You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@wicket.apache.org by Thomas Heigl <th...@umschalt.com> on 2018/06/01 13:39:03 UTC

Release WiQuery for Wicket 8

Hi,

Following the release of Wicket 8.0.0 and WicketStuff 8.0.0, could somebody
please cut a release of WiQuery compatible with the new version?

Our application still heavily relies on WiQuery and we can't move to Wicket
8 without it.

Best,

Thomas

Re: Release WiQuery for Wicket 8

Posted by Thomas Heigl <th...@umschalt.com>.
Great! Thanks Martin!

On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 5:44 PM, Martin Grigorov <ma...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 18:35 Thomas Heigl <th...@umschalt.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Ernesto,
> >
> > I'm not sure how many people are still using it. But as I said, my
> project
> > heavily depends on it.
> >
> > @papegaaij has resolved all the compile errors against 8.0.0-M9 (
> > https://github.com/wicketstuff/wiquery) and a simple release of 8.0.0
> > would
> > be enough for me.
> >
>
> I'll be able to do it Monday morning.
>
>
> > Best,
> >
> > Thomas
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 5:05 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> > reiern70@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I do not know who is actually using this project. I use to contribute
> to
> > it
> > > a few years ago. I haven't used it for ages..
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 3:39 PM, Thomas Heigl <th...@umschalt.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Following the release of Wicket 8.0.0 and WicketStuff 8.0.0, could
> > > somebody
> > > > please cut a release of WiQuery compatible with the new version?
> > > >
> > > > Our application still heavily relies on WiQuery and we can't move to
> > > Wicket
> > > > 8 without it.
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > >
> > > > Thomas
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
> > >
> >
>

Re: Release WiQuery for Wicket 8

Posted by Martin Grigorov <ma...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 18:35 Thomas Heigl <th...@umschalt.com> wrote:

> Hi Ernesto,
>
> I'm not sure how many people are still using it. But as I said, my project
> heavily depends on it.
>
> @papegaaij has resolved all the compile errors against 8.0.0-M9 (
> https://github.com/wicketstuff/wiquery) and a simple release of 8.0.0
> would
> be enough for me.
>

I'll be able to do it Monday morning.


> Best,
>
> Thomas
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 5:05 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> reiern70@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I do not know who is actually using this project. I use to contribute to
> it
> > a few years ago. I haven't used it for ages..
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 3:39 PM, Thomas Heigl <th...@umschalt.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Following the release of Wicket 8.0.0 and WicketStuff 8.0.0, could
> > somebody
> > > please cut a release of WiQuery compatible with the new version?
> > >
> > > Our application still heavily relies on WiQuery and we can't move to
> > Wicket
> > > 8 without it.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > >
> > > Thomas
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
> >
>

Re: Release WiQuery for Wicket 8

Posted by Emond Papegaaij <em...@topicus.nl>.
You are right, I still had the artifacts in my local repo. The old 
configuration did not build anymore due to changes in the jar-plugin. I'll 
look into it.

Emond

On woensdag 6 juni 2018 11:57:43 CEST Thomas Heigl wrote:
> The culprit is:
> 
> https://github.com/wicketstuff/wiquery/commit/0235691174ceeede22b588d2f67868
> b940d9be3a
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 11:51 AM, Thomas Heigl <th...@umschalt.com> wrote:
> > `mvn clean install` fails for me because no test-jar is built for the core
> > module:
> > 
> > [INFO] WiQuery Parent 8.0-SNAPSHOT ........................ SUCCESS [
> > 
> >>  0.353 s]
> >> 
> >> [INFO] WiQuery Core Project ............................... SUCCESS [
> >> 
> >>  2.673 s]
> >> 
> >> [INFO] WiQuery jQuery UI Project .......................... FAILURE [
> >> 
> >>  0.023 s]
> >> 
> >> [INFO] WiQuery Demo Project 8.0-SNAPSHOT .................. SKIPPED
> >> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------
> >> ------------
> >> [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> >> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------
> >> ------------
> >> [INFO] Total time: 3.720 s
> >> [INFO] Finished at: 2018-06-06T11:48:16+02:00
> >> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------
> >> ------------
> >> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project wiquery-jquery-ui: Could not
> >> resolve dependencies for project org.wicketstuff.wiquery:
> >> wiquery-jquery-ui:jar:8.0-SNAPSHOT: Failure to find
> >> org.wicketstuff.wiquery:wiquery-core:jar:tests:8.0-SNAPSHOT in
> >> https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots was cached in
> >> the local repository, resolution will not be reattempted until the update
> >> interval of sonatype-nexus-snapshots has elapsed or updates are forced ->
> >> [Help 1]
> >> [ERROR]
> > 
> > Did you change something about test-jar configuration? I do not see
> > `test-jar` generation enabled in the POM file.
> > 
> > On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 11:43 AM, Emond Papegaaij <
> > 
> > emond.papegaaij@topicus.nl> wrote:
> >> Hi Thomas,
> >> 
> >> The easiest way is to just run 'mvn install' and depend on 8.0-SNAPSHOT.
> >> I did
> >> not do a release, as I cannot push to central. If you want to run your
> >> tests
> >> on some CI server, you probably have to push the artifacts to a local
> >> repo
> >> also.
> >> 
> >> Best regards,
> >> Emond
> >> 
> >> On woensdag 6 juni 2018 11:36:54 CEST Thomas Heigl wrote:
> >> > Hi Emond,
> >> > 
> >> > How can I test this? Did you do a milestone release or do I have to
> >> 
> >> build
> >> 
> >> > from source and push to my local artifact repo?
> >> > 
> >> > Best,
> >> > 
> >> > Thomas
> >> > 
> >> > On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 3:01 PM, Emond Papegaaij <
> >> 
> >> emond.papegaaij@topicus.nl>
> >> 
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > I've just pushed a massive upgrade of all components. Removed all
> >> > > deprecated
> >> > > parts, upgraded jQuery UI to 1.12.1 and did some more cleanup and
> >> > > refactoring.
> >> > > Please test the changes in your project. The tests pass and the demo
> >> 
> >> runs
> >> 
> >> > > fine, but my project only uses a limited set of the UI components.
> >> > > 
> >> > > Best regards,
> >> > > Emond
> >> > > 
> >> > > On zaterdag 2 juni 2018 10:31:31 CEST you wrote:
> >> > > > I'm planning to upgrade jQuery UI to the latest version next week.
> >> 
> >> We
> >> 
> >> > > > are
> >> > > > currently migrating all our applications to wicket 8 and also
> >> 
> >> depend on
> >> 
> >> > > > wiquery quite a lot. It does however seem that jQuery UI is mostly
> >> 
> >> dead.
> >> 
> >> > > > The rest of the world probably switched to yet another fancy
> >> 
> >> JavaScript
> >> 
> >> > > ui
> >> > > 
> >> > > > library. At least the will make it easy to stay up to date with the
> >> > > 
> >> > > latest
> >> > > 
> >> > > > version :)
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > I can't push a release to central, but perhaps Martin can do that
> >> 
> >> when
> >> 
> >> > > I'm
> >> > > 
> >> > > > done? For now you can use a snapshot build. It works, but the UI
> >> > > > API
> >> > > 
> >> > > might
> >> > > 
> >> > > > change a bit before the 8.0 release.
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > Best regards,
> >> > > > Emond Papegaaij
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > Op vr 1 jun. 2018 17:36 schreef Thomas Heigl <th...@umschalt.com>:
> >> > > > > Hi Ernesto,
> >> > > > > 
> >> > > > > I'm not sure how many people are still using it. But as I said,
> >> > > > > my
> >> > > 
> >> > > project
> >> > > 
> >> > > > > heavily depends on it.
> >> > > > > 
> >> > > > > @papegaaij has resolved all the compile errors against 8.0.0-M9 (
> >> > > > > https://github.com/wicketstuff/wiquery) and a simple release of
> >> 
> >> 8.0.0
> >> 
> >> > > > > would
> >> > > > > be enough for me.
> >> > > > > 
> >> > > > > Best,
> >> > > > > 
> >> > > > > Thomas
> >> > > > > 
> >> > > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 5:05 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> >> > > > > 
> >> > > > > reiern70@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > > > > Hi,
> >> > > > > > 
> >> > > > > > I do not know who is actually using this project. I use to
> >> > > 
> >> > > contribute to
> >> > > 
> >> > > > > it
> >> > > > > 
> >> > > > > > a few years ago. I haven't used it for ages..
> >> > > > > > 
> >> > > > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 3:39 PM, Thomas Heigl <
> >> 
> >> thomas@umschalt.com>
> >> 
> >> > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > Hi,
> >> > > > > > > 
> >> > > > > > > Following the release of Wicket 8.0.0 and WicketStuff 8.0.0,
> >> 
> >> could
> >> 
> >> > > > > > somebody
> >> > > > > > 
> >> > > > > > > please cut a release of WiQuery compatible with the new
> >> 
> >> version?
> >> 
> >> > > > > > > Our application still heavily relies on WiQuery and we can't
> >> 
> >> move
> >> 
> >> > > to
> >> > > 
> >> > > > > > Wicket
> >> > > > > > 
> >> > > > > > > 8 without it.
> >> > > > > > > 
> >> > > > > > > Best,
> >> > > > > > > 
> >> > > > > > > Thomas
> >> > > > > > 
> >> > > > > > --
> >> > > > > > Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
> >> > > 
> >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >> 
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org


Re: Release WiQuery for Wicket 8

Posted by Emond Papegaaij <em...@topicus.nl>.
On donderdag 7 juni 2018 17:10:16 CEST Martin Grigorov wrote:
> 8.0 is on its way to Maven Central!

Thanks for the help with the release Martin, and Thomas thanks for testing!

Emond



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org


Re: Release WiQuery for Wicket 8

Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.
8.0 is on its way to Maven Central!

On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 5:46 PM, Emond Papegaaij <em...@topicus.nl>
wrote:

> I did not build the javadoc, but I actually don't know why. But as I don't
> care about these javadoc errors, I've disabled lint. You should be able to
> build now.
>
> Emond
>
> On donderdag 7 juni 2018 16:32:16 CEST Martin Grigorov wrote:
> > There are many javadoc related errors in this project. mvn install fails
> > with:
> >
> > [WARNING] The requested profile "frontend" could not be activated because
> > it does not exist.
> > [WARNING] The requested profile "buildbot" could not be activated because
> > it does not exist.
> > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin:2.7:jar (attach-javadocs)
> on
> > project wiquery-core: MavenReportException: Error while creating archive:
> > [ERROR] Exit code: 1 -
> > /home/martin/git/wiquery/wiquery-core/src/main/java/
> org/wicketstuff/wiquery/
> > core/util/WiQueryUtil.java:46: warning: no @return
> > [ERROR] public static ResourceReference getJQueryResourceReference()
> > [ERROR]                                ^
> > [ERROR]
> > /home/martin/git/wiquery/wiquery-core/src/main/java/
> org/wicketstuff/wiquery/
> > core/events/Event.java:78: warning: no @return
> > [ERROR] public abstract JsScope callback();
> > [ERROR]                        ^
> > [ERROR]
> > /home/martin/git/wiquery/wiquery-core/src/main/java/
> org/wicketstuff/wiquery/
> > core/events/Event.java:53: warning: no @param for eventLabels
> > [ERROR] public Event(EventLabel... eventLabels)
> > [ERROR]       ^
> > [ERROR]
> > /home/martin/git/wiquery/wiquery-core/src/main/java/
> org/wicketstuff/wiquery/
> > core/javascript/DefaultChainableStatement.java:49: warning: no @param
> for
> > label
> > [ERROR] public DefaultChainableStatement(String label, CharSequence...
> args)
> > ....
> >
> >
> > How did you build it with Java 8 ?
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 3:55 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
> >
> > wrote:
> > > OK. I will make a release!
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 3:25 PM, Thomas Heigl <th...@umschalt.com>
> wrote:
> > >> Hi Emond,
> > >>
> > >> I did some exploratory testing against the current build. I checked
> > >> Dialog,
> > >> Autocomplete, Accordion, Slider, Sortable, and Tooltip and all seem
> to be
> > >> working at first glance.
> > >>
> > >> All my tests pass as well.
> > >>
> > >> Best,
> > >>
> > >> Thomas
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 1:07 PM, Emond Papegaaij <
> > >> emond.papegaaij@topicus.nl>
> > >>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > I've fixed the problem. The setup currently used is discouraged and
> > >>
> > >> broken
> > >>
> > >> > in
> > >> > m2e, but I don't feel like restructuring the whole thing to get rid
> of
> > >> > this
> > >> > test-jar.
> > >> >
> > >> > Emond
> > >> >
> > >> > On woensdag 6 juni 2018 11:57:43 CEST Thomas Heigl wrote:
> > >> > > The culprit is:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > https://github.com/wicketstuff/wiquery/commit/
> > >> >
> > >> > 0235691174ceeede22b588d2f67868
> > >> >
> > >> > > b940d9be3a
> > >> > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 11:51 AM, Thomas Heigl <
> thomas@umschalt.com>
> > >> >
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > > > `mvn clean install` fails for me because no test-jar is built
> for
> > >>
> > >> the
> > >>
> > >> > core
> > >> >
> > >> > > > module:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > [INFO] WiQuery Parent 8.0-SNAPSHOT ........................
> SUCCESS
> > >>
> > >> [
> > >>
> > >> > > >>  0.353 s]
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> [INFO] WiQuery Core Project ...............................
> > >>
> > >> SUCCESS [
> > >>
> > >> > > >>  2.673 s]
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> [INFO] WiQuery jQuery UI Project ..........................
> > >>
> > >> FAILURE [
> > >>
> > >> > > >>  0.023 s]
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> [INFO] WiQuery Demo Project 8.0-SNAPSHOT ..................
> > >> > > >> SKIPPED
> > >> > > >> [INFO] ------------------------------
> > >>
> > >> ------------------------------
> > >>
> > >> > > >> ------------
> > >> > > >> [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> > >> > > >> [INFO] ------------------------------
> > >>
> > >> ------------------------------
> > >>
> > >> > > >> ------------
> > >> > > >> [INFO] Total time: 3.720 s
> > >> > > >> [INFO] Finished at: 2018-06-06T11:48:16+02:00
> > >> > > >> [INFO] ------------------------------
> > >>
> > >> ------------------------------
> > >>
> > >> > > >> ------------
> > >> > > >> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project wiquery-jquery-ui:
> Could
> > >>
> > >> not
> > >>
> > >> > > >> resolve dependencies for project org.wicketstuff.wiquery:
> > >> > > >> wiquery-jquery-ui:jar:8.0-SNAPSHOT: Failure to find
> > >> > > >> org.wicketstuff.wiquery:wiquery-core:jar:tests:8.0-SNAPSHOT in
> > >> > > >> https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots was
> > >>
> > >> cached in
> > >>
> > >> > > >> the local repository, resolution will not be reattempted until
> the
> > >> >
> > >> > update
> > >> >
> > >> > > >> interval of sonatype-nexus-snapshots has elapsed or updates are
> > >> >
> > >> > forced ->
> > >> >
> > >> > > >> [Help 1]
> > >> > > >> [ERROR]
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Did you change something about test-jar configuration? I do not
> see
> > >> > > > `test-jar` generation enabled in the POM file.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 11:43 AM, Emond Papegaaij <
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > emond.papegaaij@topicus.nl> wrote:
> > >> > > >> Hi Thomas,
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> The easiest way is to just run 'mvn install' and depend on
> > >> >
> > >> > 8.0-SNAPSHOT.
> > >> >
> > >> > > >> I did
> > >> > > >> not do a release, as I cannot push to central. If you want to
> run
> > >>
> > >> your
> > >>
> > >> > > >> tests
> > >> > > >> on some CI server, you probably have to push the artifacts to a
> > >>
> > >> local
> > >>
> > >> > > >> repo
> > >> > > >> also.
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Best regards,
> > >> > > >> Emond
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> On woensdag 6 juni 2018 11:36:54 CEST Thomas Heigl wrote:
> > >> > > >> > Hi Emond,
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > How can I test this? Did you do a milestone release or do I
> have
> > >>
> > >> to
> > >>
> > >> > > >> build
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> > from source and push to my local artifact repo?
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > Best,
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > Thomas
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 3:01 PM, Emond Papegaaij <
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> emond.papegaaij@topicus.nl>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> > wrote:
> > >> > > >> > > I've just pushed a massive upgrade of all components.
> Removed
> > >>
> > >> all
> > >>
> > >> > > >> > > deprecated
> > >> > > >> > > parts, upgraded jQuery UI to 1.12.1 and did some more
> cleanup
> > >>
> > >> and
> > >>
> > >> > > >> > > refactoring.
> > >> > > >> > > Please test the changes in your project. The tests pass and
> > >> > > >> > > the
> > >> >
> > >> > demo
> > >> >
> > >> > > >> runs
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> > > fine, but my project only uses a limited set of the UI
> > >>
> > >> components.
> > >>
> > >> > > >> > > Best regards,
> > >> > > >> > > Emond
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > > On zaterdag 2 juni 2018 10:31:31 CEST you wrote:
> > >> > > >> > > > I'm planning to upgrade jQuery UI to the latest version
> next
> > >> >
> > >> > week.
> > >> >
> > >> > > >> We
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> > > > are
> > >> > > >> > > > currently migrating all our applications to wicket 8 and
> > >> > > >> > > > also
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> depend on
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> > > > wiquery quite a lot. It does however seem that jQuery UI
> is
> > >> >
> > >> > mostly
> > >> >
> > >> > > >> dead.
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> > > > The rest of the world probably switched to yet another
> fancy
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> JavaScript
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> > > ui
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > > > library. At least the will make it easy to stay up to
> date
> > >>
> > >> with
> > >>
> > >> > the
> > >> >
> > >> > > >> > > latest
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > > > version :)
> > >> > > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > I can't push a release to central, but perhaps Martin
> can do
> > >> >
> > >> > that
> > >> >
> > >> > > >> when
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> > > I'm
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > > > done? For now you can use a snapshot build. It works, but
> > >>
> > >> the UI
> > >>
> > >> > > >> > > > API
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > > might
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > > > change a bit before the 8.0 release.
> > >> > > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > Best regards,
> > >> > > >> > > > Emond Papegaaij
> > >> > > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > Op vr 1 jun. 2018 17:36 schreef Thomas Heigl <
> > >> >
> > >> > thomas@umschalt.com>:
> > >> > > >> > > > > Hi Ernesto,
> > >> > > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > I'm not sure how many people are still using it. But
> as I
> > >> >
> > >> > said,
> > >> >
> > >> > > >> > > > > my
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > > project
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > heavily depends on it.
> > >> > > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > @papegaaij has resolved all the compile errors against
> > >> >
> > >> > 8.0.0-M9 (
> > >> >
> > >> > > >> > > > > https://github.com/wicketstuff/wiquery) and a simple
> > >>
> > >> release
> > >>
> > >> > of
> > >> >
> > >> > > >> 8.0.0
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> > > > > would
> > >> > > >> > > > > be enough for me.
> > >> > > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > Best,
> > >> > > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > Thomas
> > >> > > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 5:05 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo
> Barreiro
> > >> > > >> > > > > <
> > >> > > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > reiern70@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > > >> > > > > > Hi,
> > >> > > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > > I do not know who is actually using this project. I
> use
> > >>
> > >> to
> > >>
> > >> > > >> > > contribute to
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > it
> > >> > > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > > a few years ago. I haven't used it for ages..
> > >> > > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 3:39 PM, Thomas Heigl <
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> thomas@umschalt.com>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > >> > > > > > > Hi,
> > >> > > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > > > Following the release of Wicket 8.0.0 and
> WicketStuff
> > >> >
> > >> > 8.0.0,
> > >> >
> > >> > > >> could
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> > > > > > somebody
> > >> > > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > > > please cut a release of WiQuery compatible with the
> > >> > > >> > > > > > > new
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> version?
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> > > > > > > Our application still heavily relies on WiQuery
> and we
> > >> >
> > >> > can't
> > >> >
> > >> > > >> move
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> > > to
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > > Wicket
> > >> > > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > > > 8 without it.
> > >> > > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > > > Best,
> > >> > > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > > > Thomas
> > >> > > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > >> > > > > > --
> > >> > > >> > > > > > Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
> > >> > > >> > >
> > >> > > >> > > ------------------------------
> ------------------------------
> > >> >
> > >> > ---------
> > >> >
> > >> > > >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.
> apache.org
> > >> > > >> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>
> > >> ---------
> > >>
> > >> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > >> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > >> >
> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>

Re: Release WiQuery for Wicket 8

Posted by Emond Papegaaij <em...@topicus.nl>.
I did not build the javadoc, but I actually don't know why. But as I don't 
care about these javadoc errors, I've disabled lint. You should be able to 
build now.

Emond

On donderdag 7 juni 2018 16:32:16 CEST Martin Grigorov wrote:
> There are many javadoc related errors in this project. mvn install fails
> with:
> 
> [WARNING] The requested profile "frontend" could not be activated because
> it does not exist.
> [WARNING] The requested profile "buildbot" could not be activated because
> it does not exist.
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin:2.7:jar (attach-javadocs) on
> project wiquery-core: MavenReportException: Error while creating archive:
> [ERROR] Exit code: 1 -
> /home/martin/git/wiquery/wiquery-core/src/main/java/org/wicketstuff/wiquery/
> core/util/WiQueryUtil.java:46: warning: no @return
> [ERROR] public static ResourceReference getJQueryResourceReference()
> [ERROR]                                ^
> [ERROR]
> /home/martin/git/wiquery/wiquery-core/src/main/java/org/wicketstuff/wiquery/
> core/events/Event.java:78: warning: no @return
> [ERROR] public abstract JsScope callback();
> [ERROR]                        ^
> [ERROR]
> /home/martin/git/wiquery/wiquery-core/src/main/java/org/wicketstuff/wiquery/
> core/events/Event.java:53: warning: no @param for eventLabels
> [ERROR] public Event(EventLabel... eventLabels)
> [ERROR]       ^
> [ERROR]
> /home/martin/git/wiquery/wiquery-core/src/main/java/org/wicketstuff/wiquery/
> core/javascript/DefaultChainableStatement.java:49: warning: no @param for
> label
> [ERROR] public DefaultChainableStatement(String label, CharSequence... args)
> ....
> 
> 
> How did you build it with Java 8 ?
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 3:55 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
> 
> wrote:
> > OK. I will make a release!
> > 
> > On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 3:25 PM, Thomas Heigl <th...@umschalt.com> wrote:
> >> Hi Emond,
> >> 
> >> I did some exploratory testing against the current build. I checked
> >> Dialog,
> >> Autocomplete, Accordion, Slider, Sortable, and Tooltip and all seem to be
> >> working at first glance.
> >> 
> >> All my tests pass as well.
> >> 
> >> Best,
> >> 
> >> Thomas
> >> 
> >> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 1:07 PM, Emond Papegaaij <
> >> emond.papegaaij@topicus.nl>
> >> 
> >> wrote:
> >> > I've fixed the problem. The setup currently used is discouraged and
> >> 
> >> broken
> >> 
> >> > in
> >> > m2e, but I don't feel like restructuring the whole thing to get rid of
> >> > this
> >> > test-jar.
> >> > 
> >> > Emond
> >> > 
> >> > On woensdag 6 juni 2018 11:57:43 CEST Thomas Heigl wrote:
> >> > > The culprit is:
> >> > > 
> >> > > https://github.com/wicketstuff/wiquery/commit/
> >> > 
> >> > 0235691174ceeede22b588d2f67868
> >> > 
> >> > > b940d9be3a
> >> > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 11:51 AM, Thomas Heigl <th...@umschalt.com>
> >> > 
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > > `mvn clean install` fails for me because no test-jar is built for
> >> 
> >> the
> >> 
> >> > core
> >> > 
> >> > > > module:
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > [INFO] WiQuery Parent 8.0-SNAPSHOT ........................ SUCCESS
> >> 
> >> [
> >> 
> >> > > >>  0.353 s]
> >> > > >> 
> >> > > >> [INFO] WiQuery Core Project ...............................
> >> 
> >> SUCCESS [
> >> 
> >> > > >>  2.673 s]
> >> > > >> 
> >> > > >> [INFO] WiQuery jQuery UI Project ..........................
> >> 
> >> FAILURE [
> >> 
> >> > > >>  0.023 s]
> >> > > >> 
> >> > > >> [INFO] WiQuery Demo Project 8.0-SNAPSHOT ..................
> >> > > >> SKIPPED
> >> > > >> [INFO] ------------------------------
> >> 
> >> ------------------------------
> >> 
> >> > > >> ------------
> >> > > >> [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> >> > > >> [INFO] ------------------------------
> >> 
> >> ------------------------------
> >> 
> >> > > >> ------------
> >> > > >> [INFO] Total time: 3.720 s
> >> > > >> [INFO] Finished at: 2018-06-06T11:48:16+02:00
> >> > > >> [INFO] ------------------------------
> >> 
> >> ------------------------------
> >> 
> >> > > >> ------------
> >> > > >> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project wiquery-jquery-ui: Could
> >> 
> >> not
> >> 
> >> > > >> resolve dependencies for project org.wicketstuff.wiquery:
> >> > > >> wiquery-jquery-ui:jar:8.0-SNAPSHOT: Failure to find
> >> > > >> org.wicketstuff.wiquery:wiquery-core:jar:tests:8.0-SNAPSHOT in
> >> > > >> https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots was
> >> 
> >> cached in
> >> 
> >> > > >> the local repository, resolution will not be reattempted until the
> >> > 
> >> > update
> >> > 
> >> > > >> interval of sonatype-nexus-snapshots has elapsed or updates are
> >> > 
> >> > forced ->
> >> > 
> >> > > >> [Help 1]
> >> > > >> [ERROR]
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > Did you change something about test-jar configuration? I do not see
> >> > > > `test-jar` generation enabled in the POM file.
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 11:43 AM, Emond Papegaaij <
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > emond.papegaaij@topicus.nl> wrote:
> >> > > >> Hi Thomas,
> >> > > >> 
> >> > > >> The easiest way is to just run 'mvn install' and depend on
> >> > 
> >> > 8.0-SNAPSHOT.
> >> > 
> >> > > >> I did
> >> > > >> not do a release, as I cannot push to central. If you want to run
> >> 
> >> your
> >> 
> >> > > >> tests
> >> > > >> on some CI server, you probably have to push the artifacts to a
> >> 
> >> local
> >> 
> >> > > >> repo
> >> > > >> also.
> >> > > >> 
> >> > > >> Best regards,
> >> > > >> Emond
> >> > > >> 
> >> > > >> On woensdag 6 juni 2018 11:36:54 CEST Thomas Heigl wrote:
> >> > > >> > Hi Emond,
> >> > > >> > 
> >> > > >> > How can I test this? Did you do a milestone release or do I have
> >> 
> >> to
> >> 
> >> > > >> build
> >> > > >> 
> >> > > >> > from source and push to my local artifact repo?
> >> > > >> > 
> >> > > >> > Best,
> >> > > >> > 
> >> > > >> > Thomas
> >> > > >> > 
> >> > > >> > On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 3:01 PM, Emond Papegaaij <
> >> > > >> 
> >> > > >> emond.papegaaij@topicus.nl>
> >> > > >> 
> >> > > >> > wrote:
> >> > > >> > > I've just pushed a massive upgrade of all components. Removed
> >> 
> >> all
> >> 
> >> > > >> > > deprecated
> >> > > >> > > parts, upgraded jQuery UI to 1.12.1 and did some more cleanup
> >> 
> >> and
> >> 
> >> > > >> > > refactoring.
> >> > > >> > > Please test the changes in your project. The tests pass and
> >> > > >> > > the
> >> > 
> >> > demo
> >> > 
> >> > > >> runs
> >> > > >> 
> >> > > >> > > fine, but my project only uses a limited set of the UI
> >> 
> >> components.
> >> 
> >> > > >> > > Best regards,
> >> > > >> > > Emond
> >> > > >> > > 
> >> > > >> > > On zaterdag 2 juni 2018 10:31:31 CEST you wrote:
> >> > > >> > > > I'm planning to upgrade jQuery UI to the latest version next
> >> > 
> >> > week.
> >> > 
> >> > > >> We
> >> > > >> 
> >> > > >> > > > are
> >> > > >> > > > currently migrating all our applications to wicket 8 and
> >> > > >> > > > also
> >> > > >> 
> >> > > >> depend on
> >> > > >> 
> >> > > >> > > > wiquery quite a lot. It does however seem that jQuery UI is
> >> > 
> >> > mostly
> >> > 
> >> > > >> dead.
> >> > > >> 
> >> > > >> > > > The rest of the world probably switched to yet another fancy
> >> > > >> 
> >> > > >> JavaScript
> >> > > >> 
> >> > > >> > > ui
> >> > > >> > > 
> >> > > >> > > > library. At least the will make it easy to stay up to date
> >> 
> >> with
> >> 
> >> > the
> >> > 
> >> > > >> > > latest
> >> > > >> > > 
> >> > > >> > > > version :)
> >> > > >> > > > 
> >> > > >> > > > I can't push a release to central, but perhaps Martin can do
> >> > 
> >> > that
> >> > 
> >> > > >> when
> >> > > >> 
> >> > > >> > > I'm
> >> > > >> > > 
> >> > > >> > > > done? For now you can use a snapshot build. It works, but
> >> 
> >> the UI
> >> 
> >> > > >> > > > API
> >> > > >> > > 
> >> > > >> > > might
> >> > > >> > > 
> >> > > >> > > > change a bit before the 8.0 release.
> >> > > >> > > > 
> >> > > >> > > > Best regards,
> >> > > >> > > > Emond Papegaaij
> >> > > >> > > > 
> >> > > >> > > > Op vr 1 jun. 2018 17:36 schreef Thomas Heigl <
> >> > 
> >> > thomas@umschalt.com>:
> >> > > >> > > > > Hi Ernesto,
> >> > > >> > > > > 
> >> > > >> > > > > I'm not sure how many people are still using it. But as I
> >> > 
> >> > said,
> >> > 
> >> > > >> > > > > my
> >> > > >> > > 
> >> > > >> > > project
> >> > > >> > > 
> >> > > >> > > > > heavily depends on it.
> >> > > >> > > > > 
> >> > > >> > > > > @papegaaij has resolved all the compile errors against
> >> > 
> >> > 8.0.0-M9 (
> >> > 
> >> > > >> > > > > https://github.com/wicketstuff/wiquery) and a simple
> >> 
> >> release
> >> 
> >> > of
> >> > 
> >> > > >> 8.0.0
> >> > > >> 
> >> > > >> > > > > would
> >> > > >> > > > > be enough for me.
> >> > > >> > > > > 
> >> > > >> > > > > Best,
> >> > > >> > > > > 
> >> > > >> > > > > Thomas
> >> > > >> > > > > 
> >> > > >> > > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 5:05 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
> >> > > >> > > > > <
> >> > > >> > > > > 
> >> > > >> > > > > reiern70@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > >> > > > > > Hi,
> >> > > >> > > > > > 
> >> > > >> > > > > > I do not know who is actually using this project. I use
> >> 
> >> to
> >> 
> >> > > >> > > contribute to
> >> > > >> > > 
> >> > > >> > > > > it
> >> > > >> > > > > 
> >> > > >> > > > > > a few years ago. I haven't used it for ages..
> >> > > >> > > > > > 
> >> > > >> > > > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 3:39 PM, Thomas Heigl <
> >> > > >> 
> >> > > >> thomas@umschalt.com>
> >> > > >> 
> >> > > >> > > > > wrote:
> >> > > >> > > > > > > Hi,
> >> > > >> > > > > > > 
> >> > > >> > > > > > > Following the release of Wicket 8.0.0 and WicketStuff
> >> > 
> >> > 8.0.0,
> >> > 
> >> > > >> could
> >> > > >> 
> >> > > >> > > > > > somebody
> >> > > >> > > > > > 
> >> > > >> > > > > > > please cut a release of WiQuery compatible with the
> >> > > >> > > > > > > new
> >> > > >> 
> >> > > >> version?
> >> > > >> 
> >> > > >> > > > > > > Our application still heavily relies on WiQuery and we
> >> > 
> >> > can't
> >> > 
> >> > > >> move
> >> > > >> 
> >> > > >> > > to
> >> > > >> > > 
> >> > > >> > > > > > Wicket
> >> > > >> > > > > > 
> >> > > >> > > > > > > 8 without it.
> >> > > >> > > > > > > 
> >> > > >> > > > > > > Best,
> >> > > >> > > > > > > 
> >> > > >> > > > > > > Thomas
> >> > > >> > > > > > 
> >> > > >> > > > > > --
> >> > > >> > > > > > Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
> >> > > >> > > 
> >> > > >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > 
> >> > ---------
> >> > 
> >> > > >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >> > > >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >> > > >> 
> >> > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------
> >> 
> >> ---------
> >> 
> >> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >> > 
> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org


Re: Release WiQuery for Wicket 8

Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.
There are many javadoc related errors in this project. mvn install fails
with:

[WARNING] The requested profile "frontend" could not be activated because
it does not exist.
[WARNING] The requested profile "buildbot" could not be activated because
it does not exist.
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin:2.7:jar (attach-javadocs) on
project wiquery-core: MavenReportException: Error while creating archive:
[ERROR] Exit code: 1 -
/home/martin/git/wiquery/wiquery-core/src/main/java/org/wicketstuff/wiquery/core/util/WiQueryUtil.java:46:
warning: no @return
[ERROR] public static ResourceReference getJQueryResourceReference()
[ERROR]                                ^
[ERROR]
/home/martin/git/wiquery/wiquery-core/src/main/java/org/wicketstuff/wiquery/core/events/Event.java:78:
warning: no @return
[ERROR] public abstract JsScope callback();
[ERROR]                        ^
[ERROR]
/home/martin/git/wiquery/wiquery-core/src/main/java/org/wicketstuff/wiquery/core/events/Event.java:53:
warning: no @param for eventLabels
[ERROR] public Event(EventLabel... eventLabels)
[ERROR]       ^
[ERROR]
/home/martin/git/wiquery/wiquery-core/src/main/java/org/wicketstuff/wiquery/core/javascript/DefaultChainableStatement.java:49:
warning: no @param for label
[ERROR] public DefaultChainableStatement(String label, CharSequence... args)
....


How did you build it with Java 8 ?


On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 3:55 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
wrote:

> OK. I will make a release!
>
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 3:25 PM, Thomas Heigl <th...@umschalt.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Emond,
>>
>> I did some exploratory testing against the current build. I checked
>> Dialog,
>> Autocomplete, Accordion, Slider, Sortable, and Tooltip and all seem to be
>> working at first glance.
>>
>> All my tests pass as well.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Thomas
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 1:07 PM, Emond Papegaaij <
>> emond.papegaaij@topicus.nl>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I've fixed the problem. The setup currently used is discouraged and
>> broken
>> > in
>> > m2e, but I don't feel like restructuring the whole thing to get rid of
>> > this
>> > test-jar.
>> >
>> > Emond
>> >
>> > On woensdag 6 juni 2018 11:57:43 CEST Thomas Heigl wrote:
>> > > The culprit is:
>> > >
>> > > https://github.com/wicketstuff/wiquery/commit/
>> > 0235691174ceeede22b588d2f67868
>> > > b940d9be3a
>> > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 11:51 AM, Thomas Heigl <th...@umschalt.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > > > `mvn clean install` fails for me because no test-jar is built for
>> the
>> > core
>> > > > module:
>> > > >
>> > > > [INFO] WiQuery Parent 8.0-SNAPSHOT ........................ SUCCESS
>> [
>> > > >
>> > > >>  0.353 s]
>> > > >>
>> > > >> [INFO] WiQuery Core Project ...............................
>> SUCCESS [
>> > > >>
>> > > >>  2.673 s]
>> > > >>
>> > > >> [INFO] WiQuery jQuery UI Project ..........................
>> FAILURE [
>> > > >>
>> > > >>  0.023 s]
>> > > >>
>> > > >> [INFO] WiQuery Demo Project 8.0-SNAPSHOT .................. SKIPPED
>> > > >> [INFO] ------------------------------
>> ------------------------------
>> > > >> ------------
>> > > >> [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
>> > > >> [INFO] ------------------------------
>> ------------------------------
>> > > >> ------------
>> > > >> [INFO] Total time: 3.720 s
>> > > >> [INFO] Finished at: 2018-06-06T11:48:16+02:00
>> > > >> [INFO] ------------------------------
>> ------------------------------
>> > > >> ------------
>> > > >> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project wiquery-jquery-ui: Could
>> not
>> > > >> resolve dependencies for project org.wicketstuff.wiquery:
>> > > >> wiquery-jquery-ui:jar:8.0-SNAPSHOT: Failure to find
>> > > >> org.wicketstuff.wiquery:wiquery-core:jar:tests:8.0-SNAPSHOT in
>> > > >> https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots was
>> cached in
>> > > >> the local repository, resolution will not be reattempted until the
>> > update
>> > > >> interval of sonatype-nexus-snapshots has elapsed or updates are
>> > forced ->
>> > > >> [Help 1]
>> > > >> [ERROR]
>> > > >
>> > > > Did you change something about test-jar configuration? I do not see
>> > > > `test-jar` generation enabled in the POM file.
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 11:43 AM, Emond Papegaaij <
>> > > >
>> > > > emond.papegaaij@topicus.nl> wrote:
>> > > >> Hi Thomas,
>> > > >>
>> > > >> The easiest way is to just run 'mvn install' and depend on
>> > 8.0-SNAPSHOT.
>> > > >> I did
>> > > >> not do a release, as I cannot push to central. If you want to run
>> your
>> > > >> tests
>> > > >> on some CI server, you probably have to push the artifacts to a
>> local
>> > > >> repo
>> > > >> also.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Best regards,
>> > > >> Emond
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On woensdag 6 juni 2018 11:36:54 CEST Thomas Heigl wrote:
>> > > >> > Hi Emond,
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > How can I test this? Did you do a milestone release or do I have
>> to
>> > > >>
>> > > >> build
>> > > >>
>> > > >> > from source and push to my local artifact repo?
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > Best,
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > Thomas
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 3:01 PM, Emond Papegaaij <
>> > > >>
>> > > >> emond.papegaaij@topicus.nl>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> > wrote:
>> > > >> > > I've just pushed a massive upgrade of all components. Removed
>> all
>> > > >> > > deprecated
>> > > >> > > parts, upgraded jQuery UI to 1.12.1 and did some more cleanup
>> and
>> > > >> > > refactoring.
>> > > >> > > Please test the changes in your project. The tests pass and the
>> > demo
>> > > >>
>> > > >> runs
>> > > >>
>> > > >> > > fine, but my project only uses a limited set of the UI
>> components.
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > Best regards,
>> > > >> > > Emond
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > On zaterdag 2 juni 2018 10:31:31 CEST you wrote:
>> > > >> > > > I'm planning to upgrade jQuery UI to the latest version next
>> > week.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> We
>> > > >>
>> > > >> > > > are
>> > > >> > > > currently migrating all our applications to wicket 8 and also
>> > > >>
>> > > >> depend on
>> > > >>
>> > > >> > > > wiquery quite a lot. It does however seem that jQuery UI is
>> > mostly
>> > > >>
>> > > >> dead.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> > > > The rest of the world probably switched to yet another fancy
>> > > >>
>> > > >> JavaScript
>> > > >>
>> > > >> > > ui
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > > library. At least the will make it easy to stay up to date
>> with
>> > the
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > latest
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > > version :)
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > I can't push a release to central, but perhaps Martin can do
>> > that
>> > > >>
>> > > >> when
>> > > >>
>> > > >> > > I'm
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > > done? For now you can use a snapshot build. It works, but
>> the UI
>> > > >> > > > API
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > might
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > > change a bit before the 8.0 release.
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > Best regards,
>> > > >> > > > Emond Papegaaij
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > Op vr 1 jun. 2018 17:36 schreef Thomas Heigl <
>> > thomas@umschalt.com>:
>> > > >> > > > > Hi Ernesto,
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > I'm not sure how many people are still using it. But as I
>> > said,
>> > > >> > > > > my
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > project
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > > > heavily depends on it.
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > @papegaaij has resolved all the compile errors against
>> > 8.0.0-M9 (
>> > > >> > > > > https://github.com/wicketstuff/wiquery) and a simple
>> release
>> > of
>> > > >>
>> > > >> 8.0.0
>> > > >>
>> > > >> > > > > would
>> > > >> > > > > be enough for me.
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > Best,
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > Thomas
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 5:05 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > reiern70@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >> > > > > > Hi,
>> > > >> > > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > > I do not know who is actually using this project. I use
>> to
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > contribute to
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > > > it
>> > > >> > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > > a few years ago. I haven't used it for ages..
>> > > >> > > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 3:39 PM, Thomas Heigl <
>> > > >>
>> > > >> thomas@umschalt.com>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> > > > > wrote:
>> > > >> > > > > > > Hi,
>> > > >> > > > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > > > Following the release of Wicket 8.0.0 and WicketStuff
>> > 8.0.0,
>> > > >>
>> > > >> could
>> > > >>
>> > > >> > > > > > somebody
>> > > >> > > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > > > please cut a release of WiQuery compatible with the new
>> > > >>
>> > > >> version?
>> > > >>
>> > > >> > > > > > > Our application still heavily relies on WiQuery and we
>> > can't
>> > > >>
>> > > >> move
>> > > >>
>> > > >> > > to
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > > > > Wicket
>> > > >> > > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > > > 8 without it.
>> > > >> > > > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > > > Best,
>> > > >> > > > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > > > Thomas
>> > > >> > > > > >
>> > > >> > > > > > --
>> > > >> > > > > > Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------
>> > ---------
>> > > >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> > > >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>> > > >>
>> > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---------
>> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>

Re: Release WiQuery for Wicket 8

Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.
OK. I will make a release!

On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 3:25 PM, Thomas Heigl <th...@umschalt.com> wrote:

> Hi Emond,
>
> I did some exploratory testing against the current build. I checked Dialog,
> Autocomplete, Accordion, Slider, Sortable, and Tooltip and all seem to be
> working at first glance.
>
> All my tests pass as well.
>
> Best,
>
> Thomas
>
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 1:07 PM, Emond Papegaaij <
> emond.papegaaij@topicus.nl>
> wrote:
>
> > I've fixed the problem. The setup currently used is discouraged and
> broken
> > in
> > m2e, but I don't feel like restructuring the whole thing to get rid of
> > this
> > test-jar.
> >
> > Emond
> >
> > On woensdag 6 juni 2018 11:57:43 CEST Thomas Heigl wrote:
> > > The culprit is:
> > >
> > > https://github.com/wicketstuff/wiquery/commit/
> > 0235691174ceeede22b588d2f67868
> > > b940d9be3a
> > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 11:51 AM, Thomas Heigl <th...@umschalt.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > `mvn clean install` fails for me because no test-jar is built for the
> > core
> > > > module:
> > > >
> > > > [INFO] WiQuery Parent 8.0-SNAPSHOT ........................ SUCCESS [
> > > >
> > > >>  0.353 s]
> > > >>
> > > >> [INFO] WiQuery Core Project ...............................
> SUCCESS [
> > > >>
> > > >>  2.673 s]
> > > >>
> > > >> [INFO] WiQuery jQuery UI Project .......................... FAILURE
> [
> > > >>
> > > >>  0.023 s]
> > > >>
> > > >> [INFO] WiQuery Demo Project 8.0-SNAPSHOT .................. SKIPPED
> > > >> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> ------------
> > > >> [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> > > >> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> ------------
> > > >> [INFO] Total time: 3.720 s
> > > >> [INFO] Finished at: 2018-06-06T11:48:16+02:00
> > > >> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> ------------
> > > >> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project wiquery-jquery-ui: Could
> not
> > > >> resolve dependencies for project org.wicketstuff.wiquery:
> > > >> wiquery-jquery-ui:jar:8.0-SNAPSHOT: Failure to find
> > > >> org.wicketstuff.wiquery:wiquery-core:jar:tests:8.0-SNAPSHOT in
> > > >> https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots was cached
> in
> > > >> the local repository, resolution will not be reattempted until the
> > update
> > > >> interval of sonatype-nexus-snapshots has elapsed or updates are
> > forced ->
> > > >> [Help 1]
> > > >> [ERROR]
> > > >
> > > > Did you change something about test-jar configuration? I do not see
> > > > `test-jar` generation enabled in the POM file.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 11:43 AM, Emond Papegaaij <
> > > >
> > > > emond.papegaaij@topicus.nl> wrote:
> > > >> Hi Thomas,
> > > >>
> > > >> The easiest way is to just run 'mvn install' and depend on
> > 8.0-SNAPSHOT.
> > > >> I did
> > > >> not do a release, as I cannot push to central. If you want to run
> your
> > > >> tests
> > > >> on some CI server, you probably have to push the artifacts to a
> local
> > > >> repo
> > > >> also.
> > > >>
> > > >> Best regards,
> > > >> Emond
> > > >>
> > > >> On woensdag 6 juni 2018 11:36:54 CEST Thomas Heigl wrote:
> > > >> > Hi Emond,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > How can I test this? Did you do a milestone release or do I have
> to
> > > >>
> > > >> build
> > > >>
> > > >> > from source and push to my local artifact repo?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Best,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Thomas
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 3:01 PM, Emond Papegaaij <
> > > >>
> > > >> emond.papegaaij@topicus.nl>
> > > >>
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> > > I've just pushed a massive upgrade of all components. Removed
> all
> > > >> > > deprecated
> > > >> > > parts, upgraded jQuery UI to 1.12.1 and did some more cleanup
> and
> > > >> > > refactoring.
> > > >> > > Please test the changes in your project. The tests pass and the
> > demo
> > > >>
> > > >> runs
> > > >>
> > > >> > > fine, but my project only uses a limited set of the UI
> components.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Best regards,
> > > >> > > Emond
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > On zaterdag 2 juni 2018 10:31:31 CEST you wrote:
> > > >> > > > I'm planning to upgrade jQuery UI to the latest version next
> > week.
> > > >>
> > > >> We
> > > >>
> > > >> > > > are
> > > >> > > > currently migrating all our applications to wicket 8 and also
> > > >>
> > > >> depend on
> > > >>
> > > >> > > > wiquery quite a lot. It does however seem that jQuery UI is
> > mostly
> > > >>
> > > >> dead.
> > > >>
> > > >> > > > The rest of the world probably switched to yet another fancy
> > > >>
> > > >> JavaScript
> > > >>
> > > >> > > ui
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > library. At least the will make it easy to stay up to date
> with
> > the
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > latest
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > version :)
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > I can't push a release to central, but perhaps Martin can do
> > that
> > > >>
> > > >> when
> > > >>
> > > >> > > I'm
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > done? For now you can use a snapshot build. It works, but the
> UI
> > > >> > > > API
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > might
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > change a bit before the 8.0 release.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Best regards,
> > > >> > > > Emond Papegaaij
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Op vr 1 jun. 2018 17:36 schreef Thomas Heigl <
> > thomas@umschalt.com>:
> > > >> > > > > Hi Ernesto,
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > I'm not sure how many people are still using it. But as I
> > said,
> > > >> > > > > my
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > project
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > > heavily depends on it.
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > @papegaaij has resolved all the compile errors against
> > 8.0.0-M9 (
> > > >> > > > > https://github.com/wicketstuff/wiquery) and a simple
> release
> > of
> > > >>
> > > >> 8.0.0
> > > >>
> > > >> > > > > would
> > > >> > > > > be enough for me.
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > Best,
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > Thomas
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 5:05 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > reiern70@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > Hi,
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > I do not know who is actually using this project. I use to
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > contribute to
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > > it
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > a few years ago. I haven't used it for ages..
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 3:39 PM, Thomas Heigl <
> > > >>
> > > >> thomas@umschalt.com>
> > > >>
> > > >> > > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > Following the release of Wicket 8.0.0 and WicketStuff
> > 8.0.0,
> > > >>
> > > >> could
> > > >>
> > > >> > > > > > somebody
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > please cut a release of WiQuery compatible with the new
> > > >>
> > > >> version?
> > > >>
> > > >> > > > > > > Our application still heavily relies on WiQuery and we
> > can't
> > > >>
> > > >> move
> > > >>
> > > >> > > to
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > > > Wicket
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > 8 without it.
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > Best,
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > Thomas
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > --
> > > >> > > > > > Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > ---------
> > > >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > > >>
> > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Re: Release WiQuery for Wicket 8

Posted by Thomas Heigl <th...@umschalt.com>.
Hi Emond,

I did some exploratory testing against the current build. I checked Dialog,
Autocomplete, Accordion, Slider, Sortable, and Tooltip and all seem to be
working at first glance.

All my tests pass as well.

Best,

Thomas

On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 1:07 PM, Emond Papegaaij <em...@topicus.nl>
wrote:

> I've fixed the problem. The setup currently used is discouraged and broken
> in
> m2e, but I don't feel like restructuring the whole thing to get rid of
> this
> test-jar.
>
> Emond
>
> On woensdag 6 juni 2018 11:57:43 CEST Thomas Heigl wrote:
> > The culprit is:
> >
> > https://github.com/wicketstuff/wiquery/commit/
> 0235691174ceeede22b588d2f67868
> > b940d9be3a
> > On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 11:51 AM, Thomas Heigl <th...@umschalt.com>
> wrote:
> > > `mvn clean install` fails for me because no test-jar is built for the
> core
> > > module:
> > >
> > > [INFO] WiQuery Parent 8.0-SNAPSHOT ........................ SUCCESS [
> > >
> > >>  0.353 s]
> > >>
> > >> [INFO] WiQuery Core Project ............................... SUCCESS [
> > >>
> > >>  2.673 s]
> > >>
> > >> [INFO] WiQuery jQuery UI Project .......................... FAILURE [
> > >>
> > >>  0.023 s]
> > >>
> > >> [INFO] WiQuery Demo Project 8.0-SNAPSHOT .................. SKIPPED
> > >> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> ------------
> > >> [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> > >> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> ------------
> > >> [INFO] Total time: 3.720 s
> > >> [INFO] Finished at: 2018-06-06T11:48:16+02:00
> > >> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> ------------
> > >> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project wiquery-jquery-ui: Could not
> > >> resolve dependencies for project org.wicketstuff.wiquery:
> > >> wiquery-jquery-ui:jar:8.0-SNAPSHOT: Failure to find
> > >> org.wicketstuff.wiquery:wiquery-core:jar:tests:8.0-SNAPSHOT in
> > >> https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots was cached in
> > >> the local repository, resolution will not be reattempted until the
> update
> > >> interval of sonatype-nexus-snapshots has elapsed or updates are
> forced ->
> > >> [Help 1]
> > >> [ERROR]
> > >
> > > Did you change something about test-jar configuration? I do not see
> > > `test-jar` generation enabled in the POM file.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 11:43 AM, Emond Papegaaij <
> > >
> > > emond.papegaaij@topicus.nl> wrote:
> > >> Hi Thomas,
> > >>
> > >> The easiest way is to just run 'mvn install' and depend on
> 8.0-SNAPSHOT.
> > >> I did
> > >> not do a release, as I cannot push to central. If you want to run your
> > >> tests
> > >> on some CI server, you probably have to push the artifacts to a local
> > >> repo
> > >> also.
> > >>
> > >> Best regards,
> > >> Emond
> > >>
> > >> On woensdag 6 juni 2018 11:36:54 CEST Thomas Heigl wrote:
> > >> > Hi Emond,
> > >> >
> > >> > How can I test this? Did you do a milestone release or do I have to
> > >>
> > >> build
> > >>
> > >> > from source and push to my local artifact repo?
> > >> >
> > >> > Best,
> > >> >
> > >> > Thomas
> > >> >
> > >> > On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 3:01 PM, Emond Papegaaij <
> > >>
> > >> emond.papegaaij@topicus.nl>
> > >>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > > I've just pushed a massive upgrade of all components. Removed all
> > >> > > deprecated
> > >> > > parts, upgraded jQuery UI to 1.12.1 and did some more cleanup and
> > >> > > refactoring.
> > >> > > Please test the changes in your project. The tests pass and the
> demo
> > >>
> > >> runs
> > >>
> > >> > > fine, but my project only uses a limited set of the UI components.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Best regards,
> > >> > > Emond
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On zaterdag 2 juni 2018 10:31:31 CEST you wrote:
> > >> > > > I'm planning to upgrade jQuery UI to the latest version next
> week.
> > >>
> > >> We
> > >>
> > >> > > > are
> > >> > > > currently migrating all our applications to wicket 8 and also
> > >>
> > >> depend on
> > >>
> > >> > > > wiquery quite a lot. It does however seem that jQuery UI is
> mostly
> > >>
> > >> dead.
> > >>
> > >> > > > The rest of the world probably switched to yet another fancy
> > >>
> > >> JavaScript
> > >>
> > >> > > ui
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > library. At least the will make it easy to stay up to date with
> the
> > >> > >
> > >> > > latest
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > version :)
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > I can't push a release to central, but perhaps Martin can do
> that
> > >>
> > >> when
> > >>
> > >> > > I'm
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > done? For now you can use a snapshot build. It works, but the UI
> > >> > > > API
> > >> > >
> > >> > > might
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > change a bit before the 8.0 release.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Best regards,
> > >> > > > Emond Papegaaij
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Op vr 1 jun. 2018 17:36 schreef Thomas Heigl <
> thomas@umschalt.com>:
> > >> > > > > Hi Ernesto,
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > I'm not sure how many people are still using it. But as I
> said,
> > >> > > > > my
> > >> > >
> > >> > > project
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > > heavily depends on it.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > @papegaaij has resolved all the compile errors against
> 8.0.0-M9 (
> > >> > > > > https://github.com/wicketstuff/wiquery) and a simple release
> of
> > >>
> > >> 8.0.0
> > >>
> > >> > > > > would
> > >> > > > > be enough for me.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Best,
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Thomas
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 5:05 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > reiern70@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > > > > > Hi,
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > I do not know who is actually using this project. I use to
> > >> > >
> > >> > > contribute to
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > > it
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > > a few years ago. I haven't used it for ages..
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 3:39 PM, Thomas Heigl <
> > >>
> > >> thomas@umschalt.com>
> > >>
> > >> > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > Hi,
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > Following the release of Wicket 8.0.0 and WicketStuff
> 8.0.0,
> > >>
> > >> could
> > >>
> > >> > > > > > somebody
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > please cut a release of WiQuery compatible with the new
> > >>
> > >> version?
> > >>
> > >> > > > > > > Our application still heavily relies on WiQuery and we
> can't
> > >>
> > >> move
> > >>
> > >> > > to
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > > > Wicket
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > 8 without it.
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > Best,
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > Thomas
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > --
> > >> > > > > > Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
> > >> > >
> > >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> > >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> > >>
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>

Re: Release WiQuery for Wicket 8

Posted by Emond Papegaaij <em...@topicus.nl>.
I've fixed the problem. The setup currently used is discouraged and broken in 
m2e, but I don't feel like restructuring the whole thing to get rid of this 
test-jar.

Emond

On woensdag 6 juni 2018 11:57:43 CEST Thomas Heigl wrote:
> The culprit is:
> 
> https://github.com/wicketstuff/wiquery/commit/0235691174ceeede22b588d2f67868
> b940d9be3a
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 11:51 AM, Thomas Heigl <th...@umschalt.com> wrote:
> > `mvn clean install` fails for me because no test-jar is built for the core
> > module:
> > 
> > [INFO] WiQuery Parent 8.0-SNAPSHOT ........................ SUCCESS [
> > 
> >>  0.353 s]
> >> 
> >> [INFO] WiQuery Core Project ............................... SUCCESS [
> >> 
> >>  2.673 s]
> >> 
> >> [INFO] WiQuery jQuery UI Project .......................... FAILURE [
> >> 
> >>  0.023 s]
> >> 
> >> [INFO] WiQuery Demo Project 8.0-SNAPSHOT .................. SKIPPED
> >> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------
> >> ------------
> >> [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> >> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------
> >> ------------
> >> [INFO] Total time: 3.720 s
> >> [INFO] Finished at: 2018-06-06T11:48:16+02:00
> >> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------
> >> ------------
> >> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project wiquery-jquery-ui: Could not
> >> resolve dependencies for project org.wicketstuff.wiquery:
> >> wiquery-jquery-ui:jar:8.0-SNAPSHOT: Failure to find
> >> org.wicketstuff.wiquery:wiquery-core:jar:tests:8.0-SNAPSHOT in
> >> https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots was cached in
> >> the local repository, resolution will not be reattempted until the update
> >> interval of sonatype-nexus-snapshots has elapsed or updates are forced ->
> >> [Help 1]
> >> [ERROR]
> > 
> > Did you change something about test-jar configuration? I do not see
> > `test-jar` generation enabled in the POM file.
> > 
> > On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 11:43 AM, Emond Papegaaij <
> > 
> > emond.papegaaij@topicus.nl> wrote:
> >> Hi Thomas,
> >> 
> >> The easiest way is to just run 'mvn install' and depend on 8.0-SNAPSHOT.
> >> I did
> >> not do a release, as I cannot push to central. If you want to run your
> >> tests
> >> on some CI server, you probably have to push the artifacts to a local
> >> repo
> >> also.
> >> 
> >> Best regards,
> >> Emond
> >> 
> >> On woensdag 6 juni 2018 11:36:54 CEST Thomas Heigl wrote:
> >> > Hi Emond,
> >> > 
> >> > How can I test this? Did you do a milestone release or do I have to
> >> 
> >> build
> >> 
> >> > from source and push to my local artifact repo?
> >> > 
> >> > Best,
> >> > 
> >> > Thomas
> >> > 
> >> > On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 3:01 PM, Emond Papegaaij <
> >> 
> >> emond.papegaaij@topicus.nl>
> >> 
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > I've just pushed a massive upgrade of all components. Removed all
> >> > > deprecated
> >> > > parts, upgraded jQuery UI to 1.12.1 and did some more cleanup and
> >> > > refactoring.
> >> > > Please test the changes in your project. The tests pass and the demo
> >> 
> >> runs
> >> 
> >> > > fine, but my project only uses a limited set of the UI components.
> >> > > 
> >> > > Best regards,
> >> > > Emond
> >> > > 
> >> > > On zaterdag 2 juni 2018 10:31:31 CEST you wrote:
> >> > > > I'm planning to upgrade jQuery UI to the latest version next week.
> >> 
> >> We
> >> 
> >> > > > are
> >> > > > currently migrating all our applications to wicket 8 and also
> >> 
> >> depend on
> >> 
> >> > > > wiquery quite a lot. It does however seem that jQuery UI is mostly
> >> 
> >> dead.
> >> 
> >> > > > The rest of the world probably switched to yet another fancy
> >> 
> >> JavaScript
> >> 
> >> > > ui
> >> > > 
> >> > > > library. At least the will make it easy to stay up to date with the
> >> > > 
> >> > > latest
> >> > > 
> >> > > > version :)
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > I can't push a release to central, but perhaps Martin can do that
> >> 
> >> when
> >> 
> >> > > I'm
> >> > > 
> >> > > > done? For now you can use a snapshot build. It works, but the UI
> >> > > > API
> >> > > 
> >> > > might
> >> > > 
> >> > > > change a bit before the 8.0 release.
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > Best regards,
> >> > > > Emond Papegaaij
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > Op vr 1 jun. 2018 17:36 schreef Thomas Heigl <th...@umschalt.com>:
> >> > > > > Hi Ernesto,
> >> > > > > 
> >> > > > > I'm not sure how many people are still using it. But as I said,
> >> > > > > my
> >> > > 
> >> > > project
> >> > > 
> >> > > > > heavily depends on it.
> >> > > > > 
> >> > > > > @papegaaij has resolved all the compile errors against 8.0.0-M9 (
> >> > > > > https://github.com/wicketstuff/wiquery) and a simple release of
> >> 
> >> 8.0.0
> >> 
> >> > > > > would
> >> > > > > be enough for me.
> >> > > > > 
> >> > > > > Best,
> >> > > > > 
> >> > > > > Thomas
> >> > > > > 
> >> > > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 5:05 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> >> > > > > 
> >> > > > > reiern70@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > > > > Hi,
> >> > > > > > 
> >> > > > > > I do not know who is actually using this project. I use to
> >> > > 
> >> > > contribute to
> >> > > 
> >> > > > > it
> >> > > > > 
> >> > > > > > a few years ago. I haven't used it for ages..
> >> > > > > > 
> >> > > > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 3:39 PM, Thomas Heigl <
> >> 
> >> thomas@umschalt.com>
> >> 
> >> > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > Hi,
> >> > > > > > > 
> >> > > > > > > Following the release of Wicket 8.0.0 and WicketStuff 8.0.0,
> >> 
> >> could
> >> 
> >> > > > > > somebody
> >> > > > > > 
> >> > > > > > > please cut a release of WiQuery compatible with the new
> >> 
> >> version?
> >> 
> >> > > > > > > Our application still heavily relies on WiQuery and we can't
> >> 
> >> move
> >> 
> >> > > to
> >> > > 
> >> > > > > > Wicket
> >> > > > > > 
> >> > > > > > > 8 without it.
> >> > > > > > > 
> >> > > > > > > Best,
> >> > > > > > > 
> >> > > > > > > Thomas
> >> > > > > > 
> >> > > > > > --
> >> > > > > > Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
> >> > > 
> >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >> 
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org


Re: Release WiQuery for Wicket 8

Posted by Thomas Heigl <th...@umschalt.com>.
The culprit is:

https://github.com/wicketstuff/wiquery/commit/0235691174ceeede22b588d2f67868b940d9be3a

On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 11:51 AM, Thomas Heigl <th...@umschalt.com> wrote:

> `mvn clean install` fails for me because no test-jar is built for the core
> module:
>
> [INFO] WiQuery Parent 8.0-SNAPSHOT ........................ SUCCESS [
>>  0.353 s]
>> [INFO] WiQuery Core Project ............................... SUCCESS [
>>  2.673 s]
>> [INFO] WiQuery jQuery UI Project .......................... FAILURE [
>>  0.023 s]
>> [INFO] WiQuery Demo Project 8.0-SNAPSHOT .................. SKIPPED
>> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------
>> [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
>> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------
>> [INFO] Total time: 3.720 s
>> [INFO] Finished at: 2018-06-06T11:48:16+02:00
>> [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------
>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project wiquery-jquery-ui: Could not
>> resolve dependencies for project org.wicketstuff.wiquery:
>> wiquery-jquery-ui:jar:8.0-SNAPSHOT: Failure to find
>> org.wicketstuff.wiquery:wiquery-core:jar:tests:8.0-SNAPSHOT in
>> https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots was cached in
>> the local repository, resolution will not be reattempted until the update
>> interval of sonatype-nexus-snapshots has elapsed or updates are forced ->
>> [Help 1]
>> [ERROR]
>
>
> Did you change something about test-jar configuration? I do not see
> `test-jar` generation enabled in the POM file.
>
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 11:43 AM, Emond Papegaaij <
> emond.papegaaij@topicus.nl> wrote:
>
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> The easiest way is to just run 'mvn install' and depend on 8.0-SNAPSHOT.
>> I did
>> not do a release, as I cannot push to central. If you want to run your
>> tests
>> on some CI server, you probably have to push the artifacts to a local
>> repo
>> also.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Emond
>>
>> On woensdag 6 juni 2018 11:36:54 CEST Thomas Heigl wrote:
>> > Hi Emond,
>> >
>> > How can I test this? Did you do a milestone release or do I have to
>> build
>> > from source and push to my local artifact repo?
>> >
>> > Best,
>> >
>> > Thomas
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 3:01 PM, Emond Papegaaij <
>> emond.papegaaij@topicus.nl>
>> > wrote:
>> > > I've just pushed a massive upgrade of all components. Removed all
>> > > deprecated
>> > > parts, upgraded jQuery UI to 1.12.1 and did some more cleanup and
>> > > refactoring.
>> > > Please test the changes in your project. The tests pass and the demo
>> runs
>> > > fine, but my project only uses a limited set of the UI components.
>> > >
>> > > Best regards,
>> > > Emond
>> > >
>> > > On zaterdag 2 juni 2018 10:31:31 CEST you wrote:
>> > > > I'm planning to upgrade jQuery UI to the latest version next week.
>> We
>> > > > are
>> > > > currently migrating all our applications to wicket 8 and also
>> depend on
>> > > > wiquery quite a lot. It does however seem that jQuery UI is mostly
>> dead.
>> > > > The rest of the world probably switched to yet another fancy
>> JavaScript
>> > >
>> > > ui
>> > >
>> > > > library. At least the will make it easy to stay up to date with the
>> > >
>> > > latest
>> > >
>> > > > version :)
>> > > >
>> > > > I can't push a release to central, but perhaps Martin can do that
>> when
>> > >
>> > > I'm
>> > >
>> > > > done? For now you can use a snapshot build. It works, but the UI API
>> > >
>> > > might
>> > >
>> > > > change a bit before the 8.0 release.
>> > > >
>> > > > Best regards,
>> > > > Emond Papegaaij
>> > > >
>> > > > Op vr 1 jun. 2018 17:36 schreef Thomas Heigl <th...@umschalt.com>:
>> > > > > Hi Ernesto,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I'm not sure how many people are still using it. But as I said, my
>> > >
>> > > project
>> > >
>> > > > > heavily depends on it.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > @papegaaij has resolved all the compile errors against 8.0.0-M9 (
>> > > > > https://github.com/wicketstuff/wiquery) and a simple release of
>> 8.0.0
>> > > > > would
>> > > > > be enough for me.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Best,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Thomas
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 5:05 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
>> > > > >
>> > > > > reiern70@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > > > Hi,
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I do not know who is actually using this project. I use to
>> > >
>> > > contribute to
>> > >
>> > > > > it
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > a few years ago. I haven't used it for ages..
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 3:39 PM, Thomas Heigl <
>> thomas@umschalt.com>
>> > > > >
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > Hi,
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Following the release of Wicket 8.0.0 and WicketStuff 8.0.0,
>> could
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > somebody
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > please cut a release of WiQuery compatible with the new
>> version?
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Our application still heavily relies on WiQuery and we can't
>> move
>> > >
>> > > to
>> > >
>> > > > > > Wicket
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > 8 without it.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Best,
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Thomas
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > --
>> > > > > > Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
>> > >
>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>

Re: Release WiQuery for Wicket 8

Posted by Thomas Heigl <th...@umschalt.com>.
`mvn clean install` fails for me because no test-jar is built for the core
module:

[INFO] WiQuery Parent 8.0-SNAPSHOT ........................ SUCCESS [
>  0.353 s]
> [INFO] WiQuery Core Project ............................... SUCCESS [
>  2.673 s]
> [INFO] WiQuery jQuery UI Project .......................... FAILURE [
>  0.023 s]
> [INFO] WiQuery Demo Project 8.0-SNAPSHOT .................. SKIPPED
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Total time: 3.720 s
> [INFO] Finished at: 2018-06-06T11:48:16+02:00
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project wiquery-jquery-ui: Could not
> resolve dependencies for project
> org.wicketstuff.wiquery:wiquery-jquery-ui:jar:8.0-SNAPSHOT: Failure to find
> org.wicketstuff.wiquery:wiquery-core:jar:tests:8.0-SNAPSHOT in
> https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/snapshots was cached in the
> local repository, resolution will not be reattempted until the update
> interval of sonatype-nexus-snapshots has elapsed or updates are forced ->
> [Help 1]
> [ERROR]


Did you change something about test-jar configuration? I do not see
`test-jar` generation enabled in the POM file.

On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 11:43 AM, Emond Papegaaij <emond.papegaaij@topicus.nl
> wrote:

> Hi Thomas,
>
> The easiest way is to just run 'mvn install' and depend on 8.0-SNAPSHOT. I
> did
> not do a release, as I cannot push to central. If you want to run your
> tests
> on some CI server, you probably have to push the artifacts to a local repo
> also.
>
> Best regards,
> Emond
>
> On woensdag 6 juni 2018 11:36:54 CEST Thomas Heigl wrote:
> > Hi Emond,
> >
> > How can I test this? Did you do a milestone release or do I have to build
> > from source and push to my local artifact repo?
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Thomas
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 3:01 PM, Emond Papegaaij <
> emond.papegaaij@topicus.nl>
> > wrote:
> > > I've just pushed a massive upgrade of all components. Removed all
> > > deprecated
> > > parts, upgraded jQuery UI to 1.12.1 and did some more cleanup and
> > > refactoring.
> > > Please test the changes in your project. The tests pass and the demo
> runs
> > > fine, but my project only uses a limited set of the UI components.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Emond
> > >
> > > On zaterdag 2 juni 2018 10:31:31 CEST you wrote:
> > > > I'm planning to upgrade jQuery UI to the latest version next week. We
> > > > are
> > > > currently migrating all our applications to wicket 8 and also depend
> on
> > > > wiquery quite a lot. It does however seem that jQuery UI is mostly
> dead.
> > > > The rest of the world probably switched to yet another fancy
> JavaScript
> > >
> > > ui
> > >
> > > > library. At least the will make it easy to stay up to date with the
> > >
> > > latest
> > >
> > > > version :)
> > > >
> > > > I can't push a release to central, but perhaps Martin can do that
> when
> > >
> > > I'm
> > >
> > > > done? For now you can use a snapshot build. It works, but the UI API
> > >
> > > might
> > >
> > > > change a bit before the 8.0 release.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Emond Papegaaij
> > > >
> > > > Op vr 1 jun. 2018 17:36 schreef Thomas Heigl <th...@umschalt.com>:
> > > > > Hi Ernesto,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm not sure how many people are still using it. But as I said, my
> > >
> > > project
> > >
> > > > > heavily depends on it.
> > > > >
> > > > > @papegaaij has resolved all the compile errors against 8.0.0-M9 (
> > > > > https://github.com/wicketstuff/wiquery) and a simple release of
> 8.0.0
> > > > > would
> > > > > be enough for me.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thomas
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 5:05 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> > > > >
> > > > > reiern70@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I do not know who is actually using this project. I use to
> > >
> > > contribute to
> > >
> > > > > it
> > > > >
> > > > > > a few years ago. I haven't used it for ages..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 3:39 PM, Thomas Heigl <
> thomas@umschalt.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Following the release of Wicket 8.0.0 and WicketStuff 8.0.0,
> could
> > > > > >
> > > > > > somebody
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > please cut a release of WiQuery compatible with the new
> version?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Our application still heavily relies on WiQuery and we can't
> move
> > >
> > > to
> > >
> > > > > > Wicket
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > 8 without it.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thomas
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>

Re: Release WiQuery for Wicket 8

Posted by Emond Papegaaij <em...@topicus.nl>.
Hi Thomas,

The easiest way is to just run 'mvn install' and depend on 8.0-SNAPSHOT. I did 
not do a release, as I cannot push to central. If you want to run your tests 
on some CI server, you probably have to push the artifacts to a local repo 
also.

Best regards,
Emond

On woensdag 6 juni 2018 11:36:54 CEST Thomas Heigl wrote:
> Hi Emond,
> 
> How can I test this? Did you do a milestone release or do I have to build
> from source and push to my local artifact repo?
> 
> Best,
> 
> Thomas
> 
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 3:01 PM, Emond Papegaaij <em...@topicus.nl>
> wrote:
> > I've just pushed a massive upgrade of all components. Removed all
> > deprecated
> > parts, upgraded jQuery UI to 1.12.1 and did some more cleanup and
> > refactoring.
> > Please test the changes in your project. The tests pass and the demo runs
> > fine, but my project only uses a limited set of the UI components.
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Emond
> > 
> > On zaterdag 2 juni 2018 10:31:31 CEST you wrote:
> > > I'm planning to upgrade jQuery UI to the latest version next week. We
> > > are
> > > currently migrating all our applications to wicket 8 and also depend on
> > > wiquery quite a lot. It does however seem that jQuery UI is mostly dead.
> > > The rest of the world probably switched to yet another fancy JavaScript
> > 
> > ui
> > 
> > > library. At least the will make it easy to stay up to date with the
> > 
> > latest
> > 
> > > version :)
> > > 
> > > I can't push a release to central, but perhaps Martin can do that when
> > 
> > I'm
> > 
> > > done? For now you can use a snapshot build. It works, but the UI API
> > 
> > might
> > 
> > > change a bit before the 8.0 release.
> > > 
> > > Best regards,
> > > Emond Papegaaij
> > > 
> > > Op vr 1 jun. 2018 17:36 schreef Thomas Heigl <th...@umschalt.com>:
> > > > Hi Ernesto,
> > > > 
> > > > I'm not sure how many people are still using it. But as I said, my
> > 
> > project
> > 
> > > > heavily depends on it.
> > > > 
> > > > @papegaaij has resolved all the compile errors against 8.0.0-M9 (
> > > > https://github.com/wicketstuff/wiquery) and a simple release of 8.0.0
> > > > would
> > > > be enough for me.
> > > > 
> > > > Best,
> > > > 
> > > > Thomas
> > > > 
> > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 5:05 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> > > > 
> > > > reiern70@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > 
> > > > > I do not know who is actually using this project. I use to
> > 
> > contribute to
> > 
> > > > it
> > > > 
> > > > > a few years ago. I haven't used it for ages..
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 3:39 PM, Thomas Heigl <th...@umschalt.com>
> > > > 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Following the release of Wicket 8.0.0 and WicketStuff 8.0.0, could
> > > > > 
> > > > > somebody
> > > > > 
> > > > > > please cut a release of WiQuery compatible with the new version?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Our application still heavily relies on WiQuery and we can't move
> > 
> > to
> > 
> > > > > Wicket
> > > > > 
> > > > > > 8 without it.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Thomas
> > > > > 
> > > > > --
> > > > > Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org


Re: Release WiQuery for Wicket 8

Posted by Thomas Heigl <th...@umschalt.com>.
Hi Emond,

How can I test this? Did you do a milestone release or do I have to build
from source and push to my local artifact repo?

Best,

Thomas

On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 3:01 PM, Emond Papegaaij <em...@topicus.nl>
wrote:

> I've just pushed a massive upgrade of all components. Removed all
> deprecated
> parts, upgraded jQuery UI to 1.12.1 and did some more cleanup and
> refactoring.
> Please test the changes in your project. The tests pass and the demo runs
> fine, but my project only uses a limited set of the UI components.
>
> Best regards,
> Emond
>
> On zaterdag 2 juni 2018 10:31:31 CEST you wrote:
> > I'm planning to upgrade jQuery UI to the latest version next week. We are
> > currently migrating all our applications to wicket 8 and also depend on
> > wiquery quite a lot. It does however seem that jQuery UI is mostly dead.
> > The rest of the world probably switched to yet another fancy JavaScript
> ui
> > library. At least the will make it easy to stay up to date with the
> latest
> > version :)
> >
> > I can't push a release to central, but perhaps Martin can do that when
> I'm
> > done? For now you can use a snapshot build. It works, but the UI API
> might
> > change a bit before the 8.0 release.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Emond Papegaaij
> >
> > Op vr 1 jun. 2018 17:36 schreef Thomas Heigl <th...@umschalt.com>:
> > > Hi Ernesto,
> > >
> > > I'm not sure how many people are still using it. But as I said, my
> project
> > > heavily depends on it.
> > >
> > > @papegaaij has resolved all the compile errors against 8.0.0-M9 (
> > > https://github.com/wicketstuff/wiquery) and a simple release of 8.0.0
> > > would
> > > be enough for me.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > >
> > > Thomas
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 5:05 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> > >
> > > reiern70@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I do not know who is actually using this project. I use to
> contribute to
> > >
> > > it
> > >
> > > > a few years ago. I haven't used it for ages..
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 3:39 PM, Thomas Heigl <th...@umschalt.com>
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > Following the release of Wicket 8.0.0 and WicketStuff 8.0.0, could
> > > >
> > > > somebody
> > > >
> > > > > please cut a release of WiQuery compatible with the new version?
> > > > >
> > > > > Our application still heavily relies on WiQuery and we can't move
> to
> > > >
> > > > Wicket
> > > >
> > > > > 8 without it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thomas
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>

Re: Release WiQuery for Wicket 8

Posted by Emond Papegaaij <em...@topicus.nl>.
I've just pushed a massive upgrade of all components. Removed all deprecated 
parts, upgraded jQuery UI to 1.12.1 and did some more cleanup and refactoring. 
Please test the changes in your project. The tests pass and the demo runs 
fine, but my project only uses a limited set of the UI components.

Best regards,
Emond

On zaterdag 2 juni 2018 10:31:31 CEST you wrote:
> I'm planning to upgrade jQuery UI to the latest version next week. We are
> currently migrating all our applications to wicket 8 and also depend on
> wiquery quite a lot. It does however seem that jQuery UI is mostly dead.
> The rest of the world probably switched to yet another fancy JavaScript ui
> library. At least the will make it easy to stay up to date with the latest
> version :)
> 
> I can't push a release to central, but perhaps Martin can do that when I'm
> done? For now you can use a snapshot build. It works, but the UI API might
> change a bit before the 8.0 release.
> 
> Best regards,
> Emond Papegaaij
> 
> Op vr 1 jun. 2018 17:36 schreef Thomas Heigl <th...@umschalt.com>:
> > Hi Ernesto,
> > 
> > I'm not sure how many people are still using it. But as I said, my project
> > heavily depends on it.
> > 
> > @papegaaij has resolved all the compile errors against 8.0.0-M9 (
> > https://github.com/wicketstuff/wiquery) and a simple release of 8.0.0
> > would
> > be enough for me.
> > 
> > Best,
> > 
> > Thomas
> > 
> > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 5:05 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> > 
> > reiern70@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > I do not know who is actually using this project. I use to contribute to
> > 
> > it
> > 
> > > a few years ago. I haven't used it for ages..
> > > 
> > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 3:39 PM, Thomas Heigl <th...@umschalt.com>
> > 
> > wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > Following the release of Wicket 8.0.0 and WicketStuff 8.0.0, could
> > > 
> > > somebody
> > > 
> > > > please cut a release of WiQuery compatible with the new version?
> > > > 
> > > > Our application still heavily relies on WiQuery and we can't move to
> > > 
> > > Wicket
> > > 
> > > > 8 without it.
> > > > 
> > > > Best,
> > > > 
> > > > Thomas
> > > 
> > > --
> > > Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org


Re: Release WiQuery for Wicket 8

Posted by Emond Papegaaij <em...@gmail.com>.
I'm planning to upgrade jQuery UI to the latest version next week. We are
currently migrating all our applications to wicket 8 and also depend on
wiquery quite a lot. It does however seem that jQuery UI is mostly dead.
The rest of the world probably switched to yet another fancy JavaScript ui
library. At least the will make it easy to stay up to date with the latest
version :)

I can't push a release to central, but perhaps Martin can do that when I'm
done? For now you can use a snapshot build. It works, but the UI API might
change a bit before the 8.0 release.

Best regards,
Emond Papegaaij


Op vr 1 jun. 2018 17:36 schreef Thomas Heigl <th...@umschalt.com>:

> Hi Ernesto,
>
> I'm not sure how many people are still using it. But as I said, my project
> heavily depends on it.
>
> @papegaaij has resolved all the compile errors against 8.0.0-M9 (
> https://github.com/wicketstuff/wiquery) and a simple release of 8.0.0
> would
> be enough for me.
>
> Best,
>
> Thomas
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 5:05 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
> reiern70@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I do not know who is actually using this project. I use to contribute to
> it
> > a few years ago. I haven't used it for ages..
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 3:39 PM, Thomas Heigl <th...@umschalt.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Following the release of Wicket 8.0.0 and WicketStuff 8.0.0, could
> > somebody
> > > please cut a release of WiQuery compatible with the new version?
> > >
> > > Our application still heavily relies on WiQuery and we can't move to
> > Wicket
> > > 8 without it.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > >
> > > Thomas
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
> >
>

Re: Release WiQuery for Wicket 8

Posted by Thomas Heigl <th...@umschalt.com>.
Hi Ernesto,

I'm not sure how many people are still using it. But as I said, my project
heavily depends on it.

@papegaaij has resolved all the compile errors against 8.0.0-M9 (
https://github.com/wicketstuff/wiquery) and a simple release of 8.0.0 would
be enough for me.

Best,

Thomas

On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 5:05 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
reiern70@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I do not know who is actually using this project. I use to contribute to it
> a few years ago. I haven't used it for ages..
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 3:39 PM, Thomas Heigl <th...@umschalt.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Following the release of Wicket 8.0.0 and WicketStuff 8.0.0, could
> somebody
> > please cut a release of WiQuery compatible with the new version?
> >
> > Our application still heavily relies on WiQuery and we can't move to
> Wicket
> > 8 without it.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Thomas
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
>

Re: Release WiQuery for Wicket 8

Posted by Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <re...@gmail.com>.
Hi,

I do not know who is actually using this project. I use to contribute to it
a few years ago. I haven't used it for ages..

On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 3:39 PM, Thomas Heigl <th...@umschalt.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Following the release of Wicket 8.0.0 and WicketStuff 8.0.0, could somebody
> please cut a release of WiQuery compatible with the new version?
>
> Our application still heavily relies on WiQuery and we can't move to Wicket
> 8 without it.
>
> Best,
>
> Thomas
>



-- 
Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro