You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@cloudstack.apache.org by "John Kinsella (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/02/24 20:13:20 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6166) Should we be recommending
ASYNC NFS in documentation?
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13910675#comment-13910675 ]
John Kinsella commented on CLOUDSTACK-6166:
-------------------------------------------
Would be helpful if you could add some example logs...
> Should we be recommending ASYNC NFS in documentation?
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-6166
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6166
> Project: CloudStack
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.)
> Components: Doc
> Reporter: John Kinsella
> Priority: Minor
>
> Looking at current and past installation, we recommend users export secondary storage with async NFS:
> /export *(rw,async,no_root_squash,no_subtree_check)
> Generally async mode is considered risky from a data reliability point of view (eg http://serverfault.com/questions/328931/how-dangerous-is-nfs-async-when-raid-bbu-and-ups-are-present ).
> While advanced users will see this and ignore it, we probably shouldn't be guiding new ACS users towards async NFS...
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)