You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to bugs@httpd.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2008/08/05 23:35:23 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45568] New: Apache shouldn't complain about name-based SSL virtual hosts

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45568

           Summary: Apache shouldn't complain about name-based SSL virtual
                    hosts
           Product: Apache httpd-2
           Version: 2.2.9
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: All
        AssignedTo: bugs@httpd.apache.org
        ReportedBy: mdierolf@financialcontent.com


I would like to point out that name-base virtual hosts are legitimate,
acceptable, and widely used by people whom purchase a wildcard SSL certificate.

Apache should not complain about name-based hosts under the same domain name.

These error messages appear when using name-based SSL hosts:
--
[Tue Aug 05 21:23:42 2008] [warn] Init: SSL server IP/port conflict:
subdomain1.domain.com:443 (/etc/apache2/httpd.conf:179) vs.
subdomain2.domain.com:443 (/etc/apache2/httpd.conf:375)

[Tue Aug 05 21:23:42 2008] [warn] Init: SSL server IP/port conflict:
subdomain1.domain.com:443 (/etc/apache2/httpd.conf:99) vs.
subdomain2.domain.com:443 (/etc/apache2/httpd.conf:375)

[Tue Aug 05 21:23:42 2008] [warn] Init: You should not use name-based virtual
hosts in conjunction with SSL!!
--


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45568] Test ServerName Against X509 CN before rejecting configuration with a warning

Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45568


Ruediger Pluem <rp...@apache.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID




--- Comment #2 from Ruediger Pluem <rp...@apache.org>  2008-08-06 02:17:31 PST ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> I would like to point out that name-base virtual hosts are legitimate,
> acceptable, and widely used by people whom purchase a wildcard SSL certificate.
> 

No they are not. Most people using them do not know what they do and are not
aware that security sensitive SSL settings are only taken from the default
virtual host.
Therefore it is still strongly discouraged to use name based virtual hosts for
SSL. 


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45568] Test ServerName Against X509 CN before rejecting configuration with a warning

Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45568


Will Rowe <wr...@apache.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |enhancement
         OS/Version|Linux                       |All
           Platform|PC                          |All
            Summary|Apache shouldn't complain   |Test ServerName Against X509
                   |about name-based SSL virtual|CN before rejecting
                   |hosts                       |configuration with a warning




--- Comment #1 from Will Rowe <wr...@apache.org>  2008-08-05 14:54:41 PST ---
The number of users using such certificates is a tiny fraction of the number
of users who misconfigure Apache.

So the appropriate bug report would be; "Test ServerName Against X509 CN before 
rejecting configuration with a warning".

So I've updated your bug subject accordingly.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45568] Test ServerName Against X509 CN before rejecting configuration with a warning

Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45568


Will Rowe <wr...@apache.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|INVALID                     |




--- Comment #3 from Will Rowe <wr...@apache.org>  2008-08-06 08:24:04 PST ---
Ruediger, you describe a majority of users.  Certainly, they are discouraged
in the sense that users don't understand the principal.  But it is not
forbidden,
these error messages in a good configuration are invalid.

However, there are exceptions to that rule, so invalidating this enhancement
request isn't appropriate.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45568] Test ServerName Against X509 CN before rejecting configuration with a warning

Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45568


Joe Orton <jo...@redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID




--- Comment #4 from Joe Orton <jo...@redhat.com>  2008-08-07 05:13:55 PST ---
Of course the configuration is not "forbidden", these are WARNING messages. 
The warning applies in a configuration using name-based SSL vhosts which share
a common wildcard cert just as they do in any other name-based SSL vhost
config.  Unless you plan to propose a way to validate whether such a config
will work properly (sounds insane), there is nothing new here.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org