You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ignite.apache.org by "Maxim Muzafarov (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/10/02 13:19:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-9011) RendezvousAffinity.excludeNeighbors should be removed and be a default behavior

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Maxim Muzafarov updated IGNITE-9011:
------------------------------------
    Fix Version/s: 2.9

> RendezvousAffinity.excludeNeighbors should be removed and be a default behavior
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-9011
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9011
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: cache
>    Affects Versions: 2.6
>            Reporter: Dmitry Karachentsev
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 3.0, 2.9
>
>
> According to this [discussion | http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/Neighbors-exclusion-td32550.html], cache backup distribution should be more straightforward. 
> Right now we have not obvious logic on how backups will be stored across nodes. For example:
> 1. If set nodeFilter, it will filter backup nodes and if there are not enough nodes there will be less backups...
> 2. If set property excludeNeighbors, it will ignore manually set backupFilter.
> 3. By default excludeNeighbors is false.
> There seems no need to keep excludeNeighbors property at all and it should be removed. Instead, node always must do the best to distribute backups to different machines.
> If user set backupFilter, it must be used, otherwise distribute backups to other machines if it's possible.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)