You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to server-dev@james.apache.org by Markus Wiederkehr <ma...@gmail.com> on 2009/08/11 19:36:50 UTC
James 2.3.2
Would it be worth including JavaMail 1.4.2?
Markus
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
Re: James 2.3.2
Posted by Norman Maurer <no...@apache.org>.
+1,
Bye,
Norman
2009/8/12 Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@gmail.com>:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Markus
> Wiederkehr<ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Would it be worth including JavaMail 1.4.2?
>
> IMHO yes if this been spotted when this was an RC. now it's an FC,
> we'd need to issue another RC and give users a few weeks to test it.
> i'd prefer to ship what we have.
>
> - robert
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
Re: James 2.3.2
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Markus
Wiederkehr<ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Would it be worth including JavaMail 1.4.2?
IMHO yes if this been spotted when this was an RC. now it's an FC,
we'd need to issue another RC and give users a few weeks to test it.
i'd prefer to ship what we have.
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org