You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "stack (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/09/17 05:58:33 UTC
[jira] Resolved: (HBASE-3006) Reading compressed HFile blocks
causes way too many DFS RPC calls severly impacting performance
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3006?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
stack resolved HBASE-3006.
--------------------------
Hadoop Flags: [Reviewed]
Fix Version/s: 0.90.0
Resolution: Fixed
Committed. Thanks for nice fix Kannan (I left it at 64k -- use the HFile.DEFAULT_BLOCKSIZE define instead -- thinking that less rpc'ing is a better saving than a bit of memory in local heap).
> Reading compressed HFile blocks causes way too many DFS RPC calls severly impacting performance
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-3006
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3006
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.89.20100621
> Reporter: Kannan Muthukkaruppan
> Assignee: Kannan Muthukkaruppan
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 0.90.0
>
> Attachments: HBASE-3006-2.txt, HBASE-3006.txt
>
>
> On some read perf tests, we noticed several perf outliers (10 second plus range). The rows were large (spanning multiple blocks, but still the numbers didn't add up). We had compression turned on.
> We enabled DN clienttrace logging,
> log4j.logger.org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.clienttrace=DEBUG
> and noticed lots of 516 byte reads at the DN level, several of them at the same offset in the block.
> {code}
> 2010-09-16 09:28:32,335 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.clienttrace: src: /10.30.251.189:50010, dest: /10.30.251.189:38713, bytes: 516, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_-436329957, offset: 39884800, srvID: DS-1757894045-10.3\
> 0.251.189-50010-1283993662994, blockid: blk_-4686540439725119008_1985, duration: 203000
> 2010-09-16 09:28:32,336 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.clienttrace: src: /10.30.251.189:50010, dest: /10.30.251.189:40547, bytes: 516, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_-436329957, offset: 39884800, srvID: DS-1757894045-10.3\
> 0.251.189-50010-1283993662994, blockid: blk_-4686540439725119008_1985, duration: 119000
> 2010-09-16 09:28:32,337 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.clienttrace: src: /10.30.251.189:50010, dest: /10.30.251.189:40650, bytes: 516, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_-436329957, offset: 39884800, srvID: DS-1757894045-10.3\
> 0.251.189-50010-1283993662994, blockid: blk_-4686540439725119008_1985, duration: 149000
> 2010-09-16 09:28:32,337 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.clienttrace: src: /10.30.251.189:50010, dest: /10.30.251.189:40861, bytes: 516, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_-436329957, offset: 39884800, srvID: DS-1757894045-10.3\
> 0.251.189-50010-1283993662994, blockid: blk_-4686540439725119008_1985, duration: 135000
> 2010-09-16 09:28:32,338 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.clienttrace: src: /10.30.251.189:50010, dest: /10.30.251.189:41129, bytes: 516, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_-436329957, offset: 39884800, srvID: DS-1757894045-10.3\
> 0.251.189-50010-1283993662994, blockid: blk_-4686540439725119008_1985, duration: 117000
> 2010-09-16 09:28:32,339 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.clienttrace: src: /10.30.251.189:50010, dest: /10.30.251.189:41691, bytes: 516, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_-436329957, offset: 39884800, srvID: DS-1757894045-10.3\
> 0.251.189-50010-1283993662994, blockid: blk_-4686540439725119008_1985, duration: 148000
> 2010-09-16 09:28:32,339 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.clienttrace: src: /10.30.251.189:50010, dest: /10.30.251.189:42881, bytes: 516, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_-436329957, offset: 39884800, srvID: DS-1757894045-10.3\
> 0.251.189-50010-1283993662994, blockid: blk_-4686540439725119008_1985, duration: 114000
> 2010-09-16 09:28:32,341 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.clienttrace: src: /10.30.251.189:50010, dest: /10.30.251.189:49511, bytes: 516, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_-436329957, offset: 39884800, srvID: DS-1757894045-10.3\
> 0.251.189-50010-1283993662994, blockid: blk_-4686540439725119008_1985, duration: 153000
> 2010-09-16 09:28:32,342 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode.clienttrace: src: /10.30.251.189:50010, dest: /10.30.251.189:51158, bytes: 3096, op: HDFS_READ, cliID: DFSClient_-436329957, offset: 39884800, srvID: DS-1757894045-10.\
> 30.251.189-50010-1283993662994, blockid: blk_-4686540439725119008_1985, duration: 139000
> {code}
> This was strange coz our block size was 64k, and on disk block size after compression should generally have been around 6k.
> Some print debugging at the HFile and BoundedRangeFileInputStream (which is wrapped by createDecompressionStream) revealed the following:
> We are trying to read 20k from DFS @ HFile layer. The BounderRangeFileInputStream instead reads several header bytes 1 byte at a time, and then reads a 11k chunk and later a 9k chunk.
> {code}
> 2010-09-16 09:21:27,912 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.HFile: ### fs read @ offset = 34386760 compressedSize = 20711 decompressedSize = 92324
> 2010-09-16 09:21:27,912 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.BoundedRangeFileInputStream: ### seeking to reading @ 34386760; bytes: 1
> 2010-09-16 09:21:27,912 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.BoundedRangeFileInputStream: ### seeking to reading @ 34386761; bytes: 1
> 2010-09-16 09:21:27,912 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.BoundedRangeFileInputStream: ### seeking to reading @ 34386762; bytes: 1
> 2010-09-16 09:21:27,912 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.BoundedRangeFileInputStream: ### seeking to reading @ 34386763; bytes: 1
> 2010-09-16 09:21:27,912 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.BoundedRangeFileInputStream: ### seeking to reading @ 34386764; bytes: 1
> 2010-09-16 09:21:27,912 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.BoundedRangeFileInputStream: ### seeking to reading @ 34386765; bytes: 1
> 2010-09-16 09:21:27,912 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.BoundedRangeFileInputStream: ### seeking to reading @ 34386766; bytes: 1
> 2010-09-16 09:21:27,912 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.BoundedRangeFileInputStream: ### seeking to reading @ 34386767; bytes: 1
> 2010-09-16 09:21:27,912 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.BoundedRangeFileInputStream: ### seeking to reading @ 34386768; bytes: 11005
> 2010-09-16 09:21:27,912 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.BoundedRangeFileInputStream: ### seeking to reading @ 34397773; bytes: 1
> 2010-09-16 09:21:27,912 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.BoundedRangeFileInputStream: ### seeking to reading @ 34397774; bytes: 1
> 2010-09-16 09:21:27,912 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.BoundedRangeFileInputStream: ### seeking to reading @ 34397775; bytes: 1
> 2010-09-16 09:21:27,912 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.BoundedRangeFileInputStream: ### seeking to reading @ 34397776; bytes: 1
> 2010-09-16 09:21:27,912 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.BoundedRangeFileInputStream: ### seeking to reading @ 34397777; bytes: 1
> 2010-09-16 09:21:27,912 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.BoundedRangeFileInputStream: ### seeking to reading @ 34397778; bytes: 1
> 2010-09-16 09:21:27,912 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.BoundedRangeFileInputStream: ### seeking to reading @ 34397779; bytes: 1
> 2010-09-16 09:21:27,913 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.BoundedRangeFileInputStream: ### seeking to reading @ 34397780; bytes: 1
> 2010-09-16 09:21:27,913 INFO org.apache.hadoop.hbase.io.hfile.BoundedRangeFileInputStream: ### seeking to reading @ 34397781; bytes: 9690
> {code}
> Seems like it should be an easy fix to prefetch the compressed size... rather than incremental fetches.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.