You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ant.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2004/11/07 17:45:09 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32105] -
sync task behavior @ 11:05 pm on 10/31
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32105>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32105
sync task behavior @ 11:05 pm on 10/31
------- Additional Comments From ant@kruithof.xs4all.nl 2004-11-07 16:45 -------
Even if sync would have thought it would be the next day, the comparison between
the timestamps of two files should not suffer from that. Did the copy involve a
single machine only, or two different machines?
In case two different machines were involved, where the clocks of the two
machines in sync? (did both switch from summer time to winter time?)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org