[jira] [Assigned] (ARROW-14332) [C++] Rename type traits utilities to improve semantic consistency

["Eduardo Ponce (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-14332?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Eduardo Ponce reassigned ARROW-14332:
-------------------------------------

    Assignee: Eduardo Ponce

> [C++] Rename type traits utilities to improve semantic consistency
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARROW-14332
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-14332
>             Project: Apache Arrow
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Eduardo Ponce
>            Assignee: Eduardo Ponce
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: type
>             Fix For: 7.0.0
>
>
> There are semantic differences between  *enable_ifs-related* utils and *is_xxx* functions with the same name. For example, *is_binary_like* [here](https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/cpp/src/arrow/type_traits.h#L596) != [here](https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/cpp/src/arrow/type_traits.h#L924). The former includes binary only and the latter binary/string types.
> Also, the *_like* suffix seems unwarranted as they always refer to binary or string.
> Also, the *is_fixed_size_binary* includes both _FixedSizeBinaryType_ and _DecimalXXXType_. A better name is *is_base_fixed_size_binary* to match how binary/string utils are used.
> _Note_: There might be other inconsistencies.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)