You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mahout.apache.org by Robin Anil <ro...@gmail.com> on 2010/02/01 19:25:50 UTC
Any objections on including mahout utils classes in examples job
Many utility hadoop jobs (including Dictionary Vectorizer) needs utils to
zipset everything into a job
Two ways to go about it
have utils job like examples job
include utils classes in examples job
I am thinking of choosing the latter as it will act as single point launch
for anything in mahout...
Anyone else seeing a different use case?
Robin
Re: Any objections on including mahout utils classes in examples job
Posted by Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>.
+1. Examples are meant to show all of Mahout's glory...
On Feb 1, 2010, at 1:32 PM, Sean Owen wrote:
> I think it's OK for examples to depend on utils (but not the other way).
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Robin Anil <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Many utility hadoop jobs (including Dictionary Vectorizer) needs utils to
>> zipset everything into a job
>>
>> Two ways to go about it
>>
>> have utils job like examples job
>> include utils classes in examples job
>>
>>
>> I am thinking of choosing the latter as it will act as single point launch
>> for anything in mahout...
>>
>> Anyone else seeing a different use case?
>>
>>
>> Robin
>>
Re: Any objections on including mahout utils classes in examples job
Posted by Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com>.
I think it's OK for examples to depend on utils (but not the other way).
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Robin Anil <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Many utility hadoop jobs (including Dictionary Vectorizer) needs utils to
> zipset everything into a job
>
> Two ways to go about it
>
> have utils job like examples job
> include utils classes in examples job
>
>
> I am thinking of choosing the latter as it will act as single point launch
> for anything in mahout...
>
> Anyone else seeing a different use case?
>
>
> Robin
>