xalan-j is 3-4 times slower on solaris compared to windows

[nareshk <na...@virtusa.com>]

I am running SimpleTransform that is part of examples in a loop for 20 times
and measuring the performance of transform method. It is taking 3-4 times
more on Unix than in windows. I would assume that it will be much faster on
a server class machine, however the reverse is true. Any body has any ideas
why this is happening 

JDK 1.5.0_25 on both solaris server and windows machines.

-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/xalan-j-is-3-4-times-slower-on-solaris-compared-to-windows-tp30039450p30039450.html
Sent from the Xalan - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xalan-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xalan-dev-help@xml.apache.org

Re: xalan-j is 3-4 times slower on solaris compared to windows

[Mukul Gandhi <ga...@gmail.com>]

I believe Xalan-J is written in pure java.

It could be the case, that a particular JVM implementation on a given
Unix flavor is less per-formant than on some JVM implementation on
Windows. This behavior may be a case with Xalan only (not necessarily
with every application running on both of these OSs).

I don't think Xalan can do much about these issues.

On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 2:15 PM, nareshk <na...@virtusa.com> wrote:
>
> I am running SimpleTransform that is part of examples in a loop for 20 times
> and measuring the performance of transform method. It is taking 3-4 times
> more on Unix than in windows. I would assume that it will be much faster on
> a server class machine, however the reverse is true. Any body has any ideas
> why this is happening
>
> JDK 1.5.0_25 on both solaris server and windows machines.



-- 
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xalan-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xalan-dev-help@xml.apache.org