Re: [DISCUSS] Daffodil 2.6.0 Release

[Steve Lawrence <st...@gmail.com>]

Looks like Lola was able to update the KEYS file, so there shouldn't be
any permission issues performing the release steps.

- Steve

On 3/26/20 9:56 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Have Lola check when adding to the KEYS file.
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Mar 26, 2020, at 6:06 AM, Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Sounds good to have Lola do it when the time comes then. I think there
>> will be some slight changes to the release process since I believe only
>> PMC/PPMC members have permission to write to /dist/release, but I think
>> as a committer Lola should have permissions to do everything else.
>>
>>> On 3/25/20 3:58 PM, Adams, Joshua wrote:
>>> I did have interest, but it doesn't look like I'll have the time to do any Daffodil work for at least the next 2 weeks.  I have non-issue with someone else taking this one.
>>>
>>> Josh
>>>
>>> On Mar 25, 2020 3:56 PM, Olabusayo Kilo <ok...@tresys.com> wrote:
>>> I'd like to have the below done for 2.6.0
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-2305 - Remove some unused
>>> methods from Term.scala
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-2275 - Reduce code smells
>>> and make some configuration changes to Sonarqube
>>>
>>> I don't mind managing the release, although I think Josh A had expressed
>>> interest last time.
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 3/25/20 3:24 PM, Beckerle, Mike wrote:
>>>> I have two issues I'd like fixed for 2.6.0
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-2302 - this is making it difficult to update a Link16 schema that is in use by multiple parties.
>>>>
>>>> There's a second issue, which is that we still have this "NadaParsers are supposed to optimize out" problem. Came up in this same schema again even after the fix which supposedly addressed it. So I think the fix solved some, but not all of this problem.  I will try to recreate this and reopen the ticket if it is still happening.
>>>>
>>>> I don't want to manage the release, but I definitely think it's better if it isn't Steve L., ... I could have my arm twisted.
>>>> ________________________________
>>>> From: Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org>
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 3:12 PM
>>>> To: dev@daffodil.apache.org <de...@daffodil.apache.org>
>>>> Subject: [DISCUSS] Daffodil 2.6.0 Release
>>>>
>>>> With the last of the changes recently merged to support improved schema
>>>> compilation speed and memory, I think now is a good time to start
>>>> discussing the next release.
>>>>
>>>> 1) Does anyone have any changes that are close to being ready to merge
>>>> or bugs that are worth delaying the next release until resolved?
>>>>
>>>> 2) Does anyone want to volunteer to be the release manager for 2.6.0?
>>>> The release process [1] now uses containers for most of the heavy
>>>> lifting, and since I did it last time it would be good to get someone
>>>> else familiar with the new release process and make sure the container
>>>> works for someone other than myself.
>>>>
>>>> - Steve
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Best Regards
>>> Lola K.
>>>
>>>
>>
>