You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Mahadev Konar <ma...@apache.org> on 2013/03/11 01:24:18 UTC
[VOTE] Apache Ambari (incubating) 1.2.1 Release Candidate RC0.
Hi everyone,
This is a call for a vote to release Apache Ambari 1.2.1 incubating. A vote
was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 6+1's with 5 of them
binding.
mahadev (IPMC, PPMC)
ddas (IPMC, PPMC)
acmurthy (IPMC)
jitendra (PPMC)
yusaku (PPMC)
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ambari-dev/201303.mbox/%3CCALF7aMQpzbUDT3_A=4RUMvQk+y6pq5SgnsL4jR-zYPUO1R0Mxw@mail.gmail.com%3E
The staging Staging site is:
http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/ambari-1.2.1-incubating-rc0/
with user docs at:
http://incubator.apache.org/ambari/1.2.1/installing-hadoop-using-ambari/content/index.html
and dev docs at:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AMBARI/Ambari+Development
SVN source tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ambari/tags/release-1.2.1-rc0
PGP release keys (signed using 8EE2F25C)
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x0DFF492D8EE2F25C
One can look into the issues fixed in this release at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20AMBARI%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%221.2.1%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
Vote will be open for 72 hours.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
thanks
mahadev
[CANCEL][VOTE] Apache Ambari (incubating) 1.2.1 Release Candidate RC0.
Posted by Hitesh Shah <hi...@hortonworks.com>.
Closing out this vote for the votes monitor to catch. 1.2.1 RC1 was voted on and released quite some time back.
-- Hitesh
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Ambari (incubating) 1.2.1 Release Candidate RC0.
Posted by Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org>.
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> At least
>> in Hadoop ecosystem I know of no other project that provides a combined
>> bundle for the checksums.
>
>
> Have you looked at the Hadoop releases?
>
> http://www.us.apache.org/dist/hadoop/common/hadoop-1.1.2/
That's why I was very careful in phrasing my statement: "hadoop *ecosystem*" (*)
since I didn't want to get into the argument around the fact that it
may be beneficial
for Apache Hadoop project itself to reconsider its release practices
around producing
message digest information.
But regardless, there's no reason for a podling not to follow established
practices that a majority of ASF release do follow.
Thanks,
Roman.
(*) it is like saying Earth's ecosystem -- the planet itself doesn't count :-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Ambari (incubating) 1.2.1 Release Candidate RC0.
Posted by Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org>.
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org> wrote:
> At least
> in Hadoop ecosystem I know of no other project that provides a combined
> bundle for the checksums.
Have you looked at the Hadoop releases?
http://www.us.apache.org/dist/hadoop/common/hadoop-1.1.2/
-- Owen
Re: [VOTE] Apache Ambari (incubating) 1.2.1 Release Candidate RC0.
Posted by Roman Shaposhnik <rv...@apache.org>.
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 8:13 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The ambari-1.2.1-incubating.tar.gz.mds file is wrong; there should be
>> separate files for each hash type.
>> Normally only MD5 and SHA are provided.
>>
>
> In what way are they "wrong?" It is a perfectly well defined output format
> that is the preferred one for Ambari. Depending on MD5 or even SHA1 for
> tamper detection is in fact wrong.
Is there any particular reason to introduce this type of inconsistency? At least
in Hadoop ecosystem I know of no other project that provides a combined
bundle for the checksums. This makes the job of the tools that automatically
download apache tarballs and ingest them into a build pipeline more complicated
without much obvious benefit.
Thanks,
Roman.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Ambari (incubating) 1.2.1 Release Candidate RC0.
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 11 March 2013 20:17, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 8:13 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The ambari-1.2.1-incubating.tar.gz.mds file is wrong; there should be
>> separate files for each hash type.
>> Normally only MD5 and SHA are provided.
>>
>
> In what way are they "wrong?" It is a perfectly well defined output format
> that is the preferred one for Ambari. Depending on MD5 or even SHA1 for
> tamper detection is in fact wrong.
[So why are those two in the mds file?!]
But that's not the primary intention of the hashes anyway; hashes are
intended for checking that a download has succeeded.
Proper tamper detection requires signatures.
> -- Owen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Ambari (incubating) 1.2.1 Release Candidate RC0.
Posted by Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org>.
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 8:13 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
The ambari-1.2.1-incubating.tar.gz.mds file is wrong; there should be
> separate files for each hash type.
> Normally only MD5 and SHA are provided.
>
In what way are they "wrong?" It is a perfectly well defined output format
that is the preferred one for Ambari. Depending on MD5 or even SHA1 for
tamper detection is in fact wrong.
-- Owen
Re: [VOTE] Apache Ambari (incubating) 1.2.1 Release Candidate RC0.
Posted by Mahadev Konar <ma...@hortonworks.com>.
Thanks for taking a look Seb.
Let me mix the issues you mentioned and Ill upload a new tarball.
thanks
mahadev
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 8:13 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11 March 2013 00:24, Mahadev Konar <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Ambari 1.2.1 incubating. A
> vote
> > was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 6+1's with 5 of
> them
> > binding.
> >
> > mahadev (IPMC, PPMC)
> > ddas (IPMC, PPMC)
> > acmurthy (IPMC)
> > jitendra (PPMC)
> > yusaku (PPMC)
> >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ambari-dev/201303.mbox/%3CCALF7aMQpzbUDT3_A=4RUMvQk+y6pq5SgnsL4jR-zYPUO1R0Mxw@mail.gmail.com%3E
> >
> >
> > The staging Staging site is:
> > http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/ambari-1.2.1-incubating-rc0/
>
> The ambari-1.2.1-incubating.tar.gz.mds file is wrong; there should be
> separate files for each hash type.
> Normally only MD5 and SHA are provided.
>
> The archive file does not match the source tag, as it contains lots of
> .pyc files, i.e. compiled Python source.
> These should not be present in the source archive, and I would not
> expect to find them under a /src/ directory in any archive.
>
> > with user docs at:
> >
> http://incubator.apache.org/ambari/1.2.1/installing-hadoop-using-ambari/content/index.html
> > and dev docs at:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AMBARI/Ambari+Development
> >
> > SVN source tag:
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ambari/tags/release-1.2.1-rc0
>
> The NOTICE file does not have the correct format - in particular the
> component name is missing.
> Also the year looks wrong, and there is a typo in the 4th line.
>
> The file should start
>
> Apache Ambari
> Copyright year(s) The Apache Software Foundation
>
> This product includes software developed at The Apache Software
>
> Note: "developed at" not "developed by"
>
> See http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice-text
>
> As far as I can tell from the quoted license, it looks to me like the
> Puppet module does not require attribution, so should not appear in
> the NOTICE file
>
> The KEYS file does not have a header for the second key
>
> There are a lot of files without AL headers.
> Some of these are the Puppet source; some are JSON which unfortunately
> does not support comments, but there are others that could and should
> have AL headers.
>
> > PGP release keys (signed using 8EE2F25C)
> > http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x0DFF492D8EE2F25C
> >
> > One can look into the issues fixed in this release at
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20AMBARI%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%221.2.1%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
>
> Other issues: the website does not have a disclaimer, nor does it have
> an obvious link back to the Incubator or the ASF site.
> There are some other missing required elements.
>
> The License links must point to http://www.apache.org/licenses/
> The prinary mention of the Ambari name must use as an adjective (The
> Ford car is blue) an *not* a noun (The Ford is blue)
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Ambari (incubating) 1.2.1 Release Candidate RC0.
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 11 March 2013 00:24, Mahadev Konar <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Ambari 1.2.1 incubating. A vote
> was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 6+1's with 5 of them
> binding.
>
> mahadev (IPMC, PPMC)
> ddas (IPMC, PPMC)
> acmurthy (IPMC)
> jitendra (PPMC)
> yusaku (PPMC)
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ambari-dev/201303.mbox/%3CCALF7aMQpzbUDT3_A=4RUMvQk+y6pq5SgnsL4jR-zYPUO1R0Mxw@mail.gmail.com%3E
>
>
> The staging Staging site is:
> http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/ambari-1.2.1-incubating-rc0/
The ambari-1.2.1-incubating.tar.gz.mds file is wrong; there should be
separate files for each hash type.
Normally only MD5 and SHA are provided.
The archive file does not match the source tag, as it contains lots of
.pyc files, i.e. compiled Python source.
These should not be present in the source archive, and I would not
expect to find them under a /src/ directory in any archive.
> with user docs at:
> http://incubator.apache.org/ambari/1.2.1/installing-hadoop-using-ambari/content/index.html
> and dev docs at:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AMBARI/Ambari+Development
>
> SVN source tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ambari/tags/release-1.2.1-rc0
The NOTICE file does not have the correct format - in particular the
component name is missing.
Also the year looks wrong, and there is a typo in the 4th line.
The file should start
Apache Ambari
Copyright year(s) The Apache Software Foundation
This product includes software developed at The Apache Software
Note: "developed at" not "developed by"
See http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice-text
As far as I can tell from the quoted license, it looks to me like the
Puppet module does not require attribution, so should not appear in
the NOTICE file
The KEYS file does not have a header for the second key
There are a lot of files without AL headers.
Some of these are the Puppet source; some are JSON which unfortunately
does not support comments, but there are others that could and should
have AL headers.
> PGP release keys (signed using 8EE2F25C)
> http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x0DFF492D8EE2F25C
>
> One can look into the issues fixed in this release at
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20AMBARI%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%221.2.1%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Resolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
Other issues: the website does not have a disclaimer, nor does it have
an obvious link back to the Incubator or the ASF site.
There are some other missing required elements.
The License links must point to http://www.apache.org/licenses/
The prinary mention of the Ambari name must use as an adjective (The
Ford car is blue) an *not* a noun (The Ford is blue)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org