You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-dev@lucene.apache.org by "Noble Paul (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/05/01 09:07:30 UTC
[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1137) Improve package naming for DIH
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12704907#action_12704907 ]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-1137:
----------------------------------
I see your point. But DIH is rarely used as an API. Will the user ever get to see any benefit? moreover it is going to be a non-back compat change
> Improve package naming for DIH
> ------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-1137
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1137
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: contrib - DataImportHandler
> Affects Versions: 1.3
> Reporter: Amit Nithian
> Priority: Minor
>
> Currently all classes in the DIH are lumped into one package. I would like to propose a better package naming convention for the DIH:
> org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport => for those that don't fit into any of the other three but don't warrant their own package yet.
> org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.datasource
> org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.transformer
> org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.processor
> Create a test folder and mirror the package names for test classes so that test classes are not lumped into src
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.