes, mostly.
>
> What about JUnit? The archive includes junit 3.8.1 (seems a bit old -
> current version is 4.8.2)
> Also Thrift-Facebook, which has package name com.facebook - suggests
> it is not part of Apache Thrift
>
> Is ANTLR really needed at run-time? Ditto JUnit?
> If it's only need to build the software it can just be listed as a
> requirement in the build instructions.
Antlr has a runtime jar that we need to ship.
>
> Given that the code appears to use Ivy, this should be able to fetch
> compile-time dependencies automatically.
>
> BTW, you include both log4j 1.2.15 and 1.2.16 which looks wrong. Also
> antlr 2.7.7 and 3.0.1. Mixed jars often cause problems.
>
> Not sure you need both commons-logging and commons-logging-api; also
> latest version is 1.1.1 (released 2007)
All this stuff is brought along by Hive, not HCatalog unique code, so we're not in control of the versions, including the multiple versions.
>
>> Regarding the LICENSE file the licenses for the 3rd party software is in the Hive's LICENSE file which we include, but we can move it up to the top level LICENSE file.
>
> Yes, all required licenses must be in the top-level LICENSE file. You
> cannot expect users to hunt around looking for LICENSE files.
We'll fix this.
>
> I would expect to find a separate source release archive, with just
> the source from the HCatalog project.
> If I want the source, why should I have to download all the binary
> dependencies too?
No project I've been on so far (Hadoop, Pig) does this.
>
> BTW, I don't understand why you include an external to Hive source -
> surely you can just depend on one of the Hive releases?
>
No. HCatalog depends on features that have been added to Hive that are not yet released. In general, when we set up the project one of the things we realized was that, due to different points of maturity, Hive and HCatalog are moving at different speeds. Rather than try to force Hive releases when HCatalog needs them it makes more sense to include Hive's code in HCatalog. At some point in the future, as HCatalog matures, I assume this will change and HCatalog will be able to depend on released versions of Hive.
Alan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release HCatalog 0.1-incubating (RC2)
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 18 August 2011 18:42, Alan Gates <ga...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> Sebastian,
>
> Thanks for voting. I have a couple questions on your feedback. I didn't follow what you were saying about having source in the archive and about having NOTICE etc. files in every archive. HCatalog only has one archive in this proposed release, hcatalog-0.1.0.tar.gz. This archive does have all the required files, and it contains the source. You can download this archive and do a build of the project (which I did before voting).
>
> Looking through the NOTICE file, it looks like the reference to JDBM is unneeded, as that is not used. Other than that all the jars referenced in the file are included in the distribution. So is your concern just the extra JDBM plus that it says "includes/uses" instead of just "includes"?
Yes, mostly.
What about JUnit? The archive includes junit 3.8.1 (seems a bit old -
current version is 4.8.2)
Also Thrift-Facebook, which has package name com.facebook - suggests
it is not part of Apache Thrift
Is ANTLR really needed at run-time? Ditto JUnit?
If it's only need to build the software it can just be listed as a
requirement in the build instructions.
Given that the code appears to use Ivy, this should be able to fetch
compile-time dependencies automatically.
BTW, you include both log4j 1.2.15 and 1.2.16 which looks wrong. Also
antlr 2.7.7 and 3.0.1. Mixed jars often cause problems.
Not sure you need both commons-logging and commons-logging-api; also
latest version is 1.1.1 (released 2007)
> Regarding the LICENSE file the licenses for the 3rd party software is in the Hive's LICENSE file which we include, but we can move it up to the top level LICENSE file.
Yes, all required licenses must be in the top-level LICENSE file. You
cannot expect users to hunt around looking for LICENSE files.
I would expect to find a separate source release archive, with just
the source from the HCatalog project.
If I want the source, why should I have to download all the binary
dependencies too?
BTW, I don't understand why you include an external to Hive source -
surely you can just depend on one of the Hive releases?
> Alan.
>
>
> On Aug 18, 2011, at 7:25 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 14 August 2011 23:53, Ashutosh Chauhan <ha...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Please disregard previous mail due to incorrect subject line.
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> HCatalog community is excited to share that RC for first release of
>>> HCatalog has been +1'd over at hcatalog-user@incubator Please try it
>>> out and vote for the Apache HCatalog 0.1-incubating release.
>>>
>>>
>>> Vote thread:
>>> http://markmail.org/thread/5eypr4zl75fmnxuk
>>>
>>> Artifact and signatures:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~hashutosh/hcatalog-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/
>>
>> The RAT report shows that there are a lot of files without AL headers.
>> Some of these are test data comparisons, but it looks as though there
>> are a few files that should have headers.
>>
>>> SVN Tag:
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hcatalog/tags/release-0.1-rc2/
>>
>> The NOTICE file format is wrong. The paragraphs are of the form:
>>
>> This product includes/uses software developed by The Apache Software
>> Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
>>
>> NOTICE files should only include references to software which is
>> actually included in the release.
>> i.e. the "/uses" should be removed.
>>
>> Don't include references to 3rd party software which is not actually shipped.
>>
>> The NOTICE file is intended for required notices only; it is not a
>> dependecy list.
>>
>> For any 3rd party software that does require an entry in NOTICE, there
>> must be a corresponding section in the LICENSE file which contains the
>> notice.
>>
>> These are blockers in my opinion.
>>
>> Other things to check:
>> - N&L and DISCLAIMER files in every archive (and at tag top-level)
>> - source archive agrees with SVN tag
>> - sigs and hashes work
>>
>> The ASF is primarily about releasing source; there does not seem to be
>> a source archive.
>>
>> Binary archives are also often provided for convenience, but normally
>> these only include the compiled source plus javadoc and perhaps some
>> example source.
>>
>> I think the packaging needs revisiting.
>>
>>>
>>> PGP release keys:
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hcatalog/branches/branch-0.1/KEYS
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache HCatalog 0.1-incubating
>>> [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ashutosh
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release HCatalog 0.1-incubating (RC2)
Posted by Alan Gates <ga...@hortonworks.com>.
Sebastian,
Thanks for voting. I have a couple questions on your feedback. I didn't follow what you were saying about having source in the archive and about having NOTICE etc. files in every archive. HCatalog only has one archive in this proposed release, hcatalog-0.1.0.tar.gz. This archive does have all the required files, and it contains the source. You can download this archive and do a build of the project (which I did before voting).
Looking through the NOTICE file, it looks like the reference to JDBM is unneeded, as that is not used. Other than that all the jars referenced in the file are included in the distribution. So is your concern just the extra JDBM plus that it says "includes/uses" instead of just "includes"?
Regarding the LICENSE file the licenses for the 3rd party software is in the Hive's LICENSE file which we include, but we can move it up to the top level LICENSE file.
Alan.
On Aug 18, 2011, at 7:25 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 14 August 2011 23:53, Ashutosh Chauhan <ha...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Please disregard previous mail due to incorrect subject line.
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> HCatalog community is excited to share that RC for first release of
>> HCatalog has been +1'd over at hcatalog-user@incubator Please try it
>> out and vote for the Apache HCatalog 0.1-incubating release.
>>
>>
>> Vote thread:
>> http://markmail.org/thread/5eypr4zl75fmnxuk
>>
>> Artifact and signatures:
>> http://people.apache.org/~hashutosh/hcatalog-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/
>
> The RAT report shows that there are a lot of files without AL headers.
> Some of these are test data comparisons, but it looks as though there
> are a few files that should have headers.
>
>> SVN Tag:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hcatalog/tags/release-0.1-rc2/
>
> The NOTICE file format is wrong. The paragraphs are of the form:
>
> This product includes/uses software developed by The Apache Software
> Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
>
> NOTICE files should only include references to software which is
> actually included in the release.
> i.e. the "/uses" should be removed.
>
> Don't include references to 3rd party software which is not actually shipped.
>
> The NOTICE file is intended for required notices only; it is not a
> dependecy list.
>
> For any 3rd party software that does require an entry in NOTICE, there
> must be a corresponding section in the LICENSE file which contains the
> notice.
>
> These are blockers in my opinion.
>
> Other things to check:
> - N&L and DISCLAIMER files in every archive (and at tag top-level)
> - source archive agrees with SVN tag
> - sigs and hashes work
>
> The ASF is primarily about releasing source; there does not seem to be
> a source archive.
>
> Binary archives are also often provided for convenience, but normally
> these only include the compiled source plus javadoc and perhaps some
> example source.
>
> I think the packaging needs revisiting.
>
>>
>> PGP release keys:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hcatalog/branches/branch-0.1/KEYS
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache HCatalog 0.1-incubating
>> [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ashutosh
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release HCatalog 0.1-incubating (RC2)
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 14 August 2011 23:53, Ashutosh Chauhan <ha...@apache.org> wrote:
> Please disregard previous mail due to incorrect subject line.
>
> Hi all,
>
> HCatalog community is excited to share that RC for first release of
> HCatalog has been +1'd over at hcatalog-user@incubator Please try it
> out and vote for the Apache HCatalog 0.1-incubating release.
>
>
> Vote thread:
> http://markmail.org/thread/5eypr4zl75fmnxuk
>
> Artifact and signatures:
> http://people.apache.org/~hashutosh/hcatalog-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/
The RAT report shows that there are a lot of files without AL headers.
Some of these are test data comparisons, but it looks as though there
are a few files that should have headers.
> SVN Tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hcatalog/tags/release-0.1-rc2/
The NOTICE file format is wrong. The paragraphs are of the form:
This product includes/uses software developed by The Apache Software
Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
NOTICE files should only include references to software which is
actually included in the release.
i.e. the "/uses" should be removed.
Don't include references to 3rd party software which is not actually shipped.
The NOTICE file is intended for required notices only; it is not a
dependecy list.
For any 3rd party software that does require an entry in NOTICE, there
must be a corresponding section in the LICENSE file which contains the
notice.
These are blockers in my opinion.
Other things to check:
- N&L and DISCLAIMER files in every archive (and at tag top-level)
- source archive agrees with SVN tag
- sigs and hashes work
The ASF is primarily about releasing source; there does not seem to be
a source archive.
Binary archives are also often provided for convenience, but normally
these only include the compiled source plus javadoc and perhaps some
example source.
I think the packaging needs revisiting.
>
> PGP release keys:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hcatalog/branches/branch-0.1/KEYS
>
> [ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache HCatalog 0.1-incubating
> [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...
>
> Thanks,
> Ashutosh
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release HCatalog 0.1-incubating (RC2)
Posted by Alan Gates <ga...@hortonworks.com>.
All,
we could really use a couple of more votes on this. Thanks.
Alan.
On Aug 14, 2011, at 3:53 PM, Ashutosh Chauhan wrote:
> Please disregard previous mail due to incorrect subject line.
>
> Hi all,
>
> HCatalog community is excited to share that RC for first release of
> HCatalog has been +1'd over at hcatalog-user@incubator Please try it
> out and vote for the Apache HCatalog 0.1-incubating release.
>
>
> Vote thread:
> http://markmail.org/thread/5eypr4zl75fmnxuk
>
> Artifact and signatures:
> http://people.apache.org/~hashutosh/hcatalog-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/
>
> SVN Tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hcatalog/tags/release-0.1-rc2/
>
>
> PGP release keys:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hcatalog/branches/branch-0.1/KEYS
>
> [ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache HCatalog 0.1-incubating
> [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...
>
> Thanks,
> Ashutosh
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release HCatalog 0.1-incubating (RC2)
Posted by Alan Gates <ga...@hortonworks.com>.
+1 Built and ran tests on Mac and Linux. Built docs. Checked the signature, checksum, and rat report.
Alan.
On Aug 14, 2011, at 3:53 PM, Ashutosh Chauhan wrote:
> Please disregard previous mail due to incorrect subject line.
>
> Hi all,
>
> HCatalog community is excited to share that RC for first release of
> HCatalog has been +1'd over at hcatalog-user@incubator Please try it
> out and vote for the Apache HCatalog 0.1-incubating release.
>
>
> Vote thread:
> http://markmail.org/thread/5eypr4zl75fmnxuk
>
> Artifact and signatures:
> http://people.apache.org/~hashutosh/hcatalog-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/
>
> SVN Tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hcatalog/tags/release-0.1-rc2/
>
>
> PGP release keys:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/hcatalog/branches/branch-0.1/KEYS
>
> [ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache HCatalog 0.1-incubating
> [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...
>
> Thanks,
> Ashutosh
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org