You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "Toshihiro Suzuki (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/03/09 01:11:00 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-8458) Support for batch version of
checkAndPut() and checkAndDelete()
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17054584#comment-17054584 ]
Toshihiro Suzuki edited comment on HBASE-8458 at 3/9/20, 1:10 AM:
------------------------------------------------------------------
[~gxcheng] This is a very useful feature. And we need it for our use case. Are you still work on it? Or Can I take it up?
was (Author: brfrn169):
[~gxcheng] This is a very useful feature. and we need it for our use case. Are you still work on it? Or Can I take it up?
> Support for batch version of checkAndPut() and checkAndDelete()
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-8458
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8458
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Client, regionserver
> Affects Versions: 0.95.0
> Reporter: Hari Mankude
> Assignee: Guangxu Cheng
> Priority: Major
>
> The use case is that the user has multiple threads loading hundreds of keys into a hbase table. Occasionally there are collisions in the keys being uploaded by different threads. So for correctness, it is required to do checkAndPut() instead of a put(). However, doing a checkAndPut() rpc for every key update is non optimal. It would be good to have a batch version of checkAndPut() similar to batch put(). The client can partition the keys on region boundaries.
> The jira is NOT looking for any type of cross-row locking or multi-row atomicity with checkAndPut()
> Batch version of checkAndDelete() is a similar requirement.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)