Re: mass-checks flux redux

[Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


+1 once the patch for --reuse is in.  I'd *really* like to see 4460 in,
too... if that has enough votes, I'd recommend getting that in too.

Also, I suspect we may have to do a little work even after a successful
mass-check, based on the FP/FN figure that Daniel mentioned on IRC, so the
hard schedule I'd posted shouldn't be considered entirely likely...

- --j.

Henry Stern writes:
> +1
> 
> Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> > I propose we start over with the rules unzeroed (not a massively
> > significant change, but I think it is helpful) and Michael's reuse patch
> > so messages without X-Spam-Status will have non-realtime results (a more
> > significant change).  Please vote on this and we'll repeat the process.
> >
> > Daniel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS

iD8DBQFC0eTSMJF5cimLx9ARAiKJAJ49a5wOcV1VP659CMhOh5vxNwqRJQCgrA+t
9ZipI1I9GduNzOzAyfY5jSk=
=KS02
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----