You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to soap-user@xml.apache.org by Bob <rm...@mediaone.net> on 2001/02/01 12:11:24 UTC
Http 1.1
Hi,
Are there any plans to support Http 1.1 in an upcoming version of Apache Soap?
I need to wring out a little more performance and I believe this could make
a big difference for me
in that my application will make frequent calls to the server. So far I've
only managed about 30 calls
per second. That would be borderline sufficient but I'd like a little more
for my personal peace of mind and
I'm concerned about how it will scale up to a large number of clients.
I'm currently trying to decide whether to wait for a future version of
Apache Soap (if it will someday be supported),
modifying the current version or just writing my own soap servlet from scratch.
Thanks.
Bob
RE: COM Example
Posted by Gus Delgado <gu...@netquotient.com>.
Can someone send the MSVCP60D.dll as an attachment on the list. I'm trying
to get the COMProvider example to work. Thanks. Gus
-----Original Message-----
From: Gus Delgado [mailto:gus.delgado@netquotient.com]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 7:58 AM
To: soap-user@xml.apache.org
Subject: COM Example
Good Morning everyone,
I'm trying to run the COM Example from the Apache SOAP. It deployed just
fine but when I run the Addit class I get an Error that's does not make much
sense to me, but I'm sure some of you have gotten it before.
Fault Code = SOAP-ENV:Server.Exception:
Fault String = initlog
Thanks for your help in advanced.
Gus
RE: COM Example
Posted by Gus Delgado <gu...@netquotient.com>.
Can someone send the MSVCP60D.dll as an attachment on the list. I'm trying
to get the COMProvider example to work. Thanks. Gus
-----Original Message-----
From: Gus Delgado [mailto:gus.delgado@netquotient.com]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 7:58 AM
To: soap-user@xml.apache.org
Subject: COM Example
Good Morning everyone,
I'm trying to run the COM Example from the Apache SOAP. It deployed just
fine but when I run the Addit class I get an Error that's does not make much
sense to me, but I'm sure some of you have gotten it before.
Fault Code = SOAP-ENV:Server.Exception:
Fault String = initlog
Thanks for your help in advanced.
Gus
COM Example
Posted by Gus Delgado <gu...@netquotient.com>.
Good Morning everyone,
I'm trying to run the COM Example from the Apache SOAP. It deployed just
fine but when I run the Addit class I get an Error that's does not make much
sense to me, but I'm sure some of you have gotten it before.
Fault Code = SOAP-ENV:Server.Exception:
Fault String = initlog
Thanks for your help in advanced.
Gus
COM Example
Posted by Gus Delgado <gu...@netquotient.com>.
Good Morning everyone,
I'm trying to run the COM Example from the Apache SOAP. It deployed just
fine but when I run the Addit class I get an Error that's does not make much
sense to me, but I'm sure some of you have gotten it before.
Fault Code = SOAP-ENV:Server.Exception:
Fault String = initlog
Thanks for your help in advanced.
Gus
Re: Http 1.1
Posted by Aleksander Slominski <as...@cs.indiana.edu>.
Bob wrote:
> Are there any plans to support Http 1.1 in an upcoming version of Apache Soap?
> I need to wring out a little more performance and I believe this could make
> a big difference for me
> in that my application will make frequent calls to the server. So far I've
> only managed about 30 calls
> per second. That would be borderline sufficient but I'd like a little more
> for my personal peace of mind and
> I'm concerned about how it will scale up to a large number of clients.
>
> I'm currently trying to decide whether to wait for a future version of
> Apache Soap (if it will someday be supported),
> modifying the current version or just writing my own soap servlet from scratch.
hi,
i will download and look into the latest apache soap 2.1 RC1 but i have one general
recommendation from my own experience: please profile both client and server code.
by simply doing it in our soaprmi implementation i have found that we were reading
input by one character a time (!) - it was for debugging but never commented debug
code ...
simply changing it improved performance from 30 calls/second to 180 calls/second on
solaris (for more details please see:
http://mailman.cs.indiana.edu/pipermail/soaprmi/2001-February/000004.html).
thanks,
alek
--
Aleksander Slominski, LH 316, IU, http://www.extreme.indiana.edu/~aslom
As I look afar I see neither cherry Nor tinted leaves Just a modest hut
on the coast In the dusk of Autumn nightfall - Fujiwara no Teika (1162-1241)
Re: Http 1.1
Posted by Aleksander Slominski <as...@cs.indiana.edu>.
Bob wrote:
> Are there any plans to support Http 1.1 in an upcoming version of Apache Soap?
> I need to wring out a little more performance and I believe this could make
> a big difference for me
> in that my application will make frequent calls to the server. So far I've
> only managed about 30 calls
> per second. That would be borderline sufficient but I'd like a little more
> for my personal peace of mind and
> I'm concerned about how it will scale up to a large number of clients.
>
> I'm currently trying to decide whether to wait for a future version of
> Apache Soap (if it will someday be supported),
> modifying the current version or just writing my own soap servlet from scratch.
hi,
i will download and look into the latest apache soap 2.1 RC1 but i have one general
recommendation from my own experience: please profile both client and server code.
by simply doing it in our soaprmi implementation i have found that we were reading
input by one character a time (!) - it was for debugging but never commented debug
code ...
simply changing it improved performance from 30 calls/second to 180 calls/second on
solaris (for more details please see:
http://mailman.cs.indiana.edu/pipermail/soaprmi/2001-February/000004.html).
thanks,
alek
--
Aleksander Slominski, LH 316, IU, http://www.extreme.indiana.edu/~aslom
As I look afar I see neither cherry Nor tinted leaves Just a modest hut
on the coast In the dusk of Autumn nightfall - Fujiwara no Teika (1162-1241)