You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org by Boysenberry Payne <bo...@humaniteque.com> on 2006/07/08 07:02:09 UTC
Make test failed
I'm trying to build libapreq2-2.07 on Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-42,
Apache/2.0.46, perl v5.8.0 built for i386-linux-thread-multi,
mod_perl/2.0.1
Getting the following error on make test using: perl Makefile.PL
--with-apache2-apxs=/usr/local/apache2/bin/apxs --enable-perl-glue
error:
/usr/bin/perl -MTest::Harness -e 'runtests(@ARGV)' version.t cookie.t
params.t parsers.t error.t util.t
version....FAILED tests 2, 4-6
Failed 4/6 tests, 33.33% okay
cookie.....ok
params.....ok
parsers....lt-parsers: parser_header.c:118: split_header_line:
Assertion `vlen >= dlen' failed.
parsers....dubious
Test returned status 0 (wstat 6, 0x6)
DIED. FAILED tests 9-542
Failed 534/542 tests, 1.48% okay
error......ok
util.......ok 1/89/home/perl/libapreq2-2.07/library/t/.libs/lt-util:
relocation error: /home/perl/libapreq2-2.07/library/t/.libs/lt-util:
undefined symbol: apreq_charset_divine
util.......dubious
Test returned status 127 (wstat 32512, 0x7f00)
DIED. FAILED tests 25, 32-89
Failed 59/89 tests, 33.71% okay
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
parsers.t 0 6 542 1068 197.05% 9-542
util.t 127 32512 89 116 130.34% 25 32-89
version.t 6 4 66.67% 2 4-6
Failed 3/6 test scripts, 50.00% okay. 597/747 subtests failed, 20.08%
okay.
make[2]: *** [test] Error 127
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/perl/libapreq2-2.07/library/t'
make[1]: *** [test] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/perl/libapreq2-2.07/library'
make: *** [library_test] Error 2
Anyone know what I need to fix to get it working?
Thanks,
Boysenberry
boysenberrys.com | habitatlife.com | selfgnosis.com
Re: Make test failed
Posted by "Philip M. Gollucci" <pg...@p6m7g8.com>.
Boysenberry Payne wrote:
> I'm in the progress of updating it all (except gcc version 3.2.3, is
> that bad?)
Not bad, but its not current, but I'd use whatever your systems default compiler is
unless you've got a good reason.
> On my dev box I've been using Apache/2.0.55, should I upgrade to 2.2 or
> is that
> too new? It seems that the 2.0 is as 58 should I update both my
> development
> and my production to that? I know you know best.
Ideally, you should be running 2.0.58 or 2.2.2 doesn't really matter which.
> As I was updating my perl modules via cpan I noticed a lot of
> test failures. Not that I've installed perl v5.8.8 they're gone.
5.8.0 was really buggy, 5.8.1 was better, lots has been fixed/improved by the time you get to 5.8.8
including security fixes.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) 323.219.4708
Consultant / http://p6m7g8.net/Resume/resume.shtml
Senior Software Engineer - TicketMaster - http://ticketmaster.com
1024D/A79997FA F357 0FDD 2301 6296 690F 6A47 D55A 7172 A799 97F
"In all that I've done wrong I know I must have done something right to
deserve a hug every morning and butterfly kisses at night."
Re: Make test failed
Posted by Boysenberry Payne <bo...@humaniteque.com>.
I'm in the progress of updating it all (except gcc version 3.2.3, is
that bad?)
On my dev box I've been using Apache/2.0.55, should I upgrade to 2.2 or
is that
too new? It seems that the 2.0 is as 58 should I update both my
development
and my production to that? I know you know best.
> How did you get past the version check of this ?
Until last night my production server was managed by my host.
So I'm not sure how they installed anything. While I was installing
libapreq cpan failed so I tried it at the command line, and still
got the errors, so I'm not sure I could get passed the version check.
As I was updating my perl modules via cpan I noticed a lot of
test failures. Not that I've installed perl v5.8.8 they're gone.
Thanks for the help,
Boysenberry
boysenberrys.com | habitatlife.com | selfgnosis.com
On Jul 8, 2006, at 3:35 AM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> Boysenberry Payne wrote:
>> I'm trying to build libapreq2-2.07 on Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-42,
>> Apache/2.0.46, perl v5.8.0 built for i386-linux-thread-multi,
> 2.0.48 is a minium version. Please read the CHANGES file. I strongly
> suggest upgrading
> _ALL_ that software its ancient.
>
> How did you get past the version check of this ?
>
> Also, if you are using gcc 4.x you'll need to add -fno-strict-aliases
> which will be in 2.08 and I'm rolling 2.08-RC3 right this second.
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) 323.219.4708
> Consultant / http://p6m7g8.net/Resume/resume.shtml
> Senior Software Engineer - TicketMaster - http://ticketmaster.com
> 1024D/A79997FA F357 0FDD 2301 6296 690F 6A47 D55A 7172 A799 97F
>
> "In all that I've done wrong I know I must have done something right to
> deserve a hug every morning and butterfly kisses at night."
>
>
Re: Make test failed
Posted by "Philip M. Gollucci" <pg...@p6m7g8.com>.
Boysenberry Payne wrote:
> I'm trying to build libapreq2-2.07 on Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-42,
> Apache/2.0.46, perl v5.8.0 built for i386-linux-thread-multi,
2.0.48 is a minium version. Please read the CHANGES file. I strongly suggest upgrading
_ALL_ that software its ancient.
How did you get past the version check of this ?
Also, if you are using gcc 4.x you'll need to add -fno-strict-aliases
which will be in 2.08 and I'm rolling 2.08-RC3 right this second.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) 323.219.4708
Consultant / http://p6m7g8.net/Resume/resume.shtml
Senior Software Engineer - TicketMaster - http://ticketmaster.com
1024D/A79997FA F357 0FDD 2301 6296 690F 6A47 D55A 7172 A799 97F
"In all that I've done wrong I know I must have done something right to
deserve a hug every morning and butterfly kisses at night."