You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tapestry.apache.org by "Filip S. Adamsen (JIRA)" <de...@tapestry.apache.org> on 2008/03/17 18:34:24 UTC

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (TAPESTRY-2270) PageLink loses port from the url

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-2270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12579523#action_12579523 ] 

fsa edited comment on TAPESTRY-2270 at 3/17/08 10:34 AM:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

This is indeed a side effect of the introduction of the Secure annotation. Host name and ports are now handled by the BaseURLSource service, which you should override if you use non-standard ports etc. You should probably override it anyhow, just in case. Details are in the docs here: http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5/tapestry-core/guide/secure.html.

      was (Author: fsa):
    This is indeed a side effect of the introduction of the Secured annotation. Host name and ports are now handled by the BaseURLSource service, which you should override if you use non-standard ports etc. You should probably override it anyhow, just in case. Details are in the docs here: http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5/tapestry-core/guide/secure.html.
  
> PageLink loses port from the url
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TAPESTRY-2270
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-2270
>             Project: Tapestry
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 5.0.11
>         Environment: Tomcat 6.0.16 and Tomcat 6.0.14 tested on vista 64bit. Spring controls the ports and https / http scheme.
>            Reporter: Ernest Monklitch
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 5.0.12
>
>
> After upgrading to 5.0.11 we began to experience some strange behaviour, but quite fast we noticed that PageLinks are redirecting everything to 80 or 433. (There actually isn't any port in the url, just http or https.) As long as the servers use those ports everything is fine. 
> We don't use the standard ports when developing  and there are few apps on production with non-standard ports too, so this must be fixed. Secure -annotation broke this?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org