You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-user@lucene.apache.org by Andreas Hubold <an...@coremedia.com> on 2013/04/04 13:30:55 UTC
Filtered search term suggestions via Facet Prefixing or NGrams
Hi,
we've successfully implemented suggestion of search terms using facet
prefixing with Solr 4.0. However, with lots of unique index terms we've
encountered performance problems (long running queries) and even
exceptions: "Too many values for UnInvertedField faceting on field
textbody".
We must provide suggestions based on a prefix entered by the user. The
solution should use the terms from an indexed text field. Furthermore
the suggestions must be filtered according to some specified filter
queries.
Do you have any performance tips for facet prefixing or know how to
avoid the above exception even in the case of many unique terms?
What is causing the above exception: a) the total number of unique terms
in the field or b) the number of unique terms in the field of a single
document
If b), is there a way to find such documents easily? Do you know how
many unique terms can be handled without problems by facet prefixing?
I've read the blog post
http://www.searchworkings.org/blog/-/blogs/different-ways-to-make-auto-suggestions-with-solr
which describes NGrams as another possible approach to implement
suggestions with filtering. I would expect that this approach provides
better query performance (at the cost of increased index size). However
I haven't found detailed information how to implement it. I know how to
configure a field for ngrams and how to perform a query using that
field. But the results just give me the document but not the matched
terms. Or am I expected to use a stored field and inspect its value?
I also found this blog post where the Highlighter is used in combination
with ngrams to provide suggestions:
http://solr.pl/en/2013/02/25/autocomplete-on-multivalued-fields-using-highlighting/
Can this be used to get the suggested terms from a document? What about
performance? Will such an approach perform better than facet prefixing
for large text fields with lots of unique terms?
Any hints appreciated.
Thank you,
Andreas
Re: Filtered search term suggestions via Facet Prefixing or NGrams
Posted by Andreas Hubold <an...@coremedia.com>.
Hi,
can somebody help, please? Maybe you can at least answer parts of my
question?
I'd expect that somebody at least knows the limitations of faceting with
UninvertedField?
Thank you,
Andreas
Andreas Hubold wrote on 04.04.2013 13:30:
> Hi,
>
> we've successfully implemented suggestion of search terms using facet
> prefixing with Solr 4.0. However, with lots of unique index terms
> we've encountered performance problems (long running queries) and even
> exceptions: "Too many values for UnInvertedField faceting on field
> textbody".
>
> We must provide suggestions based on a prefix entered by the user. The
> solution should use the terms from an indexed text field. Furthermore
> the suggestions must be filtered according to some specified filter
> queries.
>
> Do you have any performance tips for facet prefixing or know how to
> avoid the above exception even in the case of many unique terms?
>
> What is causing the above exception: a) the total number of unique
> terms in the field or b) the number of unique terms in the field of a
> single document
> If b), is there a way to find such documents easily? Do you know how
> many unique terms can be handled without problems by facet prefixing?
>
> I've read the blog post
> http://www.searchworkings.org/blog/-/blogs/different-ways-to-make-auto-suggestions-with-solr
> which describes NGrams as another possible approach to implement
> suggestions with filtering. I would expect that this approach provides
> better query performance (at the cost of increased index size).
> However I haven't found detailed information how to implement it. I
> know how to configure a field for ngrams and how to perform a query
> using that field. But the results just give me the document but not
> the matched terms. Or am I expected to use a stored field and inspect
> its value?
>
> I also found this blog post where the Highlighter is used in
> combination with ngrams to provide suggestions:
> http://solr.pl/en/2013/02/25/autocomplete-on-multivalued-fields-using-highlighting/
> Can this be used to get the suggested terms from a document? What
> about performance? Will such an approach perform better than facet
> prefixing for large text fields with lots of unique terms?
>
> Any hints appreciated.
>
> Thank you,
> Andreas
>