You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org> on 2017/03/06 17:27:58 UTC
Artemis 1.5.4 release?
Hey guys
Just wondering, is there a plan right now for a 1.5.4? Romain's blocked a
bit on the issue he reported this morning (morning my time at least) so I
wanted to get him something to help fix it this week if possible.
If there is no plan, I can execute the release steps to prep a release and
call a vote. Thoughts?
John
Re: Artemis 1.5.4 release?
Posted by Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org>.
I see no problem with releasing from multiple branches.
Justin
----- Original Message -----
From: "Timothy Bish" <ta...@gmail.com>
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Sent: Monday, March 6, 2017 2:14:52 PM
Subject: Re: Artemis 1.5.4 release?
On 03/06/2017 03:02 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
> Does he need a 1.5.4? or a 2.0.0 would work?
>
> With the refactoring I just finished I think a 2.0 is eminent to go
> out soon. I had proposed the refactoring I just finished and I had
> held 2.0 before for it.. so I think it's ready to go now.
>
>
> I think the next to be released would be 2.0...
Projects like Camel do multiple releases without issue. Asking someone
to jump from 1.5.x to 2.0.x is a major version bump with significant
risk, so providing a bug fix release is a nice thing to do for the
community. If someone offers to run a release I wouldn't discourage
them from doing so.
> Unless it wouldn't be too overwhelming to release both 1.5.4 and 2.0.0
> at the same time.
>
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 12:27 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hey guys
>>
>> Just wondering, is there a plan right now for a 1.5.4? Romain's blocked a
>> bit on the issue he reported this morning (morning my time at least) so I
>> wanted to get him something to help fix it this week if possible.
>>
>> If there is no plan, I can execute the release steps to prep a release and
>> call a vote. Thoughts?
>>
>> John
>
>
--
Tim Bish
twitter: @tabish121
blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
Re: Artemis 1.5.4 release?
Posted by Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com>.
Yes. There are users who reported issues that have been fixed and ported
to the 1.x branch. Let's get a 1.5.4 out the door asap to get these users
unblocked.
Cheers
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 11:45 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 6:42 PM Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > >>
> > > Big +1
> > > Even if we have a 2.0 coming soon, maintaining old versions should be
> > easy
> > > enough to help those that may need it.
> >
> >
> > I have been supporter of 1.x for a while.. I wouldn't let it go away
> > for sure. I was just afraid of spamming too many releases all at once.
> > it was a new thing for me.. didn't mean to imply I'm not supporting
> > it..
> >
> >
> > >
> > > So far it sounds like there would be no objections to cutting the
> current
> > > 1.x branch as a 1.5.4, so I can plan to start that process tomorrow
> > evening.
> >
> > It would be actually awesome if you dit it actually. consider this
> > thread a HEADS UP already. 1.x is in good shape for a release.
> >
>
>
> I did just resolve an issue I saw you commit with Jiri earlier. There's 2
> still open with fix versions of 1.5.4. 1 looks like the user has a
> permissions change that went in to fix it so maybe not critical, the other
> I'll wait for Justin to comment on..
>
> https://s.apache.org/artemis-v154
>
> John
>
Re: Artemis 1.5.4 release?
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 6:42 PM Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >>
> > Big +1
> > Even if we have a 2.0 coming soon, maintaining old versions should be
> easy
> > enough to help those that may need it.
>
>
> I have been supporter of 1.x for a while.. I wouldn't let it go away
> for sure. I was just afraid of spamming too many releases all at once.
> it was a new thing for me.. didn't mean to imply I'm not supporting
> it..
>
>
> >
> > So far it sounds like there would be no objections to cutting the current
> > 1.x branch as a 1.5.4, so I can plan to start that process tomorrow
> evening.
>
> It would be actually awesome if you dit it actually. consider this
> thread a HEADS UP already. 1.x is in good shape for a release.
>
I did just resolve an issue I saw you commit with Jiri earlier. There's 2
still open with fix versions of 1.5.4. 1 looks like the user has a
permissions change that went in to fix it so maybe not critical, the other
I'll wait for Justin to comment on..
https://s.apache.org/artemis-v154
John
Re: Artemis 1.5.4 release?
Posted by Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>.
>>
> Big +1
> Even if we have a 2.0 coming soon, maintaining old versions should be easy
> enough to help those that may need it.
I have been supporter of 1.x for a while.. I wouldn't let it go away
for sure. I was just afraid of spamming too many releases all at once.
it was a new thing for me.. didn't mean to imply I'm not supporting
it..
>
> So far it sounds like there would be no objections to cutting the current
> 1.x branch as a 1.5.4, so I can plan to start that process tomorrow evening.
It would be actually awesome if you dit it actually. consider this
thread a HEADS UP already. 1.x is in good shape for a release.
Re: Artemis 1.5.4 release?
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:21 PM Timothy Bish <ta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 03/06/2017 03:02 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
> > Does he need a 1.5.4? or a 2.0.0 would work?
> >
> > With the refactoring I just finished I think a 2.0 is eminent to go
> > out soon. I had proposed the refactoring I just finished and I had
> > held 2.0 before for it.. so I think it's ready to go now.
> >
> >
> > I think the next to be released would be 2.0...
>
> Projects like Camel do multiple releases without issue. Asking someone
> to jump from 1.5.x to 2.0.x is a major version bump with significant
> risk, so providing a bug fix release is a nice thing to do for the
> community. If someone offers to run a release I wouldn't discourage
> them from doing so.
>
>
Big +1
Even if we have a 2.0 coming soon, maintaining old versions should be easy
enough to help those that may need it.
So far it sounds like there would be no objections to cutting the current
1.x branch as a 1.5.4, so I can plan to start that process tomorrow evening.
> > Unless it wouldn't be too overwhelming to release both 1.5.4 and 2.0.0
> > at the same time.
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 12:27 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> Hey guys
> >>
> >> Just wondering, is there a plan right now for a 1.5.4? Romain's
> blocked a
> >> bit on the issue he reported this morning (morning my time at least) so
> I
> >> wanted to get him something to help fix it this week if possible.
> >>
> >> If there is no plan, I can execute the release steps to prep a release
> and
> >> call a vote. Thoughts?
> >>
> >> John
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Tim Bish
> twitter: @tabish121
> blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
>
>
Re: Artemis 1.5.4 release?
Posted by Timothy Bish <ta...@gmail.com>.
On 03/06/2017 03:02 PM, Clebert Suconic wrote:
> Does he need a 1.5.4? or a 2.0.0 would work?
>
> With the refactoring I just finished I think a 2.0 is eminent to go
> out soon. I had proposed the refactoring I just finished and I had
> held 2.0 before for it.. so I think it's ready to go now.
>
>
> I think the next to be released would be 2.0...
Projects like Camel do multiple releases without issue. Asking someone
to jump from 1.5.x to 2.0.x is a major version bump with significant
risk, so providing a bug fix release is a nice thing to do for the
community. If someone offers to run a release I wouldn't discourage
them from doing so.
> Unless it wouldn't be too overwhelming to release both 1.5.4 and 2.0.0
> at the same time.
>
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 12:27 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hey guys
>>
>> Just wondering, is there a plan right now for a 1.5.4? Romain's blocked a
>> bit on the issue he reported this morning (morning my time at least) so I
>> wanted to get him something to help fix it this week if possible.
>>
>> If there is no plan, I can execute the release steps to prep a release and
>> call a vote. Thoughts?
>>
>> John
>
>
--
Tim Bish
twitter: @tabish121
blog: http://timbish.blogspot.com/
Re: Artemis 1.5.4 release?
Posted by Clebert Suconic <cl...@gmail.com>.
Does he need a 1.5.4? or a 2.0.0 would work?
With the refactoring I just finished I think a 2.0 is eminent to go
out soon. I had proposed the refactoring I just finished and I had
held 2.0 before for it.. so I think it's ready to go now.
I think the next to be released would be 2.0...
Unless it wouldn't be too overwhelming to release both 1.5.4 and 2.0.0
at the same time.
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 12:27 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hey guys
>
> Just wondering, is there a plan right now for a 1.5.4? Romain's blocked a
> bit on the issue he reported this morning (morning my time at least) so I
> wanted to get him something to help fix it this week if possible.
>
> If there is no plan, I can execute the release steps to prep a release and
> call a vote. Thoughts?
>
> John
--
Clebert Suconic
Re: Artemis 1.5.4 release?
Posted by Justin Bertram <jb...@apache.org>.
I'm not aware of any existing plans for a 1.5.4 release, but given the number of fixes it's probably warranted. Here's what 'git log' prints:
$ git log 1.5.3..1.x --oneline
b582524 ARTEMIS-919 JMS reloader reading core queues
fbdac0c ARTEMIS-1002 Use default PooledBufferAllocator in ActiveMQBuffers
e795246 ARTEMIS-999 Add support for Oracle12C
e5fde97 NO-JIRA Database Page Store Improvements
01075ae ARTEMIS-998 Fix NPE in JDBC FileDriver when BLOB is null
84acb2f ARTEMIS-986 fix int overflow
19b3ad9 NO-JIRA fixing merge script on 1.x
2f68737 ARTEMIS-995 adding teardown in a few tests
cea51be This closes #1046
a4b33bb ARTEMIS-995 Bulk of test fixes
20d627f ARTEMIS-989 fixing test after cherry-picking
2b18db6 ARTEMIS-992 deal w/bad connector-ref in cluster-cxn
1f054f0 ARTEMIS-991 handle odd password input
4ddd969 ARTEMIS-989 JMS2 context support custom session modes
a79cf3b NO-JIRA Cherry-pick fix
7553e48 NO-JIRA Send MQTT WILL outside of Server Session
779a19d Revert "NO-JIRA Remove Property shouldn't invalidate buffer if not found"
f492bd9 NO-JIRA Remove Property shouldn't invalidate buffer if not found
6d0f282 ARTEMIS-976: PostgresSequentialSequentialFileDriver SQLProvider NPE fix
f082185 ARTEMIS-974 ensure will messages are retained
64968af NO-JIRA: Removing spurious debug message
446523f NO-JIRA: fixing alignment on test
c5c50c5 ARTEMIS-969 Unecessary buffer expansion on message delivery
b058532 ARTEMIS-908: Replace lock by CAS to avoid deadlock
be37020 [ARTEMIS-963] Prevent ClassCastException in ActiveMQChannelHandler
e47b5d6 NO-JIRA Fix after cherry-pick
b398864 NO-JIRA Clean up around MQTTConnectionManager
f25396d ARTMEIS-958 Route Will message outside server session
66c19d9 ARTEMIS-960 Do not encode Will messages
16f3659 [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration
Justin
----- Original Message -----
From: "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>
To: dev@activemq.apache.org
Sent: Monday, March 6, 2017 11:27:58 AM
Subject: Artemis 1.5.4 release?
Hey guys
Just wondering, is there a plan right now for a 1.5.4? Romain's blocked a
bit on the issue he reported this morning (morning my time at least) so I
wanted to get him something to help fix it this week if possible.
If there is no plan, I can execute the release steps to prep a release and
call a vote. Thoughts?
John