Reading mails carefully (was Re: Dispatcher gives stack overflow)

[Thorsten Scherler <th...@apache.org>]

Hi all, hi Ross,

to recall the context:

El jue, 19-01-2006 a las 18:38 +0100, Thorsten Scherler escribió:
...
> Bottom line, to point this out all the time does not fix it, you can
> either wait for the final dispatcher release or fix it yourself. 
> 
> Sorry, ATM I am busy to bring up lenya zones and have a basic
> infrastructure to work on the doco pub (lenya publication - forrest
> rendering). As soon as I have lenya zones working like I want it, I
> will
> focus my time again to release the dispatcher (Cyriaque brought us
> closer to this point on forrest Friday, thanks again).
> 
> Till then 783 is for me a wont-fix since it will be fixed in the final
> release with the rewrite of v2.
> 
> P.S.: you know me, but again I want to point out no offense intended
> at
> any time. ;-)

I say 
a) to bring the issue up often, does not fix it (as a matter of fact)
b) that it will be fixed in the final release (as compromise)
c) I would not be available to help because I am busy (as explanation)
d) state when the issue will be solved (after finishing setting up
lenya.zones - the explanation why I am busy ATM)
e) point again to the well known jira issue FOR-783 (as well mail
archive recorded, where you can find further mails related to this
issue) 

...and last but not least explicit state "no offense intended at
> any time. ;-)"

Ross gives the following reply:

El jue, 19-01-2006 a las 19:40 +0000, Ross Gardler escribió:
> Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> > 
...
> >>I'll have another look at it when I have a refreshed head in the 
> >>morning. But I want to flag this up as another really good example why 
> >>we need remove this indirection as Tim suggested (see 
> >>http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOR-783 )
> 
> <snip/>
> 
> > Bottom line, to point this out all the time does not fix it, you can
> > either wait for the final dispatcher release or fix it yourself. 
> 
> Please, lets not go down this particular route again. Nobody has asked 
> you to fix anything. Please do not take things personally.
> 
> My mail clearly states I will look at it again when I have time and a 
> clear head (see quoted text above). In the meantime I believe it is 
> helpful to us all if this kind of problem is documented in our mail 
> archives so that we can all learn from it.

Now I am a bit confused. 

Who is taking things personally?

Please read mails carefully (I as well fail on this far too often). 

salu2
-- 
thorsten

"Together we stand, divided we fall!" 
Hey you (Pink Floyd)