You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org on 2009/09/30 04:25:39 UTC

[Bug 6212] Evaluate Hostkarma JMF DNSBL's

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6212

--- Comment #1 from Warren Togami <wt...@redhat.com> 2009-09-29 19:25:37 PDT ---
Sigh, line wrapping mangled those rules.

There is some discussion on users@ list about the names of these rules.  For a
while Marc had RCVD_IN_JMF_* on his wiki page and a few people use it copied
from that.  But Marc prefers to have HOSTKARMA in the name.

RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_BL
RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL
RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YL
RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_BR

I personally prefer these rule names because they are easier to read.  The only
possible difficulty is people who might have manually configured their
spamassassin using the old JMF rule names need to know to remove the JMF rules.

Do the developers have any strong opinions either way?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.