[general] Removing "endorsed" packages from JAPI reports

[Mikhail Loenko <ml...@gmail.com>]

Hi Stuart,

As it was discussed in the thread I'm copying, we are free
to replace classes in the packages listed here [1] by "classes implementing
a more recent version of the API as defined by the appropriate
standards body" [2]

Would it be possible to generate JAPI diffs not taking into account packages
listed in [1] so that we get clear picture about amount of API work remained?

Thanks,
Mikhail

[1] http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/standards/index.html
[2] http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/README.html



2007/1/23, Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com>:
> Alexey Petrenko wrote:
> > 2007/1/17, Geir Magnusson Jr. <ge...@pobox.com>:
> >> so what do we do?  I'm hoping that we can find a way to achieve this
> >> w/o us having to have "shadow" or duplicate code here...
> > That would be great. Can you suggest something?
>
> As Alexey wrote, the level of CORBA support in the RI 5.0 [1] is
> predominantly 2.3.1 based.  However, we are free to implement a later
> version of the Corba spec and still be compliant since the CORBA code is
> an "endorsed standard" (see [2]).
>
> In this case I suggest we support Yoko in their goal of implementing
> corba 2.4 (and ignore the JAPI diffs).
>
> [1] http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/idl/compliance.html
> [2] http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/README.html
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
>

Re: [general] Removing "endorsed" packages from JAPI reports

[Mikhail Loenko <ml...@gmail.com>]

2007/4/25, Alexey Petrenko <al...@gmail.com>:
> Yep, it is possible of course.
> I've added this task to my nearest-future-to-do-list but have not
> complete it yet. :)

Alexey

I was talking about regular statistics that we refer at
http://harmony.apache.org/subcomponents/classlibrary/status.html
My suggestion was to add one more stats: without "endorsed" packages

The statistics itself is located at
http://www.kaffe.org/~stuart/...

Not sure that there is write access there from your
nearest-future-to-do-list  ;)

Thanks,
Mikhail

>
> I'll finish it this week.
>
> SY, Alexey
>
> 2007/4/25, Mikhail Loenko <ml...@gmail.com>:
> > Hi Stuart,
> >
> > As it was discussed in the thread I'm copying, we are free
> > to replace classes in the packages listed here [1] by "classes implementing
> > a more recent version of the API as defined by the appropriate
> > standards body" [2]
> >
> > Would it be possible to generate JAPI diffs not taking into account packages
> > listed in [1] so that we get clear picture about amount of API work remained?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mikhail
> >
> > [1] http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/standards/index.html
> > [2] http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/README.html
> >
> >
> >
> > 2007/1/23, Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com>:
> > > Alexey Petrenko wrote:
> > > > 2007/1/17, Geir Magnusson Jr. <ge...@pobox.com>:
> > > >> so what do we do?  I'm hoping that we can find a way to achieve this
> > > >> w/o us having to have "shadow" or duplicate code here...
> > > > That would be great. Can you suggest something?
> > >
> > > As Alexey wrote, the level of CORBA support in the RI 5.0 [1] is
> > > predominantly 2.3.1 based.  However, we are free to implement a later
> > > version of the Corba spec and still be compliant since the CORBA code is
> > > an "endorsed standard" (see [2]).
> > >
> > > In this case I suggest we support Yoko in their goal of implementing
> > > corba 2.4 (and ignore the JAPI diffs).
> > >
> > > [1] http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/idl/compliance.html
> > > [2] http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/README.html
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Tim
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [general] Removing "endorsed" packages from JAPI reports

[Alexey Petrenko <al...@gmail.com>]

Yep, it is possible of course.
I've added this task to my nearest-future-to-do-list but have not
complete it yet. :)

I'll finish it this week.

SY, Alexey

2007/4/25, Mikhail Loenko <ml...@gmail.com>:
> Hi Stuart,
>
> As it was discussed in the thread I'm copying, we are free
> to replace classes in the packages listed here [1] by "classes implementing
> a more recent version of the API as defined by the appropriate
> standards body" [2]
>
> Would it be possible to generate JAPI diffs not taking into account packages
> listed in [1] so that we get clear picture about amount of API work remained?
>
> Thanks,
> Mikhail
>
> [1] http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/standards/index.html
> [2] http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/README.html
>
>
>
> 2007/1/23, Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com>:
> > Alexey Petrenko wrote:
> > > 2007/1/17, Geir Magnusson Jr. <ge...@pobox.com>:
> > >> so what do we do?  I'm hoping that we can find a way to achieve this
> > >> w/o us having to have "shadow" or duplicate code here...
> > > That would be great. Can you suggest something?
> >
> > As Alexey wrote, the level of CORBA support in the RI 5.0 [1] is
> > predominantly 2.3.1 based.  However, we are free to implement a later
> > version of the Corba spec and still be compliant since the CORBA code is
> > an "endorsed standard" (see [2]).
> >
> > In this case I suggest we support Yoko in their goal of implementing
> > corba 2.4 (and ignore the JAPI diffs).
> >
> > [1] http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/idl/compliance.html
> > [2] http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/README.html
> >
> > Regards,
> > Tim
> >
> >
>